In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My gigabit nic has gone bad (after months of working just fine it's
saying sk0 watchdog timeout after a day or so of operation - temp
fix is to reboot) - I'm looking for pointers for a low cos but
functional gigabit PCI 32 card that runs
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 11:36:28 + (GMT), Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Last week, I ordered byself a new notebook -- for reasons of price, stock,
features, etc, I went with the Lenovo z60t 2511.
Hmmm. Last week, I ordered myself a new laptop -- for reasons of
price, availability,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-5.x was never really for production use, in the same way 3.x never
was.
Why do people continue to say this? Many sites have used, are still
using, and plan to continue to use, 5.x in production. ftp5/cvsup3
ran 5.x until a few months ago, and I have a netnews
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jeff Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should see something like write failed: host is down and the
session will terminate. Of course, when ssh exits, the TCP connection
closes. The only way to see that it's still open and active is by
writing (or using) an
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
Is the compiled time zone info file binary compatible across FreeBSD
versions?
It is backwards-compatible across all versions of the Olson timezone
library going back to before there was a FreeBSD, on all platforms,
regardless of architecture (modulo bugs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] Barney Wolff writes:
As of 13:06 EST, the commits had made it to head but were NOT tagged
with RELENG_4 or RELENG_5_0 from cvsup3.
cvsup3 updates every hour at 15 after. I'm afraid you were just
unlucky.
- -GAWollman
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
Any chance that someone will finally commit the fixes to prevent the
POSIX_C_SOURCE warnings from showing up? I saw a number of posts on this
topic, but it still seems like it's not officially committed
/usr/include/sys/cdefs.h:273: warning:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 20:36:09 +0100, Matthias Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I posted about softupdate problems on a SCSI system with DISABLED WRITE
CACHE, on a somewhat flakey Micropolis drive that froze and caused
If the hardware is broken, all bets are off, soft updates or no.
-GAWollman
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Ames writes:
For us poor saps in Indiana... could we get a new zoneinfo port
prior to 5.5-R?
Sorry, I've been unable to devote any attention at all to FreeBSD in
the past three months or so. I'm hoping to clear the backlog soon,
but I don't think that I'll be able to
In article 20010511172756$[EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
I'm not sure how to monitor sendmail with SNMP, and would be
interested in hearing from others what tools they use to monitor SMTP
traffic on their FreeBSD systems.
Depends on what and how you want to monitor. For BIND, I wrote a
little
In article
mit.lcs.mail.freebsd-stable/045401c0f426$4a45d900$[EMAIL PROTECTED] you
write:
*** Problem installing ./foo , it will remain to merge by hand
That's because someone(tm) removed the `-c' options to `install' from
the -stable version of mergemaster, even though the -stable version
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 12:47:32 -0700, Jordan Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
No, I didn't miss it. You and Jason are simply asking for information
I don't have to give you and you're not going to get.
You are trying to tell me you are incapable of running `du -s | mail
freebsd-hubs' before
In article mit.lcs.mail.freebsd-stable/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
you write:
/usr/local/etc/cvsup/prefixes/FreeBSD.cvs/src/contrib/sendmail/BuildTools/OS/A-UX,v:
randy Is anyone else getting this message, and is it being fixed?
I've been told it's only on cvsup3. Try changing servers until it is
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Freddie Cash writes:
Oh, gods, please, no! That is one of the things I absolutely hate
about Debian (and its derivatives). There are some packages on Debian
where they use separate text files for each configuration option
(ProFTPd, for examples). It is a huge mess
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Eh I think I saw something like this myself.
Do you by a chance have that new device sg in your kernel?
I assume you do (GENERIC) - try to drop it.
I am not sure if this is some brokenness of that driver or fighting of
several USB drivers
In article aanlktikggsyrlnds6oihw2u3syjezrrqwdsa9z4t7...@mail.gmail.com,
amvandem...@gmail.com writes:
For the correct order, shutdown -r calls reboot which calls init which
calls rc.shutdown.
No. shutdown(8) sends a SIGINT to init(8), which runs rc.shutdown and
then calls reboot(2) as its
In article 4d0c49a2.4000...@freebsd.org, do...@freebsd.org writes:
In order to avoid repeating the scenario where we have a version of BIND
in the base that is not supported by the vendor I am proposing that we
upgrade to BIND 9.6-ESV in FreeBSD RELENG_7.
+1
All users are going to want working
In article alpine.osx.2.00.1012261912460.43...@hotlap.local,
sp...@bway.net writes:
Other gotchas would be some of the periodic scripts - you don't want
locate.updatedb traversing all that, or the setuid checks.
locate.updatedb in 9-current doesn't do that, by default. Arguably
you want the
In article 4ee6295b.3020...@cran.org.uk, brucecran.org.uk writes:
This isn't something that can be fixed by tuning ULE? For example for
desktop applications kern.sched.preempt_thresh should be set to 224 from
its default.
Where do you get that idea? I've never seen any evidence for this
In article 4ee6595c.3080...@cran.org.uk, br...@cran.org.uk writes:
On 12/12/2011 19:23, Garrett Wollman wrote:
Where do you get that idea? I've never seen any evidence for this
proposition (although the claim is repeated often enough). What are
the specific circumstances that make this useful
In article 20120217021019.ga61...@icarus.home.lan,
Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
So for version 0.90 of their metadata format, you lose drive capacity by
about 64-128KBytes, given that the space is needed for metadata.
Which is exactly what geom_mirror does, amazingly enough.
In article 719f8e0e-f88d-48e7-b2b7-aba44b4f4...@free.de,
galla...@free.de wrote:
Trying to install 9.0 release with a USB stick.
I use FreeBSD-9.0-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img
At first the bootup looks promising, but in the end it stops with Root
mount waiting for: usbus2 usbus1 usbus
The 9.0
This is unfortunately a very difficult issue to report (particularly
because I don't have console access to the machine until I get into
the office to reboot it). My server was happily serving NFS on top of
a huge ZFS pool when it ground to a halt -- but only partially. All
of the nfsd threads
In article 20120825041357.gd1...@glenbarber.us, g...@freebsd.org writes:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 04:55:48AM +0100, Ben Morrow wrote:
1. Is is sensible|supported to use freebsd-update to update just the src
component, followed by a normal buildworld/buildkernel to update the
rest of the system?
In article 504f4049.9080...@dest-unreach.be, nio...@dest-unreach.be
writes:
I'm under the illusion that I've found a bug in the FreeBSD kernel, but
since I'm new to FreeBSD, a quiet voice tells me it's probably a case of
you're doing it wrong.
Nope. It's a known bug in the version of
In article
cakvzwmwu2mouq7h5xa1aqxdomtmlj6fg98trsd5xmlfpcp5...@mail.gmail.com,
wynnwil...@gmail.com writes:
I've tried the 2.4.4 driver from Intel's site, but it still has the
same problems. Is a lagg using lacp with the ix interfaces working for
anyone else?
You bet.
lagg0:
In article 20121227162311$6...@grapevine.csail.mit.edu,
rai...@ultra-secure.de writes:
I'm creating my own repository and have created a key for it.
[...]
What does pkg expect to be in this file?
A public key. It does not use X.509 (nor is there any reason why it
should, although I suppose it
In article alpine.bsf.2.00.1301252014160.37...@wonkity.com,
wbl...@wonkity.com writes:
As far as best practices, situations vary so much that I don't know if
any drive ID method can be recommended. For a FreeBSD ZFS document, a
useful sample configuration is going to be small enough that
I just had a big fileserver deadlock in an odd way. I was
investigating a user's problem, and decided for various reasons to
restart mountd. It had been complaining like this:
Jan 28 21:06:43 nfs-prod-1 mountd[1108]: can't delete exports for
/usr/local/.zfs/snapshot/monthly-2013-01: Invalid
I posted a few days ago about what I thought was a ZFS-related
almost-deadlock. I have a bit more information now, but I'm still
puzzled. Hopefully someone else has seen this before.
While things are in the hung state, a zfs recv is running. It's
receiving an empty snapshot to one of the many
On a server that's been experiencing some issues, I note the following
in vmstat -z:
ITEM SIZE LIMIT USED FREE REQ FAIL SLEEP
UMA Kegs: 208, 0, 188, 16, 188, 0, 0
UMA Zones: 3456, 0, 188, 0, 188,
In article 20130221233838.gb92...@icarus.home.lan, j...@koitsu.org writes:
Wow, that's disappointing. I wonder if the underlying IPMI firmware has
a bug relating to using serial port speeds other than 115200.
The bug may be in the BIOS where it claims you can select some other
speed.
Certainly
We were having some memory starvation issues (which it turned out were
caused by our backup system), and I found it useful to create a munin
plugin to monitor UMA statistics (as displayed by 'vmstat -z'). As
I'm not interested in dealing with github.com, I thought I would share
it with the people
In article 8c68812328e3483ba9786ef155911...@multiplay.co.uk,
kill...@multiplay.co.uk writes:
Now interesting you should say that I've seen a stall recently on ZFS
only box running on 6 x SSD RAIDZ2.
The stall was caused by fairly large mysql import, with nothing else
running.
Then it happened I
In article 20130512205837.ga69...@icarus.home.lan, j...@koitsu.org writes:
You may also need to set kern.geom.debugflags=0x10 to inhibit GEOM's
safety measure / to permit writing to LBA 0; see GEOM(4) and search
for the word foot.
If you have set up your partitioning properly (read: following
In article 20130513032838.ga76...@icarus.home.lan, j...@koitsu.org write:
https://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot
5. Install the Protected MBR (pmbr) and gptzfsboot loader
Bug #1: Protective, not Protected.
Fixit# gpart bootcode -b /mnt2/boot/pmbr -p /mnt2/boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 ad0
In article 5e20544e3580a75759c3858f31894dc9.authentica...@ultimatedns.net,
bsd-li...@lcommand.com writes:
I haven't upgraded my tree(s) for awhile. My last attempt to rebuild
after an updating
src ports, resulted in nearly installing the entire ports tree, which
is why I've
waited so long. Try
In article alpine.bsf.2.00.1306270602300.99...@wonkity.com,
wbl...@wonkity.com writes:
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, Garrett Wollman wrote:
Having just gone through this in two different environments, I can
very very strongly recommend doing the following. It's not the easy
button of the TV
In article op.wzyd6vkx34t...@markf.office.supranet.net, f...@feld.me writes:
I've had zero problems with upgrades to Perl, etc after I stopped
compiling my packages in the host OS and started building the packages via
poudriere and using pkgng (sysutils/pkg). pkg can detect when a perl
In article
1375186900.23467.3223791.24cb3...@webmail.messagingengine.com,
f...@freebsd.org writes:
just import Unbound. However, if you can't reach any DNS servers I
assume you can't reach the roots either, so I don't understand what a
local recursor will gain you.
There are plenty of situations
I have a large (88-drive) zpool in which a drive was recently
replaced. (The pool has a bunch of duff Toshiba MK2001TRKB drives --
never ever pay money for these! -- and I'm trying to replace them one
by one before they fail completely.) The resilver on the first drive
replacement has been
I notice that systems of ours which were recently upgraded to 10.1 are
accumulating zombies at an alarming rate. (Well, alarming enough to
cause me to be paged at 4 in the morning, at any rate!) These zombies
are all children of auditd. Has anyone else seen or debugged this?
-GAWollman
< said:
>> 2) Stopping jails with virtual network stacks generates warnings from
>> UMA about memory being leaked.
> I'm given to understand that's Known, and presumably Not Quite Trivial
> To Fix. Since I'm not starting/stopping jails repeatedly as a normal
> runtime thing, I'm ignoring it.
The consensus when I asked seemed to be that VIMAGE+jail was the right
combination to give every container its own private loopback
interface, so I tried to build that. I noticed a few things:
1) The kernel prints out a warning message at boot time that VIMAGE is
"highly experimental". Should I
I have a new Dell server with a typical Dell hardware RAID. pciconf
identifies it as "MegaRAID SAS-3 3008 [Fury]"; mfiutil reports:
mfi0 Adapter:
Product Name: PERC H330 Adapter
Serial Number: 5AT00PI
Firmware: 25.3.0.0016
RAID Levels:
Battery Backup: not present
Sometimes when running "procstat -kk", I get the following error:
procstat: sysctl: kern.proc.pid: 1044: Cannot allocate memory
What is the condition that causes this? Is there a static limit in
procstat, or in the kernel, that needs to be increased?
-GAWollman
In article <20161002111719.6e22f...@x220.alogt.com>,
erichsfreebsdl...@alogt.com writes:
>'Host names are limited to {HOST_NAME_MAX} characters, not including
>the trailing null, currently 255.'
>
>which makes people assume that HOST_NAME_MAX is defined in unistd.h.
It should not make them
I've opened a bug about this before, which I can't cite by number
because bugzilla appears to be down at the moment. But I had this
problem recur tonight under otherwise idle conditions, so I was able
to get a set of kernel stacks without any confounding RPC activity
going on. This is on 10.2;
< said:
> If you're using a Skylake, I suspect that you can set the
> hw.skz63_enable tunable to 0 as a workaround, assuming you're not using
> any code that relies on Intel TSX. (I don't think there's anything in
> the base system that does.) There are some details in
>
<
said:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 08:24:38PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
>> Has anyone seen this before? It's on a busy NFS server, but hasn't
>> been observed on any of our other NFS servers.
>>
>> ---
Has anyone seen this before? It's on a busy NFS server, but hasn't
been observed on any of our other NFS servers.
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 35; apic id = 35
fault virtual address = 0x5a
fault
In article
eu...@grosbein.net writes:
>Long story short: 11.2-STABLE/amd64 r335757 leaked over 4600MB kernel
>wired memory over 81 days uptime
>out of 8GB total RAM.
Not a whole lot of evidence yet, but anecdotally I'm seeing the same
thing on some huge-memory NFS servers running releng/11.2.
< said:
> Both 11.3-RELEASE announcement and Release Notes mention this:
>> The ZFS filesystem has been updated to implement parallel mounting.
> I strongly suggest reading Release documentation in case of troubles
> after upgrade, at least. Or better, read *before* updating.
Two servers
< said:
> I am not sure how the original description leads to conclusion that
> problem is related to parallel mounting. From my point of view it
> sounds like a problem that root pool mounting happens based on name, not
> pool GUID that needs to be passed from the loader. We have seen problem
I recently upgraded several file servers from 11.2 to 11.3. All of
them boot from a ZFS pool called "tank" (the data is in a different
pool). In a couple of instances (which caused me to have to take a
late-evening 140-mile drive to the remote data center where they are
located), the servers
55 matches
Mail list logo
