Daniel Braniss wrote:
On 24 Aug 2015, at 10:22, Hans Petter Selasky h...@selasky.org wrote:
On 08/24/15 01:02, Rick Macklem wrote:
The other thing is the degradation seems to cut the rate by about half
each time.
300--150--70 I have no idea if this helps to explain it.
Might be
On 24-8-2015 16:01, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 03:49:52PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Hi,
In the previous version before Bapt upgraded pw(8) I was allowed to do
pw useradd -V /etc
Even though the manual page instructed otherwise.
The new version sticks to
Hi,
In the previous version before Bapt upgraded pw(8) I was allowed to do
pw useradd -V /etc
Even though the manual page instructed otherwise.
The new version sticks to the manual page and generates:
pw: illegal option -- V
I'm going to change the scripts, but perhaps others will be
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 03:49:52PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Hi,
In the previous version before Bapt upgraded pw(8) I was allowed to do
pw useradd -V /etc
Even though the manual page instructed otherwise.
The new version sticks to the manual page and generates:
pw:
On 24 Aug 2015, at 09:56 , Maurizio Vairani
maurizio.vair...@cloverinformatica.it wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to update an amd64 system. With the command:
# freebsd-update upgrade -r 10.2-RELEASE
I receive the error:
narrowed down a bit:
good: r285809
bad: r286380
Any hint to augment bisection?
Thanks
Anton
On 23/08/2015, Marcel Moolenaar mar...@xcllnt.net wrote:
On Aug 23, 2015, at 7:51 AM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk wrote:
I'm not sure if ia64 list is still operational, so
post here.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 01:53:52PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
narrowed down a bit:
good: r285809
bad: r286380
Any hint to augment bisection?
r285863
r285951
r285967
r286055
r286145
r286193
r286216
r286306
r286322
r286362
Thanks
Anton
On 23/08/2015, Marcel Moolenaar
Il 24/08/2015 14:14, Bjoern A. Zeeb ha scritto:
On 24 Aug 2015, at 09:56 , Maurizio Vairani
maurizio.vair...@cloverinformatica.it wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to update an amd64 system. With the command:
# freebsd-update upgrade -r 10.2-RELEASE
I receive the error:
On 24-8-2015 16:16, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 04:07:29PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
On 24-8-2015 16:01, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 03:49:52PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Hi,
In the previous version before Bapt upgraded pw(8) I was
On 24 August 2015 at 05:14, Bjoern A. Zeeb
bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net wrote:
please see the thread “freebsd-update to 10.2-RELEASE broken ?” on this
mailing list from this month; I think there is no solution yet.
The solution for me was to use a different DNS server on one of my
machines.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 04:07:29PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
On 24-8-2015 16:01, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 03:49:52PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Hi,
In the previous version before Bapt upgraded pw(8) I was allowed to do
pw useradd -V /etc
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015, jungle Boogie wrote:
On 24 August 2015 at 05:14, Bjoern A. Zeeb
bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net wrote:
please see the thread “freebsd-update to 10.2-RELEASE broken ?” on this mailing
list from this month; I think there is no solution yet.
The solution for me was to
On 08/20/15 at 12:57P, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote:
Hello!
I got silent data corruption when transferring data via em(4) interface on
10.2-STABLE r286912.
1. I got broken large file transferred via ftp (MD5 checksum mismatched);
2. I got disconnects when transferring large data via ssh with
On 08/24/15 01:02, Rick Macklem wrote:
The other thing is the degradation seems to cut the rate by about half each
time.
300--150--70 I have no idea if this helps to explain it.
Might be a NUMA binding issue for the processes involved.
man cpuset
--HPS
On 24 Aug 2015, at 10:22, Hans Petter Selasky h...@selasky.org wrote:
On 08/24/15 01:02, Rick Macklem wrote:
The other thing is the degradation seems to cut the rate by about half each
time.
300--150--70 I have no idea if this helps to explain it.
Might be a NUMA binding issue for the
On 24 Aug 2015, at 02:02, Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca wrote:
Daniel Braniss wrote:
On 22 Aug 2015, at 14:59, Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca wrote:
Daniel Braniss wrote:
On Aug 22, 2015, at 12:46 AM, Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca wrote:
Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
On Wed,
Hi,
I am trying to update an amd64 system. With the command:
# freebsd-update upgrade -r 10.2-RELEASE
I receive the error:
95101952019530195401955019560195701958019590
done.
Applying patches... done.
Fetching 13651 files...
Hello,
I'm trying to have jail with a public and a private IP address. Both
are on the same interface. The public is called 79.x.x.213 and private
10.4.3.6
Out from ifconfig within the jail is:
inet 79.x.x.213 netmask 0x broadcast 79.x.x.213
inet 10.4.3.6 netmask
I have '82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection' and see
strange:
# sysctl dev.ix.0 | grep interrupt_rate
dev.ix.0.queue7.interrupt_rate: 50
dev.ix.0.queue6.interrupt_rate: 50
dev.ix.0.queue5.interrupt_rate: 31250
dev.ix.0.queue4.interrupt_rate: 31250
Normally when jails are added their IPs are created as normal
aliases, so they'll get a /32 netmask when you don't specify. So
Depending on how you're creating the jail you'll need to specify the
netmask with the IP wherever you configure your jail. (You didn't
mention if you're using ezjail or
Hi,
Some hand-waving suggestions:
* if you're running something before 10.2, please disable IXGBE_FDIR
in sys/conf/options and sys/modules/ixgbe/Makefile . It's buggy and it
caused a lot of issues.
* It sounds like some extra latency is happening, so I'd fiddle around
with interrupt settings. By
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/20/15 02:57, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote:
Hello!
I got silent data corruption when transferring data via em(4)
interface on 10.2-STABLE r286912. 1. I got broken large file
transferred via ftp (MD5 checksum mismatched); 2. I got disconnects
What's strange about it? The interrupt rate only changes if traffic goes
out on the queue, and so if whatever applications you use don't utilize the
core the queue is bound to, then the interrupt rate won't change.
Or are you confused about the units? I know ixl(4) uses usecs instead of
Hz, so
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:13:05PM +, Eric Joyner wrote:
What's strange about it? The interrupt rate only changes if traffic goes
out on the queue, and so if whatever applications you use don't utilize the
core the queue is bound to, then the interrupt rate won't change.
Or are you
You may want to disable interrupt moderation and manually configure
interrupt rate per queue if you have high pps. I have had a lot of
headaches with ix driver and fixed it by manually setting interrupt
rates.
sysctl hw.ix.enable_aim=0
—
Babak
On 25 Aug 2015, at 2:47, Slawa Olhovchenkov
25 matches
Mail list logo
