Next I made a copy of the 8.2-RC# install disk and tried to do an upgrade in
place. It was unable to backup /etc to /var/tmp/etc due to:
ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found
Abort trap
.. again. This happens pretty much anytime I try to execute a command that
does not come
Hi!
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:55:21 +0100 Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Feb 17 22:15:44 vserv1 kernel: GEOM: ufsid/4d5d8faa10b63ac1: using
the primary only -- recovery suggested.
Boris Samorodov wrote:
It may be the case here if you to used glabel(8) to create a label
for the whole
On 2/21/2011 11:30 PM, Etienne Robillard wrote:
KLD ipfw.ko: depends on libalias - not available or version mismatch
linker_load_file: Unsupported file type
Try a:
touch sys/netinet/ipfw/*.c sys/netinet/libalias/*.c
env NO_CLEAN=1 make kernel
Does this fix the problem?
Nikos
Hi!
# glabel status
Name Status Components
ufsid/4d62938756e96a72 N/A ad7
If I use gpart, does this somehow imply glabel ?
I'm not an expert at gpart(8). But my gparted disks have geom labels for
partitions but not for disks:
Interesting.
Can you recall
On 22 February 2011 00:30, Etienne Robillard e...@gthcfoundation.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm unable to load the ipfw module in 8.2-PRELEASE. i think
this may be due to ABI changes at the kernel level. ,
$ sudo kldload /boot/kernel/ipfw.ko
$ dmesg
...
KLD ipfw.ko: depends on libalias - not
Hi!
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:23:12 +0100 Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Basically, I did this:
gpart create -s gpt ad7
newfs /dev/ad7
Wow! Don't do it. It may hurt. ;-)
Please, pay attention to gpart(8) (i.e. read the manual
carefully). One should create a specific partition and
only then create a file
--- On Tue, 2/22/11, Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca wrote:
From: Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca
Subject: Re: NFS client over udp
To: Kirill Yelizarov ykir...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Tuesday, February 22, 2011, 2:10 AM
--- On Sun, 2/20/11, Rick
Macklem
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 00:55 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
# NOTE: Systems with 8GB of RAM or more have prefetch enabled by default.
vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1
I think ZFS is enabled with 4 GB or more, not 8 GB:
ZFS NOTICE: Prefetch is disabled by default if less than 4GB of RAM is
present; to
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:05:00AM +, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 00:55 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
# NOTE: Systems with 8GB of RAM or more have prefetch enabled by default.
vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1
I think ZFS is enabled with 4 GB or more, not 8 GB:
ZFS NOTICE:
Hi!
Basically, I did this:
gpart create -s gpt ad7
newfs /dev/ad7
Wow! Don't do it. It may hurt. ;-)
Why may it hurt ? How may it hurt ? Which sector is written to by
this 'gpart' command ?
As far as I understand, GPT writes some stuff at the beginning and
the end of the harddisk.
Why may it hurt ? How may it hurt ? Which sector is written to by
this 'gpart' command ?
As far as I understand, GPT writes some stuff at the beginning and
the end of the harddisk.
Yup, this is true.
How/why will the newfs overwrite those parts ?
Because you are also giving it the whole
I'm in the process of setting up a small network of FreeBSD
installations. My plan (this time) is to keep them on branches available
to freebsd-update, instead of depending on source being checked out from
CVS.
However, I'm a wee bit curious of whether I will be able to upgrade from
8.2RC3 or if
However, I'm a wee bit curious of whether I will be able to upgrade from
8.2RC3 or if I should wait until 8.2 is actually released with the setup
(I _CAN_ wait a week or two).
Looks like its already been tagged so should be any time now:-
/usr/src/UPDATING:-
...
20110221:
8.2-RELEASE.
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Svein Skogen sv...@stillbilde.net wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up a small network of FreeBSD
installations. My plan (this time) is to keep them on branches available
to freebsd-update, instead of depending on source being checked out from
CVS.
On 01/-10/-28163 20:59, Renato Botelho wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Svein Skogensv...@stillbilde.net wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up a small network of FreeBSD
installations. My plan (this time) is to keep them on branches available
to freebsd-update, instead of depending
On 02/22/2011 04:28, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 22 February 2011 00:30, Etienne Robillarde...@gthcfoundation.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm unable to load the ipfw module in 8.2-PRELEASE. i think
this may be due to ABI changes at the kernel level. ,
$ sudo kldload /boot/kernel/ipfw.ko
$ dmesg
...
Hello,
i experience freezing of my FreeBSD machine when performing certain
operations
on a Samba share.
Technical info:
- FreeBSD 8.2 Release 64 Bit (it also happened with 8.2 RC3)
- Samba 3.5.6.1
- Athlon II Quadcore, 4 GB Ram
- 1 SSD with a ZFS pool (No.0) containing the FreeBSD system
-
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:55:37PM +0100, Henner Heck wrote:
Hello,
i experience freezing of my FreeBSD machine when performing certain
operations
on a Samba share.
Technical info:
- FreeBSD 8.2 Release 64 Bit (it also happened with 8.2 RC3)
- Samba 3.5.6.1
- Athlon II Quadcore, 4 GB
There looks like a known bug of not activating memory pages if using
sendfile(2).
This was fixed by kib@ in revision 218795 of stable/8.
Please try the following patch and report the result:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/releng_8_2/218795.zfs.patch
Dňa 22.02.2011 22:55, Henner Heck
--- On Tue, 2/22/11, Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca wrote:
From: Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca
Subject: Re: NFS client over udp
To: Kirill Yelizarov ykir...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Tuesday, February 22, 2011, 2:10 AM
--- On Sun, 2/20/11, Rick
Macklem
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:55:37PM +0100, Henner Heck wrote:
i experience freezing of my FreeBSD machine when performing certain
operations
on a Samba share.
Technical info:
- FreeBSD 8.2 Release 64 Bit (it also happened with 8.2 RC3)
- Samba 3.5.6.1
- Athlon II Quadcore, 4 GB Ram
- 1
I only connect to the BSD system via ssh at the moment, there is no
keyboard attached.
The ssh shell running top doesn't update anymore and doesn't take any
input.
A new ssh session is not possible.
Pressing the power button once does not shut down the machine,
i have to keep it pressed for
22 matches
Mail list logo
