Am Thu, 1 Nov 2012 20:14:51 -0600 (MDT)
schrieb Brett Glass br...@lariat.net:
I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how
FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will it be likely to be more stable and
robust than 9.0-RELEASE? Are there issues that will have to wait
until
- Original Message -
From: Peter Jeremy pe...@rulingia.com
On 2012-Nov-01 13:29:34 -, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
After destroying and re-creating the pool and then writing
zeros to the disk in multiple files without filling the fs
I've manged to reproduce the
On 1 November 2012, at 19:14, Brett Glass wrote:
I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how
FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will it be likely to be more stable and
robust than 9.0-RELEASE?
Doug Hardie responded:
It appears to be for me. I had problems with 9.0 not
-Original Message-
From: Andriy Gapon [mailto:a...@freebsd.org]
Sent: 1. november 2012 23:05
To: Tom Lislegaard
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org; freebsd-a...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 9-Stable panic: resource_list_unreserve: can't find resource
on 01/11/2012 11:45 Tom Lislegaard
Copying in freebsd-scsi@ for visability.
- Original Message -
From: Steven Hartland
Ok after revisiting all the facts and spotting that
the corruption only seemed to happen after my zpool
was nearly full I came up with a wild idea, could
the corruption be being caused by writes after
On 11/01/12 22:14, Brett Glass wrote:
I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how
FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will it be likely to be more stable and
robust than 9.0-RELEASE? Are there issues that will have to wait
until 9.2-RELEASE to be fixed? Opinions welcome.
--Brett
on 02/11/2012 11:56 Tom Lislegaard said the following:
The machine is usually connected to a docking station and I believe the power
is very stable. I sometimes take it home and connect it to a different
powersupply and sees the same behavior with panics there. Panics can occur
while I'm at
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
schrieb Attilio Rao am 29.10.2012 23:02 (localtime):
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
schrieb Attilio Rao am 27.10.2012 23:07 (localtime):
On Sat, Oct
I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how
FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will it be likely to be more stable and
robust than 9.0-RELEASE? Are there issues that will have to wait
until 9.2-RELEASE to be fixed? Opinions welcome.
--Brett Glass
I've got 9.1-RC2 running on 2
Hi
Why are journaled soft updates the default when installing a new system
from a 9.1-RC2 ISO?
I admit I did not pay too much attention when installing a new system
from an 9.1-RC2 ISO and found out when taking a snapshot with dump (dump
-0Lauf) to clone the system. Other systems (9-STABLE,
On 11/2/2012 23:47, Bas Smeelen wrote:
Hi
Why are journaled soft updates the default when installing a new system
from a 9.1-RC2 ISO?
I admit I did not pay too much attention when installing a new system
from an 9.1-RC2 ISO and found out when taking a snapshot with dump (dump
-0Lauf) to clone
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 00:05 +0700, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 11/2/2012 23:47, Bas Smeelen wrote:
Hi
Why are journaled soft updates the default when installing a new system
from a 9.1-RC2 ISO?
Can SU+J be disabled for the 9.1-RELEASE or do you think this is not
going to be a problem for
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Mike Jakubik
mike.jaku...@intertainservices.com wrote:
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 00:05 +0700, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 11/2/2012 23:47, Bas Smeelen wrote:
Hi
Why are journaled soft updates the default when installing a new system
from a 9.1-RC2 ISO?
Can SU+J
On 11/3/2012 0:13, Mike Jakubik wrote:
You can disable SU+J after installing, though it would be nice if the
installer gave you a choice.
This assumes that you know about this flaw, which most people do not.
I didn't until I discovered it by panic-ing a perfectly fine running
server.
On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 13:23 -0400, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
I don't think SU+J should even be an option in the installer as long
as this bug persists. If you don't use dump, go ahead and enable
journaling after the installation, but it's not a decision that new
users should be asked to make. This
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Brett Glass br...@lariat.net wrote:
I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how
FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will it be likely to be more stable and
robust than 9.0-RELEASE? Are there issues that will have to wait
until 9.2-RELEASE to be
On Nov 2, 2012, at 4:10 AM, Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
Am Thu, 1 Nov 2012 20:14:51 -0600 (MDT)
schrieb Brett Glass br...@lariat.net:
I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how
FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will it be likely to be more stable and
On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 11/3/2012 0:13, Mike Jakubik wrote:
You can disable SU+J after installing, though it would be nice if the
installer gave you a choice.
This assumes that you know about this flaw, which most people do not.
I didn't until I discovered it by
On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 11/3/2012 0:13, Mike Jakubik wrote:
You can disable SU+J after installing, though it would be nice if the
installer gave you a choice.
This assumes that you know about this flaw, which most people do not.
I didn't until I discovered it by
On 11/02/2012 07:08 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 11/3/2012 0:13, Mike Jakubik wrote:
You can disable SU+J after installing, though it would be nice if the
installer gave you a choice.
This assumes that you know about this flaw, which most people do not.
On 11/02/2012 07:17 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 07:08 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 11/3/2012 0:13, Mike Jakubik wrote:
You can disable SU+J after installing, though it would be nice if the
installer gave you a choice.
This assumes that you
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 12:27:18AM +0700, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 11/3/2012 0:13, Mike Jakubik wrote:
You can disable SU+J after installing, though it would be nice if the
installer gave you a choice.
This assumes that you know about this flaw, which most people do not.
I didn't until I
On 11/02/2012 07:31 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 12:27:18AM +0700, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 11/3/2012 0:13, Mike Jakubik wrote:
You can disable SU+J after installing, though it would be nice if the
installer gave you a choice.
This assumes that you know about this flaw, which
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:30:04PM +0100, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 07:17 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 07:08 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 11/3/2012 0:13, Mike Jakubik wrote:
You can disable SU+J after installing, though it would be
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:41:31PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:30:04PM +0100, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 07:17 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 07:08 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 11/3/2012 0:13, Mike Jakubik
On 11/02/2012 07:41 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:30:04PM +0100, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 07:17 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 07:08 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 11/3/2012 0:13, Mike Jakubik wrote:
You can disable
On 11/02/2012 07:59 PM, Gary Palmer wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:41:31PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:30:04PM +0100, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 07:17 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 07:08 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Adam Strohl
=== lib/libc++ (all)
clang++ -O -pipe -march=i686 -mtune=i686
-I/usr/src/lib/libc++/../../contrib/libc++/include
-I/usr/src/lib/libc++/../../contrib/libcxxrt -nostdlib -DLIBCXXRT
-Qunused-arguments -fstack-protector -Wno-empty-body
-Wno-string-plus-int -Wno-tautological-compare
Am Fri, 2 Nov 2012 13:34:20 -0400
schrieb Mark Saad nones...@longcount.org:
On Nov 2, 2012, at 4:10 AM, Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de
wrote:
Am Thu, 1 Nov 2012 20:14:51 -0600 (MDT)
schrieb Brett Glass br...@lariat.net:
I need to build up a few servers and routers, and
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 02:59:29PM -0400, Gary Palmer wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:41:31PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:30:04PM +0100, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 07:17 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 07:08 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:19:57AM +, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
(cross-posted message; please keep discussion on freebsd-hackers@)
Hello,
Last year FreeBSD qualified for Google Code-In 2011 event--contest for
youngest open-source hackers in 13-17yr age range:
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 11/2/2012 23:47, Bas Smeelen wrote:
Hi
Why are journaled soft updates the default when installing a new system
from a 9.1-RC2 ISO?
I admit I did not pay too much attention when installing a new system
from an 9.1-RC2 ISO and found out when taking a
On 11/02/2012 10:42 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 11/2/2012 23:47, Bas Smeelen wrote:
Hi
Why are journaled soft updates the default when installing a new system
from a 9.1-RC2 ISO?
I admit I did not pay too much attention when installing a new system
On 02/11/2012 15:57, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 1 November 2012, at 19:14, Brett Glass wrote:
I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how
FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will it be likely to be more stable and
robust than 9.0-RELEASE?
It appears to be for me. I had problems
34 matches
Mail list logo
