On 7 January 2011 14:25, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> On 7 January 2011 08:16, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
>> When I said I recalled that they didn't do TCP because of excessive
>> overhead, I forgot to mention that my recollection could be wrong.
>> Also, I suspect you are correct w.r.t. the above state
On 30 January 2011 06:20, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> Hello lists,
>
>
>
> I'm trying to get FreeBSD 8.0 or 8.1 to run on a Dell poweredge r210 server.
>
> It ships with a SATA/SAS h200 RAID controller.
>
This card may need the mps(4) driver which is only in HEAD at the moment.
Andrew
On 11 April 2011 22:00, Denny Schierz wrote:
> hi,
>
> after testing severals loadbalancing (LACP) types with Cisco, we saw,
> that we never get more than 112MB/s with two network cards and iperf.
>
> So, we tested without loadbalancing, 4 Clients (iperf -f M -c ) and
> two target IPs. Every IP ha
On 29 April 2011 11:30, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:06:32PM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> > ===> usr.sbin/usbdump (all)
> > cc -O -pipe -std=gnu99 -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W
> -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
> -Wpo
On 17 October 2011 11:22, Brett Glass wrote:
> Any word regarding timing of FreeBSD 9.0-RC1? Building machines, and would
> like to build with at least a release candidate rather than a beta.
>
If you see this commit, it looks like the RC1 build is underway. I
would guess the isos will be out in
FYI, there is a bug in 8.2 for 256b keys and was fixed in 8.2-stable.
You may want to apply the fix if it causes you issues.
http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=155118
Andrew
On 8 March 2012 04:59, Karl Denninger wrote:
> Thanks; the machines in question are on 8.2, so this sounds prett
On 11 June 2012 08:48, David ROFFIAEN wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> On FreeBSD 9-stable (csup from today) with amd64 arch (only, no poblem with
> the same source on i386) kernel panic when removing member form the bridge :
> to reproduce :
>
> # ifconfig bridge0 create addm em0
> # ifconfig bridge0 delete
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 05:27:53PM +0100, Pete French wrote:
> I have a very odd problem here - two interfaces bundled using lagg
> in 'failover' mode, so one interface is active and the other not being
> used. if the carrier drops on the active one I expect it to
> failover, but it doesnt.
>
> ..
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 06:11:58PM +0100, Pete French wrote:
> > The bce driver is not properly generating link state events.
>
> OK, that explains why it doesnt failover - but why does looking at it
> with ifconfig make a difference ? surely that should be 'read only ?
ifconfig will cause the me
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 04:00:56PM +0200, Marian Hettwer wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 15:18:36 +0200 (CEST), Oliver Fromme
> >
> > Shouldn't that be considered a security flaw? After all,
> > you can perform "ifconfig $IF" inside a jail to list the
> > interface configuration, but
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 03:18:36PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Andrew Thompson wrote:
> > Pete French wrote:
> > > > The bce driver is not properly generating link state events.
> > >
> > > OK, that explains why it doesnt failover - but why does lo
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 12:37:15PM +0200, Marian Hettwer wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'm using lagg(4) on some of our servers and I'm just wondering how the
> failover is implemented.
> The manpage isn't quite clear:
>
> failover Sends and receives traffic only through the master port.
> If
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 09:24:30PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2008-Aug-12 18:55:52 +0800, Eugene Grosbein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 12:37:15PM +0200, Marian Hettwer wrote:
> >
> >> I'm using lagg(4) on some of our servers and I'm just wondering how the
> >> failover
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:32:46PM +0300, ??? ?? wrote:
> My UPS has a usb interface with USB-to-Serial chip.
> But ucycom driver doesn't recognize it.
> uhid driver does, but it doesn't help me, I need a virtual com port.
> (output below is without uhid loaded)
> What can I do to get it wo
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 09:38:30PM +, Bruce Simpson wrote:
> Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
>> Is it possible to have traceroute MFC'd for 7.1? I would like to have -a
>> and -A switchs (ASN Path mapping) available. Thank you :)
>>
>
> There's an AS lookup capable traceroute in ports:
>/usr/p
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 08:20:04PM +0100, Mikael Bak wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> This is my first post to this list.
> I'm not exactly new to freebsd but I have used GNU/Linux more.
>
> Last week I installed my first FreeBSD 7.1 machine. A base system with
> only mc, mysql and mydns-mysql packages. I i
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 05:47:24PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 10:38:51AM -0500, Andrew Lankford wrote:
> >
> > I can't say what version of the loader it is that I'm using, but
> > (following Peter's advice, thanks), I've tried loader.old (about a week
> > old) and the la
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 09:08:56PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 02:19:23PM -0500, Andrew Lankford wrote:
> > Andrew Thompson wrote:
> ...
> > >Having the following in /boot/loader.conf triggers it for me,
> > >
> > > loader_conf_file
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:30:26PM -0800, Jeffrey Williams wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Thanks for kern.hz suggestion, but according loader.conf in the
> /boot/defaults directory, kern.hz is already set to 100, is this overridden
> somewhere else?
>
Thats a bit misleading, the commented out value isn
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:29:58PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> hi,
>
> Previously, the check for new assignments was incorrect, and it happened
> to ignored assignments which did not result in a buffer reallocation
> by the Forth interpreter (essentially, any string not longer
> than the current o
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:15:30PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 08:20:53PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
> > On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 10:30:01AM +0100, Pete French wrote:
> > > > I assume SCSI is the best path forward (either SA/SCSI or traditional)
> > > > but
> > > > have
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 03:44:06PM +0100, Pete French wrote:
> Having recently discovered if_lagg in stable I have spent the last couple
> of days experimentsin with this and using it to aggregate connections between
> a pair of servers and a pair of Cisco switches. It all appears to be
> functioni
Hi,
I have a box that does a ipv6 6in4 connection to my tunnel broker that
is having issues.
FreeBSD v6gw.fud.org.nz 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Wed Jun 6
19:16:50 NZST 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/nanobsd.full/usr/
home/thompsa/scratch/nanobsd/src/sys/CONTIVITY i386
fxp0: flags=8843
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 10:48:31PM +0300, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I csup /usr/src to patch my sysem per on
> http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-07:05.libarchive.asc
>
> bscause freebsd-update faild.
>
> Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 1 mirrors fou
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 03:15:17AM +0400, Alexey Karagodov wrote:
> is there any progress?
> just one "me too"
>
> this problem appeared for me when i try to use vlan over lagg ( to em NICs
> )
lagg on RELENG_6 is currently broken due to subtle differences that
wernt taken into account when it wa
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 01:02:06AM +0100, Pete French wrote:
> > All zeros! very interesting - am surprised the switch didn't kick up
> > a fuss about that. Well, patch applied and rebooting...
>
> ...and now all my outgoing packets have the correct MAC address as expected
> on them. I alos notic
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 10:42:21PM +0400, Alexey Karagodov wrote:
> patch did not help ...
>
> ifconfig:
>
>
> lagg0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
>inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0x broadcast 10.0.255.255
>inet 10.0.0.2 netmask 0x broadcast 10.0.255.255
>ether XX:XX:XX:XX:X
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 12:54:30PM +0100, Pete French wrote:
> > lagg on RELENG_6 is currently broken due to subtle differences that
> > wernt taken into account when it was MFCd. Can you please test this
> > patch.
>
> Erp! Do you have any mor einfo on tyhis - what kinds of things does
> this bre
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 06:51:17PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
> At 02:36 AM 10/30/2007, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
>
> >Hello Brett,
> >
> >ng_nat is part of 6-STABLE
>
>
> I'd also be interested in seeing the latest version of
> bridge(4) brought in.
Its fully up to date in RELENG_6 except for
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 02:14:47PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
> At 01:43 PM 10/31/2007, Andrew Thompson wrote:
>
> >> I'd also be interested in seeing the latest version of
> >> bridge(4) brought in.
> >
> >Its fully up to date in RELENG_6 except for
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 08:35:16AM -0800, Colin Percival wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
> > The 7.0-BETA3 builds are now available. If you would like to download
> > an ISO image to install from they are available here:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases//ISO-IMAGES/7.0/
> >
> > (ad
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:15:04PM +, Hugo Silva wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Just wanted to report another issue with BETA4 on my laptop.
>
> The wireless connection is "working" without encryption (interface goes up
> and down every few minutes, but at least I don't lose any connections, so
> i
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 05:11:24AM -0500, Robert Noland wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 14:35 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > > >I also have a similar device, which I've been messing with a bit the
> > > >last couple of days. In your case, it isn't seei
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 02:57:42PM -0700, Matthew Fleming wrote:
> I am interested in using uart(4) instead of sio(4) on stable/7, to ease
> our eventual transition to stable/8 or CURRENT. I added device uart and
> changed up /boot/device.hints (there were no entries in /etc/ttys that
> mentioned
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 11:04:16AM -0400, Raymond Owens wrote:
> I am running 6.1 release on some systems. I have a question about the
> bridging changes in if_bridge.c which were made in the stable branch.
> I am having a problem bonding two heavily loaded network interfaces
> for IDS purposes. Th
Hi,
I would quite like to MFC the autobridge feature but it depends on this
change, http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2006-May/064529.html
I cant see it being a problem MFCing this to stable as the existing devd
announcement still exists, it just adds another that includes pseudo ones
t
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 01:28:12PM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
> Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> >
> > Oh? Sounds interesting, where can I find these patches?
>
> The work has always been in perforce.freebsd.org; look in the sam_wifi
> branch. The code will not hit head until folks show up to fix le
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 12:15:25PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:58:44PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:54:19AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:23:13AM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ouch. Don't ppp(8), Ope
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 01:45:45PM -0800, Ask Bj?rn Hansen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> bootmgr hangs on the PC Engines WRAP board.
>
> It's been brought up before on the small@ list (IIRC), but with no
> solution.
>
> It hangs just after
>
> "1 FreeBSD
> 2 FreeBSD"
>
Have you set the bootloader t
On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 01:49:57AM +0100, Norbert Augenstein wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> i just want to note that after updating to RC1 /boot/loader
> still refuses to boot with Grub. -> endless rebooting
> chainloading works though, fortunately.
>
> dhclient shows a similar be
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 10:00:57PM -0700, Brett Glass wrote:
> I see that there is no scheduled release date for FreeBSD 5.4
> (which is not a surprise; 5.3 was finalized so recently).
> However, there seem to be glitches and performance issues
> which I need to see resolved before I can move to 5.
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 08:02:11AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> I've just noticed an number of unpexected "IP address changed MAC"
> messages on one of the hosts in my network. It is connected via a
> FreeBSD bridge to the rest of my network (there aren't enuf network
> ports in my son's bedroom).
Hi,
I have a patch here to MFC the rstp code to RELENG_6. It should be all
fine and dandy as for API but will cause the default spanning tree
version to change from stp to rstp.
Is it ok to change the protocol version for the STABLE users (rstp is
backwards compatable with stp) or should it sti
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 08:24:14AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Andrew Thompson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >I have a patch here to MFC the rstp code to RELENG_6. It should be all
> >fine and dandy as for API but will cause the default spanning tree
> >
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 08:33:27PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> In the midst of the madness, I found that when doing either of the
> following commands...
>
> ifconfig bridge0 addm em1
> ifconfig bridge0 deletem em1
>
> ...I see the entire em1 interface completely reset, bringing down link
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 03:30:45PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 09:37:09AM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 08:33:27PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > In the midst of the madness, I found that when doing either of the
> &
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 11:41:01PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 12:30:58AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > 'k, but how do I fix kill so that it has the proper behaviour if SysV is
> > enabled?
>
> Check the source, perhaps there's already a way. If not, talk to
> whoe
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 01:23:59AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> taking it off of pgsql-hackers, so that we don't annoy them unnecessarily
> ...
>
> 'k, looking at the code, not that most of it doesn't go over my head ...
> but ...
>
> in kern/kern_jail.c, I can see the prison_check() cal
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 01:57:17AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Andrew Thompson wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 01:23:59AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >>
> >>in kern/kern_jail.c, I can see the prison_check() call ... wouldn't on
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 04:15:10PM +0400, Yuriy Tsibizov wrote:
> I run a 6.1-RC (as of Apr, 14th) and after a day nothing can be sent from em
> interface.
>
> It is a filtering+accounting bridge-on-a-stick, with em interface
> connected to 3Com Switch 4200 100Mbit (not Gbit) port with 4 tagged
>
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 01:20:24PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
> Well, y'know, if they could release a FreeBSD 2.2.9 (as was done last month),
> it
> shouldn't be a problem to do a 4.12 release as a "last gasp" to tide us over
> until September. (Hopefully, Colin and the "summer of code" folks can
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:18:12PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> This looks like a pretty fundamental problem with the aue driver.
>
I have a patch attached that will hopefully fix it. I dont have the
hardware so anyone with an aue adapter please test.
> Scott Ullrich wrote:
>
> >Sleeping on "usb
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:53:30AM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> Hi
>
> I find some problems when running ath cards in if_bridge mode.
>
> I have continuous UP/DOWN events on the uplink card. The connection is really
> interrupted for a second or so which results in dns lookup errors
> downloads are g
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 07:34:43PM -0300, User Freebsd wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Robert Watson wrote:
> >On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, User Freebsd wrote:
> >
> >>'k, now that I'm up to 3 6-STABLE servers that are deadlocking, I'm
> >>spending time with the remote tech today to get a serial console put
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:03:20AM +0100, Imobach Gonz?lez Sosa wrote:
> El dom, 29-05-2005 a las 14:27 -0700, Kris Kennaway escribi??:
> >
> > This kind of thing is often caused by duplex mismatch on your NIC.
>
> Ok, I've been playing around with media options (10/100, full and half
> duplex) b
Hi,
You can find the patch here
http://people.freebsd.org/~thompsa/if_bridge-5stable.diff
1) Apply the patch
# cd /usr; patch -p0 < if_bridge-5stable.diff
2) Add 'device if_bridge' to your kernel config (or use the module)
3) Do the "buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, installworld
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 07:50:44PM +0200, Niki Denev wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a small machine setup to act as simple network gateway.
> I have one wireless and one wired interfaces without IP configuration
> on them, and they are added as if_b
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 10:36:56AM +, James Seward wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to deploy a FreeBSD6 machine using if_bridge and pf to
> provide some protection for our Windows servers ;)
>
> During testing it seemed to work fine, but in production it panics frequently.
>
> When I came in
Hi,
I have a Cisco Aironet 350 wireless card which I am using in my FreeBSD
laptop. It works well except for the monitor mode, if I type the
follwoing commands the laptop will reset itself (no kernel panic, goes
straight to the post startup).
< insert card >
ancontrol -i an0 -M 3
ifconfig a
Yann Golanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoth Jon on Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 13:27:28 +0100
> > Anyone else have a problem with phoenix 0.4_4 built from ports today? It
> > compiled ok, and executes, but is unable to produce any window before it
> > terminates 15 sec later.
>
> I've tried to co
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 12:49, Andrew C Bergman wrote:
> I have a C3 800 running at home, it works like a charm.
>
> I'm running 5.0-DP2 on it, simply so the PCI pcmcia cradle + wireless card I have
> would be detected and work.
>
> 4.6-R, 4.7 release and stable, and 5.0-dp2 all work a charm on it
ian j hart wrote:
On Saturday 01 February 2003 1:38 am, Andrew Thompson wrote:
Crist J. Clark wrote:
Thanks everyone for your help,
The bit I was having trouble with was doing two transparent proxies
depending if the user had logged in or not, one to squid, the other to a
static page
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 19:56, Oldach, Helge wrote:
> From: Mike Tancsa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Any chance someone can look at / commit the fix in PR 52349 before 4.9R ?
> > Its a simple fix.
>
> But unfortunately it breaks code that parses the output of netstat and
> relies on a fixed format,
Hi,
I have a 4.8 RELEASE server that I use to graph our wan links with
cacti/rrdtool.
Occasionally one of the wan links may go down so the main router removes
the route to that site (ospf). That means that when cacti goes to poll a
device on that subnet it is redirected to the main routers def
64 matches
Mail list logo
