--On Monday, December 28, 2009 3:43 PM -0500 Peter Fraser
petros.fra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All
I have two servers, one running apache and squirrelmail in a jail.
Squirrelmail on this server is trying to contact dovecot running imaps
on port 993 on another server and failing. When I try
--On Friday, January 15, 2010 10:32 AM +0100 Olivier Cochard-Labbé
oliv...@cochard.me wrote:
Hi,
I've just upgraded on of my server from 7.2 to 8.0-Release and meet a
problem with the vge(4) drivers:
All my SCP transferts didn't works since this upgrade: they close, after a
random time,
--On Wednesday, January 20, 2010 1:16 AM +0100 O. Hartmann
ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
This could end in a bad situation, where one process writes a files, say
with some arbitrary stuff and another successing process is intended to
read this file. even if the processes are run
--On Friday, January 22, 2010 10:05 PM +0100 Nicolas Rachinsky
fbsd-stabl...@ml.turing-complete.org wrote:
* Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com [2010-01-19 23:46 -0800]:
You cannot do something like where box1 COM1 is wired to box2 COM1, and
depending on what box you're on doing the
--On Thursday, February 11, 2010 10:49 PM +0100 Stefan Krueger
stadtki...@gmx.de wrote:
snip
PS: I had a spare disk so I tried Linux on the same machine, and
ntpd is running fine for 2 days without any problems; so I guess it's
not a hw fault
It is a HW fault. FreeBSD and Linux are
--On Sunday, February 14, 2010 5:28 PM + Jonathan Belson
j...@witchspace.com wrote:
Hiya
After reading some earlier threads about zfs performance, I decided to
test my own server. I found the results rather surprising...
You really need to test with at least 4GB of data, else
--On Wednesday, March 24, 2010 9:20 AM -0700 Freddie Cash
fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Michal mic...@ionic.co.uk wrote:
I wrote a really long e-mail but realised I could ask this question far
far easier, if it doesn't make sense, the original e-mail is bellow
--On Wednesday, March 24, 2010 5:12 PM + Michal mic...@ionic.co.uk
wrote:
If you were to do something like this, I'd make sure to have a fast
local ZIL (log) device on the head node. That would reduce latency
for writes, you might also do the same for reads. Then your bulk
storage
--On Thursday, March 25, 2010 3:22 PM +0100 Attila Nagy b...@fsn.hu wrote:
...
Both unbound and python accepts DNS requests, and it seems when 25%
interrupt happens, only unbound is in *udp state, where it is 50%, both
programs are in that state.
Try turning of hardware TSO/checksum offload
--On Thursday, April 22, 2010 6:59 PM +1000 Andrew Reilly
arei...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:19:29AM +0200, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
I wonder if is possible to configure the gmirror rebuild speed.
Neither I've found any related info in the net nor the man pages.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:28 AM, George Mamalakis mama...@eng.auth.gr wrote:
where one can see that pid 1544 was killed before 2864, which is the process
that caused all this mess. Yes, I know that I should use limits so as not to
allow such things to happen, but on the other hand, if a
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Pete French
petefre...@ticketswitch.com wrote:
I build code using static linking for deployment across a set of
machines. For me this has a lot of advantages - I know that the
code will run, no matter what the state of the ports is on the
machine, and if there
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Jason Hsu jhsu802...@jasonhsu.com wrote:
I'm looking for a good step-by-step quick-and-dirty FreeBSD server tutorial
for the current stable version. Most of the tutorials I've seen are for
outdated versions of FreeBSD.
My setup is: Internet - Modem -
nss_ldap fulfills most of the get*ent calls, thus based on the bits of
your configuration you've exposed I think you're ending up with that
behavior and not using pam_ldap at all. Instead the authentication is
happening via nsswitch fulfilling getpwent() call's (the passwd: files
ldap line in
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:47 PM, dweimer dwei...@dweimer.net wrote:
Perhaps CARP is what you are looking for
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/carp.html
Not even remotely close to the same thing. LVS is a kernel level load
balancer/director. Combined with some
Normally when jails are added their IPs are created as normal
aliases, so they'll get a /32 netmask when you don't specify. So
Depending on how you're creating the jail you'll need to specify the
netmask with the IP wherever you configure your jail. (You didn't
mention if you're using ezjail or
Sendmail for one can hang for stupidly long times waiting in dead resolvers
before allowing the system to continue booting. That's the most common
thing, RC scripts hanging waiting on external resources while you're locked
out simply because sshd starts ridiculously late. Very common problem.
On
FWIW I've had similar issues with Intel 750 PCIe NVMe drives when
attempting to use 4K blocks on Linux with EXT4 on top of MD RAID1 (software
mirror). I didn't dig much into because too many layers to reduce at the
time but it looked like the drive misreported the number of blocks and a
subsequent
18 matches
Mail list logo
