Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Erich
Hi, On 05 June 2012 15:33:16 Mark Andrews wrote: In message 2490439.ec638ti...@x220.ovitrap.com, Erich writes: Hi, On 05 June 2012 12:48:20 Mark Andrews wrote: In message 3506767.fvm2kmt...@x220.ovitrap.com, Erich writes: On 05 June 2012 11:24:25 Mark Andrews wrote:

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Mark Linimon
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 12:18:33PM +0700, Erich wrote: I did not know this. Do you have a link for this? I never read about it. The EOL announcements have them. I don't think the release announcements do, however. mcl ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?

2012-06-05 Thread Daniel Kalchev
On 04.06.12 22:32, Dave Hayes wrote: Chris Nehrenapeiron+freebsd-sta...@isuckatdomains.net writes: The descriptions of the options assume the admin is familiar with the software they're installing. I do not think it is the FreeBSD Project's purview to document every option for every port. At

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Mark Linimon
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:00:45PM +0700, Erich wrote: All of these, with the exception of HEAD (which is always a valid tag), only apply to the src/ tree. The ports/, doc/, and www/ trees are not branched. If you create a branch, you must create a tag for that branch. However, you can create

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?

2012-06-05 Thread Daniel Kalchev
On 05.06.12 07:33, Zane C. B-H. wrote: [on Exchange wiping devices] From a enterprise perspective, it makes sense. Lets say a device goes missing, it allows one to wipe it the next time it calls home. This is supposed to be handled by the device management software. Not by your e-mail

Re: cvsup{, d} woes after upgrading to RELENG_9 on amd64 this weekend

2012-06-05 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Henri Hennebert h...@restart.be wrote: On 06/04/2012 10:53, Trond Endrestøl wrote: Hi, After upgrading to RELENG_9 as of yesterday on my amd64 system, cvsup bombs out with Bus error: 10. Example: # /usr/local/bin/cvsup -g -L 2 /usr/src/stable-supfile

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Erich
Hi, On 05 June 2012 1:01:37 Mark Linimon wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 12:18:33PM +0700, Erich wrote: I did not know this. Do you have a link for this? I never read about it. The EOL announcements have them. I don't think the release announcements do, however. this is the problem. I

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Erich
Hi, On 05 June 2012 1:09:50 Mark Linimon wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:00:45PM +0700, Erich wrote: All of these, with the exception of HEAD (which is always a valid tag), only apply to the src/ tree. The ports/, doc/, and www/ trees are not branched. If you create a branch, you must

Re: cvsup{, d} woes after upgrading to RELENG_9 on amd64 this weekend

2012-06-05 Thread Henri Hennebert
On 06/05/2012 10:17, Scot Hetzel wrote: On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Henri Henneberth...@restart.be wrote: On 06/04/2012 10:53, Trond Endrestøl wrote: Hi, After upgrading to RELENG_9 as of yesterday on my amd64 system, cvsup bombs out with Bus error: 10. Example: # /usr/local/bin/cvsup

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Chris Rees
On Jun 5, 2012 3:07 AM, Erich erichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com wrote: Hi, On 05 June 2012 11:24:25 Mark Andrews wrote: Version tagging is just a convient way to get a snapshot at a particular point in time unless you create branches that are them we do not ask for more. There should be

Re: Load when idl on stable

2012-06-05 Thread Matthias Gamsjager
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Oliver Pinter oliver.p...@gmail.comwrote: I think, this is the old thread: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/High-load-event-idl-td5671431.html The interrupt rerouting does not help? On 6/3/12, Matt Thyer matt.th...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 1, 2012 11:27

ata_controlcmd undefined

2012-06-05 Thread George Mitchell
I csupped my 9.0-STABLE kernel on Sunday and now get this message at the beginning of booting up: link-elf-obj: symbol ata_controlcmd undefined KLD file atapicat.ko - could not finalize loading Kernel configuration is GENERIC (except scheduler is SCHED_4BSD). -- George Mitchell

ZFS autoexpand when there are 2 raidz2 vdevs

2012-06-05 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi, all, during the last couple of years I occasionally increased the capacity of raidz2 based zpools by replacing one disk at a time and resilvering, subsequently. After replacing the final disk and a reboot (I guess zpool export zpool import would have done the trick, too) the capacity of the

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Mark Linimon
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 03:23:01PM +0700, Erich wrote: But is this true for apache only or for the whole ports tree? Entire tree. mcl ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe,

Re: ZFS autoexpand when there are 2 raidz2 vdevs

2012-06-05 Thread Holger Kipp
Dear Patrick Am 05.06.2012 um 13:29 schrieb Patrick M. Hausen hau...@punkt.de: Hi, all, during the last couple of years I occasionally increased the capacity of raidz2 based zpools by replacing one disk at a time and resilvering, subsequently. After replacing the final disk and a reboot (I

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Erich
Hi, On 05 June 2012 1:09:50 Mark Linimon wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:00:45PM +0700, Erich wrote: All of these, with the exception of HEAD (which is always a valid tag), only apply to the src/ tree. The ports/, doc/, and www/ trees are not branched. If you create a branch, you must

Re: ZFS autoexpand when there are 2 raidz2 vdevs

2012-06-05 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi, Am 05.06.2012 um 14:28 schrieb Holger Kipp: I used zpool set autoextend=on tank zpool online -e tank da0 zpool online -e tank da1 ... zpool online -e tank da7 to increase the size of a raidz2 here from 5+ to 11+TB. Worked without problems. datatomb2# zpool online -e sx40

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?

2012-06-05 Thread Oliver Fromme
O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote: 2) Disk and network I/O issues under load. We realized that FreeBSD has some issues in multithreaded environments. Even on 6/12 or 12/24 core/thread systems, under heavy load (especially network and CPU load), disk I/O was (is?) poor. This is

Re: Why Are You Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Mark Felder
On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 20:45:59 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith step...@missouri.edu wrote: More recently I have had to start using Linux because FreeBSD doesn't have very good laptop support. (All I ask for is a way to configure the mouse pad so that I can switch off tap to click.) See,

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Mark Andrews
In message 1541214.zfrdxxb...@x220.ovitrap.com, Erich writes: Hi, On 05 June 2012 1:09:50 Mark Linimon wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:00:45PM +0700, Erich wrote: All of these, with the exception of HEAD (which is always a valid tag), only apply to the src/ tree. The ports/, doc/,

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Oliver Fromme
Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote: The current status is that we support 8.x and 9.x well. Ports support for 7.x is starting to fade over time as new upstream releases rely on newer APIs. 6.x went EOL 11/30/2010 and we no longer claim to support it in ports. FWIW ... In fact, I

Re: ata_controlcmd undefined

2012-06-05 Thread Oliver Fromme
George Mitchell wrote: I csupped my 9.0-STABLE kernel on Sunday and now get this message at the beginning of booting up: link-elf-obj: symbol ata_controlcmd undefined KLD file atapicat.ko - could not finalize loading The same happened to me, except that I had device atapicam

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Look at the comment of the maintainer of LibreOffice ... btw I tested and libreoffice is still working as expected. Most of the time the libreoffice failures is from people tuning their system without knowing the impact/risk of doing such, for example building some c++ libraries with g++47

Netflix's New Peering Appliance Uses FreeBSD

2012-06-05 Thread Benjamin Francom
I just saw this, and thought I'd share: Open Connect Appliance Software Netflix delivers streaming content using a combination of intelligent clients, a central control system, and a network of Open Connect appliances. When designing the Open Connect Appliance Software, we focused on these

em interfaces supermicro X9SCM-F board

2012-06-05 Thread Johan Hendriks
hello all. i have a new board the supermicro X9SCM-F with the latest firmware 508. I am having some trouble with the onboard intel nics. It only activate one nic. From dmesg em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.2.3 port 0xf020-0xf03f mem 0xf780-0xf781,0xf7825000-0xf7825fff irq

Re: em interfaces supermicro X9SCM-F board

2012-06-05 Thread Sebastian Stach
I have an X9SCA-F board and recently updated the BIOS to version 2.0 (the .508 BIOS file). Its not the same board as yours but maybe the you have the same problem. When i downloaded the BIOS from the Supermicro website on May 23 the included AMI.BAT only updated the BIOS and not the Intel ME

Re: Netflix's New Peering Appliance Uses FreeBSD

2012-06-05 Thread Dan Daley
I didn't see a link to this information in the e-mail below. I found this info detailed here: https://signup.netflix.com/openconnect/software From: Benjamin Francom bfran...@gmail.com To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sent: Tue, June 5, 2012 11:00:01 AM

Re: Netflix's New Peering Appliance Uses FreeBSD

2012-06-05 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! I didn't see a link to this information in the e-mail below. I found this info detailed here: https://signup.netflix.com/openconnect/software If you come from an IP range outside of netflix' footprint, that page is not available. But have a look at that PDF, comes from their

Re: em interfaces supermicro X9SCM-F board

2012-06-05 Thread Schaich Alonso
On 2012-06-05 (Tuesday) 19:31:44 Sebastian Stach wrote: I have an X9SCA-F board and recently updated the BIOS to version 2.0 (the .508 BIOS file). Its not the same board as yours but maybe the you have the same problem. When i downloaded the BIOS from the Supermicro website on May 23 the

Re: em interfaces supermicro X9SCM-F board

2012-06-05 Thread Johan Hendriks
Sebastian Stach schreef: I have an X9SCA-F board and recently updated the BIOS to version 2.0 (the .508 BIOS file). Its not the same board as yours but maybe the you have the same problem. When i downloaded the BIOS from the Supermicro website on May 23 the included AMI.BAT only updated the

Re: em interfaces supermicro X9SCM-F board

2012-06-05 Thread Sebastian Stach
The AMI.BAT you have already updates the BIOS and the Intel ME. I'm still in contact with the support but they told me that this fixes the issue most people are having. On my board one of the two nics is still hanging under heavy load. I hope that they will come up with a solution to this.

Re: Problem with sub-path (or sub-url) in smbfs.

2012-06-05 Thread Ronald Klop
On Tue, 29 May 2012 23:00:31 +0200, Manuel Trujillo (TooManySecrets) toom...@toomany.net wrote: On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Manuel Trujillo (TooManySecrets) toom...@toomany.net wrote: I have also an /etc/nsmb.conf configured. All runs fine... except because I only can mount up to

Re: Load when idl on stable

2012-06-05 Thread Albert Shih
Le 03/06/2012 ? 23:55:06+0200, Oliver Pinter a écrit I think, this is the old thread: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/High-load-event-idl-td5671431.html Yes. But because I didn't find any solution, I resent the problem. The interrupt rerouting does not help? Well I've no idea what you

Re: Load when idl on stable

2012-06-05 Thread Albert Shih
Le 04/06/2012 ? 06:22:34+0930, Matt Thyer a écrit Hi, Is this due to a high rate of interrupts ? No idea ;-) i.e. can you see this with systat -vm 1 with a large number in the intr field. Well I don't known what you mean by «high rate», so I make a compraison between my desktop and my

Re: Load when idl on stable

2012-06-05 Thread Albert Shih
Le 05/06/2012 ? 12:40:19+0200, Matthias Gamsjager a écrit I've three PC, all are Dell. Two laptop and one desktop. All run FreeBSD 9-Stable amd64 Since 1 or 2 months I notice the load is never drop down 0.8-0.9 event when nothing running but

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?

2012-06-05 Thread Ronald Klop
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 20:57:52 +0200, Thomas David Rivers riv...@dignus.com wrote: We used to have FreeBSD exclusively on desktops... Now, we have migrated to other desktops (mac) with FreeBSD running the build and file server... Why? Because - the mac updates itself! No pain, no

Re: Load when idl on stable

2012-06-05 Thread Adam McDougall
On 06/05/12 15:37, Albert Shih wrote: Le 03/06/2012 ? 23:55:06+0200, Oliver Pinter a écrit I think, this is the old thread: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/High-load-event-idl-td5671431.html Yes. But because I didn't find any solution, I resent the problem. The interrupt rerouting

Re: em interfaces supermicro X9SCM-F board

2012-06-05 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Sebastian Stach wrote: I have an X9SCA-F board and recently updated the BIOS to version 2.0 (the .508 BIOS file). Its not the same board as yours but maybe the you have the same problem. When i downloaded the BIOS from the Supermicro website on May 23 the included AMI.BAT only updated the

Re: em interfaces supermicro X9SCM-F board

2012-06-05 Thread Sebastian Stach
I just need to run a tool like iperf and let it run. After about 1-2 hours my nic will just hang without any messages. I can't even ping the machine anymore. I also installed Solaris to check if it's maybe a FreeBSD problem but it's the same there. The support told me that they know about

Re: Load when idl on stable

2012-06-05 Thread Albert Shih
Le 05/06/2012 ? 16:14:56-0400, Adam McDougall a écrit On 06/05/12 15:37, Albert Shih wrote: Le 03/06/2012 ? 23:55:06+0200, Oliver Pinter a écrit I think, this is the old thread: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/High-load-event-idl-td5671431.html Yes. But because I didn't find any

Re: em interfaces supermicro X9SCM-F board

2012-06-05 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Sebastian Stach wrote: I just need to run a tool like iperf and let it run. After about 1-2 hours my nic will just hang without any messages. I can't even ping the machine anymore. I also installed Solaris to check if it's maybe a FreeBSD problem but it's the same there. The support told me

Re: em interfaces supermicro X9SCM-F board

2012-06-05 Thread Sebastian Stach
The default was that IPMI is shared with the Intel NIC but i configured it to use the dedicated interface. Sebastian Stach Am 05.06.2012 um 23:21 schrieb Miroslav Lachman: The board had BIOS 1.1a with build date 2011-09-28 so I updated it to version 2.0 with build date 2012-05-08. I am

Re: Netflix's New Peering Appliance Uses FreeBSD

2012-06-05 Thread Scott Long
On Jun 5, 2012, at 9:56 AM, Benjamin Francom wrote: I just saw this, and thought I'd share: Open Connect Appliance Software Netflix delivers streaming content using a combination of intelligent clients, a central control system, and a network of Open Connect appliances. When designing

Re: ata_controlcmd undefined

2012-06-05 Thread George Mitchell
On 06/05/12 11:20, Oliver Fromme wrote: George Mitchell wrote: I csupped my 9.0-STABLE kernel on Sunday and now get this message at the beginning of booting up: link-elf-obj: symbol ata_controlcmd undefined KLD file atapicat.ko - could not finalize loading The same happened

Re: Netflix's New Peering Appliance Uses FreeBSD

2012-06-05 Thread David Magda
On Jun 5, 2012, at 20:16, Scott Long wrote: If you have any questions, let me know or follow the information links on the OpenConnect web site. Out of curiosity, given that Linux seems popular in so many other places (Google, Facebook), is there any particular reason why FreeBSD was chosen

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2012-06-05 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-06-05 23:22:03 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-06-05 23:22:03 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-06-05

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2012-06-05 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-06-06 00:04:34 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-06-06 00:04:34 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-06-06

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2012-06-05 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-06-06 00:08:22 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-06-06 00:08:22 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-06-06

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-06-05 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-06-06 00:26:55 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-06-06 00:26:55 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-06-06

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2012-06-05 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-06-06 00:20:20 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-06-06 00:20:20 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-06-06

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2012-06-05 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-06-06 00:48:27 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-06-06 00:48:27 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-06-06

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2012-06-05 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-06-06 00:51:08 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-06-06 00:51:08 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-06-06

Re: Netflix's New Peering Appliance Uses FreeBSD

2012-06-05 Thread Dan Daley
Maybe their knowledge of Linux drove them to use FreeBSD. Sorry, couldn't resist ;) On 06/05/2012 19:42, David Magda wrote: On Jun 5, 2012, at 20:16, Scott Long wrote: If you have any questions, let me know or follow the information links on the OpenConnect web site. Out of curiosity,

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Erich
Hi, On 05 June 2012 1:09:50 Mark Linimon wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:00:45PM +0700, Erich wrote: All of these, with the exception of HEAD (which is always a valid tag), only apply to the src/ tree. The ports/, doc/, and www/ trees are not branched. If you create a branch, you must

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Erich
Hi, On 05 June 2012 7:13:47 Mark Linimon wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 03:23:01PM +0700, Erich wrote: But is this true for apache only or for the whole ports tree? Entire tree. my problem with this is that the documentation states something very different: From the handbook at the

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Erich
Hi, On 06 June 2012 0:42:47 Mark Andrews wrote: In message 1541214.zfrdxxb...@x220.ovitrap.com, Erich writes: Hi, On 05 June 2012 1:09:50 Mark Linimon wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:00:45PM +0700, Erich wrote: All of these, with the exception of HEAD (which is always a valid

Re: Netflix's New Peering Appliance Uses FreeBSD

2012-06-05 Thread Scott Long
On Jun 5, 2012, at 6:42 PM, David Magda wrote: On Jun 5, 2012, at 20:16, Scott Long wrote: If you have any questions, let me know or follow the information links on the OpenConnect web site. Out of curiosity, given that Linux seems popular in so many other places (Google, Facebook), is

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-06-05 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:11:14 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-06-06 05:11:14 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-06-06

Re: Netflix's New Peering Appliance Uses FreeBSD

2012-06-05 Thread Ian Smith
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Kurt Jaeger wrote: I didn't see a link to this information in the e-mail below. I found this info detailed here: https://signup.netflix.com/openconnect/software If you come from an IP range outside of netflix' footprint, that page is not