I have just upgraded two virtual machines running on ESXi. They are i386
with 256Mb of RAM and one CPU, with just a few ports installed (sudo and
screen and dependencies). They don't do much job (low-traffic authoritative
nameservers for a dozen of domains). I upgraded by freebsd-update. I
The following is in my ntpd log.
...
27 Sep 23:06:40 ntpd[3045]: Listening on interface #67 wlan0,
fe80::21c:bfff:fe58:3a87#123 Enabled
27 Sep 23:06:49 ntpd[3045]: Listening on interface #68 wlan0, 172.17.2.154#123
Enabled
The system is sent to S3 at this point and woken 4 days later.
This is
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013, 19:55 +1000, John Marshall wrote:
Another data point: both systems on which I have seen this panic have
the ipmi driver compiled in. ipmi makes the BMC's watchdog timer
available to the system.
So, I decided to revert my source tree to a clean releng/9.2
(9.2-RELEASE) and
Hi all,
When I add an IPv6 manually on an interface vlan, I get a message
duplicated IP.
# ifconfig vlan2 inet6 2804:1054:0:2::1/64
dmesg message:
==
lagg1: IPv6 addresses on em2 have been removed before adding it as a
member to prevent IPv6 address scope violation.
lagg1: IPv6
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:01:26 +0200, Brett Glass br...@lariat.net wrote:
How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be? The improvements
are welcome, but there have been a few troubling messages about kernel
panics and VM issues on the various mailing lists. It's never clear
until
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 23:50:02 +0200, Charles Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
Hi--
On Sep 27, 2013, at 2:18 AM, Michael BlackHeart amdm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello there,
It's quite off-topic, but I'm using freebsd-stable,so
The priblem is - running a script that requires root privileges via PHP
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:23:16 +0200
From: David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 9.2-PRE: switch off that stupid Nakatomi Socrates
Message-ID: 5249c194.8030...@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 30.09.2013
Hi all,
How should I update config files in jails? I've always did it by running:
IGNORE_FILES='/boot/device.hints /etc/motd' mergemaster -PFUi -D
/path/to/jail
Now I'm getting *** FATAL ERROR: Unable to install ./boot/device.hints
to /path/to/jail/boot, so I assume that IGNORE_FILES is not
Due to trip to make, I will have to wait few days to
upgrade my nodes to 9.2 release. But, I'd like to learn
the easiest way to handle ports. Thanks to Matthew
Seaman, I will try out txz repos, when I find the
correct address for that. Otherwise, I assume portmaster
might do the job equally well.
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 01:12:38PM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
The system is sent to S3 at this point and woken 4 days later.
This is how it comes up:
27 Sep 23:07:03 ntpd[3045]: no servers reachable
27 Sep 23:19:54 ntpd[3045]: synchronized to 83.170.1.225, stratum 2
27 Sep 23:19:54
Am 01.10.2013 um 17:56 schrieb Łukasz Wąsikowski:
Hi all,
How should I update config files in jails? I've always did it by running:
IGNORE_FILES='/boot/device.hints /etc/motd' mergemaster -PFUi -D
/path/to/jail
Now I'm getting *** FATAL ERROR: Unable to install ./boot/device.hints
to
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 06:32:37PM +0200, Zoran Kolic wrote:
Due to trip to make, I will have to wait few days to
upgrade my nodes to 9.2 release. But, I'd like to learn
the easiest way to handle ports.
You don't have to recompile all ports when switching to a new _minor_ version.
Minor
I just started rolling out 9.2 to all our production machnes, which
are currently on 8.4. We have tested it pretty throughly internally
and are very happy with it, but as part of the deployment have hit
a problem. We have a pair of boxes running as a firewall using carp
and pfsync. One of the -
W dniu 2013-10-01 21:39, Kai Gallasch pisze:
Am 01.10.2013 um 17:56 schrieb Łukasz Wąsikowski:
Hi all,
How should I update config files in jails? I've always did it by running:
IGNORE_FILES='/boot/device.hints /etc/motd' mergemaster -PFUi -D
/path/to/jail
Now I'm getting *** FATAL ERROR:
On 2013/10/01 21:47, Pete French wrote:
I just started rolling out 9.2 to all our production machnes, which
are currently on 8.4. We have tested it pretty throughly internally
and are very happy with it, but as part of the deployment have hit
a problem. We have a pair of boxes running as a
15 matches
Mail list logo