Out of pure interest, I'd love to see whether xl on an earlier kernel
(say 4.x, if the hardware can even run it) or even 6.x would work.
Adrian
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To
Hi all,
I would like to use gvirstor as a thin provisioning solution for a
mysql server, but I have some doubts about using it:
a) Do I need to put geom_virstor_load=YES on loader.conf or this
kernel module is loaded automatically at boot If I create gvirstor
volume using the label
On 24/10/2011 11:21, carlopmart wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to use gvirstor as a thin provisioning solution for a
mysql server, but I have some doubts about using it:
Yes, it's kind of what it was created for...
a) Do I need to put geom_virstor_load=YES on loader.conf or this
kernel
On 10/24/2011 12:12 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 24/10/2011 11:21, carlopmart wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to use gvirstor as a thin provisioning solution for a
mysql server, but I have some doubts about using it:
Yes, it's kind of what it was created for...
a) Do I need to put
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 05:22:13PM -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
Hi,
If you have ALi/ULi M5261/M5263 ethernet controller please try the
patch at the following URL and let me know how it works.
http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/dc/dc.uli562x.diff
The patch was generated against latest HEAD
On 23-10-2011 17:09, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
but there was no forwarding table and all packets were forwarded
to all ports.
I always figured that's normal for a hub as opposed to a switch.
I also remember that SOME hubs of that era had series problems if
the cable was too short.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
On 10/21/11 5:00 PM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
I have an 8.1-RELEASE system with an xl on the mainboard:
xl0: 3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL port 0xdc80-0xdcff mem
0xf8fffc00-0xf8fffc7f irq 16 at device 4.0 on pci2
Hi all,
I have a problem with ntpd on many of our servers running 8.2-RELEASE or
newer. Some of them are newly installed, most of them are 7.x upgraded
to 8.2 or 8-STABLE amd64 with GENERIC.
Ntpd can't resolve host names on boot. This error did not existed on 7.x
Oct 24 12:45:22 vcela
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:50:29AM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
I have a problem with ntpd on many of our servers running
8.2-RELEASE or newer. Some of them are newly installed, most of them
are 7.x upgraded to 8.2 or 8-STABLE amd64 with GENERIC.
Ntpd can't resolve host names on boot. This
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com
The problem is that the networking layer is not TRULY available by the
time ntpd starts. This does have to do with NIC drivers, but the same
behaviour can be seen on all NICs, including excellent ones like em(4).
Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Out of pure interest, I'd love to see whether xl on an earlier
kernel (say 4.x, if the hardware can even run it) or even 6.x
would work.
I'll put that on the list for the next time I need to reboot it.
I'm sure I have a 6.1 CD somewhere, and probably a
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:36:56AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
- Original Message - From: Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.com
The problem is that the networking layer is not TRULY available by the
time ntpd starts. This does have to do with NIC drivers, but the same
12 matches
Mail list logo
