On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 12:45:52AM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
* Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-24 17:08 -0400]:
Unfortunately portupgrade (nor portupgrade-devel) cannot yet handle
the rigors of the xorg upgrade without a small bit of help:
# portupgrade -Rf
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 11:59:51AM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Grr, OK. Well, you might have got it wrong, so we still need to see a
portupgrade log from someone who followed the directions.
Kris,
FWIW - I followed the instructions in UPDATING - unfortunately I did
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 11:06:46AM +0300, Iulian M wrote:
joke
Yep... you have to rebuild everything. Not to fix the error but just because
you don't read other threads on the ML
/joke
On another thread the conclusion was that installing x11-fonts/font-alias
solved the fixed font
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 11:31:32PM +0100, Volker wrote:
talking to myself... ;)
On 2007-05-23 10:27, Volker wrote:
Currently I'm watching this machine over the distance and waiting for the
freeze...
...and the machine freeze came this afternoon. I've had a good dump
of the network
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 02:57:59PM -0500, Roger Miranda wrote:
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 14:03, Kris Kennaway wrote:
What happens if you enable INVARIANTS and/or WITNESS?
I have enabled WITNESS, I have no experienced a freeze yet. But i did
notice
on boot an WITNESS message
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 12:24:36PM -0500, Roger Miranda wrote:
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 11:41, Volker wrote:
There's nothing of interest in the logs (I suspect it's too late to
have any daemon write something to syslogd as the system is then
dead). As I also think, this is somehow related to
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 04:30:50PM +0100, Chris wrote:
The recent ports freeze has also concerned me, this is the longest
ports freeze I have witnessed since I started using FreeBSD years ago
and its for a desktop element of the os, does it matter if servers
running FreeBSD have to remain on
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:43:54AM -0600, Scott Swanson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/src/sys/i386/conf kldstat
Id Refs AddressSize Name
13 0xc040 65e308 kernel
21 0xc0a5f000 59f20acpi.ko
So, yes then :) Can you follow the steps for debugging modules and
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 02:42:51PM -0500, Roger Miranda wrote:
Good Day everyone.
I have this one system setup with If_bridge to filter traffic. It does work
quite good. I am running FreeBSD 6.2 but as a TINYBSD Image. The one
problem I have is I place the machine at the perimeter on our
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:21:25PM -0500, Roger Miranda wrote:
On Friday 11 May 2007 16:00, Kris Kennaway wrote:
See the developers handbook chapter on kernel debugging.
Kris, I have gone through the kernel debugging sections of the developers
handbook. The one problem is when I get
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:43:06PM -0500, Roger Miranda wrote:
You missed that the debugger is there to debug bugs (including
deadlocks). Break to the debugger and obtain the necessary debugging
I should've been more clear. I can not break to the debugger (CTRL-ALT-ESC)
when the
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 02:49:45PM -0600, Scott Swanson wrote:
Hello all,
I have a couple dozen SuperMicro servers in production and have had
reoccurring crashing issues on a couple of them that are under higher
load.
After managing to pry one out of production, I have been able to
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 07:00:00PM -0600, Scott Swanson wrote:
Unread portion of the kernel message buffer:
spin lock smp rendezvous held by 0xc95a5900 for 5 seconds
What is thread 0xc95a5900 doing?
Kris
Is this the best way to determine the action of the thread?
Regards;
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 07:13:51PM -0600, Scott Swanson wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 07:00:00PM -0600, Scott Swanson wrote:
Unread portion of the kernel message buffer:
spin lock smp rendezvous held by 0xc95a5900 for 5 seconds
What is thread 0xc95a5900 doing
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 07:44:37PM -0600, Scott Swanson wrote:
(kgdb) proc 18303
(kgdb) bt
#0 0xc0644f5b in sched_switch (td=0xc95a5900, newtd=0xc92aad80,
flags=0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/sched_4bsd.c:973
#1 0xeaa6dcb4 in ?? ()
#2 0x0001 in ?? ()
#3 0x0ee2c000 in ?? ()
#4
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 02:04:57PM +0800, Mars G. Miro wrote:
On 5/8/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 11:45:12AM +0800, Mars G. Miro wrote:
that or, does mfs speeding things up really work? remains to be
seen ...
Of course it does...even the fastest
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 07:01:02PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Now, that makes sense to me, I can understand that ... but, how would
that look as far as netstat -nA shows? Or, would it? For example, I
have:
You should use -na to list all sockets, not -nA.
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 11:45:12AM +0800, Mars G. Miro wrote:
that or, does mfs speeding things up really work? remains to be
seen ...
Of course it does...even the fastest disk hardware on the market
(well, as of a year ago) is several times slower than memory writing,
and commodity disk
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 12:38:39PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
What exactly does that one mean? I've searched Google, and all I'm finding
is
a pointer to swap_pager.c, but nothing else ...
What does that one mean? What would cause that sort of error?
You need to increase the
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 03:10:01PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
--On Saturday, May 05, 2007 10:49:29 -0700 Matthew Dillon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The swblock structures only apply to actively swapped out data. Mark,
how much data is actually swapped out (pstat -s) at the
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:11:35PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:That's why I think that the socket issue and this one are co-related ...
with
:everything started up (93 jails), my swap usage right now is:
:
:mars# pstat -s
:Device 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 12:33:48PM -0700, Anurag Jain wrote:
I am trying to move to Xorg 7.2 from git repository.
As part of the xorg - make all process -
I am getting the following error for xdriinfo package.
Don't do that yet, we're still finalizing the upgrade procedure you
need to follow.
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 02:39:55AM +0800, Mars G. Miro wrote:
Greetz,
I got my hands on a SunFire x4600. This is a dual-core 8-way
Opteron (dmesg shows 16 CPUs) w/c has 32G RAM. FreeBSD 6.2/amd64 runs
fine on it despite:
- 'reboot' doesnt work, machine just hangs in there.
There is a
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 03:29:05AM +0800, Mars G. Miro wrote:
You definitely should be measuring some difference - you need to use
time(1) though instead of just estimating.
I did use time, here:
make -j32 buildworld:
disk
3229.975u 8981.269s 18:55.21 1075.6%3804+2164k
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 07:04:43PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
make -DFORCE_PKG_REGISTER [re]install do install a second port (duplicate)
is this a bug or do I have some problem on this machine?
6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Fri Apr 27 20:46:32 BRT 2007
portsnap update I did today
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 04:34:44PM +0200, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
On Saturday 28 April 2007, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Is it a bug or is it a desired feature, that mdconfig -l doesn't list
all devices, but only last 95 devices?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/# mdconfig -l
md545 md546 md547 md548
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:14:20PM +0400, Oleg Derevenetz wrote:
Until you (or a developer) have analyzed the resulting information,
you cannot definitively determine whether or not your problem is the
same as a given random other problem, and you may just confuse the
issue by making
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:20:25PM +0400, Oleg Derevenetz wrote:
??? Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:14:20PM +0400, Oleg Derevenetz wrote:
Until you (or a developer) have analyzed the resulting information,
you cannot definitively determine whether
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 02:01:57AM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 03:56:32AM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
Another 6-STABLE (cvsupped on 27/03/07) example, with diagnostics taken
rather sooner after the hang. Processes with wmesg=ufs feature often in
the ps output.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:53:32AM +1000, Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
LI Xin wrote:
Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 03:56:32AM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 02:08:48PM +, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
At work, amoungst my stable of old computers running
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:53:08AM +0800, LI Xin wrote:
Hi, Oleg,
Oleg Derevenetz wrote:
??? LI Xin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
I'm not very sure if this is specific to one disk controller. Actually
I got some occasional reports about similar hangs on amd64 6.2-RELEASE
(slightly
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 01:27:27PM +0100, Tom Judge wrote:
Kai wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 04:14:23PM +0200, Christian Walther wrote:
On 19/04/07, Kai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:53:32PM +0200, Kai wrote:
Hello all,
We're running into regular
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 05:35:47PM +0200, Kai wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 02:33:29PM +0200, Kai wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:53:32PM +0200, Kai wrote:
Hello all,
We're running into regular panics on our webserver after upgrading
from 4.x to 6.2-stable:
Hi all,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 01:24:52PM +0100, Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
Recently I have noticed that one of our Dell PE1950's has been crashing
a lot with the following reason supervisor read, page not present.
The system runs 6.2 Release under i386.
I have attached 2 back traces, and I still
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 01:12:30PM -0400, Michael Proto wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 01:24:52PM +0100, Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
Recently I have noticed that one of our Dell PE1950's has been crashing
a lot with the following reason supervisor read, page not present
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:08:57PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +0400
From: Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and what is this, i mean why:
WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant
WARNING: MPSAFE network
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:09:34PM +0400, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hello!
My attempt to make buildworld on freshly cvsupped 6.2-RELEASEp3 fails
strangely.
AWK=awk sh
/usr/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncurses/include/MKncurses_def.sh
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 09:35:21AM +1000, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
On 19/04/2007, at 9:05 AM, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
RELEASE_4_EOL is the tag where the 4.X support was not yet removed.
We only started to remove the 4.X support after the tag, thus you
should still be able to build ports
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 02:03:36AM +0200, Marc Santhoff wrote:
Hi,
after cvsup'ing to RELEASE_4_EOL compiling accessibility/atk does not
work:
# make clean all
=== Cleaning for pkg-config-0.21
=== Cleaning for glib-2.12.9
=== Cleaning for gmake-3.81_1
=== Cleaning for
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 09:59:58AM +0200, Robert Joosten wrote:
Hi,
---cut!--
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/genattrtab.c:6240:
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 11:05:22AM +0100, Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
I have seen some problems with a new file system that I created
yesterday in that I could repeatedly get the system to crash in with a
mkdir.
Here is the disk information
mfid1: MFI Logical Disk on mfi1
mfid1: 5716992MB
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 09:09:39AM -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
Hi Chris,
Well - the NFS server is 4.5-RELEASE - a rather old box.
Everything worked fine when the shop was all 4.x boxes, but as soon
as we put in a 5.x or 6.x box - the NFS clients on those (5.x/6.x) boxes
locked
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 01:43:46AM -0700, Chris H. wrote:
# uname -a
FreeBSD host.domain.tld 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 26
16:27:14 PST 2007
Greetings,
Does anyone know when NFS and friends will be working again?
It works for the rest of us, so any problems you are seeing
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 09:46:37AM -0700, Chris H. wrote:
Quoting Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 01:43:46AM -0700, Chris H. wrote:
# uname -a
FreeBSD host.domain.tld 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 26
16:27:14 PST 2007
Greetings,
Does anyone know
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:16:43PM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
At Wed, 8 Mar 2006 19:57:22 -0500,
Kris Kennaway wrote:
No, no, you got me wrong. The pidfile is left locked after cron stopped
running (with /etc/rc.d/cron stop). This behaviour must be wrong.
OK, I misunderstood
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 11:22:47AM +0700, zen wrote:
Dear users;
i recently compile my kernel to enable SMP support,
but during process makedepend it shown these error messages:
You probably broke something, but you didn't give us enough
information to tell what. Start by explaining exactly
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 11:36:03AM +0700, zen wrote:
dear users,
sorry for my ignorant...
i just wanna ask you a simple question.
how much is the maximal RAM freebsd can handle??
You forgot to mention which architecture you are running.
Kris
___
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 02:25:44PM +0200, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
Hello,
I've got these repeatable crashes with:
klon# uname -a
FreeBSD klon.klsp.kharkov.ua 6.2-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #7:
Fri Mar 23 11:26:01 EET 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KLON i386
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 04:19:52PM +0100, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
Sometimes I'm noticing very high memory usage. Nearly my whole memory (1GB)
is
used although I'm running my usual set of processes - normally memory usage
is much lower.
I killed most processes but memory usage remains high.
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 05:48:27PM +0200, Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
Hello,
Since raid degradation I have had corrupted swap partition and unable to
boot the kernel.
After detecting HDD I have Fatal trap 12: page fault ... and current
process 0 (swapper).
This happens even when I boot
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 07:05:21PM +0200, Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 05:48:27PM +0200, Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
Hello,
Since raid degradation I have had corrupted swap partition and unable to
boot the kernel.
After detecting HDD I have
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 03:42:06PM -0400, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 03:47:29PM +0100, Martin wrote:
You can view my benchmark here:
https://manuelmartini.it/bench/mysql/
Can you add links your kernel config file for
each configuration you tested?
It looks like
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 09:13:56PM +0100, Martin wrote:
Il giorno Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:42:06 -0400
Craig Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 03:47:29PM +0100, Martin wrote:
You can view my benchmark here:
https://manuelmartini.it/bench/mysql/
Can you
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 09:19:08PM +0100, Martin wrote:
Also some more discussion would be useful, e.g. you appear to be
testing on different machines so the most important thing to
understand is how, or whether, the hardware differs. You do link to
the dmesgs, but it's hard to process
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 01:27:22AM +0100, Alban Hertroys wrote:
On Mar 13, 2007, at 22:45, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I used sql-bench
/usr/ports/databases/mysql50-server/work/mysql-5.0.33/sql-bench/
(at this time)
the default Makefile of port have --without-bench options so u
need
to make
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 12:44:03AM +0100, Eirik ?verby wrote:
Hi all,
I just installed 6.2-RELEASE on a Supermicro 6013P-8 server, a dual
P4-Xeon 2.4ghz with 4GB ECC memory and an asr driven SCSI RAID
controller.
It has been working OK (although I suspect the asr driven, being
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 10:59:46AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:03:30PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 15:53, Alex Kozlov wrote:
= Yes, I switched to swap-backed md already. But the malloc-based variety
is
= currently the _default_
Documented in the manpage, use swap backing or reserve enough space.
Kris
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:59:08AM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
The memory-mounted /tmp filled up on this 6.2-PRERELEASE system (as of Nov 7).
Unfortunately, instead of the process existing due to ENOSPC, the entire
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:24:21PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 16:09, Kris Kennaway wrote:
= Documented in the manpage, use swap backing or reserve enough space.
=
= Kris
The strings panic and -o reserve are mentioned in neither mdmfs(8) nor in
rc.conf(5
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:46:57PM -0500, Michael Proto wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:24:21PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
The strings panic and -o reserve are mentioned in neither mdmfs(8) nor
in
rc.conf(5)... Is one supposed to look elsewhere?
Yes
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 10:09:50PM +0100, Volker wrote:
On 02/19/07 20:51, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 08:40:37PM +0100, Volker wrote:
The tape sits there since 48 hours writing a block of data every
other minute and still didn't fill up the tape completely. The
system
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 08:40:37PM +0100, Volker wrote:
Hi!
For my dentist I'm currently in the process of destroying some tape
cartridges (SLR7) and also two hard disks (147G SCSI).
As I started for the tapes, I've used dd to fill the tape with
random garbage. Just a simple `dd
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 09:12:38AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Volker [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 02/19/07 20:51, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 08:40:37PM +0100, Volker wrote:
The tape sits there since 48 hours writing a block of data every
other minute and still
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 06:21:52PM -0600, Billy Newsom wrote:
When a SMP machine does not have an AT keyboard controller, there needs
to be a way to reboot the machine under FreeBSD!
Like the sysctl that was added in 6.2?
hw.acpi.handle_reboot=1
Kris
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 09:31:47PM +0200, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
Hello!
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Not that it contradicts anything you said, but it's worth
re-emphasizing that there is apparently no-one in the community
interested in maintaining pppd on FreeBSD, which
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:38:08PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
Not to suggest that any pppd/kernel interaction problems ought not to be
addressed by those wishing to maintain pppd for linux compatibility or
other reasons, but the reality is that most FreeBSD users have long
preferred user ppp for
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:24:54PM -0500, Michael R. Wayne wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 11:28:16AM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 02:24:35AM -0500, Michael R. Wayne wrote:
We have a nubmer of similar machines that were initiallly formated
with 6.2 before it was
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 10:12:26PM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Hello,
I don't understand this error:
=== zlib (all)
cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=pentium3 -Werror -D_KERNEL
-DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 01:02:32AM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Am Sonntag, 28. Januar 2007 23:17 schrieb Kris Kennaway:
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 10:12:26PM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Hello,
I don't understand this error:
=== zlib (all)
[...]
1 error
*** Error code
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 08:45:15PM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
Hello and thank you for your response...
Quoting Mike Jakubik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris H. wrote:
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP (1102.51-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = AuthenticAMD Id = 0x680 Stepping = 0
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 10:51:21PM +, Joao Barros wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to upgrade my Sun Ultra 5 from 6.1R to 6.2R and bumped
into this when doing a make buildword:
building static binutils library
ranlib libbinutils.a
=== gnu/usr.bin/binutils/addr2line (all)
cc -O2 -pipe -I.
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 03:30:18AM +, Joao Barros wrote:
On 1/26/07, Matthew Herzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have never been able to upgrade Sparc64 from source. I suspect it is
nearly impossible.
Please let me know if you suceed.
Matthew,
We established long ago that you have a
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 03:34:46PM +0100, Roman Le Houelleur wrote:
Hi everyone,
It's been about a year or so that I upgrade my box to RELENG_6
from time to time. I got some suprises this week, I've seen a
few things that made me think of hardware problems but some are
definitly soft.
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 02:48:18PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Or waiting until the snapshot operation finishes. You (still) haven't
determined that it's actually hanging as opposed to just waiting for
the snapshot operation to finish.
Just upgraded to 6.2-STABLE
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 06:22:31AM +0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've found word 'installathon' in share/dict/freebsd dictionary. Is it
error?
No, this is a dictionary of freebsd-related jargon. An installathon
is an advocacy event where the aim is to install FreeBSD on many
computers.
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:13:57AM -0800, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
FWIW, with this patch I find making snap-shots a lot more reliable:
--- sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.c.orig Wed Mar 22 09:42:31 2006
+++ sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.cMon Nov 20 14:59:13 2006
@@ -282,6 +282,8 @@ restart:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 09:26:47PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Doug Ambrisko wrote:
| or things can get wedged. We have some other patches as well that
might
| be required. As a hack on a local server we have been using snap shots
| to do a hot back-up of a data base each morning.
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 01:17:33PM -0800, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
Kris Kennaway writes:
| On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 09:26:47PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
| Doug Ambrisko wrote:
| | or things can get wedged. We have some other patches as well that
| might
| | be required. As a hack
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 09:55:00PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
..
The file-system would come to a stop, processes stuck on bio, snap-shots
not finishing etc. This was caused by the system running out of usable
buffers. The change forces them to be flushed
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 05:13:16AM +0100, Par Leijonhufvud wrote:
I have a FreeBSD box (running ancient 4.8) that used to collect email
fine with fetchmail. Then after te latest portupgrade of fetchmail it
stopped working. When trying to run it manual I see the error shown
below.
Anyone
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 11:33:33AM -0500, Sven Willenberger wrote:
This is indicating a problem either with your bge hardware or the driver.
Kris
I suspect the driver: This same hardware setup was being used as a
databse server with FreeBSD 5.4. I had been using the bge driver but set
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 02:03:28PM -0500, Sven Willenberger wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 13:22 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 11:33:33AM -0500, Sven Willenberger wrote:
This is indicating a problem either with your bge hardware or the
driver.
Kris
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 04:30:23PM -0500, Sven Willenberger wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 15:24 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 02:03:28PM -0500, Sven Willenberger wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 13:22 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 11:33:33AM -0500
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 06:04:13PM -0500, Sven Willenberger wrote:
Sven Willenberger presumably uttered the following on 12/18/06 12:33:
On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 23:20 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 02:29:58PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
SNIP
FWIW, I do
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 07:14:41PM +1100, Geoff Roberts wrote:
Hi,
I can consistantly make my system freeze when building makeworld and
running dump at the same time. The system actually locks - I have to
hit the reset switch to bring the system back to life.
I also get a core dump on
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 09:06:24PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Hi,
I got the following Filesystem:
FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused
/dev/da0a 1.3T422G823G34% 565952 1828334700%
Running of a 3ware 9550, on a dual core Opteron
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:25:34AM -0800, Scott Oertel wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 09:06:24PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Hi,
I got the following Filesystem:
FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused
/dev/da0a 1.3T422G
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 01:40:12PM -0800, Scott Oertel wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:25:34AM -0800, Scott Oertel wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 09:06:24PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Hi,
I got the following Filesystem
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 04:52:29PM +0100, Krzysztof Kowalik wrote:
Hello.
We are running an (IRC) server that under high-rate traffic (ie. DDoS
attack) stops to respond to the network. The network remains locked up
even after the original attack stops. However running tcpdump (which
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 02:54:15PM +0100, Martin Sch?tte wrote:
Kris Kennaway schrieb:
The machine has 4gb of ram, a 4gb swap partition on /dev/amrd0s1b, and
provides nfs/nis/samba/printing (cups) services.
I have the same problem with FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE on my SMP-System
(2xAthlon MP
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 03:57:35PM -0500, Matthew Herzog wrote:
Hello.
I run FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p7 on an UltraSparc 5 machine.
I ran chkrootkit yesterday and saw this:
Checking `lkm'... You have94 process hidden for readdir command
chkproc: Warning: Possible LKM Trojan installed
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 09:54:11AM +1100, Geoffrey Giesemann wrote:
Running a fairly recent RELENG_6 SMP kernel, I had a nasty experience
where filesystem corruption on a pair of RAID5 volumes on an arcmsr
would cause the machine to panic during the background fsck. This
resulted in a merry
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 07:40:16AM -0500, Ken Sallot wrote:
Greetings,
Yesterday morning I came in to find a 6.2-RC1 server deadlocked in a loop
with the following error messages on the console:
swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: bufobj: 0, blkno: 5, size: 4096
swap_pager: indefinite
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 08:20:21PM +, Chris wrote:
On 18/12/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:39:13AM +, Chris wrote:
On 14/12/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 01:28:48AM +, Chris wrote:
It does make
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:39:13AM +, Chris wrote:
On 14/12/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 01:28:48AM +, Chris wrote:
It does make sense if thats the problem since the entire server even
locally stops working properly, and it always follows
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 09:22:32AM +0100, Bram wrote:
Hi all,
I turned kernel debuging on and tried the key combinations when the
machine was stuck
but it did not really help because the machine was not responding to this.
I do think that I might have found the cause of the problem.
I
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 10:01:19AM -0500, Sven Willenberger wrote:
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 12:38 +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Kostik Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ko What version of sys/nfsserver/nfs_serv.c do you use ? If it is older
than
ko 1.156.2.7, please,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 02:12:16PM -0500, Sven Willenberger wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 13:15 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 10:01:19AM -0500, Sven Willenberger wrote:
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 12:38 +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Kostik Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 07:09:15PM +1100, Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
- Daichi Goto's unionfs-p16 has been applied.
- The Areca driver is 1.20.00.12 from the Areca website.
- sym(4) patch (see PR/89550), but no sym controller present.
- SMP + FAST_IPSEC +
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 01:28:48AM +, Chris wrote:
It does make sense if thats the problem since the entire server even
locally stops working properly, and it always follows a unexpected
nfs/sshfs disconnection ie. network timeout.
I am now running 6.2-RC that has the new file and
301 - 400 of 1403 matches
Mail list logo
