I'm sorry. What I have to do? I'm ready)
2013/8/7 Gregory Shapiro gshap...@freebsd.org:
I found a problem in new FreeBSD 9.2-{BETA2,RC1} which uses Sendmail-8.14.7.
If you try to send email from FreeBSD 9.2 in IPv4 network with MS DNS
you won't receive it.
But in same time email passes from
I tried to revert mentioned patch, i.e. applied this
--- sendmail/conf.c.orig2013-08-08 12:28:40.0 +0400
+++ sendmail/conf.c 2013-08-08 12:31:17.0 +0400
@@ -4294,12 +4294,7 @@
#else /* (SOLARIS 1 SOLARIS 20400) || (defined(SOLARIS)
SOLARIS 204) ||
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013, at 4:35, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
I tried to revert mentioned patch, i.e. applied this
--- sendmail/conf.c.orig2013-08-08 12:28:40.0 +0400
+++ sendmail/conf.c 2013-08-08 12:31:17.0 +0400
@@ -4294,12 +4294,7 @@
#else /* (SOLARIS 1 SOLARIS
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:26 PM, George Kontostanos wrote:
Hi list,
With a 9.1 system and the following:
/etc/sysctl.conf:
security.jail.mount_allowed=1
security.jail.mount_zfs_allowed=1
security.jail.enforce_statfs=1
zfs set jailed=on Pool
zfs jail 1 Pool
jexec 1 tcsh
jail1# zfs
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013, at 6:53, George Kontostanos wrote:
Anybody?
Can you provide your jail configuration? I think 9.2 introduces the new
/etc/jail.conf functionality and perhaps it somehow it broke the way you
were doing it previously? If so, the old method is supposed to be work
as well...
John Reynolds wrote:
About all you need to do is add a V4: ... line to your
/etc/exports
and then set nfsv4_server_enable=YES in /etc/rc.conf and reboot.
On the client mount, you need to add nfsv4 as a mount option.
I had to enable the proper daemons and mount on the client from the
On Thu, 8 Aug 2013 14:53+0300, George Kontostanos wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:26 PM, George Kontostanos wrote:
Hi list,
With a 9.1 system and the following:
/etc/sysctl.conf:
security.jail.mount_allowed=1
security.jail.mount_zfs_allowed=1
security.jail.enforce_statfs=1
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013, at 6:59, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
I'm just guessing, but I doubt a jail would be able to create new ZFS
filesystems outside its own structure, if at all able. A jail would
however be allowed to (un)mount already existing filesystems within
its own structure, i.e.
On Thu, 8 Aug 2013 07:05-0500, Mark Felder wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013, at 6:59, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
I'm just guessing, but I doubt a jail would be able to create new ZFS
filesystems outside its own structure, if at all able. A jail would
however be allowed to (un)mount already
On 08/08/2013 13:05, Mark Felder wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013, at 6:59, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
I'm just guessing, but I doubt a jail would be able to create new ZFS
filesystems outside its own structure, if at all able. A jail would
however be allowed to (un)mount already existing filesystems
On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 05:56:21 +0200, Michael Schuh
michael.sc...@gmail.com wrote:
H i@list,
i have a simple wuestion caused by a device loss.
is there a special routine for unplugging usb-storage devices?
in the meaning:
may be settle some commends before unplugging the device
other than
On 08/06/2013 14:23, J David wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Eric van Gyzen e...@vangyzen.net wrote:
on an otherwise idle amd64 system with 4 CPUs. The first command in the
build.log file:
rm -rf /usr/obj/home/freebsd/tmp
took over three minutes. It should have taken about
On 8 August 2013 05:56, Michael Schuh michael.sc...@gmail.com wrote:
ugen3.2: Verbatim at usbus3
umass0: Verbatim STORE N GO, class 0/0, rev 2.10/1.10, addr 2 on usbus3
umass0: SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks = 0x0100
umass0:8:0:-1: Attached to scbus8
da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 scbus8 target 0 lun
On 08/08/2013 09:19, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
On 08/06/2013 14:23, J David wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Eric van Gyzen e...@vangyzen.net wrote:
on an otherwise idle amd64 system with 4 CPUs. The first command in the
build.log file:
rm -rf /usr/obj/home/freebsd/tmp
took over
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 07:28:01PM +0200, free...@omnilan.de wrote:
Hello,
I went through my local patches against base/releng/, 9.2 in that case.
There are some fixes which are noct in 9.2-RC1:
- Regarding kerberized builds:
Hi,
I'm (successfully) using an ALFA AWUS036H usb wireless network adapter on
FreeBSD 9.1, with the urtw driver.
I can monitor networks (using Kismet or airodump-ng), but there is something I
can't do: inject packets to the device. And for one simple reason: this seems
not to be supported by
2013/8/8 Alban Hertroys haram...@gmail.com
On 8 August 2013 05:56, Michael Schuh michael.sc...@gmail.com wrote:
ugen3.2: Verbatim at usbus3
umass0: Verbatim STORE N GO, class 0/0, rev 2.10/1.10, addr 2 on usbus3
umass0: SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks = 0x0100
umass0:8:0:-1: Attached to scbus8
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Mark Felder f...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013, at 6:53, George Kontostanos wrote:
Anybody?
Can you provide your jail configuration? I think 9.2 introduces the new
/etc/jail.conf functionality and perhaps it somehow it broke the way you
were
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 08/08/2013 13:05, Mark Felder wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013, at 6:59, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
I'm just guessing, but I doubt a jail would be able to create new ZFS
filesystems outside its own structure, if at all
On Aug 8, 2013, at 9:04 AM, George Kontostanos wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Mark Felder f...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013, at 6:53, George Kontostanos wrote:
Anybody?
Can you provide your jail configuration? I think 9.2 introduces the new
/etc/jail.conf
Bezüglich Glen Barber's Nachricht vom 08.08.2013 16:50 (localtime):
...
- Regarding kerberized builds:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2011-April/043902.html
I'll take a look at this, but I do not see this change even committed to
head/ yet.
Thank you for your attention!
-
...
Can someone please have a look why this wasn't MFCd?
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=252653
Thanks,
-Harry
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 08.08.2013 01:46, Peter Wemm wrote:
I've run into this before. Our loader and kernel are excessively
pedantic about this.
gpart create -s gpt -n entries ...
leads to bootblocks or loader or kernel rejecting it if it is 128,
and some of the bootblocks reject it if it is 128.
As
On Thu, 8 Aug 2013 19:04+0300, George Kontostanos wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Mark Felder f...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013, at 6:53, George Kontostanos wrote:
Anybody?
Can you provide your jail configuration? I think 9.2 introduces the new
/etc/jail.conf
24 matches
Mail list logo
