Re: zfs on geli vs. geli on zfs (via zvol)

2011-07-01 Thread nickolasbug
2011/7/1 Todd Wasson t...@duke.edu: Thanks to both C. P. and Pete for your responses.  Comments inline: Case 1.) is probably harmless, because geli would return a corrupted sectors' content to zfs... which zfs will likely detect because it wouldn't checksum correctly. So zfs will correct it

Re: Crashes with Promise controller

2011-07-01 Thread Tom Evans
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Christian Baer christian.b...@uni-dortmund.de wrote: A serial console is easy enough to set up on a Sun for example, but in this case, I am running a simple AthlonXP, which has nothing for that sort of help. I would need a special card for that and those cose

scp: Write Failed: Cannot allocate memory

2011-07-01 Thread Scott Sipe
Hello, I'm running 8.2-RELEASE and am having new problems with scp. When scping files to a ZFS directory on the FreeBSD server -- most notably large files -- the transfer frequently dies after just a few seconds. In my last test, I tried to scp an 800mb file to the FreeBSD system and the transfer

Re: scp: Write Failed: Cannot allocate memory

2011-07-01 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 03:13:17PM -0400, Scott Sipe wrote: I'm running 8.2-RELEASE and am having new problems with scp. When scping files to a ZFS directory on the FreeBSD server -- most notably large files -- the transfer frequently dies after just a few seconds. In my last test, I tried to

libarchive, lzma, and xz interaction

2011-07-01 Thread Kevin Oberman
I'm trying to understand the problems I am having on some systems regarding libarchive, lzma, and xz. I have an 8-Stable system updated yesterday. As far as I can tell, libarchive does include the lzma stuff from libzma. At least I see the references. But several ports seem to still pull in

Re: scp: Write Failed: Cannot allocate memory

2011-07-01 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:54:35AM -0400, jhell wrote: On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 03:22:32PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: The user in that thread is using rsync, which relies on scp by default. I believe this problem is similar, if not identical, to yours. rsync(1) does not rely on scp(1)