Hi.
I was trying to understand a cause for this problem, and made an ugly hack:
diff -u ./rtld_lock.c.orig ./rtld_lock.c
--- ./rtld_lock.c.orig 2011-11-15 07:56:14.0 +
+++ ./rtld_lock.c 2011-11-15 07:54:42.0 +
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
sigset_t tmp_oldsigmask;
for ( ; ; ) {
-
Hi.
I was trying to understand a cause for this problem, and made an ugly hack:
diff -u ./rtld_lock.c.orig ./rtld_lock.c
--- ./rtld_lock.c.orig 2011-11-15 07:56:14.0 +
+++ ./rtld_lock.c 2011-11-15 07:54:42.0 +
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
sigset_t tmp_oldsigmask;
for ( ; ; ) {
-
Daniil Cherednik wrote:
After all that I was trying to compare perfomance of return from fork()
in Linux and FreeBSD (see
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2011-October/036705.html)
and fork() in FreeBSD was slower.
our fork() differs from linux fork() in handling parent and
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:51:35PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
On 11/14/2011 12:31, Doug Barton wrote:
Trying to track down a load problem we're seeing on 8.2-RELEASE-p4 i386
in a busy web hosting environment I came across the following post:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:07:45AM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:51:35PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
On 11/14/2011 12:31, Doug Barton wrote:
Trying to track down a load problem we're seeing on 8.2-RELEASE-p4 i386
in a busy web hosting environment I came across the
On 15/11/2011 01:46, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 07:56:07PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
[...]
I don't particularly care what the man page says, I just know what
works. :-)
If there is something in the man page that is not precise, I personally
am
- Original Message -
From: Daniil Cherednik dchered...@masterhost.ru
I am not trying to start a holy war, but I really need to increase
performance of our hosting in FreeBSD.
Is there something you need from apache that means you
cant use nginx for instead?
nginx + php-fpm is much
We know about it. But unfortunately we can`t use php-fpm or other fcgi
solution. We must use .htaccess with php directive.
On 15.11.2011 15:34, Steven Hartland wrote:
- Original Message - From: Daniil Cherednik
dchered...@masterhost.ru
I am not trying to start a holy war, but I
On Monday, November 14, 2011 7:27:18 pm Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
Hi,
Sorry about being unclear. They all failed in the same way.
So, these combinations have continuous timeout errors and fail to completely
boot:
Plain 9.0-RC1
9-stable with 1.62 of mfi.c
9-stable with
On 15/11/2011 00:56, Glen Barber wrote:
Hi,
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
[...]
I don't particularly care what the man page says, I just know what
works. :-)
If there is something in the man page that is not precise, I personally
am interested in any inconsistencies with reality so they can
Hi Vincent,
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:25:18PM +, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
On 15/11/2011 00:56, Glen Barber wrote:
Hi,
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
[...]
I don't particularly care what the man page says, I just know what
works. :-)
If there is something in the man page that is
Hello list,
more insights since my last post. Here is a small code to trigger the bug (end
of email).
When you run it on 9.0-RC1, it gets an alias address instead of the main inet
address:
% ./get-ip re0
inet: 192.168.2.10
# Main address being 192.168.1.148
On 8.2-RELEASE, all goes
Is it possible to do a buildkernel of 9-stable (r227536) on a stock
8.2 system? Most of it seems to work, but the linker fails towards the
end with
...
MAKE=make sh /usr/home/ctuffli/dev/releng_9/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh GENERIC
/usr/local/bin/svnversion
cc -c -O2 -frename-registers -pipe
On 2011-11-15 18:10:01 (+0100), GR free...@gomor.org wrote:
more insights since my last post. Here is a small code to trigger the bug
(end of email).
When you run it on 9.0-RC1, it gets an alias address instead of the main inet
address:
% ./get-ip re0
inet: 192.168.2.10
# Main
On (15/11/2011 18:10), GR wrote:
Hello list,
more insights since my last post. Here is a small code to trigger the bug
(end of email).
When you run it on 9.0-RC1, it gets an alias address instead of the main inet
address:
% ./get-ip re0
inet: 192.168.2.10
# Main address
From Kristof Provost kris...@sigsegv.be:
[..]
The 'ia' pointer is later used to return the IP address.
In other words: it returns the first address on the interface
of type IF_INET (which isn't assigned to a jail).
I think the order of the addresses is not fixed, or rather it depends
on
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:35:37PM +0100, GR wrote:
From Kristof Provost kris...@sigsegv.be:
[..]
The 'ia' pointer is later used to return the IP address.
In other words: it returns the first address on the interface
of type IF_INET (which isn't assigned to a jail).
I think the
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:45:02AM -0800, Chuck Tuffli wrote:
Is it possible to do a buildkernel of 9-stable (r227536) on a stock
8.2 system? Most of it seems to work, but the linker fails towards the
end with
...
MAKE=make sh /usr/home/ctuffli/dev/releng_9/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:29:44PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:45:02AM -0800, Chuck Tuffli wrote:
Is it possible to do a buildkernel of 9-stable (r227536) on a stock
8.2 system? Most of it seems to work, but the linker fails towards the
end with
...
On 15 November 2011 23:45, Chuck Tuffli ctuf...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to do a buildkernel of 9-stable (r227536) on a stock
8.2 system? Most of it seems to work, but the linker fails towards the
end with
...
MAKE=make sh /usr/home/ctuffli/dev/releng_9/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh GENERIC
Hey,
we have seen this or a very similar panic for about 1 year now once in
a while and I think I reported it before; this is FreeBSD as guest on
vmware. Seems it was a double panic this time. Could someone please
see what's going on there?It was on 8.x-STABLE in the past and this
is
Am 15.11.2011 um 23:35 schrieb GR:
So, I switched to static assignement and it changes the behaviour (and
fixes the bug).
My guess is that during the time waiting for the DHCP offer, all aliases are
already configured on the network interface, and the IP address given by DHCP
is added at
22 matches
Mail list logo
