Greetings all and my apologies for cross posting!
There seems to be a confusion regarding the ABI change in FreeBSD 9
and if this affects the usual upgrade path which includes a full port
rebuild.
The relevant post is here: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=28831
Frankly, I am also
On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 4:11:10 pm Rob Clark wrote:
System: Dell 600sc
Currently running: 8.2-RELEASE
In attempting to update this system to 8-STABLE I did
what I usually do to update a system (see below).
make buildworld completes successfully, but make
buildkernel does not. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
JFYI for those of you who aren't subscribed to the announce@ mailing
list... 9.0-RELEASE is, finally, announced. The announcement message
is available here:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.0R/announce.html
Lots of you noticed that the
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:52:28 -0600
Andre Goree an...@drenet.info wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Rob Clark rpcl...@tds.net wrote:
System: Dell 600sc
Currently running: 8.2-RELEASE
In attempting to update this system to 8-STABLE I did
what I usually do to update a system (see
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:15:50 -0500
John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 4:11:10 pm Rob Clark wrote:
System: Dell 600sc
Currently running: 8.2-RELEASE
In attempting to update this system to 8-STABLE I did
what I usually do to update a system (see below).
chflags -R noschg /usr/obj/usr
rm -rf /usr/obj/usr
It's much faster to do:
/bin/rm -rf ${obj}/* 2 /dev/null || /bin/chflags -R 0 ${obj}/*
/bin/rm -rf ${obj}/*
--
You can observe a lot just by watching. -- Yogi Berra
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
chflags -R noschg /usr/obj/usr
rm -rf /usr/obj/usr
It's much faster to do:
/bin/rm -rf ${obj}/* 2 /dev/null || /bin/chflags -R 0 ${obj}/*
/bin/rm -rf ${obj}/*
+1. And it's faster yet when you can run parallel copies of
On 01/12/2012 09:11 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
+1. And it's faster yet when you can run parallel copies of rm on
different portions of the directory tree (e.g. xargs, find [..] -exec)
as rm is O(n).
I have always wondered about that! I thought that the main bottleneck
in rm -r might be
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:11:54 -0800
Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org
wrote:
chflags -R noschg /usr/obj/usr
rm -rf /usr/obj/usr
It's much faster to do:
/bin/rm -rf ${obj}/* 2 /dev/null || /bin/chflags -R 0
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
step...@missouri.edu wrote:
On 01/12/2012 09:11 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
+1. And it's faster yet when you can run parallel copies of rm on
different portions of the directory tree (e.g. xargs, find [..] -exec)
as rm is O(n).
I have
On 01/12/2012 20:10, Garrett Cooper wrote:
When I did
stuff in parallel (have 8 regular cores, 8 SMT cores), the process
took less than an hour to complete.
Sounds like you should get to work figuring out how to optimize rm to
take advantage of this. :)
Doug
--
You can observe a
11 matches
Mail list logo
