Re: Freebsd 11.0 RELEASE - ZFS deadlock

On 11/18/2016 13:30, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 14/11/2016 14:00, Henri Hennebert wrote: On 11/14/2016 12:45, Andriy Gapon wrote: Okay. Luckily for us, it seems that 'm' is available in frame 5. It also happens to be the first field of 'struct faultstate'. So, could you please go to frame

Re: Freebsd 11.0 RELEASE - ZFS deadlock

On 11/14/2016 12:45, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 14/11/2016 11:35, Henri Hennebert wrote: On 11/14/2016 10:07, Andriy Gapon wrote: Hmm, I've just noticed another interesting thread: Thread 668 (Thread 101245): #0 sched_switch (td=0xf800b642aa00, newtd=0xf8000285f000, flags=) at /usr

Re: Freebsd 11.0 RELEASE - ZFS deadlock

On 11/14/2016 10:07, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 13/11/2016 15:28, Henri Hennebert wrote: On 11/13/2016 11:06, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 12/11/2016 14:40, Henri Hennebert wrote: [snip] Could you please show 'info local' in frame 14? I expected that 'nd' variable would be defined there and it may

Re: Freebsd 11.0 RELEASE - ZFS deadlock

On 11/13/2016 14:28, Henri Hennebert wrote: This 2 threads are innd processes. In core.txt.4: 8 14789 29165 0 24 4 40040 6612 zfs DN- 0:00.00 [innd] 8 29165 1 0 20 0 42496 6888 select Ds- 0:01.33 [innd] 8 49778 29165 0 24 4 40040 6900 zfs

Re: Freebsd 11.0 RELEASE - ZFS deadlock

On 11/13/2016 11:06, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 12/11/2016 14:40, Henri Hennebert wrote: I attatch it Thank you! So, these two threads are trying to get the lock in the exclusive mode: Thread 687 (Thread 101243): #0 sched_switch (td=0xf800b642b500, newtd=0xf8000285ea00, flags=) at /usr

Re: Freebsd 11.0 RELEASE - ZFS deadlock

On 11/11/2016 12:24, Andriy Gapon wrote: At this stage I would try to get a system crash dump for post-mortem analysis. There are a few way to do that. You can enter ddb and then run 'dump' and 'reset' commands. Or you can just do `sysctl debug.kdb.panic=1`. In either case, please

Re: Freebsd 11.0 RELEASE - ZFS deadlock

On 11/10/2016 19:40, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 10/11/2016 19:55, Henri Hennebert wrote: On 11/10/2016 18:33, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 10/11/2016 18:12, Henri Hennebert wrote: On 11/10/2016 16:54, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 10/11/2016 17:20, Henri Hennebert wrote: On 11/10/2016 15:00, Andriy Gapon

Re: Freebsd 11.0 RELEASE - ZFS deadlock

On 11/10/2016 18:33, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 10/11/2016 18:12, Henri Hennebert wrote: On 11/10/2016 16:54, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 10/11/2016 17:20, Henri Hennebert wrote: On 11/10/2016 15:00, Andriy Gapon wrote: Interesting. I can not spot any suspicious thread that would hold the vnode

Re: Freebsd 11.0 RELEASE - ZFS deadlock

On 11/10/2016 16:54, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 10/11/2016 17:20, Henri Hennebert wrote: On 11/10/2016 15:00, Andriy Gapon wrote: Interesting. I can not spot any suspicious thread that would hold the vnode lock. Could you please run kgdb (just like that, no arguments), then execute 'bt' command

Re: Freebsd 11.0 RELEASE - ZFS deadlock

On 11/10/2016 15:00, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 10/11/2016 12:30, Henri Hennebert wrote: On 11/10/2016 11:21, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 09/11/2016 15:58, Eric van Gyzen wrote: On 11/09/2016 07:48, Henri Hennebert wrote: I encounter a strange deadlock on FreeBSD avoriaz.restart.bel 11.0-RELEASE-p3

Re: Freebsd 11.0 RELEASE - ZFS deadlock

On 11/10/2016 11:21, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 09/11/2016 15:58, Eric van Gyzen wrote: On 11/09/2016 07:48, Henri Hennebert wrote: I encounter a strange deadlock on FreeBSD avoriaz.restart.bel 11.0-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p3 #0 r308260: Fri Nov 4 02:51:33 CET 2016 r

Re: Freebsd 11.0 RELEASE - ZFS deadlock

On 11/09/2016 19:23, Thierry Thomas wrote: Le mer. 9 nov. 16 à 15:03:49 +0100, Henri Hennebert <h...@restart.be> écrivait : [root@avoriaz ~]# procstat -kk 85656 PIDTID COMM TDNAME KSTACK 85656 101112 find -mi_switch+0xd2 sleepq_wait+0x3a s

Re: Freebsd 11.0 RELEASE - ZFS deadlock

On 11/09/2016 14:58, Eric van Gyzen wrote: On 11/09/2016 07:48, Henri Hennebert wrote: I encounter a strange deadlock on FreeBSD avoriaz.restart.bel 11.0-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p3 #0 r308260: Fri Nov 4 02:51:33 CET 2016 r...@avoriaz.restart.bel:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/AVORIAZ amd64

Freebsd 11.0 RELEASE - ZFS deadlock

I encounter a strange deadlock on FreeBSD avoriaz.restart.bel 11.0-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p3 #0 r308260: Fri Nov 4 02:51:33 CET 2016 r...@avoriaz.restart.bel:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/AVORIAZ amd64 This system is exclusively running on zfs. After 3 or 4 days, `periodic daily` is

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

On 02/18/2016 01:24, Marius Strobl wrote: > > Could those of you experiencing these hangs with ZFS please test > whether instead of reverting all of r292895, a kernel built with > just the merge of r291244 undone via the following patch gets rid > of that problem - especially on amd64 - and

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

On 02/03/2016 02:03, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, > >> On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 07:07:38 +1100 >> Peter Jeremy said: > > peter> As others have said, you need to provide lots more detail on your > peter> configuration. > > CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3500+ > Memory:

Link error in usr.bin/dig if WITH_BIND_XML=yes

Hello, Dig can't be linked if WITH_BIND_XML=yes is added to /etc/src.conf. [root@morzine src]# svn info Path: . Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src URL: http://svn.restart.bel/svn-FreeBSD-base/stable/9 Relative URL: ^/stable/9 Repository Root: http://svn.restart.bel/svn-FreeBSD-base Repository

Re: Lost CAM Access to DVD Writer

On 09/02/2013 01:54, Thomas Laus wrote: Hi, :-( Unable to CAMGETPASSTHRU for /dev/cd0 Inappropriate ioctl for device. I encounter the same problem and reinstalling dvd+rw-tools-7.1 solved it. Henri Could someone else try to make a 'dump to DVD' backup [...] /sbin/dump -0u -L -C16

Re: 9.2-BETA2 - Problem with newsyslog

On 07/29/2013 11:18, Henri Hennebert wrote: Hello, My entry for newsyslog in /etc/crontab is: 0 * * * * rootnewsyslog -t \%Y-\%m-\%d_\%H:\%M And I get: newsyslog: Could not convert time string to time value: No such file or directory I try to use the newsyslog from head

9.2-BETA2 - Problem with newsyslog

Hello, My entry for newsyslog in /etc/crontab is: 0 * * * * rootnewsyslog -t \%Y-\%m-\%d_\%H:\%M And I get: newsyslog: Could not convert time string to time value: No such file or directory I try to use the newsyslog from head to to avail. This solution was working a month ago (see

9.2-BETA2 bind + WITH_BIND_XML=yes + libxml2-2.8.0

Hello, When compiling world of 9.2-BETA2 and adding in /etc/src.conf WITH_BIND_XML=yes and with libxml2-2.8.0_2 (textproc/libxml2) installed in /usr/local I get this link error: === usr.bin/dig (all) /usr/local/lib/libxml2.a(xzlib.o): In function `__libxml2_xzclose': xzlib.c:(.text+0x69):

Re: sysctl -a causes kernel trap 12

On 02/12/2013 12:22, Henri Hennebert wrote: On 01/19/2013 06:58, Brandon Gooch wrote: On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Xin Li delp...@delphij.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/18/13 12:50, Brandon Gooch wrote: On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Xin Li delp

Re: Can not build kernel with modular ata and ATA_CAM

On 06/25/2012 10:50, Mitya wrote: My kernel options: # Bus support. device acpi device pci # Modular ATA device atadisk # ATA disk drives device atacore # Core ATA functionality device atapci # PCI bus support; only generic

Re: cvsup{, d} woes after upgrading to RELENG_9 on amd64 this weekend

On 06/05/2012 10:17, Scot Hetzel wrote: On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Henri Henneberth...@restart.be wrote: On 06/04/2012 10:53, Trond Endrestøl wrote: Hi, After upgrading to RELENG_9 as of yesterday on my amd64 system, cvsup bombs out with Bus error: 10. Example: # /usr/local/bin/cvsup

Re: cvsup{, d} woes after upgrading to RELENG_9 on amd64 this weekend

On 06/04/2012 10:53, Trond Endrestøl wrote: Hi, After upgrading to RELENG_9 as of yesterday on my amd64 system, cvsup bombs out with Bus error: 10. Example: # /usr/local/bin/cvsup -g -L 2 /usr/src/stable-supfile Parsing supfile /usr/src/stable-supfile Connecting to localhost Connected to

Re: strange system corruption (freebsd 9.0)

On 04/20/2012 18:38, Ingrid Ditra wrote: Hi, folks! I am in the middle of really creepy problem with my new FreeBSD box. I would appreciate any ideas about what the hell happened. I've installed FreeBSD 9.0 from CD on IBM System x3550 server (with RAID-5 on 4 hard drives) and moved on it the

Re: libutempter

On 01/14/2012 09:47, Andre Goree wrote: On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:58:13 -0600, Andre Goree an...@drenet.info wrote: I recently csup'd 9-STABLE and was able to get it working along with my custom kernel. I'm now in the process of rebuilding all my ports, and I've come across something when

Re: FreeBSD 9 recompile ports

On 01/14/2012 09:46, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 13/01/2012 22:57, Andriy Gapon wrote: But if the appropriate misc/compatX port is installed, then those libraries do actually exist and the system should be fully usable... Modulo the compat libraries not working with the new kernel as Kostik

Re: FreeBSD 9 recompile ports

On 01/14/2012 11:37, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:29:00AM +0100, Henri Hennebert wrote: On 01/14/2012 09:46, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 13/01/2012 22:57, Andriy Gapon wrote: But if the appropriate misc/compatX port is installed, then those libraries do actually exist

Tripwire segmentation fault - amd64 - 9.0-RC2 in _malloc_postfork

Hello, On 2 systems running 9.0-RC2 amd64 tripwire segfault. The problem occurs during `tripwire --check` after +/- 20 minutes of execution: Here is the bt [root@tignes tripwire]# gdb ./tripwire GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software,

Re: ZFS boot inside on the second partition inside a slice

On 06/21/2011 23:27, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 4:13:20 pm Henri Hennebert wrote: On 06/21/2011 21:25, John Baldwin wrote: and I get: Read error: 04 Hmm, that is the error for an invalid sector. Try this patch. It reshuffles a few more things and adds code to dump

Re: ZFS boot inside on the second partition inside a slice

On 06/22/2011 16:19, Henri Hennebert wrote: On 06/22/2011 15:57, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 7:34:05 am Henri Hennebert wrote: I get LBA: 8200 Read error: 04 Odd. Oh, I fubar'd and read the wrong thing for the sector. Also, we should leave the EDD packet on the stack

Re: ZFS boot inside on the second partition inside a slice

On 06/22/2011 15:57, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 7:34:05 am Henri Hennebert wrote: I get LBA: 8200 Read error: 04 Odd. Oh, I fubar'd and read the wrong thing for the sector. Also, we should leave the EDD packet on the stack so it doesn't get trashed by calling hex8

Re: ZFS boot inside on the second partition inside a slice

On 06/22/2011 16:23, Henri Hennebert wrote: On 06/22/2011 16:19, Henri Hennebert wrote: On 06/22/2011 15:57, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 7:34:05 am Henri Hennebert wrote: I get LBA: 8200 Read error: 04 Odd. Oh, I fubar'd and read the wrong thing for the sector. Also

Re: ZFS boot inside on the second partition inside a slice

On 06/22/2011 17:58, John Baldwin wrote: Index: zfsldr.S === --- zfsldr.S(revision 223365) +++ zfsldr.S(working copy) @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ */ /* Memory Locations */ - .set MEM_REL,0x700 #

Re: ZFS boot inside on the second partition inside a slice

On 06/20/2011 15:51, John Baldwin wrote: On Saturday, June 18, 2011 5:04:07 am Henri Hennebert wrote: On 06/17/2011 19:37, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, June 17, 2011 1:06:22 pm Henri Hennebert wrote: On 06/16/2011 19:35, John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, June 16, 2011 8:45:41 am Zhihao Yuan

Re: ZFS boot inside on the second partition inside a slice

On 06/21/2011 15:01, John Baldwin wrote: Index: zfsldr.S === --- zfsldr.S(revision 223339) +++ zfsldr.S(working copy) @@ -234,9 +234,12 @@ nread.1: xor %ecx,%ecx # Get callw read

Re: ZFS boot inside on the second partition inside a slice

On 06/21/2011 17:55, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 10:50:14 am Henri Hennebert wrote: On 06/21/2011 15:01, John Baldwin wrote: Index: zfsldr.S === --- zfsldr.S(revision 223339) +++ zfsldr.S(working copy

Re: ZFS boot inside on the second partition inside a slice

On 06/21/2011 19:51, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 12:15:58 pm Henri Hennebert wrote: On 06/21/2011 17:55, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 10:50:14 am Henri Hennebert wrote: On 06/21/2011 15:01, John Baldwin wrote: Index: zfsldr.S

Re: ZFS boot inside on the second partition inside a slice

On 06/21/2011 21:25, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 3:02:28 pm Henri Hennebert wrote: On 06/21/2011 19:51, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 12:15:58 pm Henri Hennebert wrote: On 06/21/2011 17:55, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 10:50:14 am Henri

Re: ZFS boot inside on the second partition inside a slice

On 06/16/2011 19:35, John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, June 16, 2011 8:45:41 am Zhihao Yuan wrote: Exactly. The MFCed ZFSv28 is different from any patch maintained by mm@. Maybe some untested changes involved. Can you try reverting this change: Author: jhb Date: Thu Apr 28 17:44:24 2011

Re: ZFS boot inside on the second partition inside a slice

On 06/16/2011 07:32, Zhihao Yuan wrote: I just redo everything, and changed the order of freebsd-zfs and freebsd-swap. The Read error still happens! Just a me too. Everything was working great with zfsboot from 8.2-RELEASE + a patch (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/153552).

Re: ZFS boot inside on the second partition inside a slice

On 06/16/2011 19:35, John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, June 16, 2011 8:45:41 am Zhihao Yuan wrote: Exactly. The MFCed ZFSv28 is different from any patch maintained by mm@. Maybe some untested changes involved. Can you try reverting this change: Author: jhb Date: Thu Apr 28 17:44:24 2011 New

zfsboot from 8.2RC1 freeze at boot time

Hello and merry Xmas to everybody, I upgrade a remote server from 8.1-RELEASE to 8.2-RC1. This server have one disk: [r...@tignes ~]# gpart show = 63 488397105 ada0 MBR (233G) 63 12583809 1 freebsd (6.0G) 12583872 475813296 2 freebsd [active] (227G) =

Re: MFC of ZFSv15

prefer to install bootcode BEFORE. Then reboot and check it with the printf of my simple patch. Then you can zpool/zfs upgrade without problem. Am I understanding this correctly ? Thanks for all the work on ZFS BTW, it's great! Dan On Sep 16, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Henri Hennebert wrote

Re: MFC of ZFSv15

On 09/16/2010 17:18, jhell wrote: On 09/16/2010 09:55, Mike Tancsa wrote: Thanks again for all the ZFS fixes and enhancements! Are there any caveats to upgrading ? Do I just do zpool upgrade -a zfs upgrade -a or are there any extra steps ? Hi Mike, No-one knows your bootcode better

Re: zfs destroy snapshot doesn't free space

On 08/13/2010 20:02, Andreas Mayer wrote: $ uname -a FreeBSD wurd.dev001.net 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Jul 19 02:36:49 UTC 2010 r...@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 2010/8/13 Malcolm Waltz mwa...@pacific.edu: Have you tried zfs list -t all ? I

Re: Pack of CAM improvements

On 01/19/2010 17:12, Alexander Motin wrote: Hi. I've made a patch, that should solve set of problems of CAM ATA and CAM generally. I would like to ask for testing and feedback. What patch does: - It unifies bus reset/probe sequence. Whenever bus attached at boot or later, CAM will

Re: USB problems on 8.0-STABLE

On 01/09/2010 05:39, Warren Block wrote: On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, Frank wrote: On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, Steven Friedrich wrote: Option AllowEmptyInput off EndSection Comment out the line containing AllowEmptyInput. OK, this took care of the nothing-works-unless-mouse-is-moved problem but why do I

Re: cvsweb: src/UPDATING on RELENG_7

Le 1/01/2010 16:40, Ian Smith a écrit : Hi, Thought I had a clue on using cvsweb, but seem to have mislaid it .. After updating 7.0-RELEASE to RELENG_7 sources on Dec 28, checking UPDATING before and during buildworld, went hunting on cvsweb for the very version of UPDATING I was reading,

[SOLVED] 8.0-BETA1 - for the record - different paths followed by IPv4 and IPv6 for 'local' connections

packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 0.531/0.721/0.884/0.145 ms Thanks Henri -Original Message- From: Henri Hennebert [mailto:h...@restart.be] Sent: Sat 7/11/2009 3:09 AM To: Li, Qing Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; freebsd

Re: 8.0-BETA1 - for the record - different paths followed by IPv4 and IPv6 for 'local' connections

transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 0.531/0.721/0.884/0.145 ms Thanks Henri -Original Message- From: Henri Hennebert [mailto:h...@restart.be] Sent: Sat 7/11/2009 3:09 AM To: Li, Qing Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; freebsd-...@freebsd.org

Re: 8.0-BETA1 - for the record - different paths followed by IPv4 and IPv6 for 'local' connections

no entry for 2001:41d0:2:2d29:1:1:: This is by design as part of the new architecture in 8.0, which maintains the L2 ARP/ND6 and L3 routing tables separately. -- Qing -Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org on behalf of Henri Hennebert Sent: Fri 7/10/2009 5:32 AM

8.0-BETA1 - for the record - different paths followed by IPv4 and IPv6 for 'local' connections

Hello, After upgrading from 7.2-STABLE to 8.0-BETA1 I encounter a problem when connecting with firefox to a local apache server using the global unicast IPv6 address of the local machine. pf.conf must be updated! My configuration: [r...@avoriaz ~]# ifconfig em0 em0:

8.0-BETA1 - for the record - different paths followed by IPv4 and IPv6 for 'local' connections

Hello, After upgrading from 7.2-STABLE to 8.0-BETA1 I encounter a problem when connecting with firefox to a local apache server using the global unicast IPv6 address of the local machine. pf.conf must be updated! My configuration: [r...@avoriaz ~]# ifconfig em0 em0:

Re: Zfs on usb-disk checksum errors?

Ronald Klop wrote: Hi. I put zfs on my external usb-disk, so I can backup my harddisk with zfs send/receive. I now have corruption on this volume. [r...@sjakie ~]# zpool status -v pool: extern state: ONLINE status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data

Re: FreeBSD 7-STABLE and chflags on ZFS now(?) failing

Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: One of my FreeBSD boxes is a 7-STABLE/amd64 one on ZFS, now in production for over a 1.5 years now and which receives regular upgrades. The last installation of FreeBSD 7-STABLE was just about 2 weeks ago. Today the upgrade failed the first time:

Re: ZFS pool from current

Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: On Wed, June 17, 2009 11:16, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2009-06-17 16:09, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: And for virtualbox on amd64 purposes I want to run 7.2R or STABLE to use VT-x and amd64 vm's under vbox. will I have to make anything, or it will just work ? Kip Macy created a

Re: ZFS pool from current

Gavin Atkinson wrote: On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 16:51 +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote: Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: thanks, I was just looking for this update on web interface to cvs and there is nothing in UPDATING for RELENG_7 there. is this really supposed to happen ? Sadly a known and ignored problem

Stable from May 31 - zfs list locked

Hello, I encounter this problem for the second time. The system is working perfectly well but suddenly the command `zfs list' don't work and can't be killed. Here is a procstat of the culprit: [r...@morzine ~]# procstat -k 91766 PIDTID COMM TDNAME KSTACK 91766

Re: Stable from May 31 - zfs list locked

Henri Hennebert wrote: Hello, I encounter this problem for the second time. The system is working perfectly well but suddenly the command `zfs list' don't work and can't be killed. Here is a procstat of the culprit: [r...@morzine ~]# procstat -k 91766 PIDTID COMM TDNAME

Re: ZFS booting without partitions

Kip Macy wrote: On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Adam McDougall mcdou...@egr.msu.edu wrote: I'm thinking that too. I spent some time taking stabs at figuring it out yesterday but didn't get anywhere useful. I did try compiling the -current src/sys/boot tree on 7.2 after a couple header tweaks

Re: /boot/loader can't load kernel if too many pool/devices

Doug Rabson wrote: On 1 Jun 2009, at 11:22, Henri Hennebert wrote: Hello, During my tests (succesful) to directly boot from ZFS (with zfsboot and gptzfsboot) I encounter the error can't boot 'kernel' if too many devices/pools are connected to the machine. In my case: 2 SAS disks with 2

Re: ZFS booting without partitions

Lorenzo Perone wrote: Hi, I tried hard... but without success ;( the result is, when choosing the disk with the zfs boot sectors in it (in my case F5, which goes to ad6), the kernel is not found. the console shows: forth not found definitions not found only not found (the above repeated

/boot/loader can't load kernel if too many pool/devices

Hello, During my tests (succesful) to directly boot from ZFS (with zfsboot and gptzfsboot) I encounter the error can't boot 'kernel' if too many devices/pools are connected to the machine. In my case: 2 SAS disks with 2 pools 2 SATA disks with 2 pools 1 USB key with one pool `heap` command:

Re: ZFS booting without partitions

Henri Hennebert wrote: Lorenzo Perone wrote: Hi, I tried hard... but without success ;( the result is, when choosing the disk with the zfs boot sectors in it (in my case F5, which goes to ad6), the kernel is not found. the console shows: forth not found definitions not found only not found

Re: libzpool assert vs libc assert

Andriy Gapon wrote: on 29/05/2009 15:35 Andriy Gapon said the following: So anyone else feels that this is a bug? on 28/05/2009 16:55 Andriy Gapon said the following: on 28/05/2009 16:26 Henri Hennebert said the following: (gdb) bt #0 0x0008012a6f22 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.7 #1

Re: ZFS MFC heads down

, Henri Hennebert h...@restart.be wrote: Kip Macy wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote: I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will continue to work without upgrade

Re: Problem with postfix and mail command

Ruben Lara wrote: Hi all! I just installed postfix, after build world without sendmail If i try to send mail i get: mail# mail aaa Subject: a a . EOT mail# mail: /usr/sbin/sendmail: No such file or directory Event with WITHOUT_SENDMAIL=yes in /etc/src.conf, make installworld must create

Re: ZFS MFC heads down

Kip Macy wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote: I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will continue to work without upgrade. If you choose to upgrade a pool to take

Re: ZFS MFC heads down

Kip Macy wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Artem Belevich fbsdl...@src.cx wrote: I had the same problem on -current. Try attached patch. It may not apply cleanly on -stable, but should be easy enough to make equivalent changes on -stable. --Artem Adding to rw_init looks fine, but I'd

Re: ZFS MFC heads down

Andriy Gapon wrote: on 28/05/2009 16:26 Henri Hennebert said the following: (gdb) bt #0 0x0008012a6f22 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.7 #1 0x0008012a0feb in open () from /lib/libc.so.7 #2 0x00080129ea59 in open () from /lib/libc.so.7 #3 0x0008012a1f2e in vfprintf () from

Re: ZFS MFC heads down

Henri Hennebert wrote: Kip Macy wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote: I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will continue to work without upgrade. If you choose

Re: ZFS MFC heads down

Kip Macy wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote: I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will continue to work without upgrade. If you choose to upgrade a pool to take

Re: ZFS MFC heads down

and time Henri --Artem On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Henri Hennebert h...@restart.be wrote: Kip Macy wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote: I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both world and kernel will need to be re

Re: ZFS MFC heads down

Henri Hennebert wrote: Artem Belevich wrote: I had the same problem on -current. Try attached patch. It may not apply cleanly on -stable, but should be easy enough to make equivalent changes on -stable. The patch is ok for stable. now I get for the pool with my root: [r...@morzine libzpool

Re: ZFS MFC heads down

Artem Belevich wrote: Did you by any chance do that from single-user mode? ZFS seems to rely on hostid being set. Try running /etc/rc.d/hostid start and then re-try your zfs commands. I was in multiuser with hostid set. Henri --Artem On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Henri Hennebert h

Re: ZFS MFC heads down

or crash. Henri -Kip On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Henri Hennebert h...@restart.be wrote: Kip Macy wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote: I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both world and kernel will need to be re-built

Re: ZFS MFC heads down

Kip Macy wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote: I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will continue to work without upgrade. If you choose to upgrade a pool to take

Re: ZFS MFC heads down

Navdeep Parhar wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote: Not really a problem but a question: Is the v13 on-disk format exactly the same as that used by Solaris/Opensolaris? It is supposed to be. The sources are the same. However, I have not tested

Re: ZFS MFC heads down

Kip Macy wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote: I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will continue to work without upgrade. If you choose to upgrade a pool to take

Re: ZFS MFC heads down

Henri Hennebert wrote: Kip Macy wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote: I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will continue to work without upgrade. If you choose

7.2-RC1 - serial console / sio0 not working

Hello, Experiencing some deadlock, I try to reenable my serial console on 7.2-RC1. (console=comconsole,vidconsole in /boot/loader.conf and -Dh or -Dh -S115200 in /boot.config). /var/log/message show: 'sio0: type 16550A, console' and from the vga point of view, console output from kernel is

7.2-RC1 - serial console / sio0 not working

Sorry for the previous wrong followup :-( Hello, Experiencing some deadlock, I try to reenable my serial console on 7.2-RC1. (console=comconsole,vidconsole in /boot/loader.conf and -Dh or -Dh -S115200 in /boot.config). /var/log/message show: 'sio0: type 16550A, console' and from the vga

Re: 7.2-RC1 - serial console / sio0 not working

Marten Vijn wrote: On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 16:49 +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote: Hello, Experiencing some deadlock, I try to reenable my serial console on 7.2-RC1. (console=comconsole,vidconsole in /boot/loader.conf and -Dh or -Dh -S115200 in /boot.config). /var/log/message show: 'sio0: type

Re: 6.4-STABLE and PHP5 pcre and phpsysinfo

xer wrote: Hello Mine 6.4-STABLE today has a strange problem regarding phpsysinfo that i use it. Ports are updated,but phpsysinfo (on browser) today show errors about pcre: --- Notice: Undefined offset: 3 in

hald and GEOM_PART_BSD + GEOM_PART_MBR

Just for the record, I add options GEOM_PART_BSD and GEOM_PART_MBR to my kernel config (I want to see what gpart was saying abount my disks). At boot time I get some messages as: GEOM: ad4s2: geometry does not match label. GEOM: ad4s2: media size does not match label. and more important:

Re: ZFS performance issues (solved?!)

John Birrell wrote: For those people experiencing a performance degradation since the DTrace import, please update your copy of src/sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/kern/opensolaris_kmem.c by either cvsup of direct edit to remove #define KMEM_DEBUG. You only need to rebuild the opensolaris kernel

Re: Possible ZFS patch, please test!

Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 09:28:36PM +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote: John Baldwin wrote: This patch merges a few changes from HEAD back to 7.x. I think the endian changes specifically might solve the issue people saw with zpools created with non-dtrace kernels not being

Re: Possible ZFS patch, please test!

John Baldwin wrote: On Friday 29 August 2008 03:57:46 am Henri Hennebert wrote: Henri Hennebert wrote: John Baldwin wrote: This patch merges a few changes from HEAD back to 7.x. I think the endian changes specifically might solve the issue people saw with zpools created with non-dtrace

Re: Possible ZFS patch, please test!

John Birrell wrote: On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 09:07:15AM +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote: I try, but with the wold of 7.1-PRERELEASE I got cc: Internal error: Segmentation fault: 11 (program ld) Please submit a full bug report. See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions. *** Error code 1

Re: Possible ZFS patch, please test!

John Birrell wrote: On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 10:40:12AM +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote: I believe that the buildworld that you have is OK, even when built with the CTF data it's the installworld when things go bad. Do you need me to send you any files to recover from this problem? No problem

Re: Possible ZFS patch, please test!

John Baldwin wrote: This patch merges a few changes from HEAD back to 7.x. I think the endian changes specifically might solve the issue people saw with zpools created with non-dtrace kernels not being readable by dtrace kernels and vice versa. http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/zfs_7.patch

Re: Possible ZFS patch, please test!

John Baldwin wrote: This patch merges a few changes from HEAD back to 7.x. I think the endian changes specifically might solve the issue people saw with zpools created with non-dtrace kernels not being readable by dtrace kernels and vice versa. http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/zfs_7.patch

Re: Possible ZFS patch, please test!

Henri Hennebert wrote: John Baldwin wrote: This patch merges a few changes from HEAD back to 7.x. I think the endian changes specifically might solve the issue people saw with zpools created with non-dtrace kernels not being readable by dtrace kernels and vice versa. http://www.FreeBSD.org

Re: recent regression with REL7 and Zfs

Thierry Herbelot wrote: Hello, I am using a recent 7.0-Stable (x86) and a Zfs pool for my data. After the dtrace import, I have updated my sources (and make buildworld, make buildkernel) and I no longer have access to my Zfs pool (just to be sure, I have since updated twice more to work

Re: RELENG_7 /src/UPDATING out od date?

Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: Hey, http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/UPDATING?rev=1.507;only_with_tag=RELENG_7 NOTE TO PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT FreeBSD 7.x IS SLOW: FreeBSD 7.x has many debugging features turned on, in both the kernel and userland. These features

Re: finstall alpha3

Julian H. Stacey wrote: Ivan Voras wrote: As some of you may already know, I'm working on a graphical installer for FreeBSD 7, which was started as a Google SoC 2007 project but still continues. 10+ years back when Jordan did first pre= X, 24x80 graphical installer, soon afer he'd finished a

Re: finstall alpha3

Julian Stacey wrote: Henri Hennebert wrote 2 emails with same common text To: Julian H. Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:20:38 +0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The first private shouting got answered. Then came To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org

Re: 7.0-RC1 - ZFS + UFS + io activity show a deadlock

Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 02:47:02PM +0100, Henri Hennebert wrote: Hello, I encounter a deadlock while 1) cpio -p from a ZFS filesystem to a UFS filesystem 2) rsync from ZFS to ZFS I was running with this patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zgd_done.patch

  1   2   >