FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p3 amd64
/usr/bin/gcc -O1 -pipe -march=nocona -DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE
-I/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl
-I/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto
-I/files3/build/obj/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto -DOPENSSL_THREADS
-DOPENSSL_NO_IDEA
On Fri, September 29, 2006 10:09, Colin Percival wrote:
Christer Solskogen wrote:
/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_err.
c
/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_err.
c:81:
error: `DH_R_MODULUS_TOO_LARGE' undeclared here
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 05:30:05 -0700
Colin Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christer Solskogen wrote:
I've tried norway's mirror (my default), the danish, the swedish
mirror and the mirror in holland. No change.
Just to be sure I also deletet src/crypto before I tried the
different
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:27:55 -0700
security [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christer Solskogen wrote:
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 05:30:05 -0700
Colin Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you mean using different mirrors? I'm using a supfile for that.
But if you mean building I used 'make
Hi!
I got myself a mainboard with the ICH7 chipset. This chipset is supported
in FreeBSD, but on my board it had a problem. It found only 2 of my four
disks (ad0 and ad2) I tried updating to 6.0-stable (from 6.0-release) but
the problem resist.
I found a patch at bsdforums that did indeed work.
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:38 AM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Howdy,
Great work, Doug! Thanks.
--
chs
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Colin free...@southportcomputers.co.uk wrote:
Anyone got any pointers?
Could you post your /etc/make.conf?
That said, I recon you build your kernel in a rather wierd way. Delete
/usr/obj/* and run make cleandir make cleandir in /usr/src. Then
build your world
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Miroslav Lachman 000.f...@quip.cz wrote:
System is booted from 2GB internal USB flash
Be aware that not all USB sticks work as a root device on 8.0-RELEASE.
I've tried a couple of different sticks
that is probed *after* the kernel tries to mount /. It seems to be
I have a machine which works as a prison for a couple of jails. That
particular machine has its /usr/ports, /usr/ports/distfiles, and
/usr/ports/packages mounted via NFS from another FreeBSD machine. The
machine that crases also nullmounts those filesystems into each jail.
I'm not completly sure
My load on my i7 920 is certainly higher when I add a 8GB usb stick as
a ZFS cache device.
It seems to use about 10% system load - If I remove the cache device
it drops about 10%. Anyone else seeing this?
With cache device:
CPU: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 10.3% system, 0.0% interrupt, 91.5% idle
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Brian Reichert reich...@numachi.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:50:50PM +0100, Christer Solskogen wrote:
My load on my i7 920 is certainly higher when I add a 8GB usb stick as
a ZFS cache device.
USB 1.0? 2.0? Dunno even if that would make a difference
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
You can easily test it - use the stick as a simple disk device with UFS and
see how much CPU does it take simply to talk to the device.
See, that is why I think it is a ZFS issue. Because I did that.
I created a UFS
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Alexander Leidinger
alexan...@leidinger.net wrote:
How do you measure that nothing is read or written to it?
I used zpool iostat -v
Please check with
gstat -f '^DEVICE$'
if there are really no reads/writes to the device (please replace DEVICE
with the name
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Ollivier Robert
robe...@keltia.freenix.fr wrote:
According to Christer Solskogen:
See, that is why I think it is a ZFS issue. Because I did that.
I created a UFS filesystem on the same usb stick. Mounted it and did a
dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/file
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Alexander Leidinger
alexan...@leidinger.net wrote:
Quoting Christer Solskogen christer.solsko...@gmail.com (from Tue, 16 Nov
2010 14:00:48 +0100):
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Alexander Leidinger
alexan...@leidinger.net wrote:
How do you measure
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
sysctl -a | grep vfs.zfs.arc
sysctl -a | grep vm.kmem
sysctl kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats
$ sysctl -a | grep vfs.zfs.arc
vfs.zfs.arc_meta_limit: 1342177280
vfs.zfs.arc_meta_used: 1319657696
vfs.zfs.arc_min: 671088640
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
Since you're running 8.1-RELEASE, can you please test this issue on
RELENG_8 (8.1-STABLE) and see if it exists there?
Sure, I could do that. 8.2-RELEASE isn't that far away, is it? But I
think that Alexander
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Christer Solskogen
christer.solsko...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Yesterday I installed 8.1-RELEASE on another machine, made a zpool and
added the same usb device as cache. That machine does not have same
issue as my other machine.
--
chs
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Christer Solskogen
christer.solsko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Christer Solskogen
christer.solsko...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Yesterday I installed 8.1-RELEASE on another machine, made a zpool and
added the same usb device as cache
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Christer Solskogen
christer.solsko...@gmail.com wrote:
Will try to reboot server now to se if that has any impact.
It seems to have solved it. At least temporary.
--
chs,
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Matthew Seaman
m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/05/2010 11:40:23, Stefan Bethke wrote:
For the record: I'm now running -stable as of last night, compiled
without issue on ZFS filesystems throughout.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
# Set TXG write limit to a lower threshold. This helps level out
# the throughput rate (see zpool iostat). A value of 256MB works well
# for systems with 4GB of RAM, while 1GB works well for us w/ 8GB on
#
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
Is the procedure for creating new FreeBSD memstick images documented
anywhere?
I'm not sure if its documented but this is how I do it:
(edit /etc/make.conf and /etc/src.conf if necessary)
make buildworld make
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:27 PM, George Kontostanos
gkontos.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Just out of curiosity or confusion maybe..
Will those commits be included to FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE ?
Almost certain of it, since releng/9.0-branch yet has to be created.
--
chs,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.com wrote:
FreeBSD currently have very obscure, closed community. To get in touch, you
need to subscribe to several mail lists, constantly read them, I've just
found recently (my shame of course) in mail list that there is
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
As long as I have reliable checksums that match the what the upstream source
says is the real thing, it doesn't practically matter where I get my images
from.
Checksums compared to what? How would you know what the
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
Release engineering for FreeBSD produces SHA256 checksums for all
official releases. AFAIK though they're only in the announcement emails and
not stored anywhere else.
I can't speak for OpenBSD's release
Hi!
I have a zpool called data, and I have some inconsistencies with sizes.
$ zpool iostat
capacity operationsbandwidth
poolalloc free read write read write
-- - - - - - -
data3.32T 761G516 50 56.1M
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Christer Solskogen
christer.solsko...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Ups, I forgot to say that this is on FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE and all
filesystems are v28.
--
chs,
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Shawn Webb latt...@gmail.com wrote:
The `zpool` command does not show all the overhead from ZFS. The `zfs`
command does. That's why the `zfs` command shows less available space
than the `zpool` command.
A overhead of almost 300GB? That seems a bit to much,
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Tom Evans tevans...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Christer Solskogen
christer.solsko...@gmail.com wrote:
A overhead of almost 300GB? That seems a bit to much, don't you think?
The pool consist of one vdev with two 1,5TB disks and one
Cross-building went fine (buildworld, buildkernel), but making the
USB-image seems to not work (At least on my system)
make release TARGET=powerpc TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64
__MAKE_CONF=/dev/null SRCCONF=/dev/null NOPORTS=1 NOSRC=1
...
sh /usr/src/release/powerpc/make-memstick.sh
Is it still broken? I get jail: unknown parameter: allow.nomount
when starting a newly created jail. It was supposed to be fixed, but
something might reintroduced it?
ref. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165515
--
chs,
___
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello list,
Why are /usr/include files installed with install -C during make
installworld when almost everything else is installed without the -C
flag? This makes it harder to track which files were actually
installed
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
You don't need to do those last 2 steps below if you mv /usr/include
right before you do 'make installworld', FYI.
You are completely right.
--
chs,
___
On 4/6/2012 10:53 AM, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
Hi,
After upgrading to RELENG_9 as of yesterday on my amd64 system, cvsup
bombs out with Bus error: 10.
Why use cvsup, when you've got csup? :-)
--
chs
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no wrote:
OriS site.free...@orientalsensation.com writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no writes:
On an amd64 system, you should just set it to 0.
Well, maybe it'd be a good idea to set it to 0 on amd64 systems for
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Shiv. Nath
prabh...@digital-infotech.net wrote:
Dear FreeBSD Guys,
It is FreeBSD Release 9.0 x64 and i see this log very frequent almost every
second, And i want to block this IP from reaching my server. i configured
the PF as following but still see the same
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote:
For most of the failures, we are already aware of them, as a result of
our periodic runs. So, just filing a PR to say broken on clang doesn't
really help us all that much.
I disagree. Just a tiny bit ;-)
If the PR
Now that FreeBSD-13 is branched, is there a way of "following" that
branch on a Pi by upgrading from binaries instead of
buildworld/buildkernel? I know that freebsd-update exists, but that
can't be used AFAIK.
--
chs
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
40 matches
Mail list logo
