Hey Troy,
I can't speak for the rest of the list but I think we're missing a bit
of information here.
What are you trying to build and boot, 8.1, 8.2pre ?
Are you building a GENERIC kernel ? I notice you're currently using a
custom one.
If you're not, I would suggest trying GENERIC first.
Hey michael,
First, I'd advise making use of FreeBSD's nextboot utility to test new
kernels:
http://fuse4bsd.creo.hu/localcgi/man-cgi.cgi?nextboot+8
Second, I would suggest reading the handbook's excellent section on
upgrading your machine or rebuilding the kernel:
On 12/27/10 11:58 PM, Clifton Royston wrote:
OK, and oh well... I wish there were some way to automate the diffing
out of the $FreeBSD lines. I suppose those might be the artifact of
some previous upgrade, so that the file version present is not the one
expected for FreeBSD 6.1.
/27/2010 6:24 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hey Troy,
I can't speak for the rest of the list but I think we're missing a bit
of information here.
What are you trying to build and boot, 8.1, 8.2pre ?
Are you building a GENERIC kernel ? I notice you're currently using a
custom one.
If you're
On 12/28/10 7:20 AM, Jason Helfman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 04:52:03PM -0800, Doug Barton thus spake:
On 12/27/2010 16:40, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 12/27/10 11:58 PM, Clifton Royston wrote:
OK, and oh well... I wish there were some way to automate the
diffing
out
as mass storage
USB, USB printer, USB NICs...
Just get shot of everything you don't use to be honest ;)
On 12/28/2010 4:13 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Well, I would suggest you try this:
cd /usr/src
make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC
make installkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC
cd /boot
mv kernel
Hello list,
I currently have a ZFS zraid1 with 4x 1.5TB drives.
The system is a zfs-only FreeBSD 8.1 with zfs version 14.
I am concerned that in the event a drive fails, I won't be able to
repair the disks in time before another actually fails.
I wish to reinstall the OS on a dedicated
.
I remember getting rather average performance on v14 but Jean-Yves
reported good performance boosts from upgrading to v15.
Will try this out when the disks arrive :)
Thanks for the pointers guys.
On 12/30/10 6:49 PM, Ronald Klop wrote:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 12:40:00 +0100, Damien Fleuriot m
On 1/1/11 6:28 PM, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
On 2 January 2011 02:11, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
I remember getting rather average performance on v14 but Jean-Yves
reported good performance boosts from upgrading to v15.
that was v28 :)
saw no major difference between v14 and v15
On 1/3/11 2:17 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 12/30/10 12:40, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
I am concerned that in the event a drive fails, I won't be able to
repair the disks in time before another actually fails.
An old trick to avoid that is to buy drives from different series or
manufacturers
I would suggest the following 2 very quick tests:
1/ swap for another mouse, see if you have the problem with this one
2/ check mouse batteries if wireless, one never knows
On 1/4/11 5:11 PM, Barbara wrote:
Sometimes my mouse seems frozen, then it become responsive again after few
-64gb, with 15 for the system itself
and some spare.
Is it worth using the free space for cache ? ZIL ? both ?
@jean-yves : didn't you experience problems recently when using both ?
---
Fleuriot Damien
On 3 Jan 2011, at 16:08, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
On 1/3/11 2:17 PM, Ivan
-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Damien Fleuriot
Sent: January-05-11 5:01 AM
To: Damien Fleuriot
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ZFS - moving from a zraid1 to zraid2 pool with 1.5tb disks
Hi again List,
I'm not so sure about using
?
---
Fleuriot Damien
On 5 Jan 2011, at 23:12, Artem Belevich fbsdl...@src.cx wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
Well actually...
raidz2:
- 7x 1.5 tb = 10.5tb
- 2 parity drives
raidz1:
- 3x 1.5 tb = 4.5 tb
- 4x 1.5 tb = 6 tb , total 10.5tb
- 2
. You can get old Gigabyte i-RAM drives with 4 gig of memory for the
cost of a 60 gig SSD, and it will trounce the SSD for speed.
I'd put your SSD to L2ARC (cache).
-Original Message-
From: Damien Fleuriot [mailto:m...@my.gd]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 5:20 AM
To: Artem
On 6 January 2011 14:45, Daniel Kalchev dan...@digsys.bg wrote:
For pure storage, that is a place you send/store files, you don't really
need the ZIL. You also need the L2ARC only if you read over and over again
the same dataset, which is larger than the available ARC (ZFS cache memory).
Both
On 1/7/11 1:10 PM, Markiyan Kushnir wrote:
2011/1/7 Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com:
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 12:29:17PM +1100, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
On 6 January 2011 22:26, Chris Forgeron cforge...@acsi.ca wrote:
You know, these days I'm not as happy with SSD's for ZIL. I may
On 1/21/11 11:20 PM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
On Thu, 20.01.2011 at 21:17:40 +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
Hello,
Currently our buildworld relies on groff(1) and vgrind(1) being present
in the host system. I have a patch ready that at least makes sure these
are built during bootstrap-tools
Hello list,
I'm getting nervous here, I seem to get a checksum mismatch for port
graphics/jpeg , whether I'm using a mirror or the master sites.
See below:
# make
=== Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
=== License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
=== Extracting
On 1/25/11 5:28 PM, Boris Kochergin wrote:
On 01/25/11 11:24, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list,
I'm getting nervous here, I seem to get a checksum mismatch for port
graphics/jpeg , whether I'm using a mirror or the master sites.
See below:
# make
=== Vulnerability check disabled
On 1/25/11 5:35 PM, Boris Kochergin wrote:
On 01/25/11 11:30, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 1/25/11 5:28 PM, Boris Kochergin wrote:
On 01/25/11 11:24, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list,
I'm getting nervous here, I seem to get a checksum mismatch for port
graphics/jpeg , whether I'm using
Hello list,
I have a problem with interrupts, network cards, and PF performance.
We have 2 firewalls running FreeBSD 8.0 for the current master and
FreeBSD 8.1 for the backup host, which I upgraded just yesterday.
The servers use CARP for redundancy.
These are rather busy boxes which run
On 1/27/11 11:03 AM, Bartosz Stec wrote:
W dniu 2011-01-27 10:57, Damien Fleuriot pisze:
Hello list,
I have a problem with interrupts, network cards, and PF performance.
I think you should try with polling(4) enabled and probably increase
kernel.hz i sysctl.conf :)
As a matter of fact
On 1/27/11 6:27 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:57:14AM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list,
I have a problem with interrupts, network cards, and PF performance.
We have 2 firewalls running FreeBSD 8.0 for the current master and
FreeBSD 8.1 for the backup host
On 1/27/11 6:37 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 06:31:29PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 1/27/11 6:27 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:57:14AM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list,
I have a problem with interrupts, network cards, and PF
On 1/27/11 6:41 PM, Vogel, Jack wrote:
Jeremy is right, if you have a problem the first step is to try the latest
code.
However, when I look at the interrupts below I don't see what the problem is?
The Broadcom seems to have about the same rate, it just doesn't have MSIX
(multiple
On 1/27/11 7:46 PM, Sergey Lobanov wrote:
В сообщении от Пятница 28 января 2011 00:55:35 автор Damien Fleuriot написал:
On 1/27/11 6:41 PM, Vogel, Jack wrote:
Jeremy is right, if you have a problem the first step is to try the
latest code.
However, when I look at the interrupts below I
On 1/27/11 8:57 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:39:40PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 1/27/11 7:46 PM, Sergey Lobanov wrote:
В сообщении от Пятница 28 января 2011 00:55:35 автор Damien Fleuriot
написал:
On 1/27/11 6:41 PM, Vogel, Jack wrote:
Jeremy is right
On 1/27/11 9:02 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
If you go to 8.2 and the latest driver you will get better stats also,
ahem...
Jack
We'll be doing that as soon as 8.2 hits release, as opposed to
prerelease/rc.
Can never be too careful with this one project, outtages would be costly -.-
On 1/27/11 10:44 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
The 8.X kernel is NOT single-threaded. Anything but. And the stack has
also been improved, I believe there are still bottlenecks but its far better
than the old days.
The igb driver in 8.2 creates up to 8 queues on the right hardware, they
are each
On 1/27/11 9:58 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Kernel folks should be able to talk about this in detail, but my
understanding is that the kernel itself supports multiple threads, but
the question is whether or not the drivers or relevant pieces (e.g.
igb(4) driver, pf, TCP stack, etc.) support
On 1/28/11 11:37 AM, Bartosz Stec wrote:
Guys,
could someone explain me this?
# sysctl hw.realmem
hw.realmem: 2139029504
top line shows:
Mem: 32M Active, 35M Inact, 899M Wired, 8392K Cache,
199M Buf, 58M Free
32+35+899+8+199+58 = 1231MB
Shouldn't that sum to
Hello lists,
I'm trying to get FreeBSD 8.0 or 8.1 to run on a Dell poweredge r210 server.
It ships with a SATA/SAS h200 RAID controller.
Sadly, the MFI driver doesn't seem to register for this card...
Find below the pciconf -lcvb
--
none6@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x010700 card=0x1f1d1028
On 29 Jan 2011, at 23:24, Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net
wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello lists,
I'm trying to get FreeBSD 8.0 or 8.1 to run on a Dell poweredge r210 server.
It ships with a SATA/SAS h200 RAID controller.
Sadly, the MFI
On 29 Jan 2011, at 20:26, Andrew Thompson thom...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 30 January 2011 06:20, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
Hello lists,
I'm trying to get FreeBSD 8.0 or 8.1 to run on a Dell poweredge r210 server.
It ships with a SATA/SAS h200 RAID controller.
This card may
On 29 Jan 2011, at 19:00, jhelf...@e-e.com wrote:
Hello lists,
I'm trying to get FreeBSD 8.0 or 8.1 to run on a Dell poweredge r210
server.
It ships with a SATA/SAS h200 RAID controller.
Sadly, the MFI driver doesn't seem to register for this card...
Find below the pciconf
On 29 January 2011 23:24, Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello lists,
I'm trying to get FreeBSD 8.0 or 8.1 to run on a Dell poweredge r210
server.
It ships with a SATA/SAS h200 RAID controller.
Sadly, the MFI driver
to the dedibox (that's what you are targeting, right?
:))
I tried to test it in vmware but I have a password issue right now.
It is also a ZFSv28 image.
Le 30 janv. 2011 à 01:56, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd a écrit :
On 29 Jan 2011, at 20:26, Andrew Thompson thom...@freebsd.org wrote
On 30 Jan 2011, at 13:14, Daniel Kalchev dan...@digsys.bg wrote:
On 30.1.2011 г. 13:30 ч., Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Ok I've loaded the newly patched mfi.ko and booted a MFS image.
Here's the relevant snip from dmesg.run :
at
mfi0:Dell PERC H200 Integrated port 0xfc00-0xfcff mem
0xdf2b
On 1/30/11 11:18 PM, Ollivier Robert wrote:
According to Garrett Cooper:
+1. PERC7 should be supported by mfi(4) (required bits may need to
be added to mfi(4) though as you've pointed out, but additional
details may need to be obtained from Dell).
I've seen mention of the mps driver (in
We have tried POLLING here on Intel cards attached to the igb driver
(see my post entitled High interrupt rate on a PF box + performance
from 27/01/2011.
This broke carp *badly* and we switched back to interrupts.
You say a single thread eats up a full CPU core, can you post a top to
show the
On 2/1/11 1:35 PM, Yue Wu wrote:
Hi list,
I'm trying to do something to make rc.conf can act conditionally
What I want is:
1. List the wireless access points,
grep if there is one which bssid is 'bb:bb:bb:bb:bb:bb',
if there is, then set ifconfig_wlan0 to the value:
inet
On 2/2/11 12:09 AM, Ollivier Robert wrote:
According to Damien Fleuriot:
As requested, find below the output of a verbose boot.
Thanks to Damien and his machine, we have seen that in RAID mode, the mps
driver, backported from current (backported as in, drop the mps directory in
the 8.2
Hello list,
I have a firewall with 2x Intel pro dual port cards.
On Intel A , port 1 goes to switch 1, port 2 goes to switch 2
On Intel B , port 1 goes to switch 1, port 2 goes to switch 2
I have created the following 2 lagg devices using LACP:
lagg0 = A1 + B1
lagg1 = A2 + B2
This works
On 2/4/11 1:19 PM, Pete French wrote:
If you want failover using lagg then your best bet is to get lagg between
two ports on different switches. If you have a pair of switches which
will present as a single device then you can use LACP to do this, else
use simple failover. I do this for all
On 2/4/11 1:42 PM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
On Friday 04 February 2011 13:13:52 Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list,
I have a firewall with 2x Intel pro dual port cards.
On Intel A , port 1 goes to switch 1, port 2 goes to switch 2
On Intel B , port 1 goes to switch 1, port 2 goes
On 2/4/11 2:51 PM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
On 2/4/2011 2:35 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Even if I can't concatenate my 2 lagg interfaces into a failover one
over the 2 switches, the new setup will still be an improvement.
Did you consider using STP? Are these switches RSTP capable
On 2/4/11 4:55 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
I have a firewall with 2x Intel pro dual port cards.
On Intel A , port 1 goes to switch 1, port 2 goes to switch 2
On Intel B , port 1 goes to switch 1, port 2 goes to switch 2
I have
On 2/10/11 4:13 PM, Mark Powell wrote:
Hi,
FreeBSD 8.1 r218475.
I have a raidz2 with 6x2TB devices; 3x2tb HDD and 3 stripes of 2x1TB HDD.
I have ufs / on USB flash.
After boot0 starts and the USB boots it displays Drive C: is disk0
etc. for each drive. Then I can hear all the drives
Hi,
mps0@pci0:1:0:0:class=0x010700 card=0x1f1d1028 chip=0x00721000
rev=0x02 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'LSI Logic (Was: Symbios Logic, NCR)'
class = mass storage
subclass = SAS
bar [10] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xfc00, size 256, enabled
bar [14] = type
On 2/16/11 5:23 PM, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
DK I have sucessfully used that motherboard with FreeBSD 9 and the mps
driver.
DK The mfi driver found on the LSI site does not support this controller.
Ah that makes sense. I'm a bit reluctant to
On 16 Feb 2011, at 21:35, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 22:07:11 +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
KDM Ah that makes sense. I'm a bit reluctant to use -current on this
particular
KDM machine, so I would
On 2/17/11 12:10 PM, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:07:17PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
It looks rather unhappy:
mybsd root /usr/ports/sysutils/smartmontools
#
/usr/local/sbin/smartctl -a /dev
On 2/17/11 1:18 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
What is sad is that these controllers are becoming very mainstream now,
we're getting them more and more on Dell servers , and the fbsd project
still struggles with them (for reasons I
On 2/17/11 3:21 PM, Ollivier Robert wrote:
According to Damien Fleuriot:
I destroyed the logical volume and built mps copied from -current (I opened
a thread on stable@ a few weeks ago about this) but my patch was *nowhere*
as big as this.
Here Ken's patch:
[snip]
There may be some
On 1/28/11 11:29 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 1/27/11 10:44 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
The 8.X kernel is NOT single-threaded. Anything but. And the stack has
also been improved, I believe there are still bottlenecks but its far better
than the old days.
The igb driver in 8.2 creates up to 8
On 2/18/11 5:49 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:07:21 -0800, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
Hello Damien, list:
Anyway this was just my humble attempt to encourage the MFC of this driver.
I think the card is
pretty good. I'd like to hear other people's opinion on this HBA
On 2/18/11 6:28 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:57:11 -0700
From: Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 17:53:11 +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 2/18/11 5:49 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011
On 2/18/11 5:42 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
Let me know if you run into any issues.
Ken
Rebuilt this afternoon, rebooted, still works fine.
I'll post if I run into any problem.
Thanks for your work, this driver was clearly needed on 8.x seeing the
cards are becoming more and more
Hello list,
I've recently upgraded my home box from 8.2-PRE to 8.2-RELEASE and since
then I've been experiencing *abysmal* performance with samba.
We're talking transfer rates of say 50kbytes/s here, and I'm the only
client on the box.
I've seen here and there discussions about sendfile's
On 2/24/11 8:55 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:30:17AM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list,
I've recently upgraded my home box from 8.2-PRE to 8.2-RELEASE and since
then I've been experiencing *abysmal* performance with samba.
We're talking transfer rates of say
Hello list,
I apologize for this very trivial question but I can't seem to find the
answer in the doc:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/pr-guidelines/article.html
I have submitted a PR late december 2k10 and it's still in open state:
On 24/02/11 12:03 +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list,
I apologize for this very trivial question but I can't seem to find the
answer in the doc:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/pr-guidelines/article.html
I have submitted a PR late december 2k10 and it's still
On 24 February 2011 08:55, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:30:17AM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list,
I've recently upgraded my home box from 8.2-PRE to 8.2-RELEASE and since
then I've been experiencing *abysmal* performance with samba
On 3/7/11 2:33 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
18 month old 7.2
FreeBSD dfw1.psg.com 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #1: Sat Aug 22 08:37:36
UTC 2009 r...@dfw1.psg.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DFW1 amd64
csup and
o make buildworld
o make kernel
o boot single user
o locks up right after
On 3/8/11 11:52 PM, Dave Johnson wrote:
Hi all
An IPFW problem?
An help gladly accepted
It would appear Port 80 closed
Ports 21 25 443 587 998 work well
rc.conf
defaultrouter=192.168.0.1
gateway_enable=YES
hostname=xxx.xxx.xxx
ifconfig_re0=inet 192.168.0.11 netmask
On 4/9/11 9:25 AM, David Marec wrote:
Hi guys.
Since the release of FreeBSD 8.2, building world fails on the following
error:
--
david:/home/david#cd /usr/src
david:/usr/src#make -j4 buildworld make kernel
--
World
Hello list,
Here I am today, setting up CARP interfaces on our backup firewalls, and
I'm wondering something...
Let's take the following scenario:
Datacenter PRIM, firewall PRIM:
- carp13 has public IPs X and Y and is master (advskew 100)
Datacenter PRIM, firewall BACK:
- carp13 has public
On 6/14/11 11:06 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list,
Here I am today, setting up CARP interfaces on our backup firewalls, and
I'm wondering something...
Let's take the following scenario:
Datacenter PRIM, firewall PRIM:
- carp13 has public IPs X and Y and is master (advskew
On 14 Jun 2011, at 19:33, Steve Polyack kor...@comcast.net wrote:
On 06/14/2011 01:00 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
I can confirm that this scenario causes problems, see below:
### ON FIREWALL 1 , carp master for carp0, carp1, carp2
carp2: flags=49UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING metric 0 mtu 1500
On 23 Jun 2011, at 01:02, George Kontostanos gkontos.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Look, I think that this is getting personal and not constructive at all.
Stop mumbling unless you have something useful to add.
How about you do what he says and stop top posting, as per the list's policy ?
Annoying
On 8/2/11 9:39 AM, seanr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I Googled around and checked the PRs and wasn't successful in finding
any reports of what I'm seeing. I'm hoping someone here can help me
debug what's going on.
On my FreeBSD 8.2-S machine (built circa 12th June), I created a
Posting to -stable since -pf didn't show much interest :/
Original Message
Subject: CARP interfaces and mastership issue
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:07:37 +0200
Hello list,
TLDR: carp interface becomes MASTER for a split second after being
created, even if another MASTER
On 15 September 2011 18:12, Brian Seklecki (Mobile)
laval...@probikesllc.com wrote:
Things went smoothly but when we brought the production VLANs up again
at layer 2 on the switches, when spanning-tree converged we had again a
double MASTER problem.
In older versions of FBSD, creating
On 18 Sep 2011, at 12:44, Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org wrote:
Le Sat, 17 Sep 2011 23:40:06 -0400 (EDT),
Brian Seklecki (Mobile) laval...@probikesllc.com a écrit :
What would help here, is for a carp interface to wait a given delay
(tunable through a sysctl ?) after creation
On 9/15/11 11:07 AM, Damien FLEURIOT wrote:
Hello list,
TLDR: carp interface becomes MASTER for a split second after being
created, even if another MASTER exists on the network with faster
advertisements. Breaks connections. HOWTO prevent ?
We've been experiencing
On 29 September 2011 14:20, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
On 9/15/11 11:07 AM, Damien FLEURIOT wrote:
Hello list,
TLDR: carp interface becomes MASTER for a split second after being
created, even if another MASTER exists on the network with faster
advertisements. Breaks connections
Quick follow-up again.
This is the code for sys/netinet/ip_carp.c on FreeBSD 8.2, OpenBSD
3.8, OpenBSD 3.9 in function carp_setrun(struct carp_softc *sc,
sa_family_t af)
FREEBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE with init + preempt = auto MASTER bug
Function starts at line 1371.
---
On 1 October 2011 11:04, johan Hendriks joh.hendr...@gmail.com wrote:
Op 29-09-11 16:49, Damien Fleuriot schreef:
Quick follow-up again.
This is the code for sys/netinet/ip_carp.c on FreeBSD 8.2, OpenBSD
3.8, OpenBSD 3.9 in function carp_setrun(struct carp_softc *sc,
sa_family_t af
On 1 October 2011 03:18, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
It's a php module doing a lookup for the hostname of the back-end mysql
server.
Are the delays always 3 seconds?
Pretty much.
If so, that almost sounds like a timeout of some kind.
That was my first thought, but the answer
On 15 Oct 2011, at 14:24, kapral kap...@toya.net.pl wrote:
Now i don't see any strange connections established but i had them b4 i
wrote email i know my browsers connect to strange ip unfortunatly i didn't
checked a port to whih was connected to but it was from high ports abowe
1024 on my
On 15 Oct 2011, at 22:56, Marius Strobl mar...@alchemy.franken.de wrote:
Could owners of nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) driven hardware (as for
rl(4) only 8129 need testing, 8139 don't) please give the following
patch a try in order to ensure it doesn't break anything?
for 9/head:
On 10/21/11 5:00 PM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
I have an 8.1-RELEASE system with an xl on the mainboard:
xl0: 3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL port 0xdc80-0xdcff mem
0xf8fffc00-0xf8fffc7f irq 16 at device 4.0 on pci2
miibus0: MII bus on xl0
xlphy0: 3c905C 10/100 internal PHY PHY
On 10/31/11 12:04 AM, Gót András wrote:
Dear All,
I'd like to have the following ruleset, for pure-ftpd passive port range:
(pasv and past mistyping corrected)
---
ftp_pasv_start=X
ftp_pasv_end=Y
rdr on $netif inet proto tcp from any to $internalip port
On 12/9/11 11:10 AM, Johan Hendriks wrote:
Brett Glass schreef:
The interfaces SEEM to be configured correctly, but the messages --
which must be coming from scripts called by /etc/netstart -- are
troubling.
Same thing happens with lagg0
If i use this config, after a reboot all is fine
On 12/9/11 10:13 AM, Brett Glass wrote:
FreeBSD 9.0-RC3 is looking good, but I'm still encountering two problems.
Firstly, when I try to configure VLANs in /etc/rc.conf, I'm getting
errors. For example, if I use
vlans_re0=1 2
ip_addrs_re0_1=192.168.0.1-4/16
ip_addrs_re0_2=10.0.0.0/24
On 9 Dec 2011, at 18:30, Brett Glass br...@lariat.net wrote:
At 03:10 AM 12/9/2011, Johan Hendriks wrote:
After a /etc/netstart, i get the following:
ifconfig: create: bad value.
I get the create: bad value messages as well. What's more, if I change
rc.conf to assign variables of the
Hey up list,
Look, just a rant here.
Who in *HELL* thought it would be a cool idea to release no less than
FOUR security advisories today ?
I mean, couldn't this have waited and remained undisclosed until monday ?
I for one do *NOT* relish the idea of updating 50+ boxes this evening
and
On 12/23/11 5:39 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, December 23, 2011 11:07:56 am Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hey up list,
Look, just a rant here.
Who in *HELL* thought it would be a cool idea to release no less than
FOUR security advisories today ?
I mean, couldn't this have waited
My point (which may or may not be valid) was that if the vulnerabilities
remained *undisclosed*, they would have a much lower chance of being
exploited.
On 12/23/11 5:47 PM, Joe Holden wrote:
So don't update until Monday? The outcome will be the same :)
Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hey up list
On 12/23/11 5:50 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 12/23/2011 10:07 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hey up list,
Look, just a rant here.
Who in *HELL* thought it would be a cool idea to release no less than
FOUR security advisories today ?
After receiving the fifth security advisory
On 12/23/11 5:54 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
Look, just a rant here.
Who in *HELL* thought it would be a cool idea to release no less than
FOUR security advisories today ?
What's the impact for your boxes?
Only the BIND exploit concerns me, means that *potentially* servers for
my projects
. And
others are already exploiting some of these vulnerabilities.
Thanks,
Shawn Webb
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
My point (which may or may not be valid) was that if the vulnerabilities
remained *undisclosed*, they would have a much lower chance of being
Hello list,
Yesterday and today, I've been busy either patching boxes for the BIND
advisory that we received on the 23rd (when they were running 8.1 or
8.2-RELEASE), or upgrading them (when running 8.0-RELEASE).
Today I've come across 2 boxes running 8.2-STABLE and of course, the
BIND patch
On 12/27/11 10:22 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 07:46:52PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list,
Yesterday and today, I've been busy either patching boxes for the BIND
advisory that we received on the 23rd (when they were running 8.1 or
8.2-RELEASE), or upgrading
On 12/28/11 10:46 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 12/27/11 10:22 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 07:46:52PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list,
Yesterday and today, I've been busy either patching boxes for the BIND
advisory that we received on the 23rd (when
On 12/28/11 11:50 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 27 December 2011 22:46, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
Hello list,
Yesterday and today, I've been busy either patching boxes for the BIND
advisory that we received on the 23rd (when they were running 8.1 or
8.2-RELEASE), or upgrading
On 12/28/11 1:38 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:45:37AM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 12/28/11 10:46 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 12/27/11 10:22 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 07:46:52PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
The upgrade that troubles
On 12/28/11 12:37 PM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 28 December 2011 15:11, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
On 12/28/11 11:50 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 27 December 2011 22:46, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
Hello list,
Yesterday and today, I've been busy either patching boxes
On 12/28/11 3:35 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 12/28/11 12:37 PM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 28 December 2011 15:11, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
On 12/28/11 11:50 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 27 December 2011 22:46, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
Hello list,
Yesterday
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
