details etc.
--
Adam Strohl
http://www.ateamsystems.com/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 6/19/2013 19:21, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 06:35:57PM +0700, Adam Strohl wrote:
Hello -STABLE@,
So I've seen this situation seemingly randomly on a number of both
physical 9.1 boxes as well as VMs for I would say 6-9 months at
least. I finally have a physical box here
On 6/19/2013 19:53, Adam Strohl wrote:
sync(8) does not do what you think it does. Please read (not skim) this
entire thread starting here:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2013-April/thread.html#16982
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2013-April/016982.html
Groking
) disconnected, the only USB
device (via a port -- I realize there might be MB virtual ports) was a
Dell KB.
But it all depends on your kernel config, which I've now asked for.
Yeah
--
Adam Strohl
http://www.ateamsystems.com/
___
freebsd-stable
On 6/19/2013 21:21, Steven Hartland wrote:
You still need to test if stable/9 fixes your issue though as otherwise
you don't know if the issue your seeing has already been fixed, and if
its the old know ZFS vfs hang on shutdown, it has.
Thanks Steve, understood but probably not going to happen
On 6/19/2013 22:04, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 09:15:18PM +0700, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 6/19/2013 20:35, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I've snipped out portions which aren't relevant at this point in the
convo. I'm trying to be terse as much as possible here (honest).
To recap
it means booting up in single user to undo it which is a hassle
for a server if it's in production (I realize that's a bit whiny :P).
--
Adam Strohl
http://www.ateamsystems.com/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On 11/4/2012 5:32, Karl Denninger wrote:
It is utter insanity to enable, by default, filesystem options that
break _*the canonical backup solution*_ in the handbook (dump, when
used with -L, which it must be to dump a live filesystem SAFELY.)
Exactly.
--
Adam Strohl
http
On 11/2/2012 23:47, Bas Smeelen wrote:
Hi
Why are journaled soft updates the default when installing a new system
from a 9.1-RC2 ISO?
I admit I did not pay too much attention when installing a new system
from an 9.1-RC2 ISO and found out when taking a snapshot with dump (dump
-0Lauf) to clone
. Getting burned by a known bug like this shouldn't be SOP for
users of FreeBSD.
If anything it should be turned off by default, and people can turn it
on if they want given the landmine it plants. If they know how to turn
it on they're much more likely to be aware of the issue.
--
Adam Strohl
http
!
--
Adam Strohl
http://www.ateamsystems.com/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
calls to protocol drain routines
Adrian
On 30 October 2012 06:21, Adam Strohl adams-free...@ateamsystems.com wrote:
Hey -STABLE,
I've got a client who we've setup a FreeBSD cluster for with about a dozens
servers, all behind two front end proxies/LBs/firewalls which also act as
NAT gateways
:
kern.timecounter.hardware=ACPI-fast
Pre 9.x:
kern.timecounter.hardware=ACPI-safe
Hope this helps anyone running across this issue.
--
Adam Strohl
http://www.ateamsystems.com/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
Doh, correct URL for the forum post is:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=31929page=2
On 8/3/2012 14:38, Adam Strohl wrote:
Just a heads up on the original issue, which is FreeBSD's timer/clock
stopping under ESXi 5.0 and some later versions of VMware Workstation.
I've gotten a few
: memory driver, OS control (ie; shutdown), etc.
I manage dozens of FreeBSD VMs under ESXi 3.5, 4.x and 5.0 ... most of
them using OpenVM tools (ie; the 9.x hosts), works great.
--
Adam Strohl
http://www.ateamsystems.com/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
(both peers
end up thinking they're MASTER).
In 9.x it all works as expected at least for IPv4 (rc.conf
carpn_aliasn entries, aliases, on the fly reconfiguring).
--
Adam Strohl
http://www.ateamsystems.com/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
caught this just as I hit send :P
--
Adam Strohl
http://www.ateamsystems.com/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
with snapshots is way
more valuable and important in my book.
My .02.
--
Adam Strohl
http://www.ateamsystems.com/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd
too, using snapshots makes it so that
all the files make sense together, instead of the files getting more and
more recent as the end of the backup block approaches.
--
Adam Strohl
http://www.ateamsystems.com/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On 6/9/2012 20:29, Sami Halabi wrote:
Hi,
/var/log/messages - no new logs
Sorry if this has been asked, anything in dmesg?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any
-patching their serial consoles to each other so if one
goes down you can serial via the other one (ie; server1's com1 to
server2's com2, and server2's com1 to server1's com2). You need to set
this up as root though so no help now.
--
Adam Strohl
http://www.ateamsystems.com
On 6/9/2012 14:50, O. Hartmann wrote:
Lucky man! We are off from some desktop services (like LibreOffice and
Firefox) for more than a week now!
Why did you update to begin with? Bug/security fix?
--
Adam Strohl
http://www.ateamsystems.com
weird and I'm just
at a loss as to what they're doing and why.
I get the feeling people are updating their ports tree and then
recompiling/reinstalling everything just because and then are
complaining when one thing breaks (its the only thing I can think of).
--
Adam Strohl
http
was just released? Is it a security thing or is it I want the latest
? I'm just curious (and totally uninterested in how this ranks in your
worse question list).
--
Adam Strohl
http://www.ateamsystems.com/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
just for the heck of
it, though I don't get how even that takes 48 hours. Even make
buildworld is done in multi-user mode and so you could use your
workstation during the build. And we're talking about ports here so ...
Just curious!
--
Adam Strohl
http://www.ateamsystems.com
On 6/3/2012 10:09, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 01:43:43AM +0200, Fritz Wuehler wrote:
So there could be lots of overlap and just looking at the two numbers
you posted doesn't really tell the whole story.
No, I agree that it doesn't. I was just trying to add an aside, and
point
On 6/3/2012 11:14, Erich wrote:
What I really do not understand in this whole discussion is very simple. Is it
just a few people who run into problems like this or is this simply ignored by
the people who set the strategy for FreeBSD?
I mention since yeares here that putting version numbers
On 6/3/2012 17:51, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
Always I am stressing that to manage FreeBSD, a fair amount of expertise
is required which I think this level may be reduced by improving the
FreeBSD management by transferring knowledge to its managing parts ( for
example : package management ,
On 6/3/2012 19:24, Erich wrote:
yes, you miss a very simple thing. Updated this morning your ports tree. Your
client asks for something for Monday morning for which you need now a program
which needs some kind of PNG but you did not install it.
Do you have a machine that is fast enough to
On 6/1/2012 17:19, Katinka wrote:
There's a nice discussion going on, over at Phoronix.
http://phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?71263
For some reason, they don't seem to like us very much.
Lots of the comments remind me about Linux vs. Windows in the late 90s,
and taken with a grain of
On 6/1/2012 18:03, Jason Leschnik wrote:
I may be totally incorrect with my above ideas, but it's what i would
like to see from FreeBSD *again*... This is the reason in the first
place most people used FreeBSD, stability/scalability/performance are
the hallmarks of FreeBSD. If we have these hard
On 5/31/2012 21:22, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 5/31/12 4:01 PM, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
To add others, in no particular order:
Ease of upgrade. While some have noted that binary upgrades are easier
on Debian, it's far and away superior, IMMHO, to have a locally compiled
system. Many Linux distros
On 5/31/2012 21:47, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Regarding packages, I've never really explored it, would you detail a bit ?
Well, I really mean the resulting pkg info from a port. A good example
is PHP, sometimes you have to say everyone out of the pool because of
an upgrade:
cd /var/db/pkg
On 5/31/2012 1:20, David Chisnall wrote:
I am currently looking at updating some of our advocacy material (which
advertises exciting new features like SMP support), and before I do I'd like to
get a better feel for why the rest of you are using FreeBSD. If you had to
list the three things
On 5/16/2012 8:12, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Ok, I'm just impatient. I let it sit, and it eventually came up.
Would it be possible for the next 9.x release to set hw.memtest.tests=0
when we discover we're under a hypervisor to avoid doing the tests? (or
default it to 0 in the installer kernel?)?
On 5/16/2012 22:05, Larry Rosenman wrote:
I believe this is due to the 8G of memory I put on it. (I like to build
big VM's.
It's directly proportional to the size of the VM.
Ahh! Yeah I rarely build a VM with more than a gig or two here in the
office (ie; where I use Workstation).
On 5/14/2012 22:18, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Is there a known issue with 9.0-RELEASE on amd64 VMWare Workstation?
Since nobody has chimed in I felt I should:
I use FreeBSD 9.0 routinely under VMWare Workstation without issue (my
current VMWare Workstation version is 8.0.0 which is slightly out
On 5/15/2012 21:49, Larry Rosenman wrote:
This is VMWare Workstation 8.0.3 booting off the release ISO.
Ideas?
Is this the installer that doesn't boot or is it the OS after you've
installed?
If its the former you might just have a bad ISO download. Have/did you
verified the checksum of
On 5/2/2012 23:08, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 02.05.2012 17:53, Adam Strohl wrote:
% gpart recover da0
Good thought, but no dice:
$ gpart recover da0
da0 recovering is not needed
I already saw several reports about gptboot's complains on 3ware
controllers, but don't know what
Thanks Andrey,
I've just recompiled /boot/gptboot after updating gpt.c and installed it
via:
gpart bootcode -p /boot/gptboot -i 1 da0
I still see gptboot: invalid backup GPT header on boot (but it does
still boot).
On 5/2/2012 12:58, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 30.04.2012 23:14, Adam
On 5/2/2012 20:46, Mark Saad wrote:
Did you try to repair the header ? I saw a similar issue on upgraded
boxes that were 7-STABLE upgraded to 9-STABLE. and recovering made the
warning go away . I may be way off here but just my 2 cents .
% gpart recover da0
Good thought, but no dice:
$
63S/T 364725C)
Let me know anyone wants to see anything else/has seen this/has any
theories!
--
Adam Strohl
A-Team Systems
http://ateamsystems.com/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
On 3/12/2012 0:01, Ian Lepore wrote:
It seems unlikely to me that ntpd and the vm tools would be fighting in
a way that caused this symptom. The way ntpd affects timing is to step
the clock (which gets logged), or to numerically steer the kernel's
timekeeping routines. The steering is
on all the other VMs which have yet to
show this issue).
Anyone seen anything like this? Ring any bells?
--
Adam Strohl
A-Team Systems
http://ateamsystems.com/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
On 3/10/2012 17:10, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 10. Mar 2012, at 08:07 , Adam Strohl wrote:
I've now seen this on two different VMs on two different ESXi servers (Xeon
based hosts but different hardware otherwise and at different facilities):
Everything runs fine for weeks then (seemingly
On 3/5/2012 15:00, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
I happen to share the opinion and the experience of Mark Linimon in situations
like this and yes, I do believe you have been rude here. For no reason
whatsoever.
I agree. This H person has been hijacking threads over the last week
or so, and all of
On 3/3/2012 22:32, H wrote:
then you tell us today that ports is the best ever happened to you
It definitely is for me, and is a major reason why I love FreeBSD.
Yum/RPM/etc are not without their own issues, and definitely is not fool
proof nor 100% reliable in my experience.
On 2/24/2012 1:39, Kurt Buff wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:25, Damien Fleuriotm...@my.gd wrote:
snip
Now, I find the number of problem reports regarding 9.0-RELEASE alarming
and I'm growing more and more fearful towards it.
In the current state of things, I have *absolutely* no wish to
On 2/24/2012 1:39, Kurt Buff wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:25, Damien Fleuriotm...@my.gd wrote:
snip
Now, I find the number of problem reports regarding 9.0-RELEASE alarming
and I'm growing more and more fearful towards it.
In the current state of things, I have *absolutely* no wish to
On 2/3/2012 21:48, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
This is a bug in +J code (even if you do not use +J). Do you have
softupdates enabled on the volume ? If yes, try the following patch.
diff --git a/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c b/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c
index 5b4b6b9..ed2db79 100644
---
On 2/3/2012 15:45, Marcel Bonnet wrote:
Hi, what would be the best choice?
1. turn off SUJ and dump using -L flag and the turn it on again (but I'm
affraid to destroy the system this way - is this possible?)
Yes, this is what I have done for my 9.0 servers. Unfortunately you
need to be in
On 2/3/2012 17:15, Adam Strohl wrote:
After doing this I have been using dump(8) nightly via cron(8) for
about a week now under 9.0 without issue. Running it on 11 servers
currently.
P.S.
To be clear, I am using dump with -L (snapshots) without issue.
around smart cron script if anyone is interested (and I'm not missing
something silly :P).
--
Adam Strohl
A-Team Systems
http://ateamsystems.com/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
if I can provide more details etc!
--
Adam Strohl
A-Team Systems
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
54 matches
Mail list logo
