TB --- 2012-06-06 04:41:23 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 04:41:23 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-06-06
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:29:37 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:29:37 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-06-06
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:33:44 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:33:44 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-06-06
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:51:49 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:51:49 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-06-06
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:52:40 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:52:40 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-06-06
In message 1805884.wjzbqif...@x220.ovitrap.com, Erich writes:
Hi,
On 06 June 2012 0:42:47 Mark Andrews wrote:
In message 1541214.zfrdxxb...@x220.ovitrap.com, Erich writes:
Hi,
On 05 June 2012 1:09:50 Mark Linimon wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:00:45PM +0700, Erich wrote:
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:48:34 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:48:34 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-06-06
TB --- 2012-06-06 06:07:45 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 06:07:45 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-06-06
On 06.06.12 05:28, Erich wrote:
Why should a normal user continue to search for a tag when the
handbook is so clear on this? Erich
I continue to wonder, why are you searching for tags on the ports tree,
when you were told on a number of occasions that those who depend on
particular state
On Jun 6, 2012 3:38 AM, Erich erichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com wrote:
Hi,
On 05 June 2012 7:13:47 Mark Linimon wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 03:23:01PM +0700, Erich wrote:
But is this true for apache only or for the whole ports tree?
Entire tree.
my problem with this is that the
* O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de [2012-06-03 22:55 +0200]:
... I spent now two complete days watching my boxes updating their
ports. Several ports do not compile anymore (inkscape, libreoffice,
libxul, to name some of the very hurting ones!).
Do you have graphics/libwpg01 installed?
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Sebastian Stach wrote:
I just need to run a tool like iperf and let it run. After about 1-2
hours my nic will just hang
without any messages. I can't even ping the machine anymore. I also
installed Solaris to check
if it's maybe a FreeBSD problem but it's the same there.
TB --- 2012-06-06 10:13:33 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 10:13:33 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-06-06
TB --- 2012-06-06 09:44:27 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 09:44:27 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-06-06
TB --- 2012-06-06 10:26:20 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 10:26:20 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-06-06
TB --- 2012-06-06 10:41:59 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 10:41:59 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-06-06
TB --- 2012-06-06 10:54:29 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 10:54:29 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-06-06
TB --- 2012-06-06 10:55:06 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 10:55:06 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-06-06
TB --- 2012-06-06 10:54:39 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 10:54:39 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-06-06
TB --- 2012-06-06 10:50:54 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 10:50:54 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-06-06
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 11:16:20AM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
...
cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -std=c99 -Wall -Wredundant-decls
-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions
On 06/06/12 10:41, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
* O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de [2012-06-03 22:55 +0200]:
... I spent now two complete days watching my boxes updating their
ports. Several ports do not compile anymore (inkscape, libreoffice,
libxul, to name some of the very hurting
Hi,
let me rite the answer on top before my mouse scrolling down.
I am fully aware of what you are writing. I am saying this from the point of
view people have when they start with FreeBSD.
This little help would make them feel much much saver.
I know that it would not change much in real
Hi,
On 06 June 2012 8:48:10 Chris Rees wrote:
On Jun 6, 2012 3:38 AM, Erich erichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com wrote:
No it doesn't. It states clearly that you shouldn't use tags unless you
know what you are doing, as several of us have explained more than once.
is my English really this bad?
On 6 June 2012 14:12, Erich erichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com wrote:
Hi,
On 06 June 2012 8:48:10 Chris Rees wrote:
On Jun 6, 2012 3:38 AM, Erich erichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com wrote:
No it doesn't. It states clearly that you shouldn't use tags unless you
know what you are doing, as several of us
Hi all,
I am attempting to build stable/8 (as of 21 May 2012) on a DL360p G8
with a BCM5719. I receive a kernel panic very similar to the one at
this URL:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Fatal-trap-19-Stopped-at-bge-init-locked-and-bge-booting-problems-td5504461.html
.
The hardware notes
From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Ian Smith
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
I didn't see a link to this information in the e-mail below. I found
this info
detailed here:
Thanks for doing the test.
My conditions are different in that i have a gigabit network.
The only difference in the iperf options is that i'm using
-d (dualmode).
On the weekend i will have time to do a test with the NICs
set to 100MBit.
Sebastian Stach
Am 06.06.2012 um 12:18 schrieb Miroslav
Daniel Kalchev dan...@digsys.bg writes:
On 04.06.12 22:32, Dave Hayes wrote:
That's a fair position. Perhaps it would not be too much trouble to add
this one idea to optionsng: a more info field on each option knob
which may be filled in by a port maintainer.
The pkg-descr file in the port
Hi,
I recently updated an amd64 machine from 8-stable to 9-stable,
csupped on June 1st:
$ uname -rsm
FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE-20120601 amd64
When I merged my old kernel configuration, at first I kept
device atapicam because this is still mentioned in NOTES.
Config and compiling worked, but linking
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Mark Linimon wrote:
It's not particularly easy to see this on cvsweb. But let's take a look
at a random Mk/bsd.*.mk file via 'cvs log':
RCS file: /home/FreeBSD/pcvs/ports/Mk/bsd.apache.mk,v
Working file: bsd.apache.mk
head: 1.36
branch:
locks: strict
access list:
On 06/07/2012 00:16, Chris Rees wrote:
On 6 June 2012 14:12, Ericherichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com wrote:
[..]
is my English really this bad?
From the handbook:
'. In particular, use only tag=. for the ports-* collections.'
Your English is fine, but being told to use tag=. !=
On 06/06/2012 11:59, Dave Hayes wrote:
I'm describing more of a use case here, not attempting to specify an
implementation. If a user invokes 'make', a window is presented to them
with various options. It's probably very common that this is met with an
initial reaction of what the hell do
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 02:14:46PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
On 06/06/2012 11:59, Dave Hayes wrote:
I'm describing more of a use case here, not attempting to specify an
implementation. If a user invokes 'make', a window is presented to them
with various options. It's probably very common
I, for one, appreciate you changing the subject because I didn't know
this either and its an important function in my use case where point
in time snapshots are important to the architects and ops folks!
On 6/6/12, grenville armitage garmit...@swin.edu.au wrote:
On 06/07/2012 00:16, Chris Rees
On 6 Jun 2012, at 23:10, grenville armitage garmit...@swin.edu.au wrote:
On 06/07/2012 00:16, Chris Rees wrote:
On 6 June 2012 14:12, Ericherichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com wrote:
[..]
is my English really this bad?
From the handbook:
'. In particular, use only tag=. for the
On 06/06/2012 22:23, Glen Barber wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 02:14:46PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
On 06/06/2012 11:59, Dave Hayes wrote:
I'm describing more of a use case here, not attempting to specify an
implementation. If a user invokes 'make', a window is presented to them
with various
on 31/05/2012 23:28 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
It is simple but I don't like locking scheduler, binding CPU, and writing
the same MSR, multiple times for each core.
Not sure if parse this. The MSR is _written_ /once/ for each core.
(BTW, locking scheduler is not a completely accurate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-06-06 17:58:57 -0400, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 31/05/2012 23:28 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
It is simple but I don't like locking scheduler, binding CPU, and
writing the same MSR, multiple times for each core.
Not sure if parse this.
Hi,
On 06 June 2012 17:40:28 Rick Miller wrote:
I, for one, appreciate you changing the subject because I didn't know
this either and its an important function in my use case where point
in time snapshots are important to the architects and ops folks!
and it should be mentioned in the hand
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 16:02 -0700, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
Buy me a Bulldozer and I'll fix it for you! :-P
Since I have one (FX-8150), do you want me to expose it to the internet
and let you play with it?
Sean
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
On 06/06/2012 22:23, Glen Barber wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 02:14:46PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
On 06/06/2012 11:59, Dave Hayes wrote:
I'm describing more of a use case here, not attempting to specify an
implementation. If a user invokes
Mergemaster fails in a up-to-date as of now build.
uname -a
FreeBSD P9X79.tddhome 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0: Wed Jun 6
16:16:58 PDT 2012 root@P9X79.tddhome:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
amd64
# mergemaster
...
[END]
And no response to the keyboard, except ctrl-Z.
^Z
# ps
...
1363
Hi,
today I had a really strange experience with my laptop. I ran 2 lisp
processes each consuming 100% CPU (i.e. in top, 100% CPU means one
full core), since I have 2 cores, it means full processor load. I was
moreover running Emacs and Opera, but that is more or less irrelevant
since they
On 06/06/2012 18:01, Момчил Иванов wrote:
Is there some remedy?
Try the 4BSD scheduler.
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To
Hi,
On 07 June 2012 3:01:07 Момчил Иванов wrote:
temperature. It was constantly increasing from about 33 C. I took a
look at top and saw that both processes were wildly jumping accross
the cores, i.e. CPU0 and CPU1.
So before reading all the papers about the ULE scheduler and the
source
On Jun 6, 2012, at 7:43 PM, Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
On 06/06/2012 22:23, Glen Barber wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 02:14:46PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
On 06/06/2012 11:59, Dave Hayes wrote:
I'm describing more of a use case here, not attempting to
I usually use portmaster to install ports. The options dialogs that pop
up are often for dependencies. The options dialog gives the name of the
port for which the options are being selected, but no description or
indication as to why this is being installed (this could be a dependency
of a
On 6 June 2012 23:29, Oliver Fromme o...@lurza.secnetix.de wrote:
Hi,
Hi, Oliver Fromme.
This is a wild guess, but see below.
Anyway, I commented atapicam out because it seems that now
options ATA_CAM does the same thing. This time the kernel
linked, but during boot I got the following
TB --- 2012-06-07 03:32:44 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-07 03:32:44 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-06-07
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 16:51:27 -0700 , Thomas D. Dean wrote:
Mergemaster fails in a up-to-date as of now build.
uname -a
FreeBSD P9X79.tddhome 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0: Wed Jun 6
16:16:58 PDT 2012 root@P9X79.tddhome:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
amd64
# mergemaster
...
TB --- 2012-06-07 03:45:23 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-07 03:45:23 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-06-07
TB --- 2012-06-07 04:07:13 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-07 04:07:13 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-06-07
TB --- 2012-06-07 04:01:44 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-07 04:01:44 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-06-07
TB --- 2012-06-07 04:13:45 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-07 04:13:45 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-06-07
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org writes:
On 06/06/2012 11:59, Dave Hayes wrote:
I'm describing more of a use case here, not attempting to specify an
implementation. If a user invokes 'make', a window is presented to them
with various options. It's probably very common that this is met with an
56 matches
Mail list logo
