Re: PAM modules; pthreads not reliably dispatching background threads :(.

On 09.02.20 12:25, Dr Josef Karthauser wrote: Hi Folks, Has anyone got any experience with PAM and pthreads? We’re using a 2FA module (pam_yubico https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=pam_yubico=8 ). It’s proving unreliable.

Re: No amdtemp sysctls, AMD Ryzen 5 3600X

Here is the patch to add support for 3rd gen Ryzen to amdtemp: Index: sys/dev/amdsmn/amdsmn.c === --- sys/dev/amdsmn/amdsmn.c    (revision 355171) +++ sys/dev/amdsmn/amdsmn.c    (working copy) @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@  #define   

Re: GENERIC crash 11.3-PRERELEASE (i386)

This list doesn't allow attachments. Diese Mailingliste erlaubt keine Anhänge. On 26.06.19 10:13, Schuendehuette, Matthias wrote: Hello, for some days now the GENERIC kernel of 11.3-PRERELEASE (i386) crashes on my ProLiant DL380 G5 server. Main error message is "kernel trap 12 with

Re: update of graphics/drm-next-kmod to Linux 4.11 level for recent CURRENT and 11-STABLE

On 28.02.18 18:03, Hadi Rezaee wrote: Hello there, My laptop is running FreeBSD-12 CURRENT, and i hadnt any problem with my graphic before upgrading drm-next (g20180117_3 -> 4.11.g20180224). But now it getting failed. Tried to build from source, but same result. Laptop model: Lenovo E470 I

Re: update of graphics/drm-next-kmod to Linux 4.11 level for recent CURRENT and 11-STABLE

On 25.02.18 16:48, Johannes M Dieterich wrote: Dear all, Please CC me as I am not subscribed. On behalf of the FreeBSDDesktop team and thanks to the tireless efforts of Johannes Lundberg and Hans Petter Selasky (hselasky), I am pleased to report that the graphics/drm-next-kmod port just

Re: Boot partition size

On 29/01/2017 06:43, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: On 29/1/17 3:50pm, Warner Losh wrote: (2) shrinking a swap partition to snag some space Yes, except I put my swap into a zvol. I did this when I lost a disk once with a dedicated swap partition and that caused the system to crash. So I realised

Re: buildworld build times 10-stable vs. 11-stable

On 15/01/2017 17:40, Dan Mack wrote: I have a system which builds world, kernel, install, boot, installworld, reboot several times per week. I just noticed that my build times increased from about (just cherry picking a couple build logs): Starting build of FreeBSD SVN [309852] 10.3-STABLE

Re: Help! two machines ran out of swap and corrupted their zpools!

repos? -- Jan Bramkamp ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: vt console driver and default vga mode: breaking POLA

On 09/09/16 11:59, Borja Marcos wrote: Hi I apologise for being late on this, but I just noticed. The new vt console driver has a very important change in behavior, replacing the ancient “BIOS” text mode with a graphic VGA mode. I don’t know how many people relies on BIOS serial redirection

Re: FreeBSD 10.3 slow boot on Supermicro X11SSW-F

On 28/06/16 15:59, Miroslav Lachman wrote: I installed FreeBSD 10.3 on brand new machine Supermicro X11SSW-F. It sits on top of 4x 1TB Samsung SSDs on ZFS RAIDZ2. The booting is painfully slow from BTX to menu to kernel loading. Progress indicated by \ | / - characters is changing by speed of 1

Re: Best practices for ZFS setup for a strictly SSD based system?

On 09/02/16 16:54, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: Hi, all, while there is quite a bit of documentation on how to improve ZFS performance by using a combination of rotating disks and SSDs, I have not found much about an SSD only setup. We are planning to try a hosting server with 8 SATA SSDs with

Re: Periodic jobs triggering panics in 10.1 and 10.2

On 09/12/15 01:04, Michael B. Eichorn wrote: On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 16:31 -0600, Dustin Wenz wrote: I suspect this is a zfs bug that is triggered by the access patterns in the periodic scripts. There is significant load on the system when the scheduled processes start, because all jails

Re: Periodic jobs triggering panics in 10.1 and 10.2

On 09/12/15 13:45, Michelle Sullivan wrote: Michael B. Eichorn wrote: On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 16:31 -0600, Dustin Wenz wrote: I suspect this is a zfs bug that is triggered by the access patterns in the periodic scripts. There is significant load on the system when the scheduled processes start,

Re: GPU suggestion: gtx 750ti

On 04/09/15 16:34, Dot Yet wrote: Hello, I currently run haswell based desktop and am planning to add a second gpu to get decent graphics functional. I am thinking about purchasing nvidia gtx 750ti. can anyone confirm if its supported by drivers and is capable of hardware acceleration? if

Re: LDAP authentication confusion

On 15.07.2013 21:09, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, Michael Loftis wrote: nss_ldap fulfills most of the get*ent calls, thus based on the bits of your configuration you've exposed I think you're ending up with that behavior and not using pam_ldap at all. Instead the authentication

Re: LDAP authentication confusion

On 15.07.2013 21:25, Mark Felder wrote: On Mon, Jul 15, 2013, at 14:19, Jan Bramkamp wrote: More than that. In my opinion it should be updated by replacing nss_ldap and pam_ldap with nss-pam-ldapd which splits the job of both into a shared daemon talking to the LDAP server and small stubs

Re: LDAP authentication confusion

On 15.07.2013 21:44, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, Jan Bramkamp wrote: On 15.07.2013 21:09, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, Michael Loftis wrote: nss_ldap fulfills most of the get*ent calls, thus based on the bits of your configuration you've exposed I think you're

Re: LDAP authentication confusion

On 15.07.2013 21:51, Daniel Eischen wrote: Wouldn't it be easier just to edit /etc/nsswitch.conf anyway? PAM and NSS switch are two different subsystems. NSS is just for resource lookups (users, groups, hosts, ...). PAM is for access control. With ldap in nsswitch.conf for users and groups

Re: LDAP authentication confusion

On 16.07.2013 00:47, Ben Morrow wrote: Quoth Jan Bramkamp cr...@rlwinm.de: On 15.07.2013 21:51, Daniel Eischen wrote: Wouldn't it be easier just to edit /etc/nsswitch.conf anyway? PAM and NSS switch are two different subsystems. NSS is just for resource lookups (users, groups, hosts

Re: LDAP authentication confusion

On 16.07.2013 04:28, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, Jan Bramkamp wrote: On 16.07.2013 00:47, Ben Morrow wrote: Quoth Jan Bramkamp cr...@rlwinm.de: On 15.07.2013 21:51, Daniel Eischen wrote: Wouldn't it be easier just to edit /etc/nsswitch.conf anyway? PAM and NSS switch