Hi,
I suprised that followings , cited from AMD BKDG(42301 Rev 3.06 - January 25,
2012)
2.5.2.1.4
Core P-state Visibility
(snip)
If a compute unit is in a boosted P-state, MSRC001_0063[CurPstate]
reads back as 0.
^
if in a boosted P-state, MSRC001_0063 reads back as 0.
so
On Fri, 25 May 2012 16:05:56 -0400
Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org wrote:
if we decide so, then I think that we could still keep the things
simple. As we currently use the wholesale approach (all CPUs
are set to the same P-state regardless of topology), then we could
first make a pass of
the following patches.
http://people.freebsd.org/~iwasaki/acpi/syscons-vesa-resume-20120526.diff
This is already done in vesa(4), added support non-vesa mode.
FWIW, Xorg suspend/resume via the switch to VTY before suspending
hack works on this Thinkpad T60. It's not optimal but hey, it _does_
work
TB --- 2012-05-26 10:05:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-05-26 10:05:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-05-26
On Wed, May 23, 2012 17:07, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 12:54, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 11:22, Mike Tancsa wrote:
On 5/21/2012 9:04 PM, Matthew Gamble wrote:
We have a box with 3 SiI3124 SATA controllers and 9 CFI-B53PM 5 Port
Backplane port
multipliers
Hi All,
I have a new Intel DH77DF mini-ITX motherboard with a Core i5 3550 CPU and am
having trouble getting X to run. This is on a 9-STABLE system just updated
today via cvsup. There appear to be two obvious problems: the first is that X
will no longer start (it used to with about a two week
Pour afficher correctem= ent la page [1]Cliquez-ici
Pour = Devenir Partenaire [2]Cliq= uez-ici
[3]3DPV4_NEWSLETTER_SOLAIRE_PV4_CAVAILLON_CN2i_DEVELOPPEMENT_MARS_20
Pour Dev= enir Partenaire [4]Cliq= uez-ici
Michael FRAYSSE ?n= bsp;Direction ? CN2i DEVELOPPEMENT
Site Web
I have just noticed the following depicting unzip not being
updated/installed during a make installworld.
The last binary before this test that caught my attention was from Apr
15, in which I cd(1) into unzip's source directory and did a make
everything neccesary to install it. After running a
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 04:24:32PM -0400 I heard the voice of
Jason Hellenthal, and lo! it spake thus:
I have just noticed the following depicting unzip not being
updated/installed during a make installworld.
From a quick look at history, unzip was never connected to the build
in 8.x, only
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 03:31:28PM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 04:24:32PM -0400 I heard the voice of
Jason Hellenthal, and lo! it spake thus:
I have just noticed the following depicting unzip not being
updated/installed during a make installworld.
From a
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 04:39:40PM -0400 I heard the voice of
Jason Hellenthal, and lo! it spake thus:
Funny... so there are probably alot of machines running around with
old unzip binaries... including the already packaged releases.
No, they wouldn't have _any_ unzip binaries.
--
Matthew
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 03:41:55PM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 04:39:40PM -0400 I heard the voice of
Jason Hellenthal, and lo! it spake thus:
Funny... so there are probably alot of machines running around with
old unzip binaries... including the already
12 matches
Mail list logo
