Re: Request for flowtable testers and actionable feedback RE: flowtable usable or not

2012-03-05 Thread Daniel Kalchev
On Mar 5, 2012, at 9:11 AM, H wrote: I have the right, even the obligation to point out what I think is wrong So, you see yourself as speaking for others? You certainly do not speak for me! Never authorized you for this, never ever knew you actually exist. For various historical reasons, I

Re: Request for flowtable testers and actionable feedback RE: flowtable usable or not

2012-03-05 Thread Adam Strohl
On 3/5/2012 15:00, Daniel Kalchev wrote: I happen to share the opinion and the experience of Mark Linimon in situations like this and yes, I do believe you have been rude here. For no reason whatsoever. I agree. This H person has been hijacking threads over the last week or so, and all of

Re: Request for flowtable testers and actionable feedback RE: flowtable usable or not

2012-03-05 Thread H
Daniel Kalchev wrote: On Mar 5, 2012, at 9:11 AM, H wrote: I have the right, even the obligation to point out what I think is wrong So, you see yourself as speaking for others? You certainly do not speak for me! Never authorized you for this, never ever knew you actually exist. For various

Re: Request for flowtable testers and actionable feedback RE: flowtable usable or not

2012-03-05 Thread H
Adam Strohl wrote: On 3/5/2012 15:00, Daniel Kalchev wrote: I happen to share the opinion and the experience of Mark Linimon in situations like this and yes, I do believe you have been rude here. For no reason whatsoever. I agree. This H person has been hijacking threads over the last week

Re: Request for flowtable testers and actionable feedback RE: flowtable usable or not

2012-03-05 Thread Tom Evans
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:37 PM, H h...@hm.net.br wrote: If you are curious about something, ask, right away ... clear and straight I'm curious about when you will stop trolling one of the last few fora on the internet where the SNR is actually high. This topic is discussing how users can help

Re: Complete hang on 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-05 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote: 2012/2/29, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com: Hi, On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote: 2012/2/29,

Re: Complete hang on 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-05 Thread Attilio Rao
2012/3/5, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com: Hi, On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote: 2012/2/29, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com: Hi, On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:44 PM,

Re: Complete hang on 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-05 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote: 2012/3/5, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com: 9.0-RELEASE (kernel + userland) hanged today while running 2000 threads. Next step is to reproduce it with a watchdog+textdump enabled kernel. And you were still unable to

Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-05 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, I've been running a couple of system with 9.0-RELEASE since it is out. All the system were installed through the standard installation procedure. After unclean reboot, either crash or power-failure, I get a huge amount of really bad filesystem corruption (read: silent, fs-wide, corruptions).

Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-05 Thread Xin Li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/05/12 14:12, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: Hi, I've been running a couple of system with 9.0-RELEASE since it is out. All the system were installed through the standard installation procedure. After unclean reboot, either crash or

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2012-03-05 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-03-05 23:02:43 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-05 23:02:43 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2012-03-05 23:02:43 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-05 23:02:43 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-05 23:02:43 -

Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-05 Thread Mark Saad
On Mar 5, 2012, at 5:21 PM, Xin Li delp...@delphij.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/05/12 14:12, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: Hi, I've been running a couple of system with 9.0-RELEASE since it is out. All the system were installed through the standard

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2012-03-05 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-03-06 03:11:01 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-06 03:11:01 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2012-03-06 03:11:01 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-06 03:11:54 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-06 03:11:54 -

Re: flowtable usable or not

2012-03-05 Thread Doug Barton
On 3/4/2012 2:04 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: 2012/3/3 Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org: On 03/02/2012 16:05, Adrian Chadd wrote: Try breaking that cycle. ... one of the things I've been asking for years. :) Julian's right though, I think PC-BSD will help, but I still think that committers should