Re: panic with overcommit and RACCT

Wiadomość napisana przez Andrey Zonov w dniu 20 maj 2012, o godz. 15:23: On 5/15/12 1:23 AM, Andrey Zonov wrote: On 5/14/12 12:29 AM, Mateusz Guzik wrote: On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 09:27:11PM +0400, Andrey Zonov wrote: Hi, I've got a repeatable panic on latest 9.0-STABLE and HEAD with turned

Re: panic with overcommit and RACCT

Wiadomość napisana przez Andrey Zonov w dniu 20 maj 2012, o godz. 15:23: On 5/15/12 1:23 AM, Andrey Zonov wrote: On 5/14/12 12:29 AM, Mateusz Guzik wrote: On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 09:27:11PM +0400, Andrey Zonov wrote: Hi, I've got a repeatable panic on latest 9.0-STABLE and HEAD with turned

Re: FreeBSD 9-STABLE: jail + rctl … what is datasize?

Wiadomość napisana przez Hub- FreeBSD w dniu 1 gru 2012, o godz. 20:37: Eagerly awaiting the %cpu ability that is in 10, I'm starting to play with using this … not so much to deny, but to allow me to more accurately calculate usage … when I do an 'rctl -u' for a jail, I see two values:

Re: multiple ACEs with the same ACL qualifier

Wiadomość napisana przez Harald Schmalzbauer w dniu 8 lut 2013, o godz. 17:54: Hello, I'd like to duplicate the following ACL: # file: /data/shared/ # owner: harry # group: harry group:1stgroup:r-x---a-R-c--s:fd:allow group:2ndgroup:rwxp--a-R-c--s:-d:allow

Re: setfacl man page states d=delete_child and D=delete

Wiadomość napisana przez Harald Schmalzbauer w dniu 8 lut 2013, o godz. 16:08: Hello, I think there's a confusion in the man page setfacl(1). In my tests, D means delete_child and d delete; like it's true for other NFSv4 implementations. But manpage tells the other way around. Fixed the

Re: setfacl man page states d=delete_child and D=delete

Wiadomość napisana przez Eitan Adler w dniu 8 lut 2013, o godz. 20:05: On 8 February 2013 13:46, Edward Tomasz Napierała tr...@freebsd.org wrote: Wiadomość napisana przez Harald Schmalzbauer w dniu 8 lut 2013, o godz. 16:08: Hello, I think there's a confusion in the man page setfacl(1

Re: Make use of RACCT and rctl

Wiadomość napisana przez Peter Ankerstål w dniu 2 mar 2013, o godz. 16:21: Hi! Im trying to limit memory usage for jails with the rctl API. But I don't really get it. I have compiled the kernel with the right options and rctl show me stuff like: jail:jail22:memoryuse:deny=268435456

Re: Make use of RACCT and rctl

Wiadomość napisana przez Peter Ankerstål w dniu 2 mar 2013, o godz. 17:18: On Mar 2, 2013, at 5:15 PM, Edward Tomasz Napierała tr...@freebsd.org wrote: [..] Could you please do jls jid name and verify that a jail named jail20 is actually running? -- If you cut off my head, what

Re: gmirror crash writing to disk? Or is it su+j crash?

Wiadomość napisana przez Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com w dniu 29 sie 2013, o godz. 23:35: So I have a system running: FreeBSD walk.dclg.ca 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 # r254952: Wed Aug 28 03:02:55 EDT 2013 r...@walk.dclg.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/STRIKE i386 and it has two 2T SATA

Re: gmirror crash writing to disk? Or is it su+j crash?

Wiadomość napisana przez Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com w dniu 31 sie 2013, o godz. 00:49: Because someone said that there would be no logging of unerlying ATA errors without verbose, I rebooted with verbose and tried the same make -j4 again... and here is the relatively similar

Re: rctl logs swapuse even if swap is empty

It's been a while since I last touched that part of code, but I believe the swapuse limit is swap reservation. In other words, the amount of swap that would be used if the system had to swap, in the worst case scenario. On 0329T1151, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Hello Edward, I am trying to contact

Re: 10-STABLE merge of lemul64

On 0703T0850, Johannes Jost Meixner wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Glen, Here's the PR you asked for: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299 I've discussed the merge with dchagin@, and he couldn't do it between code slush and code freeze

Re: Question about "pcpu" rctl

On 0915T1000, John Dison via freebsd-stable wrote: > Hello and have a nice day! > > I try to limit cpu usage for multi-threaded process on a multi-core machine. > I use the following command: > # rctl -a user:myusernm:pcpu:deny=200/user > And I expect (please correct me if I am wrong) that all

Re: Reloading iscsi target, iscsi initiator panics

On 1014T2316, Frank de Bot (lists) wrote: > Hello, > > I have a FreeBSD 10.2 server running as iSCSI target. Another FreeBSD > 10.2 is an initiator and has several targets used. > > When I add a target and reload its config with 'service ctld reload', > the FreeBSD initiator server panics. It's

Re: Reloading iscsi target, iscsi initiator panics

On 1015T2005, Frank de Bot (lists) wrote: > Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: > > On 1014T2316, Frank de Bot (lists) wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I have a FreeBSD 10.2 server running as iSCSI target. Another FreeBSD > >> 10.2 is an initiator and has severa

Re: Reloading iscsi target, iscsi initiator panics

On 1018T2321, Frank de Bot (lists) wrote: > Frank de Bot wrote: > > Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: > >> On 1015T2005, Frank de Bot (lists) wrote: > >>> Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: > >>>> On 1014T2316, Frank de Bot (lists) wrote: > >>&

Re: r284665 causes MSI problems - ahcich2: Timeout in slot 11 port 0

On 0711T1956, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hello, r284665 causes ahci(4) to fail with timeouts when using MSI (the default). What's the hardware? 'hint.ahci.0.msi=0' is one way to make ahci(4) working with r284665, but obviously not the desired solution, it just disables usage of an MSI.

Re: FreeBSD as iSCSI target and VMWare ESX

On 0621T0835, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hi. > > Guys, does someone have experience with multiple LUNs on a target in > ctld ? Recently I was installing ESX on a bunch of diskless hosts, > connected to FreeBSD ctld. I was organizing them inside one target, > multiple LUNs. As soon as the

Re: Auto-mounting USB NTFS formatted devices on FreeBSD 10.2 and HEAD

On 0125T1756, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Kevin Oberman wrote: > > Since the removal of NTFS support, it is unclear how to get USB drives > > formatted as NTFS (or ExFAT) to automatically mount. Prior to FreeBSD 10 it > > was possible to replace /sbin/mount_ntfs with a script that would generate > >

Re: Auto-mounting USB NTFS formatted devices on FreeBSD 10.2 and HEAD

On 0124T1650, Kevin Oberman wrote: > Since the removal of NTFS support, it is unclear how to get USB drives > formatted as NTFS (or ExFAT) to automatically mount. Prior to FreeBSD 10 it > was possible to replace /sbin/mount_ntfs with a script that would generate > appropriate options and exec

Re: Auto-mounting USB NTFS formatted devices on FreeBSD 10.2 and HEAD

On 0125T1943, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > On 25.01.2016 19:14, Andrzej Bylicki wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I mounted all of my NTFS formatted drives via fuse from the > > sysutils/fusefs-ntfs port. I am not entirely sure, but assuming that it is > > possible to automate the mounting procedure by

Re: Interaction between make & autofs/automountd

On 0404T0549, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 07:28:49AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > > ... > > A couple of the machines use autofs & automountd to make the ports tree > > available on demand. (In the case of the 3rd, I manually mount it when > > needed, but that's not at

Re: 10.3 and reboot -r (reroot)

On 0502T2326, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:46:54PM +0200, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: > > On 0419T0906, Melissa Jenkins wrote: > > > I've been trying to get reboot -r to work but get an error that > > > kern.proc.pathname is undefined. It the

Re: 10.3 and reboot -r (reroot)

On 0419T0906, Melissa Jenkins wrote: > I've been trying to get reboot -r to work but get an error that > kern.proc.pathname is undefined. It then drops to single user mode. > > Interestingly I've checked the value of kern.proc.pathname and it appears to > be undefined on all the OS boxes we

Re: decent 40G network adapters

On 0118T1448, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hi. > > Could someone recommend a decent 40Gbit adapter that are proven to be > working under FreeBSD ? The intended purpose - iSCSI traffic, not much > pps, but rates definitely above 10G. I've tried Supermicro-manufactured > Intel XL710 ones (two

Re: cannot destroy '': dataset is busy vs iSCSI

On 0818T1958, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hi. > > I'm using zvol clones with iSCSI. Perdiodically I renew them and destroy > the old ones, but sometimes the clone gets stuck and refuses to be > destroyed: > > (I'm showing the full sequence so it's self explanatory who is who's parent) > >

Re: How to copy ACLs on ZFS with tar ?

> On 4 Mar 2017, at 11:50, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > Hi! > > I have a file with the following ACL (in fact, a whole tree with files > like that): > > srv$ getfacl myfile > # file: myfile > # owner: myuser > # group: domain-users > group:myuser:rw-p--aARWcCo-:---:allow >

Re: moutnroot failing on zpools in Azure after upgrade from 10 to 11 due to lack of waiting for da0

On 0313T1206, Pete French wrote: > I have a number of machines in Azure, all booting from ZFS and, until > the weekend, running 10.3 perfectly happily. > > I started upgrading these to 11. The first went fine, the second would > not boot. Looking at the boot diagnistics it is having problems

Re: moutnroot failing on zpools in Azure after upgrade from 10 to 11 due to lack of waiting for da0

On 0316T1004, Warner Losh wrote: > [[ stupid mouse ]] > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 6:06 AM, Pete French > > wrote: > >>> I don't like the delay and retry approach at all. > >> > >> Its not

Re: moutnroot failing on zpools in Azure after upgrade from 10 to 11 due to lack of waiting for da0

On 0313T1206, Pete French wrote: > I have a number of machines in Azure, all booting from ZFS and, until > the weekend, running 10.3 perfectly happily. > > I started upgrading these to 11. The first went fine, the second would > not boot. Looking at the boot diagnistics it is having problems

Re: ctld: only 579 iSCSI targets can be created

On 0922T1036, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hi, > > I have old 11-STABLE as an iSCSI server, but out of the blue I > encountered weird problem: only 579 targets can be created. I mean, I am > fully aware that the out-of-the-box limit is 128 targets, with is > enforced by the CTL_MAX_PORTS

Re: removable storage usability, devd, hald and X11-desktop in general

On 0519T2035, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: > Hello, > > after 10 years I replaced my personal desktop machine (FreeBSD8 -> > FreeBSD12). > While aware of OS progress, I haven't followed any development on the > X11 planet. > > To my surprise, things were in better shape 10 years ago, regarding >

Re: iSCSI initiator multipath

On 0629T1330, Frank (lists) wrote: > Hi, > > I have a  HA setup with LIO on linux. The exact set up is can be found > here: http://docs.ceph.com/docs/mimic/rbd/iscsi-target-cli/ > > I'm trying to use FreeBSD as initiator for this, but I can't manage to > get it working. Is this kind of setup

FreeBSD Quarterly Status Report - Third Quarter 2018

FreeBSD Project Quarterly Status Report - 3rd Quarter 2018 With FreeBSD having gone all the way to 12, it is perhaps useful to take a look back at all the things that have been accomplished, in terms of many visible changes, as well as all the things that happen behind the scenes to

FreeBSD Quarterly Status Report - Fourth Quarter 2018

FreeBSD Project Quarterly Status Report - 4th Quarter 2018 Since we are still on this island among many in this vast ocean of the Internet, we write this message in a bottle to inform you of the work we have finished and what lies ahead of us. These deeds that we have wrought with our

FreeBSD Quarterly Status Report - First Quarter 2019

FreeBSD Project Quarterly Status Report - 1st Quarter 2019 As spring leads into summer, we reflect back on what the FreeBSD project has accomplished in the first quarter of 2019. Events included FOSDEM and AsiaBSDCon, the FreeBSD Journal is now free to everyone, ASLR is available in

FreeBSD Quarterly Status Report - Second Quarter 2019

FreeBSD Project Quarterly Status Report - 2nd Quarter 2019 This quarter our report includes some interesting topics easily accessible to anyone, even if you are not a programmer: we report the link to a presentation of the 2019 FreeBSD survey results at BSDCan 2019 and describe an

Re: two questions about autofs on FBSD

On 0103T1602, Lee Damon wrote: > I am (reluctantly) replacing am-utils (amd) with autofs. To do this I > need to replace a lot of functionality that I've had embedded for a very > long time and which my users absolutely rely on. I have two (so far) > questions that I need to solve before I can