Hi,
My system have two non-responding processes after some truss(1)ing
i did on them. They seem stopped and do not respond to sigcont.
%ps
PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND
9768 0- I 0:00.12 truss -p 9739
9514 1 Is 0:00.29 -csh (csh)
9739 1 TX+2:06.24 sqlite3
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:57:11PM +0300, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
My system have two non-responding processes after some truss(1)ing
i did on them. They seem stopped and do not respond to sigcont.
%ps
PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND
9768 0- I 0:00.12 truss -p 9739
9514 1 Is
Hi,
Hello, thanks for reply.
Please try to do this without wlan loaded at all (not just down, but
build your wifi support as a module.)
Then try without X, see whether it's related to that or not.
First i make kldunload if_iwn.
When i try to suspend from X, Xorg close, i see console and
On 9/27/2011 1:10 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
kill -9 your truss processes; the underlying processes which you are
truss'ing will probably resume.
My experience for years has been that truss on FreeBSD is extremely
buggy and cannot be relied upon (case in point). Such is still the case
on
I found a had sync enabled on my server so I set zfs set sync=disabled data
and will look for failures. Are there any other setting for nfs over zfs i can
check or set?
# uname -a
FreeBSD brat.faberlic.com 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Thu Jun 9
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:21:23 +0800, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Hi,
Please try to do this without wlan loaded at all (not just down, but
build your wifi support as a module.)
Then try without X, see whether it's related to that or not.
(And you haven't told us what your hardware is.)
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 04:04:10AM -0700, Kirill Yelizarov wrote:
I found a had sync enabled on my server so I set? zfs?set?sync=disabled data
and will look for failures. Are there any other setting for nfs over zfs i
can check or set?
# uname -a
From: Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com
To: Kirill Yelizarov ykir...@yahoo.com
Cc: rmack...@uoguelph.ca; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: NFSD hang
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 04:04:10AM -0700, Kirill
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:41:57AM -0700, Kirill Yelizarov wrote:
From: Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com
To: Kirill Yelizarov ykir...@yahoo.com
Cc: rmack...@uoguelph.ca; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: NFSD hang
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Nikos Vassiliadis nv...@gmx.com wrote:
On 9/27/2011 1:10 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
kill -9 your truss processes; the underlying processes which you are
truss'ing will probably resume.
My experience for years has been that truss on FreeBSD is extremely
buggy
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 09:28:56AM -0400, Mark Saad wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Nikos Vassiliadis nv...@gmx.com wrote:
On 9/27/2011 1:10 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
kill -9 your truss processes; the underlying processes which you are
truss'ing will probably resume.
My
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:41:57AM -0700, Kirill Yelizarov wrote:
From: Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com
To: Kirill Yelizarov ykir...@yahoo.com
Cc: rmack...@uoguelph.ca; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: NFSD
Hello list,
As the title said. When on 8-stable, luit -encdoding gbk works fine,
anyone can figure it out what's wrong?
I'm sure it's not a luit's bug because luit works fine and no any
version updating happened before and after OS's upgrading, I just
recompiled luit from ports after upgrade
On 28 September 2011 09:08, Yue Wu vano...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello list,
As the title said. When on 8-stable, luit -encdoding gbk works fine,
anyone can figure it out what's wrong?
I'm sure it's not a luit's bug because luit works fine and no any
version updating happened before and after
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:17:54AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 28 September 2011 09:08, Yue Wu vano...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello list,
As the title said. When on 8-stable, luit -encdoding gbk works fine,
anyone can figure it out what's wrong?
I'm sure it's not a luit's bug because luit
15 matches
Mail list logo
