On Aug 27, 2007, at 1:08 PM, gareth wrote:
hey guys, for over a month i haven't been able to get a copy of the
portaudit db. no-one else seems to be having this problem.
this's what happens:
# portaudit -F
auditfile.tbz 100% of 43 kB 1045
kBps
portaudit:
On Aug 21, 2007, at 12:50 PM, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
I found this while trying to migrate groups into LDAP, but you don't
need LDAP to reproduce this, simply place the following in /etc/group
wheel:*:0:root
wheel:*:0:us
That's a misconfiguration. From man 5 group:
The group field is the
On Aug 21, 2007, at 2:02 PM, Richard Foulkes wrote:
Ok, so how are you supposed to control membership of the wheel
group via ldap? Ok, you COULD remove the local wheel entry in /etc/
group, but this would probably be a bad idea if the ldap server
were unavailable.
You've aptly summarized
On Jul 23, 2007, at 7:10 AM, Oliver Fromme wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
server 0.de.pool.ntp.org minpoll 4 maxpoll 8
server 1.de.pool.ntp.org minpoll 4 maxpoll 8
server 2.de.pool.ntp.org minpoll 4 maxpoll 8
server ntp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de minpoll 4 maxpoll 8
server
On Jul 23, 2007, at 12:22 PM, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
I wish to second what Oliver has said, only more strongly: using
minpoll 4 is considered abusive and a misuse of the NTP pool. From
http://www.pool.ntp.org/use.html
That was only for testing.
Please use your own timeservers for testing, not
On Jul 12, 2007, at 12:34 PM, Stephen Clark wrote:
Did something change in 6.2? If my mtu size on rl0 is 1280 it won't
accept a larger incoming packet.
Nothing changed; that is the expected behavior.
(Modulo support for 4-byte VLAN tags.)
kernel: rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type 800
On Jul 12, 2007, at 1:38 PM, Stephen Clark wrote:
The MTU is actually defined in reference to a network segment such
as an ethernet collision domain, and applies to all machines
sending traffic to that segment. If the MTU is really 1280,
nobody else should be sending larger packets, and
On Jun 11, 2007, at 10:46 AM, Kevin K. wrote:
There are some problems, first DDoS (hardware DDoS) in the system.
I'd like to know what you mean by hardware DDoS
I'm not sure what the OP meant, but I can provide examples of a
hardware DDoS.
Way back when, certain machines were equipped
On Jun 11, 2007, at 1:57 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 04:54 PM 6/11/2007, Chuck Swiger wrote:
this unfortunate event by reordering instructions if needed, but if
you wrote your own assembly, you could in fact do a hardware DDoS if
you weren't careful. :-)
Hi,
I thought DDoS
On May 22, 2007, at 12:03 PM, Olivier Mueller wrote:
So I can only do that after the installation of mysql50-client, which
means all the services will have to be stopped during the
compilation of
mysql50-server, which usually takes some time.
Isn't there a better way? How do you handle such
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
[ ... ]
okay, next question ... under 'Active UNIX domain sockets, I see alot that have
no Addr:
Active UNIX domain sockets
Address Type Recv-Q Send-QInode Conn Refs Nextref Addr
d06b7480 stream 0 00 c969b24000
On Mar 26, 2007, at 11:19 AM, Marten wrote:
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 13:53 -0700, Joe Kelsey wrote:
I am having a real hard time with gmirror. I recently bought two new
400G SATA disks and I want to mirror them. I think I am following
the
directions, but I am not sure.
I have seen lockups,
On Mar 22, 2007, at 4:17 PM, Michael Schuh wrote:
i can't understand how malloc can eat all available
memory, i have 2Gigs of it ;-)
so it seems to me i know what i doing, if
i have 1,6 Gigs free Memory, and i say ok get me 750Megs from
my 1,6 Gigs of free Memory, what was faulty on that
On Mar 21, 2007, at 1:31 PM, Claus Guttesen wrote:
Hi.
Probably a bit premature but has anyone used zfs on FreeBSD without
problems. The reason I ask is that I have installed Solaris 10 on an
intel-box, but adding additional programs is *not* as easy as
'portinstall postfix' etc. on FreeBSD. So
Hi, Kevin--
On Mar 13, 2007, at 1:14 PM, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
ntpd won't continue running on my stratum 2 server (making our
other systems a tad untrustworthy as time goes by).
$ uname -a
FreeBSD ezekiel.daleco.biz 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #5: Sat
Jan 20 16:41:42 CST 2007 [EMAIL
On Mar 13, 2007, at 3:46 PM, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
The ktrace is on ntpd -C /etc/ntp.conf -l $HOME/ntp.log --- I'd
seen nothing at all in /var/log/messages (was running tail on it
while restarting it several times), so I pointed it there. The
full ktrace is rather long, any point to posting
On Mar 8, 2007, at 9:24 PM, Eric Anderson wrote:
[ ... ]
Dunno. I was merely trying to keep things honest, since what was
communicated (whether intended or not) was that a C3 isn't modern,
and is akin to a Pentium, which it isn't.
I've got a VIA C3 Samuel myself, and it is fine for what it
On Mar 9, 2007, at 11:34 AM, Eric Anderson wrote:
I've got a VIA C3 Samuel myself, and it is fine for what it is,
which is a low-power clone of the Pentium-MMX in terms of
capabilities; the newer C3 Nehemiah is roughly comparable to a
P2, plus SSE and the extra AES/RNG crypto stuff. Look
Jeffrey Williams wrote:
[ ... ]
My only concern, and what I was hoping to get more information on, is
whether there are any potential problems with having two active ethernet
interfaces on the same network segment, e.g. arp issues, etc.
The problem you are going to run into is that the
On Jan 24, 2007, at 4:32 AM, Ilia Gorstkin wrote:
I'm having trouble with arp:
arp: unknown hardware address format (0x4500)
and
arp: unknown hardware address format (0x4242)
these messages fall on the console in a plenty.
I do tcpdump -exn arp[0]=0x45 and arp[1]=0:
tcpdump: verbose output
On Jan 10, 2007, at 1:53 PM, Jeffrey Williams wrote:
Can someone point to documentation for all the make targets in used
in the /usr/src/Makefile. I am not looking for full documentation
of each target, once I narrow down what targets I want I can get
what need by walking the make files,
On Jan 10, 2007, at 9:34 AM, George Hartzell wrote:
I'm setting up a Dell Poweredge 750 1U server. A friend is loaning me
space in his rack and since his rack usage is limited by power I'd
like to be as thrifty as possible.
I hooked my kill-a-watt meter up and ran the machine for a couple of
Doug Barton wrote:
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi--
I had named segfault a day or so ago under high load (adnslogres -c
200 against a webserver logfile) after logging the following:
Hard to tell if your problem here is related to running on 5.5 or not,
but of course recommendation number one
Hi--
I had named segfault a day or so ago under high load (adnslogres -c 200
against a webserver logfile) after logging the following:
[ ... ]
Dec 28 03:38:56 daemon.notice pi named[1853]: enforced delegation-only for
'AR' (ctina.ar/A/IN) from 137.39.1.3#53
Dec 28 03:40:20 daemon.notice pi
On Dec 1, 2006, at 2:14 AM, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
Hello!
Hi...
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Chuck Swiger wrote:
http://www.ssh.com/support/downloads/secureshellserver/non-
commercial.html
contains both download URLs and Non-commercial license agreement
for SSH Secure Shell for Servers link
On Dec 1, 2006, at 1:49 PM, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Chuck Swiger wrote:
And I didn't say that it's the OSI Open Source. I wrote (which
is also open-source), not even Open Source. So I didn't mean
that you can just copypaste their sources into OpenSSH. [ ... ]
I'd
On Nov 30, 2006, at 11:10 AM, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
Is it really open-source? I couldn't find any reference to source
downloads or licensing terms on http://www.ssh.com/. It mentions
OpenSSH
as an open-source alternative.
Well, security/ssh2 port builds all binaries from sources
On Nov 27, 2006, at 8:41 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
As far as I know, that's not different from calling sync
just once. It might make more sense to put a little sleep
between the sync calls, though.
The traditional mantra was
sync
sync
sync
and not sync;sync;sync. The reason was timing. By
Russell Jackson wrote:
[ ... ]
pnpbios: Bad PnP BIOS data checksum
Did you notice this? Try reflashing your motherboard to the latest available
BIOS revision, doing a load defaults, and then clearing and reseting the ESCD.
--
-Chuck
___
Greg Black wrote:
[ ... ]
Dunno about PAE on i386 (and don't much care). As it happens,
my amd64 box is hardly higher end, but it has slots for 4GB and
its doco claims that it can run with 4GB. However, to my great
displeasure, I discovered after setting it up that both its BIOS
and any OS I
On Oct 25, 2006, at 3:39 PM, Freek Nossin wrote:
Then I tried Carl's advice and bought a 80-connector cable. And
amazingly
enough... It worked!
But I wonder, why is FreeBSD so picky about it? My previous Windows
installation did not itch a bit. And should this not be documented
anywhere
On Oct 23, 2006, at 4:01 PM, Mike Jakubik wrote:
I am in the process of implementing a fairly large mysql server
for an even larger company, and naturally i want to use FreeBSD.
The hardware will be an HP DL385, 2 x dual-core Opterons, 16GB
RAM, 7 x 15k rpm disks in a RAID5 setup. I'm not
On Oct 23, 2006, at 4:44 PM, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Moderately...it kinda depends on the budget available. I regard
Solaris + Oracle as one of the most reliable combinations for
moderate to extreme load, for a system that might well be in
operation for five to ten years. If I was going to do
On Oct 19, 2006, at 9:39 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
do folk actually successfully upgrade
# uname -a
FreeBSD psg.com 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #15: Sun Oct 1
18:41:24 GMT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PSG i386
to RELENG_6 *safely* on a many-user production system using
On Oct 18, 2006, at 1:07 PM, Andresen, Jason R. wrote:
Ok, I have a recurring problem with my webserver. Once a day or so it
gets locked into a loop with some random server usually somewhere
in my
ISP. When it does this, it spends all of its time spitting out
packets
and getting FIN, ACKs
On Oct 12, 2006, at 2:11 PM, Scott Ullrich wrote:
We (pfSense developers) have noticed an interesting problem where
userland stops functioning under high packet forwarding workloads.
Userland applications such as sshd and lighttpd freeze but userland
resumes after the network load eases.
[
On Oct 6, 2006, at 1:11 PM, Dominik Zalewski wrote:
I just want to capture all smtp/pop3 traffic in packets level.
OK:
tcpdump -w /var/log/mailarchive.dump -s 0 port smtp or port pop3
But be aware that you should disclose the existence of this mail
monitoring to all users, consult your
On Sep 13, 2006, at 9:42 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
-funroll-loops is as likely to decrease performance for a particular
program as it is to help.
Isn't the compiler intelligent enough to have a reasonable
limit, N, of the loops it will unroll to ensure a faster runtime?
On Sep 13, 2006, at 11:15 AM, Gary Kline wrote:
Well, after this lengthy discussion, I've switched to -RELEASE.
-STABLE just ain't... We all realize that none of us would
put out a buggy release--not even -CURRENT. But let me ask
the next obvious question. How
On Sep 13, 2006, at 4:49 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
A couple of things. Will having gcc unroll loops have any
negative consequences?
Yes, it certainly can have negative consequences. The primary intent
of using that option is to change a loop from executing the test or
control
On Aug 23, 2006, at 12:00 PM, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
I compiled net/krb5 today on my 6.1-STABLE machine. As I tried to
initialize Kerberos with '/usr/local/bin/kinit User@Domain I
got the following error:
kinit in free(): error: junk pointer, too high to make sense
Abort trap: 6
On Aug 23, 2006, at 4:41 PM, Greg Byshenk wrote:
As a possible point of clarification, my comments earlier (and, I
suspect similar comments of others) were not meant to imply that one
should not rebuild ports after a major upgrade, but only that one need
not do so _before_ upgrading.
On Aug 22, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Todorov @ Paladin wrote:
[ ... ]
How to find which is dynamically using libs and which application
is not?
You can use ldd.
In practice, however, pretty much all software nowadays depends on
shared libraries, so it's reasonable to do a pkg_delete -a after
On Aug 19, 2006, at 10:58 PM, SigmaX asdf wrote:
Found my problem. T[h]e firewall_type option is case sensitive --
and OPEN
is supposed to be lowercase.
The firewall_type option isn't case-sensitive, and hasn't been since
early 4.x; see /etc/rc.firewall:
case ${firewall_type} in
On Aug 16, 2006, at 10:28 PM, Bill LeFebvre wrote:
You have multiple CPUs, so a threaded process can theoretically
reach
100*ncpus cpu usage.
Ahh, thats makes sense, thanks.
Actually it doesn't. IMO, %CPU should be biased for all available
cpu, not just a single cpu. In other words, a
Hi, Martin--
Martin Blapp wrote:
[ ...test program to create load... ]
CPU states: 50.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 50.0%
idle
You've probably got HTT disabled by sysctl rather than in the BIOS. In that
case, top sees that your system claims to have 4 CPUs, but you're
Mike Jakubik wrote:
[ ... ]
Why are the limits so low by default? In any case, this is what i found
in LINT.
options MAXDSIZ=(1024UL*1024*1024)
options MAXSSIZ=(128UL*1024*1024)
options DFLDSIZ=(1024UL*1024*1024)
I have no idea what those values mean, what should i set
Mike Jakubik wrote:
Chuck Swiger wrote:
512MB is more than enough for almost all processes to run just fine,
and is only really inappropriate for the case where you've got 1-plus
GB of physical RAM and want to dedicate the system to a single large
task, or perhaps a single-digit number
Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
I have seen messages like this on every FreeBSD machine that I have ever
built. Can anybody indicate to me what this means?
pid 60038 (conftest), uid 0: exited on signal 12 (core dumped)
While building software which uses GNU autoconf, ./configure tries to build
Michel Talon wrote:
[ ...a long email snipped... ]
My only conclusion is that these NFS stories are very
tricky. The only moment everything worked fine was when we were running
Solaris on the server.
I can't speak to the earlier part about NFS with Linux, but at least I very
much agree with
Peter Thoenen wrote:
--- Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ... ]
Is anyone on this list running a Tor node on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE
or later with similar or higher load?
I am hitting the same issue still Fabian. I had that PR closed as
works for me with insignificant testing. I am still
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Up to 48 right now, and still nothing to show for it ...
Perhaps it is not clear to you that under Unix is it normal for processes to
block waiting on events like user input, a signal indicating a timer has fired
or a pipe has more data, etc.
The reason you are
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
[ ... ]
31750 vnode pager pageins
15954 vnode pager pageouts
It's the vnode pager, not the swap pager. AIUI, that's mostly paging
in and out pages of running binaries (from the image on disk), not
moving stuff in and out of swapspace.
ah, okay ...
Yeah-- it's
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
[ ... ]
Figuring that the last time I checked, I was using something like 7000
pipes, @ 16k each, I should be setting it closer to 128M, and that is
assuming no 64k pipes ...
So, is there an 'upper max' that it won't allow me to set it past?
Read man tuning about
Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
What is the best approach to keep dhclient from overwriting
/etc/resolv.conf every time it gets a new lease on an IP address?
Perhaps:
chflags schg /etc/resolv.conf
This has been a frustrating search as Google has turned up next to nothing on
the issue other
Ivan Voras wrote:
Some time ago I reported that pagezero kernel thread sometime takes
(what seems to me) a too large chunk of available CPU (30%) on a very
busy web server. There were no replies :( Since then, I've
reconfigured apache to use PHP as a fastcgi module and the problem
seems to
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
In 4.x, it was a 'shut it off' sort of deal .. my new amd64 don't
appear to have it enabled, but my older i386 server that I just
upgraded to 6.x does:
user pid %cpu %mem vsz rss tt state starttime command
root 14 104.0 0.0 0 8 ?? RL
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
The solution is to run a local caching nameserver instance. You should do this anyway, for
performance reasons. Add 'named_enable=YES' to /etc/rc.conf, and modify your
/etc/dhclient.conf as follows:
Good idea, but this defeates the
Michael Schuh wrote:
Hi everyone,
i need suggestions and hints about an redundant
storage-system.
My requirements are:
a Storage that is available via Network, flexible in scalation,
and must be redundant, and cheap if possible
My Own suggestion was this scenario:
2 boxes very cheap for
Alexey Karagodov wrote:
2006/4/6, Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[ ... ]
and again. if *NIX developers can't answer user's question, they say get
out or it's your problem or try something else or For that matter;
you're not required to use it at all. everytime one answer for multiple
question WE
Alban wrote:
For some reason I'm getting more or less random segfaults compiling
kernels, world or PHP5 on BETA-3 (Python and perl went ok). So far I
haven't succeeded building a fresh kernel or world. This system is an
Athlon XP with 1MB RAM and 4GB swap, compiling is done in the usual
Yar Tikhiy wrote:
[ ... ]
A similar effect was observed when a `domain' line was specified
in resolv.conf in place of `search'.
Is there a real reason to retry with a different domain when the
nameserver doesn't respond at all?
UDP is lossy, and it may take a nameserver longer to respond
Hi--
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
[ ... ]
For ftp.c.diff, how about considering adding new option for timeout?
However, I'm still in doubt. I cannot think it is usual situation
that there are unreachable IP addresses in /etc/resolv.conf.
Certainly that situation is not usual, in the sense that
Thomas Franck wrote:
[ ... ]
It doesn't seem to affect the function of the server, but it's
mighty irritating and blows up the logs a lot... plus, I don't
think it's supposed to show this behaviour.. :)
I've going through the archives web but the threads I found
didn't fit my case.. :(
Thomas Franck wrote:
On 17 Feb 2006 at 8:07, Chuck Swiger wrote:
[ ... ]
Isn't the request broadcast and the reply MAC addressed?
ARPOP_REQUESTs are made to the all-ones broadcast MAC address, and ARPOP_REPLYs
go back addressed to the sender's MAC.
FreeBSD notes when ARP traffic is seen which
Vinny Abello wrote:
[ ... ]
I may try doing a cvsup of source and rebuilding again. My make.conf
settings are pretty tame:
CPUTYPE=pentium4
CFLAGS= -O2 -pipe
COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe
Remove the CPUTYPE declaration, or at least decrease it to just pentium.
--
-Chuck
Vinny Abello wrote:
[ ... ]
Nevermind. I just answered my own question. I should have RTFM more
carefully. :)
:-)
If CPUTYPE is defined in your /etc/make.conf, make sure to use the
?= instead of the = assignment operator, so that buildworld can
override the CPUTYPE if it
David W. Hankins wrote:
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 01:37:33AM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote:
[ ...sorry for the minor delay, realjob sometimes interferes... ]
OK, cool. Are you doing anything with regard to Zeroconf/Rendezvous?
Not really, no, except when DHCP options appear to turn off IPv4LL
David W. Hankins wrote:
Marcin Jessa wrote:
Son't be silly. What if you dont know what IP you will get from the
lease? That's what working implementation of DHCP is for...
I thought that was why FreeBSD moved away from ISC DHCP to OpenBSD
dhclient?
Actually, I guess I never did
Koen Martens wrote:
[ ... ]
With 5.4, there was only the rxcsum option for the bge card, not a
txcsum. It worked fine with rxcsum enabled on 5.4..
What are the consequences of disabling {rx,tx}csum? What is wrong
with enabling it on 6-STABLE?
The consequence is your CPU has to spend the
Scott Markwell wrote:
--
Scott Markwell
Whoosh! If you poke me, I'll whoosh! you back... :-)
--
-Chuck
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
Eli K. Breen wrote:
Does anyone have any explanation and resolution for the excessive
interrupt%?:
Does turning off USB and/or changing the BIOS option to assign an IRQ to the USB
controller help?
--
-Chuck
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jan 5, 2006, at 11:08 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
There's an interesting thread about the AMR RAID controller used in
the newer 18x0/28x0 Dells with the PERC/4 controller, and I know of
enough people using them that such improvements (by Doug Ambrisko?)
will be welcomed
Vivek Khera wrote:
[ ... ]
The only other aac controller I have is a Dell PERC type which is god-
awful slow, but I hear that's dell's fault not adaptec's. I don't know
what to believe there. That card is quite stable however.
Any experiences with this that anyone wishes to share?
Jo Rhett wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 06:55:03PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote:
YMMV. I burned a 6.0 release from the ISO image, and did a binary upgrade on an
IBM ThinkPad (T.34? maybe), which worked perfectly. All of the 5.x binaries,
including X11, KDE, printing, Mozilla, etc worked just
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 04:58:01PM +0100, Frank Steinborn wrote:
i'm trying to update to -STABLE from today from a 6.0-RELEASE and make
installworld fails here:
[ ... ]
=== libexec/bootpd (install)
install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 bootpd /usr/libexec
strip:
Joe Rhett wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:04:05AM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
There will be three FreeBSD 6 releases in 2006.
While this is nice, may I suggest that it is time to put aside/delay one
release cycle and come up with a binary update mechanism supported well by
the OS? Increasing
Matthew Tomsa wrote:
What is the difference between RELEASE versions, STABLE versions, and
CURRENT versions? I've done some reading but I'm still a bit confused.
Thanks.
-CURRENT is alpha.
-STABLE is supposed to be the leading edge of functionality yet be stable
enough for production use;
Mike Eubanks wrote:
As soon as I mount my NFS file systems, the network load increases to a
constant 80%-90% of network bandwidth, even when the file systems are
not in use. NFS stats on the client machine (nfsstat -c) produce the
following:
[ ... ]
Fsstat and Requests are increasing very
Craig Boston wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:05:13PM +1000, Joel Hatton wrote:
Thanks, Craig. I'm glad to hear that I'm not alone in pursuing this method.
Do you know of any particular disadvantages of continuing with this
less-than-optimised model - I guess I mean, is this something that is
Francisco wrote:
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Brad Knowles wrote:
Note that RAID-1 is the second worst-case for mail server
performance -- it accelerates reads (if you have mirror
load-balancing), but all writes are required to be held until complete
on both disks. The only worse case would be
dick hoogendijk wrote:
My make.conf contains (fbsd-5.4)
CFLAGS= -O -pipe
COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe
Are these settings the same for the upcoming release6 or do I need to
set -O2 in this new version?
FreeBSD is moving towards -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing by default [1], but there
is nothing wrong with
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 05:04:40PM +0300, Lefteris Tsintjelis wrote:
L You are expecting wrong from these socket options. They do not specify
L time after which socket should be closed, if no IO is done.
L
L Is there any easy build in functionality for that?
Pardon, but I
Andreas Klemm wrote:
[ ... ]
- burncd leaves cdrom in a way that CD cannot be mounted
after burning, one has to open and re-close CD tray manually
before one is able to mount the frshly burned CD.
This is an issue with the drive firmware more than anything to do with
software. Most
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
[ ... ]
If I try it with ping in a shell (on FreeBSD), it also fails.
However both 'host' and 'nslookup' happily foes a lookup of that name.
so it seems that our resolver (on FreeBSD) is to blame.
I have seen a few old (ok, from 2003) mailing list posts, which seems to
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:57:53AM +1000, Robert Backhaus wrote:
[ ... ]
Simply because not every port works with -O2 optimisations. It caused
bad code in some circumstances.
Is there an automated way to identify those ports so they can be forced
not to use -O higer than
Jon Dama wrote:
yes, that's quite generous.
why isn't /tmp just an mfs mount though?
While I like that suggestion personally, some people get perturbed about files
in /tmp going away if the power fails or you reboot.
--
-Chuck
___
Matthias Buelow wrote:
Don Lewis wrote:
[ ... ]
Did you remember to disable write caching by setting the WCE mode page
bit to zero? At least with SCSI, it doesn't seem to affect performance
under most workloads.
No.. I thought that with SCSI it is ok to leave the cache enabled
because SCSI
Matthias Buelow wrote:
Chuck Swiger wrote:
PS: Haven't we had this conversation before?
Yes, indeed, and I don't want to reopen that issue since that would
lead to no new insights (and since I don't have the time atm. to
contribute anything I couldn't provide any stuff myself).
Yet you seem
J. T. Farmer wrote:
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Matthias Buelow wrote:
Yes, indeed, and I don't want to reopen that issue since that would
lead to no new insights (and since I don't have the time atm. to
contribute anything I couldn't provide any stuff myself).
Yet you seem willing to spend time
Matthias Buelow wrote:
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Yet you seem willing to spend time discussing the matter...?
Because it's somewhat of my pet peeve and I always see the mantra-like
repetition of the argument that you have to disable the write-back
cache if you want any safety at all
Ivailo Bonev wrote:
What is the difference between installing 5.4 Release in Safe mode and
Normal installation?
Tried installing Normal installation on laptop paniced, but with Safe
mode is ok?
Safe mode disables ACPI/APM, it disables APIC and SMP, it slows down the hard
drives and so
Brandon Fosdick wrote:
Erik Stian Tefre wrote:
You can avoid the problem by splitting the array up in partitions
smaller than
2TB each. (I know this does not answer your question, but it
simplifies things,
and it works for me(TM)... :-)
:) Thanks, but I thought of that already. This is
Karl Denninger wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 12:46:04AM +0200, S?ren Schmidt wrote:
[ ... ]
I've already gone WAY out of my way to try to support the sii3112,
and I'm not inclined to waste more of my precious spare time on it.
However, if it really is that important to enough people to try
O. Hartmann wrote:
[ ... ]
One of my SATA disks, the SAMSUNG SP2004C seems to show errors during
operation (and also showd under 5.4-RELEASE-p3).
Sometimes I get this error:
ad10: WARNING - READ_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=11441599
while the machine still keeps working.
Other
Pertti Kosunen wrote:
Pertti Kosunen wrote:
What could cause dhclient sometimes to fail renew the lease? I updated
world and moved to pf from ipfw same time so i don't know which to blame.
This happens from twice a day to every few days.
Jul 21 03:44:55 myserver dhclient: send_packet: No
Hi, all--
I am seeing lower-than-expected I/O performance on a Dell PowerEdge 2850, using
two of these:
da0: MAXTOR ATLAS10K5_73SCA JNZM Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device
da0: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 127, 16bit), Tagged Queueing
Enabled
da0: 70007MB (143374650 512 byte
Matthias Buelow wrote:
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
[ ... ]
Why am I arguing in an uphill battle here? Is data safety no longer
important to the FreeBSD community? Such issues should not even
have to be discussed at all!
You ask a good question: so, just why are *you* arguing? [1]
If sysctl
Michal Vanco wrote:
i discovered that routes are not deleted from routing table after
link on interface goes down. For example:
[ ... ]
Should't all routes via bge0 be deleted after link on bge0 goes down?
Maybe. If the system was not going to be reconnected to that network anytime
soon,
Michal Vanco wrote:
On Saturday 18 June 2005 20:48, Chuck Swiger wrote:
[ ... ]
Maybe. If the system was not going to be reconnected to that network
anytime soon, it would be a good idea. On the other hand, if the link down
was due to a transient failure of a wireless connection, which
101 - 200 of 236 matches
Mail list logo
