On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 07:26:08PM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Am 14.08.2006 um 22:07 schrieb Darryl Yeoh:
While destroying gif interface, I notice it also removes IPv4
default route. Has anyone else
encountered this ?
No problem on a FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #8: Fri Jun 16 17:15:03 CEST
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:54:19AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:23:13AM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Ouch. Don't ppp(8), OpenVPN etc. destroy the tun interface they're
using when they exit? Flushing all routes then would be rather
harmful. I'm glad I haven't
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 12:15:25PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:58:44PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:54:19AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:23:13AM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Ouch. Don't ppp(8), OpenVPN etc
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 03:59:13PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:49:27AM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 12:15:25PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:58:44PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:54:19AM
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:57:02AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 16 August 2006 04:53, David Malone wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 08:13:20AM +0200, Kees Plonsz wrote:
I just updated to 6-STABLE but my ipfw rules stopped working.
It seems that me6 is vanished into thin air.
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 03:04:09PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Oct 24), Doug Barton said:
Duane Whitty wrote:
Patching it myself after every cvs update is not such a big deal; It
is forgetting to patch it after every update which is a big deal.
Write a little script
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 01:29:45AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:34:09 +0400 Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 12:28:35PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 19:19:24 +0400 Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:15:07PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy
if maybe
something good or bad happens. It did not.
At this point, I wanted to include links to two mails on amd64@ I
found when I first searched for this oddity, both of which had no
reply. Instead I found a posting to net@ that occured in the meantime,
and a reply to it by Yar Tikhiy two
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:49:43PM +0100, V??clav Haisman wrote:
Hi,
I wrote about how FreeBSD 6.1 RC1, with latest RELENG_6 kernel, prints loads
of calcru: runtime went backwards... and calcru: negative runtime...
messages when the FreeBSD runs as virtual server under Microsoft Virtual
Hi all,
I hope the following story will divert a few potential subscribers
from freebsd-eol and save some effort aimed to keep the 4.11 zombie
dancing.
DISCLAIMER: I take no responsibility for inconvenience or damage
that can happen if one uses my story as a how-to guide, especially
without full
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:03:30PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 15:53, Alex Kozlov wrote:
= Yes, I switched to swap-backed md already. But the malloc-based variety
is
= currently the _default_ (see /etc/defaults/rc.conf)...
= Bad default.
Filing a PR.
Keep
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 10:59:46PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 10:59:46AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:03:30PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 15:53, Alex Kozlov wrote:
= Yes, I switched to swap-backed md already
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:14:29PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
= How will it break them? swap backing only touches swap if there is
= memory pressure, i.e. precisely the situation in which malloc backing
= will panic.
=
= I forgot
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:30:22PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:17:14PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:14:29PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
= How will it break them? swap backing only
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:14:29PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
= How will it break them? swap backing only touches swap if there is
= memory pressure, i.e. precisely the situation in which malloc backing
= will panic.
=
= I forgot
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:40:11PM -0800, Archie Cobbs wrote:
Mike Tancsa writes:
Not sure why this hasn't been detected before though. Below is
a possible patch.
It has been at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=25478 and
discussed a few times in freebsd-net.
Here is
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:30:49AM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
Please take a careful look at the frames 6 through 9 of the stack
trace in PR#25478, so you may notice that your patch happens to do
nothing about the broblem. You are going to add a check for IFF_UP
to ether_output_frame() while
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 04:45:52PM +0100, Max Laier wrote:
On Thursday 31 March 2005 04:38, Marko ??uk wrote:
Max, that solution works fine. I have tried it and it works fine for me.
Thanks.
Anyway, do you know some issues with dropping traffic on em0 vlan
enabled interfaces and
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 01:28:00PM +0100, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Hi everybody,
After my latest update to
FreeBSD hudson 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #15:
Mon Jan 23 12:29:38 CET 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NFS-32-FBSD6 i386
I have a small problem with my vlan
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 02:01:47AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 01:28:00PM +0100, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
After my latest update to
FreeBSD hudson 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #15:
Mon Jan 23 12:29:38 CET 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NFS-32
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 08:48:30PM +, Pete French wrote:
I have a piece of coode which does some networking, in which I see read
and write calls failing with 'Interrupted system call' from time to time.
You will get EINTR if the interrupt occurs before any data is read
or
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 01:29:10AM -0600, Z.C.B. wrote:
I was just looking at building releng_6 on a releng_5 box. What I am
wondering about is how to specify a location other than /usr/obj and
Just set the MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX variable in the environment to the
desired path, and the build system
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 01:20:29AM +0200, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:35:18 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav) wrote:
David Malone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I did once mail des@ to ask him if he'd mind me changing the default
login timeout for sshd to be
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 04:57:57PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, James Wyatt wrote:
JW I've seen something very similar when the permissions of the mount point's
JW underlieing subdirectory wasn't 777. Really strange to see, but it was a
JW fallout from a company-wide
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 04:38:21PM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:34:35 -0800
Peter Losher [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
plosher [1 text/plain; ISO-8859-1 (quoted-printable)]
plosher Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
The ipfw in 6-STABLE has an IPv6 awareness, but it is not
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:51:24AM +0100, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Well,
options NETSMBCRYPTO
options NETSMB
did not work out very well:
Do I need anything else here?
smb_usr.o(.text+0x4ad):/usr/src/sys/netsmb/smb_usr.c:274: undefined
Hi all,
As some folks have already noticed, a change affecting modules'
build-time options was merged to RELENG_6. Namely, almost all
modules now get their options from the main kernel conf file.
The only exceptions I'm aware of are pf.ko and ipfw.ko -- the
latter gets INET6 and IPSEC stuff, but
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 04:01:53PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
YT On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 04:57:57PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
YT On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, James Wyatt wrote:
YT
YT JW I've seen something very similar when the permissions
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 01:27:48PM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
* Yar Tikhiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-19 13:58 +0300]:
This looks like a file-a-PR case if you are sure you didn't overlook
anything. To the best of my knowledge, the underlying mount point
permissions should affect
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:57:01PM +0200, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 13:49:12 +0300
Yar Tikhiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 01:20:29AM +0200, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:35:18 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav) wrote
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 02:08:21AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:51:53 +0200
Rostislav Krasny [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rosti Excellent! What about RES_DFLRETRY decreasing from 4 to 2? Does it need
rosti more testing or discussion?
It seems reasonable to me, and
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:04:54AM +, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 19:29 +0800, Tai-hwa Liang wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Bachilo Dmitry wrote:
I've cvsuped from 6.0 to 6.1-PRERELEASE and now I can't mount NT's shares
with
password. It worked fine before, but after
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 02:42:46AM +0200, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:40:07 +0300
Yar Tikhiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To Rostislav: Could you do now, with the resolver fixes applied,
the following experiment: find how many dead nameservers in resolv.conf
it takes
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 02:08:21AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:51:53 +0200
Rostislav Krasny [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rosti Excellent! What about RES_DFLRETRY decreasing from 4 to 2? Does it need
rosti more testing or discussion?
It seems reasonable to me, and
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 12:28:14AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:19:54 +0300
Yar Tikhiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
yar I finally spared some time to test your recent changes and found
yar that the resolver still would retry using the first, and only the
yar first
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 04:28:50PM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 02:42:46 +0200
Rostislav Krasny [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rosti I've found the problem in both: ftpd(8) and ftp(1). In the ftpd(8) a
rosti getaddrinfo() is called in two places with hints.ai_socktype == 0 and
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 01:28:34AM -0800, Nick Price wrote:
I'm currently administering a machine about 1500mi from me with nobody
local to the machine to assist me. Anyways, my only access to this
machine is via SSH, no remote serial console or anything.
When I try to
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 08:01:31PM +, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:04:54AM +, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
Is there a reason this change was made? And is there a reason why
The change wasn't against NETSMBCRYPTO, it just
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 11:50:29PM +, Nick Barnes wrote:
At 2006-03-02 22:24:17+, Nik Clayton writes:
I'm failing to understand how getrusage() works, which is a bit perplexing,
because it doesn't seem like it would be terribly complicated.
ru_maxrss is the maximum resident set
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:50:41PM -0800, Ade Lovett wrote:
While we're at it, bin/94028 points out a fundamental problem with
ifconfig(8) as it stands on 6.1-PRERELEASE, preventing MTUs from
being set on vlan interfaces.
I've taken the PR -- no reason to panic.
--
Yar
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 12:11:56PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 02:15:56AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
Personally, I'd like to say a me too. /me too fails to see why
in a quiet, idle system ru_maxrss is very unpredictable over numerous
runs of the test program
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:50:41PM -0800, Ade Lovett wrote:
While we're at it, bin/94028 points out a fundamental problem with
ifconfig(8) as it stands on 6.1-PRERELEASE, preventing MTUs from
being set on vlan interfaces.
A patch has been sent to the audit trail of the PR.
All interested
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 06:12:59PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 06:06:31PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 12:11:56PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 02:15:56AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
Personally, I'd like to say a me
Hi all,
As some of us may have noticed, sshd(8) has ignored nologin(5) in
its default configuration since it was PAM-ified. That is a pain
to admins of multi-user systems as they have to resort to drastic
means such as killing the sshd master process when they need to
disable user logins
44 matches
Mail list logo
