location. Where is it?
I think the freebsd-update build code might be homeless right now. I know I
have seen emails mentioning that it needs to land somewhere but I don't recall
any decision being reached.
--
Colin Percival
Security Officer Emeritus, FreeBSD | The power to serve
Founder, Tarsnap |
chine hangs
> in the loader.
Do you know what version of FreeBSD this system was originally running? It
may be that there are other oddities in the old partitioning which cause
problems for the newer loader code.
--
Colin Percival
Security Officer Emeritus, FreeBSD | The power to serve
Foun
team.
Thanks to Peter Ankerstål, Allan Jude, Warner Losh, and Glen Barber for
their help in tracking down this problem.
--
Colin Percival
Security Officer Emeritus, FreeBSD | The power to serve
Founder, Tarsnap | www.tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid
|9.0-RELEASE |Normal |January 10, 2012 |January 31, 2013 |
+-+
- --
Colin Percival
Security Officer, FreeBSD | freebsd.org | The power to serve
Founder / author, Tarsnap | tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid
Hi all,
I forgot to upload some of the amd64 RC3 bits to the mirrors earlier. They
should be in place now.
--
Colin Percival
Security Officer, FreeBSD | freebsd.org | The power to serve
Founder / author, Tarsnap | tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid
, 2010|July 31, 2012|
+-+
- --
Colin Percival
Security Officer, FreeBSD | freebsd.org | The power to serve
Founder / author, Tarsnap | tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
to that I don't really want to have any more mirrors than
necessary.
--
Colin Percival
Security Officer, FreeBSD | freebsd.org | The power to serve
Founder / author, Tarsnap | tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid
___
freebsd-stable
. Assuming that the second mirror works, send me an email telling me which
mirror failed and which one worked so that I can have the load balancing
adjusted.
--
Colin Percival
Security Officer, FreeBSD | freebsd.org | The power to serve
Founder / author, Tarsnap | tarsnap.com | Online backups
Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
On 09/01/2009, at 7:19 AM, Colin Percival wrote:
2. Assuming the first mirror still fails, use the -s option to pick a
different
mirror.
Where can we find a list of mirrors?
The list of is distributed via DNS SRV records:
# host -t srv _http
Hi all,
FreeBSD Update is being slow right now due to server load issues.
It will improve.
Please be patient.
--
Colin Percival
Security Officer, FreeBSD | freebsd.org | The power to serve
Founder / author, Tarsnap | tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid
FreeBSD Update realize that you're running
7.1-BETA:
# env UNAME_r=7.1-BETA freebsd-update [...]
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it does on 7.0-RC1).
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of the installed ports, but (unless some
disaster strikes) this should be the last time it is needed until FreeBSD 8.x
happens ~2 years from now.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
Max Laier wrote:
On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Colin Percival wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
Considering that /etc/pf.conf is a file that users edit to configure
pf(4), removing it out from under them is probably a very bad idea.
The heuristics didn't work this time. :-(
Yet they lose
John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 02:47:11 pm Colin Percival wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
I am not 100% sure, maybe I overlook something in binary major version
upgrade procedure, but after upgrade from 6.2 to 7.0-BETA3 my roots
~/.cshrc was accidentally replaced with dist
is due to it being removed from
the release (it is now in /usr/share/examples/etc). The fact that /.cshrc
was upgraded in spite of having been locally modified is probably a bad
idea -- I'll change the default freebsd-update.conf to deal with this.
Colin Percival
-minor-version-upgrade.html
for upgrading from 7.0-BETA1.5 or 7.0-BETA2 to 7.0-BETA3.
Colin Percival
FreeBSD Security Officer FreeBSD Update wrangler
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
).
FreeBSD Update will never produce mangled files as a result of applying a
bsdiff patch to the wrong file -- it checks file hashes before and after
applying patches and gracefully falls back to downloading complete files
if it can't generate a file via patching.
Colin Percival
Colin Percival wrote:
A quick heads-up to everyone here using my new FreeBSD Update upgrade
code: If you have performed a minor version upgrade (e.g., 6.2-RELEASE -
6.3-BETA1 or 7.0-BETA1.5 - 7.0-BETA2) please do not attempt to roll it
back using freebsd-update rollback.
That code
Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
Colin Percival wrote:
I believe that your system is now 6.3-BETA1 with a few shared libraries
from 6.2-RELEASE mixed in. If you can get a copy of /lib/*.so.* and
/usr/lib/*.so.* from a 6.3-BETA1 system and install those into place
(in fact, probably all you need
-- is it a disaster if
this system ends up stuck at 6.3-BETA1?
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
your system unbootable. I
should have this fixed within the next couple of days.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
will be provided
via the freebsd-stable list when available.
As promised, instructions on upgrading from FreeBSD 6.x to 7.0-BETA2 are
now available:
http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2007-11-11-freebsd-major-version-upgrade.html
Colin Percival
FreeBSD Security Officer
FreeBSD 6.x to 6.3-BETA1 are now available:
http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2007-11-10-freebsd-minor-version-upgrade.html
Instructions on using FreeBSD Update to upgrade to 7.0-BETA2 should be
here within 24 hours.
Colin Percival
FreeBSD Security Officer
been released (hopefully by the end of December). FreeBSD 6.3 will
be supported until the end of 2009, while FreeBSD 7.0 will be supported until
the end of 2008.
Colin Percival
FreeBSD Security Officer
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
for errata against 6.2-RELEASE...I'm not sure what their
current state is.
Don't ask me, I just approve the errata which you send to me. Which hasn't
been anything at all lately. :-)
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Scott Long wrote:
Colin Percival wrote:
I point releases have been obsoleted by errata notices. In the past when
X.Y.Z-RELEASE has happened, it has been because of critical bugs in the
X.Y-RELEASE which there wasn't any other mechanism to fix. Now that we
have errata noticed and FreeBSD
.* .
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
makes you think that the archive created by BSD tar was invalid?
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steven Hartland wrote:
- Original Message - From: Colin Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tar -xvzf test.tar.gz
tar: Ignoring unknown extended header keyword `SCHILY.dev'
tar: Ignoring unknown extended header keyword `SCHILY.ino'
tar: Ignoring unknown extended header keyword `SCHILY.nlink
-update fetch
[...]
No updates needed to update system to 6.2-RELEASE-p3.
This may look odd, but it's actually correct. The version number reported
by `uname` is the version number of the kernel, and the change from
6.2-RELEASE-p2 to 6.2-RELEASE-p3 didn't affect the kernel.
Colin Percival
/rc.d/jail
This is correct. The version you have here is not the version which
was distributed with the release -- it's the version in the latest
RELENG_6_2.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
, yet. I might add support for the snapshot
ISOs at some point (at least for upgrading to/from them -- there will not be
security updates built for them).
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
`sysctl kern.bootfile` say?
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.69.2.13.2.5
+ src/UPDATING 1.416.2.29.2.6
+ src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.69.2.13.2.6
I guess I ought to update my CVS tree before using it to figure out the
RCS numbers... :-)
Colin Percival
on a patch for this and will be talking to re@ about having an
Errata Notice sent out about this.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
upgrading, since you don't start running the new kernel until you reboot.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/upgrade, or document that it's a no-no.
It will be documented. :-)
Thanks,
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
team for being very patient with us and delaying the
upcoming release to give us time to fix this.
Sincerely,
Colin Percival
FreeBSD Security Officer
FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote:
=
FreeBSD-SA-07:01.jail
Philipp Wuensche wrote:
Colin Percival wrote:
In the end we opted to reduce functionality (the jail startup process is
no longer logged to /var/log/console.log inside the jail)
Thats a bummer, when Dirk showed me this problem the first time my ideas
for fixing this problem without losing
upon your time zone.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
much time for people to migrate to the newest FreeBSD release. I think it
would be fair if support is extended for a few more months especially since
6.2 is so late in coming.
Your opinion has been noted.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
merging of configuration files soon.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Colin Percival wrote:
Petr Holub wrote:
I'm working on it.
If I install RC1 now, would it be possible to upgrade to RC2
and RELEASE, or is it not ready yet?
My intention is that anyone running 6.1-RELEASE, 6.2-BETA*, or
6.2-RC* will be able to upgrade to the latest release candidate
out all the details yet as to how this should
be done to minimize the chance that my script will accidentally
break things, but I'm not going to release anything until I think
that accidental breakage is very unlikely. :-)
Colin Percival
___
freebsd
Hans F. Nordhaug wrote:
At daemonology.net Colin Percival has some excellent instructions on
how to do binary upgrades - he has even written a script to do a 6.0
to 6.1 upgrade. My question is: Can I do a 5.3 to 6.1 upgrade using
the instructions for 5.4 system to FreeBSD 6.0 - see
http
any complaints.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a major supporter of FreeBSD -- back when
they were RackShack, it took a petition of several hundred people
before they started offering FreeBSD at all.
I wonder if they'll start offering more recent FreeBSD releases next
month after FreeBSD 5.4 becomes unsupported...
Colin Percival
. Try running cvsup again, maybe
from a different mirror.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christer Solskogen wrote:
I've tried norway's mirror (my default), the danish, the swedish mirror
and the mirror in holland. No change.
Just to be sure I also deletet src/crypto before I tried the different
mirrors.
Exactly what command did you run to try to compile this?
Colin Percival
be able
to fetch the updates right now.
If it doesn't, something is broken, and I'd like to hear about it.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
that RELENG_6 = STABLE?
Yes.
I'm going to guess then that RELENG_7 is CURRENT.
No, this doesn't make sense to me at all.
RELENG_7 doesn't exist yet. RELENG_7 will be 7-STABLE once it exists,
some time in 2007.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable
accurate.
What is a valid ETA for starting the 6.2R releng process?
I'm not part of the release engineering team, but I'm not aware of anything
which they're waiting for before starting the freeze. I'd be surprised if
RELENG_6 isn't frozen by this time next week.
Colin Percival
is entirely secure.
The script can be obtained from
http://www.daemonology.net/freebsd-upgrade-6.0-to-6.1/
and the SHA256 hash of the download is
29075fc5711e0b20d879c69d12bbe5414c1c56d597c8116da7acc0d291116d2f .
Colin Percival
FreeBSD Security Officer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Sun, 2006-Jul-09 00:42:31 -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
I have written an automatic script
for performing binary FreeBSD 6.0 - FreeBSD 6.1 upgrades.
That sounds useful. Are you intending to provide this for future
FreeBSD minor-revision releases?
Yes. This is made
Ken Smith wrote:
BitTorrent
--
5.5-RELEASE ISOs are not available via BitTorrent at this time. They
may be made available in the future on an on-demand basis.
Thanks to ps, torrents are now available for 5.5-RELEASE:
http://torrents.freebsd.org:8080/
Colin Percival
://people.freebsd.org/~cperciva/survey.html
and complete the survey below before May 31st, 2006.
Thanks,
Colin Percival
FreeBSD Security Officer
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
If you absolutely must run FreeBSD 4.11, install the RELEASE and
then run FreeBSD Update.
Personally, since FreeBSD 4.11 will reach its EoL about 8 months
from now, and the 4.x-[56].x upgrade path is non-trivial, I
recommend installing FreeBSD 6.1 instead.
Colin Percival
). Given that most systems running
portsnap are FreeBSD 6.0 or 6.1, this doesn't cause much differential
loading.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
or if not is their a
way I can apply to host an eu mirror or even 2 eu mirrors.
I have a list of people who have offered mirrors, but so far I haven't
seen any need for additional mirrors -- the two which already exist are
showing no signs of slowing down.
Why do you think there should be an .eu mirror?
Colin
with the number set to 6.1-RC1?
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
question, but i am only curious to know why ?
Is there any special reason for this ?
Look at the date on Scott's email. :-)
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe
), which processors do you see actually running
processes?
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pete French wrote:
If you look at top(1), which processors do you see actually running
processes?
Errr, 0, 1, 2 and 3!
What do
# sysctl machdep.hlt_cpus
# sysctl machdep.logical_cpus_mask
# sysctl machdep.hyperthreading_allowed
say?
Colin Percival
to those as soon as I have time. Sadly, I have a pesky thing
called a full time job and my FreeBSD time has been occupied with
portsnap lately.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Colin Percival wrote:
I find this argument hard to accept. The vast majority of FreeBSD
users will never need the NFS_ROOT option, and many systems do not
even have the hardware for serial or parallel ports, yet those are
supported in the GENERIC
is not how many people use this?, but
instead would adding this option inconvenience more people than it would
help?.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send
might like to
try FreeBSD Update (http://www.daemonology.net/freebsd-update,
or security/freebsd-update in the ports tree).
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe
; on /, for example, it is hard to imagine a situation where a normal
user would use more than 150MB of space unless they were doing something which
they shouldn't be doing.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
this; I've changed the grep regex to '^[+]' in order
to catch lines from both unified and non-unified diffs. This change isn't
going to be in 6.0-BETA3, but hopefully I can get it MFCed before 6.0-RELEASE.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
was deploying a new server today, I'd install FreeBSD 5.4. If I were
planning on installing a new server next month, I'd install FreeBSD
6.0-BETA-whatever-number-we're-up-to-by-then.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
: nested extern
declaration of `TSTMP_GT'
What version of /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_var.h do you have on that system?
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send
Colin Percival wrote:
What version of /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_var.h do you have on that
system?
Oops. I meant to ask about src/sys/netinet/tcp_seq.h of course...
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
like the mirrors managed to update at exactly the wrong time
and got one patch but not the other. Fortunately, this doesn't happen very
often.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
Mipam wrote:
Thanks for the kernel.
What parameters did you change in your SMP kernel.
Just curious, surely gonna try your kernel. :-)
I didn't change any parameters, I just used the SMP kernel configuration
from the source tree (i.e., GENERIC plus options SMP).
Colin Percival
/SMP
# freebsd-update fetch
# freebsd-update install
# echo 'bootfile=SMP' /boot/loader.conf
and reboot. You should now find that `uname -ri` outputs 5.4-SECURITY SMP.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Billy Newsom wrote:
Colin Percival wrote:
It sounds like the SMP kernel I provided for FreeBSD 5.3 was quite
popular [...]
I'm curious how popular. Would you like to report some statistics here
on the list? As in, how many SMP downloads did you get, say, in
comparison to the GENERIC?
Ok
hyper-threading is still enabled by default in HEAD.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
branch).
Is the goal to have a new major branch every 2 years?
Something like that, yes.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
is expected to be supported until late 2007 (FreeBSD 5.5 plus two
years), and FreeBSD 6.x will probably be supported until early 2009 (the last
FreeBSD 6.x release plus two years).
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Rob wrote:
Some time ago, there was (or still is) a similar
conflict with hostname resolution at bootup when
using ntpd.
Yes, but not with named -- the problem was only when
using a dns cache from the ports tree, since those
are started later in the boot sequence.
Colin Percival
should Never Happen. :-)
Colin Percival
PS. Bravo to Ian for tracking down the bug in NFS -- I spent a while looking
for this, but got hopelessly lost.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
a
good idea.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
upgrade to -RC3? I'm
not sure if it's worth burning another few hundred megabytes of ftp mirror
bandwidth.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
to the operating system, so there should be no problems.
For that matter, my understanding is that dual core opterons *are*
separate processors, connected only via their normal external
interface.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
how a bug which
caused / to be labelled as noexec managed to avoid causing major
problems until now.
I don't know anything about NFS, but hopefully someone on -stable
will be able to work out what's going on from the rest of your
email (quoted below).
Colin Percival
In this case, / is mounted
correct? I've seen this happen when the local
hostname (i.e., the output of `hostname`) cannot be resolved.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
to look up names in DNS and then
goes into an infinite loop.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(about 80 hours -- but 48 hours of that was over a weekend),
but aside from that I have no complaints.
Colin Percival
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
Brett Glass wrote:
Would anyone else besides me like to see a 5.3.1 minor release
sometime around, say, February?
No, but quite a few people would like to see a 5.4 minor release
sometime around, say, late February or early March.
Colin Percival
not apply to any FreeBSD releases other than
5.3.
Colin Percival
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
into the future. (Just look at the
floppy disk situation.)
Much better just to accept that it doesn't fit onto a 3 CD-R and
move on. :-)
Colin Percival
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send
At 20:59 19/04/2004, Doug Lee wrote:
CVS is being updated but FreeBSD still uses v1.11.5. ...
Any plans to update CVS in the base system?
CVS 1.11.15 was imported into -current four days ago. I
would assume that it will be merged onto -stable at some
point after 4.10-RELEASE.
Colin Percival
/sysutils/makefs)
saves about 23k on the mfsroot floppy.
Colin Percival
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=1.17.2.4
Colin Percival
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, but I'm not
sure that's necessarily the case any more; now that we have all the
release/security branches, I think it's safe to say that most systems which
need absolute stability aren't going to be running STABLE.
Colin Percival
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED
, but nobody has actually
gotten around to doing it yet.
Colin Percival
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
98 matches
Mail list logo
