On 28.09.2013 11:32, Phil Regnauld wrote:
Teske, Devin (Devin.Teske) writes:
If you work seriously on serious issues long enough... you'll become burned-
out. Let me just come right out and say it...
I coded it.
And thanks, you got me chuckling - nice to see some humor once in a
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Daniel Kalchev dan...@digsys.bg wrote:
On 03.06.12 07:24, Erich wrote:
isn't this what I just suggested to be done by the team? Give the ports
tree a new version number and people can fall back to this then.
Isn't this solution too simple to be done?
As was
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Prabhpal S. Mavi
prabh...@digital-infotech.net wrote:
Greetings Friends,
have anyone has come across this warning / error? This occurs when i ssh
to my FreeBSD 9.0 System. any help would be greatly appreciated.
Warning:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Garrett R. Groesbeck
garrett.groesb...@gmail.com wrote:
I hope you are well. I've been working on a Sun Blade 2000 with FreeBSD 9.0
(sparc64) installed.
(... snip ...)
panic: kmem_suballoc: bad status return of 3
cpuid = 0
KDB: stack backtrace:
#0
Hello,
I think that reading from CDROM is actually broken
in 9.0-RELEASE/sparc64.
On FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE/sparc64, mounting a physical
CDROM burned with FreeBSD-9.0-RELEASE-sparc64-disc1.iso
and running sha256 on usr/freebsd-dist/*.txz yields the same
results as listed in
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:54 PM, C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws wrote:
Hello,
I think that reading from CDROM is actually broken
in 9.0-RELEASE/sparc64.
On FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE/sparc64, mounting a physical
CDROM burned with FreeBSD-9.0-RELEASE-sparc64-disc1.iso
and running sha256 on usr
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:54 PM, C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws wrote:
Hello,
I think that reading from CDROM is actually broken
in 9.0-RELEASE/sparc64.
On FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE/sparc64, mounting a physical
CDROM burned with FreeBSD-9.0-RELEASE-sparc64-disc1.iso
and running sha256 on usr
Hi,
I'm trying to boot 9.0-RELEASE on sparc64, but I'm
getting stuck at:
panic: kmem_suballoc: bad status return of 3
cpuid = 0
KDB: stack backtrace:
#0 0xc079841c at ??+0
#1 0xc04ca59c at ??+0
#2 0xc0487f90 at ??+0
#3 0xc0098028 at ??+0
I'm not able to break into the kernel debugger from
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Tom Evans tevans...@googlemail.com wrote:
Real time scheduler changing would be insane! I was thinking that
both/any/all schedulers could be compiled into the kernel, and the
choice of which one to use becomes a boot time configuration. You
don't have to
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Olivier Smedts oliv...@gid0.org wrote:
2011/6/17 Rolf Nielsen listrea...@lazlarlyricon.com:
2011-06-17 16:29, Artem Belevich skrev:
...
Are you sure that it's harmless? It appeared for me as an evidence of
pool
breakage. I had these messages when I ran any
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:39 AM, seanr...@gmail.com seanr...@gmail.com wrote:
On my FreeBSD 8.2-S machine (built circa 12th June), I created a
directory and populated it over the course of 3 weeks with about 2
million individual files. As you might imagine, a 'ls' of this
directory took quite
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Todd Wasson t...@duke.edu wrote:
While zfs on geli is less complex (in the sense that geli on zfs involves
two layers of filesystems), I'm concerned as to whether encrypting the
device will somehow affect zfs' ability to detect silent corruption,
self-heal, or
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Marius Strobl
mar...@alchemy.franken.de wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 12:46:19AM +0200, C. P. Ghost wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Marius Strobl
mar...@alchemy.franken.de wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:53:11PM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Marius Strobl
mar...@alchemy.franken.de wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:53:11PM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
Hi,
I have merged ZFS version 28 to 8-STABLE (revision 222741)
New major features:
- data deduplication
- triple parity RAIDZ (RAIDZ3)
- zfs
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Since Soekris hardware (net45xx, net48xx, lan16xx) is quite popular for
firewalls and carp is quite often used together with this hardware, this
looks like a showstopper for 8.2 :-(
Since you didn't post dmesg output I'm
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Thomas Zander
thomas.e.zan...@googlemail.com wrote:
Dear,
is there any way to inspect a running STABLE machine for the presence
or state of ECC memory before an MCA error detected message actually
occurs?
In comparison when I quickly boot the machine in
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Bartosz Stec ad...@kkip.pl wrote:
On 2010-09-15 17:20, Ivan Voras wrote:
uname -a -
FreeBSD (XX).uni-tuebingen.de 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0:
Sat Nov 21 15:02:08 UTC 2009
r...@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
That is
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:18 PM, William D. Colburn (Schlake)
schl...@gmail.com wrote:
I got my new 8-stable system up, and now I just have recurrent disk
controller failures. The machine can't stay more than about ten
minutes before it panics into a hung kernel, or simple reboots.
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:27 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
To developers: what incentives would help get this issue well-needed
attention? This problem makes kernel debugging, panic analysis, and
other console-oriented viewing basically impossible.
I was recently going to look at
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Ruben de Groot mai...@bzerk.org wrote:
malenfant# sysctl kern.timecounter
kern.timecounter.tick: 1
kern.timecounter.choice: TSC(-100) HPET(900) ACPI-safe(850) i8254(0)
dummy(-100)
kern.timecounter.hardware: HPET
Just a wild guess... but is HPET really
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:15 PM, George Liaskos geo.lias...@gmail.com wrote:
I am having the same issue since Feb 20 which was my last update.
ahcich1: Timeout on slot 3
ahcich1: is cs 0018 ss rs 0018 tfd d0 serr
ahcich1: Timeout on slot 5
ahcich1: is
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 4:12 AM, C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws wrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com
wrote:
Some Linux users have reported AHCI-related issues with the SB600
southbridge, but the core of the problem turned out to be MSI on certain
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.comwrote:
We can safely rule out the Silicon Image controller (otherwise ataX
wouldn't be involved), which leaves the AMD SB700 SATA controller and
the AMD SB700 PATA controller.
What exact disks (e.g. adX) are attached
23 matches
Mail list logo
