Re: unbound and ntp issuse

2016-06-10 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 03:10:10PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Slawa Olhovchenkov writes: > > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 02:31:17PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > > >> Slawa Olhovchenkov writes: > >> > >> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 09:48:25AM -0400, Lowell

Re: unbound and ntp issuse

2016-06-10 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Lowell Gilbert < freebsd-stable-lo...@be-well.ilk.org> wrote: > Well, we know that is not the case, because in that case nearly everyone > would be having the problem. > That would be the point... maybe not "nearly everyone" although it is hard to be certain, but

Re: unbound and ntp issuse

2016-06-10 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Slawa Olhovchenkov writes: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 02:31:17PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > >> Slawa Olhovchenkov writes: >> >> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 09:48:25AM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> > >> >> Slawa Olhovchenkov writes: >> >>

Re: unbound and ntp issuse

2016-06-10 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:53:04PM +0100, krad wrote: > Pretty much every box requires some form of configuration so its a moot > point. IF you want automated deployment you will almost certainly be > building a pxe or prepreared usb/cd image of some sort. In which case you > include these

Re: unbound and ntp issuse

2016-06-10 Thread krad
Pretty much every box requires some form of configuration so its a moot point. IF you want automated deployment you will almost certainly be building a pxe or prepreared usb/cd image of some sort. In which case you include these settings in the deployed rc.conf. On 9 June 2016 at 14:37, Slawa