Hi Rick,
thank you very much for answering.
On 06/26/2012 02:17 AM, Rick Macklem wrote:
Herbert Poeckl wrote:
Hi everybody.
We are new to this list and need technical help.
We are getting access denied error on our debian clients when mounting
nfsv4 network drives with kerberos 5
on 26/06/2012 22:25 Alexander Yerenkow said the following:
g_vfs_done():da2s1[WRITE(offset=3227648, length=4096)]error = 5
g_vfs_done():da2s1[WRITE(offset=3227648, length=4096)]error = 5
g_vfs_done():da2s1[WRITE(offset=3227648, length=4096)]error = 5
Looks like a problem writing to the
2012/6/27 Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org:
on 26/06/2012 22:25 Alexander Yerenkow said the following:
g_vfs_done():da2s1[WRITE(offset=3227648, length=4096)]error = 5
g_vfs_done():da2s1[WRITE(offset=3227648, length=4096)]error = 5
g_vfs_done():da2s1[WRITE(offset=3227648, length=4096)]error = 5
Dear list!
This evening my 7 years old node powers down for it's own sake.
After a bit of panic, I made a decision to get new box.
Regarding fast development of hardware, I cannot choose what is
the correct way to go. For long time I use AMD and would like to
have another one, but would listen to
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Zoran Kolic zko...@sbb.rs wrote:
Dear list!
This evening my 7 years old node powers down for it's own sake.
After a bit of panic, I made a decision to get new box.
Regarding fast development of hardware, I cannot choose what is
the correct way to go. For long
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/27/2012 10:37 AM, Zoran Kolic wrote:
Dear list! This evening my 7 years old node powers down for it's
own sake. After a bit of panic, I made a decision to get new box.
Regarding fast development of hardware, I cannot choose what is
the
Hello,
I have a FreeBSD 9-STABLE box (world built today) that panics whenever I
try to delete data using rm on my ZFS pool.
This occurred on the same system with a world that was about a month
old. Generic kernel and pretty vanilla system.
I can consistently reproduce this. I can't see
Hallo everyone,
we did more testing on this topic.
After we found a few hosts, basically HP desktop workstation with Intel
onboard NICs, that worked and more hosts that didn't work, we placed a
second PCI based NIC into one of the hosts that worked.
The surprising result is:
With the onboard
AMD and Intel both have good CPU offerings. Both have a turbo feature to
improve single core workloads.
The real question is which video card do you want to use? Both have integrated
solutions now or you could pick a discrete card. I personally go amd but buy
nvidia cards as there are binary
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Lucas Holt wrote:
AMD and Intel both have good CPU offerings. Both have a turbo feature to
improve single core workloads.
The real question is which video card do you want to use? Both have integrated
solutions now or you could pick a discrete card. I personally go amd
Herbert Poeckl wrote:
Hallo everyone,
we did more testing on this topic.
After we found a few hosts, basically HP desktop workstation with
Intel
onboard NICs, that worked and more hosts that didn't work, we placed a
second PCI based NIC into one of the hosts that worked.
The
11 matches
Mail list logo
