On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 09:17:23AM -0500, Paul Mather wrote:
> I updated a system yesterday to the latest 12-STABLE as part of the upcoming
> 12-RELEASE cycle. I've installed several BETA and at least one RC of 12
> since updating from 11-STABLE as part of the 12 cycle and have had no
>
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:32 PM Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Somebody needs to make collection/submission automatic and make a port out
> of it, so that it's as easy as pkg install dmesg_survey &&
> dmesg_survey_enabled="YES" in the /etc/rc.conf. JIMHO. I'd gladly make it a
> default on all dev boxes
Somebody needs to make collection/submission automatic and make a port out
of it, so that it's as easy as pkg install dmesg_survey &&
dmesg_survey_enabled="YES" in the /etc/rc.conf. JIMHO. I'd gladly make it a
default on all dev boxes within our organization. Might also make a nice
SoC project
Yuri Pankov wrote:
> Warner Losh wrote:
>> Greetings
>>
>> a few weeks ago I pointed people to the nycbug dmesg service. I said I was
>> looking at data to drive SCSI retirement. I've gatherd some preliminary
>> data, which I've uploaded to
>>
On 11/24/18 9:47 AM, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> Is there any reason why bsdtar is built without XZ multi-threading support?
>
> It's not documented in the man page, so maybe it's an experimental feature.
>
> Can be tested with this command:
> tar -Jcf /dev/null --options xz:threads=4 $HOME
>
>
On 11/26/18 13:31, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 11/22/18 12:39 PM, Joe Clarke wrote:
>> I believe after the commit 340016 for the dynamic IRQ layout, my Xen VM
>> started to panic. I just upgraded the kernel today and saw this:
>>
>> xen: unable to map IRQ#2
>> panic: Unable to register interrupt
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:31:43AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 11/22/18 12:39 PM, Joe Clarke wrote:
> > I believe after the commit 340016 for the dynamic IRQ layout, my Xen VM
> > started to panic. I just upgraded the kernel today and saw this:
> >
> > xen: unable to map IRQ#2
> > panic:
On 11/22/18 12:39 PM, Joe Clarke wrote:
> I believe after the commit 340016 for the dynamic IRQ layout, my Xen VM
> started to panic. I just upgraded the kernel today and saw this:
>
> xen: unable to map IRQ#2
> panic: Unable to register interrupt override
> cpuid = 0
> KDB: stack backtrace:
>
On 26/11/2018 16:30, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Interesting, I too have noticed my one test box have the odd lockup. I
think it started around the BETA series. Is it possible something
"undid" one of the fixes ? I brought the box in question upto
12.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 12.0-PRERELEASE r340724 and
On 26/11/2018 16:28, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
My Ryzen has never run 11, but I have never seen a single problem on 12.
As you suggest, it's probably due to the particular hardware
combination. If updating the BIOS doesn't help, I agree that lowering
the memory clock is the best next step.
I
On 11/26/2018 11:25 AM, Pete French wrote:
> Foolwing up an old thread I know, but my ssystem ahs been pretty
> stable until recently, when it started locking up about one a week at
> least. This co-incided with me doing two things to it:
>
Interesting, I too have noticed my one test box have the
On 11/26/18 10:25 AM, Pete French wrote:
> Foolwing up an old thread I know, but my ssystem ahs been pretty stable
> until recently, when it started locking up about one a week at least.
> This co-incided with me doing two things to it:
>
> 1) Doubling the amount of RAM in it to 16 gig, using RAM
Foolwing up an old thread I know, but my ssystem ahs been pretty stable
until recently, when it started locking up about one a week at least.
This co-incided with me doing two things to it:
1) Doubling the amount of RAM in it to 16 gig, using RAM which runs a
bit faster than the original
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 06:56:29PM +0200, Sami Halabi wrote:
> HI,
> I went over the release notes and honestly I don't see what 12 brings new..
> I remember older versions were big change each in different aspect.. So
> what is 12-Rel unique aspect VS 11 let's say?
>
The release notes are in
Hi,
Would you be interested in an email leads from the below mentioned titles?
* Top IT Executives
* Top Finance Executives
* Top HR Executives
* Top Sales and Marketing Executives
* Doctors and Physicians
* Dentists
* Nurses
I'd be glad to send more than few example
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 21:09:18 +0700 Eugene Grosbein
wrote about Re: high cpu irq load and slow boot after update from 10.4 to
11.2:
> Try switching to "HPET" in both cases and do not wait for next disaster
> but do it right now with sysctl command, reboot is not needed.
> You can restore default
On 11/25/18 18:22, Richard M.Timoney wrote:
> I have the same failure to boot 11-stable as a DomU host on xen_version:
> 4.4.1
>
>
> Kernel I was trying was recent, FreeBSD 11.2-STABLE (GENERIC) #23
> r334205:340834
>
>
> commit 340016 for the dynamic IRQ layout seems rather involved and I
26.11.2018 20:14, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> Which settings would be recommended to try? This is what I have now:
>
> ---
> root@storage:~ # sysctl kern.timecounter.hardware
> kern.timecounter.hardware: TSC
>
> root@storage:~ # sysctl kern.timecounter.choice
> kern.timecounter.choice: ACPI-safe(850)
26.11.2018 15:49, Christian Ullrich wrote:
>>> 26.11.2018 1:26, Christian Ullrich wrote:
>>>
I'd really like to upgrade to 12. If anyone can suggest something I can
try, I'll be happy to do experiments.
>>>
>>> Try verbose boot (boot -v), collect pre-panic output and post it again.
>
>
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 19:34:43 +0700 Eugene Grosbein
wrote about Re: high cpu irq load and slow boot after update from 10.4 to
11.2:
> > Any ideas?
> Maybe this box has some clocking problems incompatible with tickless
> kernel.
Is there anything I could look out for in dmesg or similar to
26.11.2018 15:46, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> A couple of weeks ago, I updated an older storage server (2 CPUs, 4 cores
> each, 48GB RAM, 36x4GB HDDs, 3 LSI-based mps controllers) from 10.4 to
> 11.2. The first thing I noticed was that booting takes much longer now. The
> system probes each HDD (there
* Christian Ullrich wrote:
> * Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
>> 26.11.2018 1:26, Christian Ullrich wrote:
>>
>>> I'd really like to upgrade to 12. If anyone can suggest something I can
>>> try, I'll be happy to do experiments.
>>
>> Try verbose boot (boot -v), collect pre-panic output and post it
Hi all,
A couple of weeks ago, I updated an older storage server (2 CPUs, 4 cores
each, 48GB RAM, 36x4GB HDDs, 3 LSI-based mps controllers) from 10.4 to
11.2. The first thing I noticed was that booting takes much longer now. The
system probes each HDD (there are 36 of them, attached to mps
* Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 26.11.2018 1:26, Christian Ullrich wrote:
>
>> I'd really like to upgrade to 12. If anyone can suggest something I can
>> try, I'll be happy to do experiments.
>
> Try verbose boot (boot -v), collect pre-panic output and post it again.
This is from the 12-RC2
24 matches
Mail list logo
