http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide
Seems not working :)
--
Regards,
Alexander Yerenkow
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On 01/08/2013 09:08 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide
Seems not working :)
Works here!
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send
Hi,
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:08:33 +0200
Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.com wrote:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide
Error 503 Service Unavailable
Service Unavailable
Guru Meditation:
XID: 931036950
Varnish cache server
is all I get.
Erich
On 01/08/2013 09:32 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
2013/1/8 Bas Smeelen b.smee...@ose.nl mailto:b.smee...@ose.nl
On 01/08/2013 09:08 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide
Seems not working :)
Works here!
Hm, could you look at this:
On 01/08/2013 09:37 AM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:08:33 +0200
Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.com wrote:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide
Error 503 Service Unavailable
Service Unavailable
Guru Meditation:
XID: 931036950
Varnish cache server
is all I get.
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 09:39+0100, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 01/08/2013 09:32 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
2013/1/8 Bas Smeelen b.smee...@ose.nl mailto:b.smee...@ose.nl
On 01/08/2013 09:08 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide
On Jan 8, 2013, at 3:10 AM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 01/08/2013 09:08 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide
Seems not working :)
Works here!
What's odd is that it looks like some changes were reverted. I'd asked someone
with write privs on it to include a
Thus spake Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org:
on 29/11/2012 17:16 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
Would that mean that the regular checkout of stable/9 contains enough
code to allow painless rebooting...
Not yet...
Has this been resolved? I still see a hang on reboot/shutdown on my box
On 01/08/2013 10:00 AM, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 09:39+0100, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 01/08/2013 09:32 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
2013/1/8 Bas Smeelen b.smee...@ose.nl mailto:b.smee...@ose.nl
On 01/08/2013 09:08 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
On 6 January 2013 20:40, Simon L. B. Nielsen si...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hey,
tl;dr Wiki is back, and everybody with account need to reset their password.
Small followup. The wiki's surge protection (yet again) got confused
and blocked the frontend proxy. I think it should be fixed now.
If you
Hey,
I upgraded a server running 8.x to 9.1 over the weekend and sendmail no
longer wants to bind the AF_INET6 sockets.
So while this still works:
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MSA, M=Eu,
InputMailFilters=dkim')
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Addr=::1, Name=MSA, Family=inet6,
How can I unstupid sendmail here?
I don't think sendmail is being stupid here as it is doing what it has been
doing under 8.x and 9.1 (the code is the same). I think something changed with
the upgrade to 9.1. As far as tracking it down, the sendmail code does:
On 01/08/2013 16:18, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
[...]
98054 sendmail CALL bind(0x7,0x708dbc,0x1c)
98054 sendmail STRU struct sockaddr { AF_INET6, [:::88.198.49.12]:587 }
98054 sendmail RET bind -1 errno 49 Can't assign requested address
Yeah right ... I don't want an IPv6-mapped-IPv4
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 18:36:34 +0100, Michiel Boland wrote:
On 01/08/2013 16:18, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
Hey,
I upgraded a server running 8.x to 9.1 over the weekend and sendmail no
longer wants to bind the AF_INET6 sockets.
So while this still works:
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp,
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 10:09:20 -0800, Gregory Shapiro wrote:
How can I unstupid sendmail here?
I don't think sendmail is being stupid here as it is doing what it has been
doing under 8.x and 9.1 (the code is the same). I think something changed
with the upgrade to 9.1. As far as
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 19:46:09 +0100 Ulrich Spörlein u...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Turns out it was the missing setting of
ip6addrctl_policy=ipv6_prefer in rc.conf that also bit me in
strange and mysterious ways on another machine where I did the
upgrade. It's very unfortunate that this will
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 16:02:43 -0500 J.R. Oldroyd f...@opal.com wrote:
Seems to me that the ip6addrctl script should also prefer IPv6 if any
interface has IPv6 enabled using one of the ifconfig_(interface)_ipv6
variables.
-jr
A simple change along the lines of the attached patch,
Gregory Shapiro gshap...@freebsd.org wrote
in 20130108180920.gj36...@rugsucker.smi.sendmail.com:
gs How can I unstupid sendmail here?
gs
gs I don't think sendmail is being stupid here as it is doing what it has
gs been doing under 8.x and 9.1 (the code is the same). I think
gs something
Ulrich Spörlein u...@freebsd.org wrote
in 20130108184051.gi35...@acme.spoerlein.net:
uq After setting this, it now looks like this:
uq root@acme: ~# ip6addrctl
uq Prefix Prec Label Use
uq ::1/128 50 00
uq ::/0
19 matches
Mail list logo
