On 2013-Jan-01 21:30:14 -0800, Doug Hardie wrote:
>Is the cvs code going away?
There has been some discussion about removing CVS from the base system
now it is no longer used. No concensus was reached, so it's not going
away immediately (and would not be removed from 9.x or earlier branches
in a
Hi,
the last batch of changes to bge caused the ipmi to stop working on a
Sun Fire X2200 M2, and
bge0: mem
0xfdff-0xfdff,0xfdfe-0xfdfe irq 17 at device 4.0 on pci6
bge0: CHIP ID 0x9003; ASIC REV 0x09; CHIP REV 0x90; PCI-X 133 MHz
miibus2: on bge0
bge1: mem
0xfdfc-0xfd
On 1/1/13 9:30 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 1 January 2013, at 21:16, Chris H wrote:
On 1 January 2013 15:17, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/1/13 6:55 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 1 January 2013 02:54, Derek Kulinski wrote:
That said I would totally understand you being upset if FreeBSD would
deci
Hello Doug,
Tuesday, January 1, 2013, 9:30:14 PM, you wrote:
>> Thank God! I'd hate to think that after unwinding years accumulated
>> CVS process, to rewind it for SVN, only to have to do it again for GIT,
>> just seems a bit masochistic.
> Is the cvs code going away?
I'm not in any way FreeBS
On 1 January 2013, at 21:16, Chris H wrote:
>> On 1 January 2013 15:17, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>> On 1/1/13 6:55 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 1 January 2013 02:54, Derek Kulinski wrote:
>
> That said I would totally understand you being upset if FreeBSD would
> decide to
Hi,
> Thank God! I'd hate to think that after unwinding years accumulated
> CVS process, to rewind it for SVN, only to have to do it again for
> GIT, just seems a bit masochistic.
do not worry. It will come.
Seriously, I do not understand many changes especially when there is a
system in place w
> On 1 January 2013 15:17, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>> On 1/1/13 6:55 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1 January 2013 02:54, Derek Kulinski wrote:
That said I would totally understand you being upset if FreeBSD would
decide to switch to git, since despite its benefits that is a hug
Hiroki Sato wrote:
> I have been in a trouble about my NFS server for a long time.
> The symptom is that it stops working in one or two weeks after
> a boot ... It did not panic, just stopped working---while it
> responded to ping, userland programs seemed not working ...
> Does anyone see
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 31.12.2012 21:40, schrieb Chris H:
>
>> IM(NS)HO; SVN is an inferior RCS created so Windows users wouldn't feel
>> left out.
>
> No, and it has nothing to do with Windows. CVS does work on Windows.
>
> SVN 1.5 or newer is CVS done right
Hello,
I have been in a trouble about my NFS server for a long time. The
symptom is that it stops working in one or two weeks after a boot. I
could not track down the cause yet, but it is reproducible and only
occurred under a very high I/O load.
It did not panic, just stopped working---wh
>> (..) I am not familiar with
>> 'WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS'. Why did you add that and what does it do?
>
> WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS = yes makes the new libc++ being built. It can be used
> with LLVM/CLANG by setting explicitely
>
> CXXFLAGS+= -stdlib=libc++ -std=c++11
>
> in /etc/src.conf for be
Am 01/01/13 23:46, schrieb Mark van Dijk:
>> Accordingly, I configured /etc/src.conf to read:
>>
>> CC=clang
>> CXX=clang++
>> CPP=clang-cpp
>> WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS=yes
>
> This has worked for me as well, but I am not familiar with
> 'WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS'. Why did you add that and what does it do?
>
>
Am 31.12.2012 21:40, schrieb Chris H:
> IM(NS)HO; SVN is an inferior RCS created so Windows users wouldn't feel
> left out.
No, and it has nothing to do with Windows. CVS does work on Windows.
SVN 1.5 or newer is CVS done right, if you want the server-client split
model, and can waive the "dist
> Accordingly, I configured /etc/src.conf to read:
>
> CC=clang
> CXX=clang++
> CPP=clang-cpp
> WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS=yes
This has worked for me as well, but I am not familiar with
'WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS'. Why did you add that and what does it do?
Thanks
Mark
__
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> "git-svn" is somewhat problematic:
>
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/GitWorkflow -> "Using git-svn (FreeBSD committers
> only)" ->
>
>> Things to keep in mind:
>>
>> *
>>
>> Never git merge branches, unless you know what you're doing.
>>
>>
Hello Kevin,
Monday, December 31, 2012, 2:39:15 PM, you wrote:
> All of that said, I still use CVS for on thing, RANCiD. (It is a
> system for managing router and switch configurations).It can use
> either CVS or SVN, but I keep the data is CVS as there is considerable
> advantage to being able t
On 1/1/13 12:51 PM, Derek Kulinski wrote:
Hello Alfred,
Tuesday, January 1, 2013, 12:17:17 PM, you wrote:
Just In Case:
FreeBSD has no plans to switch to get in either the short or long
term. We will however offer git repositories and first-class cousins
via git.freebsd.org and github.
Are
Hello Alfred,
Tuesday, January 1, 2013, 12:17:17 PM, you wrote:
>> Just In Case:
>>
>> FreeBSD has no plans to switch to get in either the short or long
>> term. We will however offer git repositories and first-class cousins
>> via git.freebsd.org and github.
>>
> Are you sure? Most of the diff
On 1/1/13 12:19 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 1 January 2013 15:17, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 1/1/13 6:55 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 1 January 2013 02:54, Derek Kulinski wrote:
That said I would totally understand you being upset if FreeBSD would
decide to switch to git, since despite its benefi
On 1 January 2013 15:17, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> On 1/1/13 6:55 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>
>> On 1 January 2013 02:54, Derek Kulinski wrote:
>>>
>>> That said I would totally understand you being upset if FreeBSD would
>>> decide to switch to git, since despite its benefits that is a huge
>>> ch
On 1/1/13 6:55 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 1 January 2013 02:54, Derek Kulinski wrote:
That said I would totally understand you being upset if FreeBSD would
decide to switch to git, since despite its benefits that is a huge
change, and would definitely be hard for people to adjust.
Just In Case:
On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 06:44:16AM -0800, Robert wrote:
> ...
> I will be upgrading my main desktop system from 8-stable to 9-stable
> this week and am quite confused with regards to Clang vs GCC. I have
> complete backups and will be doing a complete re-install.
>
> I have seen several different
On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 15:44:16 +0100, Robert wrote:
Greetings
I will be upgrading my main desktop system from 8-stable to 9-stable
this week and am quite confused with regards to Clang vs GCC. I have
complete backups and will be doing a complete re-install.
I have seen several different example
Greetings
I will be upgrading my main desktop system from 8-stable to 9-stable
this week and am quite confused with regards to Clang vs GCC. I have
complete backups and will be doing a complete re-install.
I have seen several different examples of what to put
into /etc/src.conf and /etc/make.conf
On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 02:39:44PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 01/01/2013 07:51, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 02:05:11AM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> >> On 01/01/2013 01:49, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> >>> On 01/01/2013 01:29, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 1 Jan 2013
On 01-01-13 15:55, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 1 January 2013 02:54, Derek Kulinski wrote:
>> That said I would totally understand you being upset if FreeBSD would
>> decide to switch to git, since despite its benefits that is a huge
>> change, and would definitely be hard for people to adjust.
>
> J
On 12/31/12, Zoran Kolic wrote:
> I'm quite happy to see 9.1 out and want to ask polite and
> benevolent question:
> regarding times on the site, are iso and img files the same
> as 2 weeks ago? To remind noble readers. I installed on my
> computers what was release at that time and got it up and
On 1 January 2013 02:54, Derek Kulinski wrote:
> That said I would totally understand you being upset if FreeBSD would
> decide to switch to git, since despite its benefits that is a huge
> change, and would definitely be hard for people to adjust.
Just In Case:
FreeBSD has no plans to switch to
On 01/01/2013 07:51, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 02:05:11AM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> On 01/01/2013 01:49, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>>> On 01/01/2013 01:29, Chris Rees wrote:
On 1 Jan 2013 00:01, "Dominic Fandrey" wrote:
>
> I have a Tinderbox that I just
On 01/01/2013 07:51, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 02:05:11AM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> On 01/01/2013 01:49, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>>> On 01/01/2013 01:29, Chris Rees wrote:
On 1 Jan 2013 00:01, "Dominic Fandrey" wrote:
>
> I have a Tinderbox that I just
On 01/01/2013 07:51, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 02:05:11AM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> On 01/01/2013 01:49, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>>> On 01/01/2013 01:29, Chris Rees wrote:
On 1 Jan 2013 00:01, "Dominic Fandrey" wrote:
>
> I have a Tinderbox that I just
Hello Zoran,
Monday, December 31, 2012, 8:33:43 AM, you wrote:
> I'm quite happy to see 9.1 out and want to ask polite and
> benevolent question:
> regarding times on the site, are iso and img files the same
> as 2 weeks ago? To remind noble readers. I installed on my
> computers what was release
Monday, December 31, 2012, 12:40:47 PM, you wrote:
> That's what I was afraid I would hear. Recently, I was informed by SF.NET,
> that my account would be upgraded, and all the projects I have, which all
> use CVS, would be "upgraded" to SVN (which renders them useless). When I
> asked why, they t
33 matches
Mail list logo
