Re: [SOLVED] [#2] panics collections on FreeBSD 11.0-RC1 RC2 PRERELEASE RELEASE STABLE

On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:33:10 +0200 Ivan Klymenko <fi...@ukr.net> wrote: > On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 09:57:29 -0800 > hiren panchasara <hi...@strugglingcoder.info> wrote: > > > On 12/28/16 at 07:53P, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > > On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 09:41

Re: panics collections on FreeBSD 11.0-RC1 RC2 PRERELEASE RELEASE STABLE

On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 19:16:04 +0300 "Andrey V. Elsukov" <a...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 27.01.2017 17:41, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > >> I didn't done the merge of the patch into stable/11 and > >> releng/11.0, because Adrian said it is not good eno

Re: panics collections on FreeBSD 11.0-RC1 RC2 PRERELEASE RELEASE STABLE

On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 15:01:18 +0300 "Andrey V. Elsukov" <a...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 27.01.2017 14:58, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:46:30 +0300 > > "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7c...@yandex.ru> wrote: > > > >> On

Re: [SOLVED] panics collections on FreeBSD 11.0-RC1 RC2 PRERELEASE RELEASE STABLE

On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 15:01:18 +0300 "Andrey V. Elsukov" <a...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 27.01.2017 14:58, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:46:30 +0300 > > "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7c...@yandex.ru> wrote: > > > >> On

Re: [SOLVED] panics collections on FreeBSD 11.0-RC1 RC2 PRERELEASE RELEASE STABLE

On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:46:30 +0300 "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7c...@yandex.ru> wrote: > On 27.01.2017 01:33, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > The reason most panics served as tuning Netisr: > > net.isr.numthreads=4 > > net.isr.maxthreads=4 > > net.isr.bindthreads=1

Re: [SOLVED] panics collections on FreeBSD 11.0-RC1 RC2 PRERELEASE RELEASE STABLE

On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 09:57:29 -0800 hiren panchasara <hi...@strugglingcoder.info> wrote: > On 12/28/16 at 07:53P, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 09:41:42 -0800 > > hiren panchasara <hi...@strugglingcoder.info> wrote: > > > > > Can you ope

Re: panics collections on FreeBSD 11.0-RC1 RC2 PRERELEASE RELEASE STABLE

Next panic uname -a FreeBSD ns 11.0-STABLE FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #1 r310470: Fri Dec 23 12:00:49 EET 2016 root@ns:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/bzk11 amd64 Dec 28 09:43:21 ns kernel: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode Dec 28 09:43:21 ns kernel: cpuid = 3; apic id = 03 Dec 28 09:43:21 ns

Re: panics collections on FreeBSD 11.0-RC1 RC2 PRERELEASE RELEASE STABLE

On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 18:35:24 +0100 Oliver Pinter <oliver.pin...@hardenedbsd.org> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Ivan Klymenko <fi...@ukr.net> wrote: > > Next > > Are you able to reproduce these without loaded VirtualBox kernel > modules? > Th

Re: panics collections on FreeBSD 11.0-RC1 RC2 PRERELEASE RELEASE STABLE

Next uname -a FreeBSD nonamehost 11.0-STABLE FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #10 r308523: Fri Nov 11 13:52:01 EET 2016 root@nonamehost:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/bzk11 amd64 Nov 21 17:33:40 ns kernel: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode Nov 21 17:33:40 ns kernel: cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 Nov 21

Re: panics collections on FreeBSD 11.0-RC1 RC2 PRERELEASE RELEASE STABLE

Next panic Oct 28 09:06:50 ns kernel: panic: sbsndptr: sockbuf 0xf8008f186878 and mbuf 0xf8008f29d200 clashing Oct 28 09:06:50 ns kernel: cpuid = 7 Oct 28 09:06:50 ns kernel: KDB: stack backtrace: Oct 28 09:06:50 ns kernel: #0 0x80b5f0e7 at kdb_backtrace+0x67 Oct 28 09:06:50 ns

Re: 11.0-RELEASE-p2: panic: vm_page_unwire: page 0x[...]'s wire count is zero

On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:01:30 +0500 "Eugene M. Zheganin" wrote: > Hi, > > I've upgraded one of my old FreeBSD from 10-STABLE (which was leaking > the wired memory and this was fixed in the spring; other than that it > was pretty much stable) to the 11.0-RELEASE-p2, and almost

Re: panics collections on FreeBSD 11.0-RC1 RC2 PRERELEASE RELEASE STABLE

Next Oct 21 22:06:26 ns syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel Oct 21 22:06:26 ns kernel: panic: sbsndptr: sockbuf 0xf80201038518 and mbuf 0xf802820a1200 clashing Oct 21 22:06:26 ns kernel: cpuid = 3 Oct 21 22:06:26 ns kernel: KDB: stack backtrace: Oct 21 22:06:26 ns kernel: #0

panics collections on FreeBSD 11.0-RC1 RC2 PRERELEASE RELEASE STABLE

Hi, friendly community. I present to you my collection. I have : //===// System Information Manufacturer: Supermicro Product Name: X10SLH-F/X10SLM+-F //===// pciconf -lv

Re: high disk %busy, while almost nothing happens

On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:47:57 +0500 "Eugene M. Zheganin" <e...@norma.perm.ru> wrote: > Hi. > > On 27.11.2015 01:37, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:19:18 +0500 > > "Eugene M. Zheganin" <e...@norma.perm.ru> wrote: &

Re: high disk %busy, while almost nothing happens

On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:19:18 +0500 "Eugene M. Zheganin" wrote: > Hi. > > I'm using FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE as an application server, last week I've > noticed that disks are always busy while gstat shows that the activity > measured in iops/reads/writes is low, form my point of

Re: intel(0): Detected a hung GPU, disabling acceleration

Mon, 8 Jun 2015 09:51:38 -0700 Joseph Olatt j...@eskimo.com написав: mplayer and vlc stopped showing video while trying watch .flv, .mp4, etc. on my FreeBSD laptop running: FreeBSD peace 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #7 r284146: Mon Jun 8 05:10:48 CDT 2015

Re: CPU frequency doesn't drop below 1200MHz (like it used to)

Fri, 22 May 2015 09:33:15 +0200 Nikos Vassiliadis nv...@gmx.com написав: Hi, I just noticed that my CPU's frequency doesn't support dropping below 1200MHz. It used to be able to go down to 150MHz, if I am not mistaken. I'd like it to go down to 600MHz via powerd, like it used to go. This

Re: Hangs with nvidia-driver.

В Mon, 5 Nov 2012 11:03:56 +0300 arrowdodger 6year...@gmail.com пишет: I've started experiencing hangs after 9.1-RC2 update. These hangs are caused by indefinitly looping somewhere inside nvidia_drv.so. As time passes, X server figures it out somehow and escapes from loop, but after short

Re: lowest C-state changes

В Thu, 05 Apr 2012 13:15:35 +0300 Volodymyr Kostyrko c.kw...@gmail.com пишет: Любомир Григоров wrote: Hello all, I am using FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE with Konstantin's patch from March 22nd. Everything else is stock. However, after heavy load, or compiling, C-states go to C1 as lowest. I think

Re: lowest C-state changes

В Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:10:30 -0700 Любомир Григоров nm.kn...@gmail.com пишет: Have you checked http://wiki.freebsd.org/TuningPowerConsumption? I have. It was kind of confusing and didn't know about: 1. For CX states to function correctly you better disable throttling and powerd. I also

Re: can't ping local address

В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:18:51 +0400 Andrey Zonov and...@zonov.org пишет: Hi, Does any one have this [1] problem? or just know how to fix it? [1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/159103 I have this same problem ifconfig re0 re0:

Re: can't ping local address

В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:47:45 +0400 Andrey Zonov and...@zonov.org пишет: On 12.03.2012 14:40, Ivan Klymenko wrote: В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:18:51 +0400 Andrey Zonovand...@zonov.org пишет: Hi, Does any one have this [1] problem? or just know how to fix it? [1] http://www.freebsd.org

Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER

Note also that the above entry for cd0 does NOT change after inserting various different data CDs, all different sizes, nor after mounting one, so that 534181888 entry is from some time before, perhaps the first CD inserted after boot, not sure? Also the sizes are bytes, regardless of

Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER

В Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:24:17 +0100 vermaden verma...@interia.pl пишет: Ivan Klymenko fi...@ukr.net pisze: Note also that the above entry for cd0 does NOT change after inserting various different data CDs, all different sizes, nor after mounting one, so that 534181888 entry is from

Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER

Hi, I have been pretty busy lately because of boring things work/life stuff, but here is the new version, with more options of course and some bugs fixed, it now displays help when triggered as 'automount --help', at least a substitute of a man page ;) I have a quastion, which devd(8)

Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER

Unfortunately, I spent a few days that would have to understand how it is possible to detect the inserted CD-ROM with devd; but alas - the only thing that detects changes in the drive CD-ROM - a :sysctl kern.geom.conftxt before inserting the disc: kern.geom.conftxt: 0 DISK cd0 0

Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER

В Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:43:59 +0100 vermaden verma...@interia.pl пишет: Hi, new version with new features (and BUGs ;p) Added check if ntfsfix from sysutils/ntfsprogs is available, if Yes then try to fix the NTFS filesystem before mouting it. Added GPL3 License ... just joking ;) ...

Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default

В Sat, 17 Dec 2011 23:13:16 +0200 Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org пишет: on 17/12/2011 19:33 George Mitchell said the following: Summing up for the record, in my original test: 1. It doesn't matter whether X is running or not. 2. The problem is not limited to two or fewer CPUs. (It also

Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default

В Thu, 15 Dec 2011 03:05:12 +0100 Oliver Pinter oliver.p...@gmail.com пишет: On 12/15/11, O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote: On 12/14/11 18:54, Tom Evans wrote: On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:06 AM, George Mitchell george+free...@m5p.com wrote: Dear Secret Masters of FreeBSD:

Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default

В Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:02:44 +0100 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org пишет: 2011/12/15 Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com: On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:26:27PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote: 2011/12/13 Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com: On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 02:47:57PM +0100, O.

Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default

В Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:34:35 +0400 Andrey Chernov a...@freebsd.org пишет: On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:22:48AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: On 13 December 2011 01:00, Andrey Chernov a...@freebsd.org wrote: If the algorithm ULE does not contain problems - it means the problem has Core2Duo,

Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default

On 12/12/2011 05:47, O. Hartmann wrote: Do we have any proof at hand for such cases where SCHED_ULE performs much better than SCHED_4BSD? I complained about poor interactive performance of ULE in a desktop environment for years. I had numerous people try to help, including Jeff, with

Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default

В Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:04:42 +0100 Jilles Tjoelker jil...@stack.nl пишет: On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:40:48AM +0200, Ivan Klymenko wrote: If the algorithm ULE does not contain problems - it means the problem has Core2Duo, or in a piece of code that uses the ULE scheduler. I already wrote

Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default

В Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:02:15 + Marcus Reid mar...@blazingdot.com пишет: On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 04:29:14PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: On 12/12/2011 05:47, O. Hartmann wrote: Do we have any proof at hand for such cases where SCHED_ULE performs much better than SCHED_4BSD? I

Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default

В Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:01:56 -0800 m...@freebsd.org пишет: On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Ivan Klymenko fi...@ukr.net wrote: В Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:04:42 +0100 Jilles Tjoelker jil...@stack.nl пишет: On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:40:48AM +0200, Ivan Klymenko wrote: If the algorithm ULE

Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default

В Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:18:35 + Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk пишет: On 12/12/2011 15:51, Steve Kargl wrote: This comes up every 9 months or so, and must be approaching FAQ status. In a HPC environment, I recommend 4BSD. Depending on the workload, ULE can cause a severe increase in turn