Re: GCC + FreeBSD 11.0 Stable - stat.h does not have vm_ooffset_t definition

2017-04-27 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On 04/27/2017 19:07, Patrick Powell wrote: > On 04/27/17 13:59, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> On 04/27/2017 12:45, Patrick Powell wrote: >>> On 04/26/17 09:34, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On 04/26/2017 10:14, Patrick Powell wrote: > First: a big thank-you to the support/fixit people for all of their work!

Re: GCC + FreeBSD 11.0 Stable - stat.h does not have vm_ooffset_t definition

2017-04-27 Thread Patrick Powell
On 04/27/17 13:59, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On 04/27/2017 12:45, Patrick Powell wrote: On 04/26/17 09:34, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On 04/26/2017 10:14, Patrick Powell wrote: First: a big thank-you to the support/fixit people for all of their work! I was doing some testing using FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE and

Re: GCC + FreeBSD 11.0 Stable - stat.h does not have vm_ooffset_t definition

2017-04-27 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On 04/27/2017 12:45, Patrick Powell wrote: > On 04/26/17 09:34, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> On 04/26/2017 10:14, Patrick Powell wrote: >>> First: a big thank-you to the support/fixit people for all of their work! >>> >>> I was doing some testing using FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE and some of my >>> configure

Re: GCC + FreeBSD 11.0 Stable - stat.h does not have vm_ooffset_t definition

2017-04-27 Thread Patrick Powell
On 04/26/17 09:34, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On 04/26/2017 10:14, Patrick Powell wrote: First: a big thank-you to the support/fixit people for all of their work! I was doing some testing using FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE and some of my configure scripts died. However, they were working fine on FreeBSD 11.0