On 2013-02-19 04:48, Kurt Buff wrote:
I'm working on troubleshooting a random network dropout in an older
Acer Aspire One, and am compiling an otherwise generic kernel with the
following options:
...
linking kernel.debug
ld:/usr/src/sys/conf/ldscript.i386:66: syntax error
*** [kernel.debug]
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:09:38AM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2013-02-19 04:48, Kurt Buff wrote:
I'm working on troubleshooting a random network dropout in an older
Acer Aspire One, and am compiling an otherwise generic kernel with the
following options:
...
linking kernel.debug
on 19/02/2013 02:24 Edwin L. Culp W. said the following:
Sound works fine for all players, browsers, etc. everything except SKYPE
I've user both ports and both give the same results. Rigt now I'm using:
skype-2.1.0.81_1,1
I've used it for years with no problems. It quite working during
Hey, try using dsp0 and mixer0 if you use this device, or create link from
bsd alsa config (from /etc... to /compat...). Setting default pcm to 1 with
sysctl will produce sound on another device :-)
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 17.02.2013 08:54, schrieb Xin Li:
On 2/16/13 10:24 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
On 16 February 2013 18:08, Gary Palmer gpal...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 05:38:56PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
On 16 February 2013 17:05, Paul Mather
2013/2/14 David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com
Le mardi 12 février 2013 21:42:01 Ronald Klop a écrit :
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:44:49 +0100, David Demelier
demelier.da...@gmail.com wrote:
Le mardi 12 février 2013 10:01:10 Andriy Gapon a écrit :
on 12/02/2013 09:57 David Demelier
On 19 Feb 2013 14:23, Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
18.02.2013 15:26, Chris Rees написав(ла):
I'm sure you understand that our compiler in base is rather elderly,
and that a project as insanely huge as Libreoffice is going to be
highly sensitive to minute changes.
No,
On 11/02/2013 12:23, Panagiotis Christias wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to install FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 on an IBM x3550 M3 server.
Installation went smoothly, RAID controller and network cards were
successfully recognised.
How stable is it? I may have a problem manifesting in random reboots
with a
18.02.2013 15:26, Chris Rees ???(??):
I'm sure you understand that our compiler in base is rather elderly,
and that a project as insanely huge as Libreoffice is going to be
highly sensitive to minute changes.
No, Chris... I do not understand this wonderfully PR-esque response.
See, my
On Friday, February 15, 2013 11:31:11 pm Marc Fournier wrote:
Trying the patch now … but what do you mean by using 'SIGSTOP'? I generally
do a 'kill -HUP' then when that doesn't work 'kill -9' … should Iuse -STOP
instead of 9?
No. This patch only helps if you are using kill -STOP to pause
On 19.02.2013 09:45, Chris Rees wrote:
a. The code is buggy.
b. The compiler is buggy.
c.Both of the above.
My question was, which is it?
My answer is that it is almost certainly (b).
Are there identified, known problems with the version? From what little I've
heard, our cc had some
Hi,
The base compiler is supposed to compile base and bootstrap whatever
else you need to compile other software.
It's not supposed to be continuously updated to new, major versions. :-)
I bet *office just uses a bunch of either horrible syntax that breaks
things, or newer C/C++ features that
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 09:23 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
The base compiler is supposed to compile base and bootstrap whatever
else you need to compile other software.
It's not supposed to be continuously updated to new, major versions. :-)
I bet *office just uses a bunch of either
Actually libreoffice builds with base clang and gcc47 from ports.
I don't know about status of base gcc compiler.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Why-can-t-gcc-4-2-1-build-usable-libreoffice-tp5786977p5788485.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list
On 02/18/13 09:29, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 09:26:42AM -0700, Jamie Gritton wrote:
On 02/18/13 01:54, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
schrieb Jamie Gritton am 16.02.2013 00:40 (localtime):
On 02/15/13 09:27, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Hello,
like already posted, on
On 19.02.2013 12:23, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I bet *office just uses a bunch of either horrible syntax that breaks
things, or newer C/C++ features that are buggy in older compilers.
Well, yes, this is, what I wanted to find out -- which case is it. There was a
point, when we had a special
On 19 February 2013 09:35, Ian Lepore i...@freebsd.org wrote:
It has been. The OP stated the he disabled that and forced use of gcc
4.2.1, and is now complaining that it doesn't work after specifically
taking steps to make it not-work.
Hence my reply. :-)
OP - don't do that. The base
.. I think the compiler people just use the port as compiled with the
compiler that is known to work with it, and move on. :-)
I re-read your original post. It's likely some queer corner case C++
or C++ library bug as shipped with the base system.
Adrian
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 13:03 -0500, Mikhail T. wrote:
On 19.02.2013 12:23, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I bet *office just uses a bunch of either horrible syntax that breaks
things, or newer C/C++ features that are buggy in older compilers.
Well, yes, this is, what I wanted to find out -- which case
On 19.02.2013 13:19, Ian Lepore wrote:
All strike me as being complaints, but if that seems like a
mis-characterization to you, then I apologize.
These were, indeed, complaints, but not about the port not working after I
broke it. My complaint is that, though the port works out of the box, the
Somehow attribution has been screwed here-- I will perhaps blame the
appalling Android Gmail app that I used to reply to an earlier
message.
On 19 February 2013 18:54, Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
snip
These were, indeed, complaints, but not about the port not working after I
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 13:54 -0500, Mikhail T. wrote:
Licensing prevents us from updating gcc in the base.
Licensing? Could you elaborate, which aspect of licensing you have in
mind?
Versions of gcc after the 4.2.1 version we use are licensed under GPLv3.
I'm not a lawyer, so I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-02-19 12:23:07 -0500, Adrian Chadd wrote:
In any case, why hasn't that port been blessed with the requires
gcc 4.6+ port option/dependency? I thought that's why we _have_
that.
The short answer is we cannot support gcc 4.6+ unless we have
On 19.02.2013 14:15, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
What do we go from here? I don't know. One thing I know for sure is
we cannot support every possible build/runtime environment.
Feel free to suggest your ideas and thoughts.
Well, support for every possible combination is, of course, a toll order, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-02-19 14:31:02 -0500, Mikhail T. wrote:
On 19.02.2013 14:15, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
What do we go from here? I don't know. One thing I know for
sure is we cannot support every possible build/runtime
environment.
Feel free to suggest your
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 02:15:03PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
The short answer is we cannot support gcc 4.6+ unless we have a
dedicated *ports* compiler.
{blah blah}
What do we go from here? I don't know. One thing I know for sure is
we cannot support every possible build/runtime
On 19.02.2013 14:45, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
Actually, I tried very hard to build sane LO with gcc 4.2 but it
wasn't fruitful. Eventually, I gave up on adding kludges after
kludges because LO is moving away from pre-C++11 compilers anyway.:-(
Should not a pre-C++11 compiler simply /fail/ upon
On 19.02.2013 14:54, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Licensing zealotism benefits no user, but I can
see it benefiting certain companies whose commercial products are
reliant on FreeBSD. So out with it already.
But support from (and even mere adoption by) large companies benefits FreeBSD in
a number of
Hello :-)
I have just bought a Pioneer 15x BluRay recorder. I saw something like
below in the dmesg, I cannot access video with VLC, should I worry
about that? I guess recording files can be done just as for DVD with
growisofs? :-)
(cd2:ata0:0:1:0): READ DVD STRUCTURE. CDB: ad 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 09:54:42AM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
schrieb Jamie Gritton am 16.02.2013 00:40 (localtime):
On 02/15/13 09:27, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Hello,
like already posted, on 9.1-R, I highly appreciate the new jail(8) and
jail.conf capabilities. Thanks for
There is no problem with everything that I can think of, and I tried every
thread in the mailing list/forum, and the only problem is, nothing works.
http://twipic.com/c56lmz
(taken from the shell on the install CD)
--
Zhihao Yuan, ID lichray
The best way to predict the future is to invent it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-02-19 15:05:13 -0500, Mikhail T. wrote:
On 19.02.2013 14:45, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
Actually, I tried very hard to build sane LO with gcc 4.2 but it
wasn't fruitful. Eventually, I gave up on adding kludges after
kludges because LO is moving
http://twipic.com/c56lmz
The URI should be http://twitpic.com/c56lmz
--
Zhihao Yuan, ID lichray
The best way to predict the future is to invent it.
___
4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/
___
2 = ENOENT. Were you booting from zfs:zdell/ROOT?
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Zhihao Yuan lich...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no problem with everything that I can think of, and I tried every
thread in the mailing list/forum, and the only problem is, nothing works.
Yes, the real root which is mounted to /
--
Zhihao Yuan
On Feb 19, 2013 7:50 PM, Xin LI delp...@gmail.com wrote:
2 = ENOENT. Were you booting from zfs:zdell/ROOT?
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Zhihao Yuan lich...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no problem with everything that I can think of,
I have done a buildworld and a buildkernel, and the latter finished
just fine, so now to see if I can diagnose the problem.
Thanks for the help...
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:09:38AM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/19/13 16:57, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
Yes, the real root which is mounted to /
Show the error message from root mount (plus what shows up after
?enter). It's pretty likely that you have a bad zpool.cache or bad
fstab configuration.
Cheers,
- --
On Feb 19, 2013 9:00 PM, Xin Li delp...@delphij.net wrote:
Show the error message from root mount (plus what shows up after
?enter).
http://twitpic.com/c57t9b
After ?enter, I see a list of gptids and names; nothing mentions 'zfs'.
It's pretty likely that you have a bad zpool.cache or bad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2/19/13 6:21 PM, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
On Feb 19, 2013 9:00 PM, Xin Li delp...@delphij.net wrote:
Show the error message from root mount (plus what shows up after
?enter).
http://twitpic.com/c57t9b
After ?enter, I see a list of gptids and
On Feb 19, 2013 10:49 PM, Xin Li delp...@delphij.net wrote:
Did you loaded zfs.ko?
Yes, as in loader.conf, zfs_load.
Regenerate the zpool.cache with:
zpool set cachefile=/mnt/boot/zfs/zpool.cache zdell
Then sync; sleep 5; sync; then reboot.
Without exporting the zpool?
Anyway, I'll give
19.02.2013 17:30, Jung-uk Kim ???(??):
I really love to build LO with GCC 4.2, too. I really do. However, I
don't see much point of mentioning that fact in PR.
You mentioned earlier, that you believe there were plenty PRs already.
Are the patches contained in them currently in the port's
On 19.02.13 20:54, Mikhail T. wrote:
My complaint is that, though the port works out of the box, the
office@ maintainers have given up on the base compiler too easily --
comments in the makefile make no mention of any bug-reports filed with
anyone, for example. It sure seems, no attempts
42 matches
Mail list logo
