Hello,
I've sent a similar query before, but didn't receive any answers.
When upgrading from 9.1 to 9-STABLE, the buildworld fails with:
=== usr.bin/xinstall (all)
cc -O2 -pipe -I/usr/src/usr.bin/xinstall/../../contrib/mtree
-I/usr/src/usr.bin/xinstall/../../lib/libnetbsd
On 29/08/2013 03:32, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
From the analysis perforned in 2009, and referenced earlier by Robert, this
https://wiki.freebsd.org/DirhashDynamicMemory and other material at this site,
indicates that the reclaimage interval is workload dependent and that 5 to 8
seconds seems,
On 28/08/2013 05:58, Robert Burmeister wrote:
On 8/27/2013 9:40 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 27 August 2013 16:41, Robert Burmeister
robert.burmeis...@utoledo.edu wrote:
I have been experimenting with dirhash settings, and have scoured the
internet for other peoples' experience with it.
Updated via svnup from releng/9.0 to releng/9.2 (r254910) and I got this
in buildworld:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/usr/src/usr.bin/xinstall/xinstall.c: In function 'metadata_log':
/usr/src/usr.bin/xinstall/xinstall.c:1331: warning: implicit declaration
of function 'strsvis'
On 11/02/2013 12:23, Panagiotis Christias wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to install FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 on an IBM x3550 M3 server.
Installation went smoothly, RAID controller and network cards were
successfully recognised.
How stable is it? I may have a problem manifesting in random reboots
with a
Hello,
Is there a way to add a process title to SIGSEGV messages which are
usually collected in /var/log/messages?
Jan 18 15:08:06 www kernel: pid 95174 (process-name), uid 80: exited on
signal 11
I'd like to inspect the process' titles alongside process-name.
signature.asc
Description:
On 28/08/2012 17:38, Norbert Aschendorff wrote:
Configuration v6 v4
===
Linux - Linux925 935 # = This could be v6's 40B header
# vs. v4's 20B
Linux - FreeBSD 450 700
FreeBSD -
On 06/07/2012 20:56, Bob Healey wrote:
Hello. I've got a quartet of IBM x3630 M3 with one that is frequently
hard locking under heavy NFS load. I am running 9.0-RELEASE with all
the patches from freebsd-update.
My problem machine has 8 16 core clients, each doing IO intensive tasks
Hello,
I have a very embarrassing problem where apache22-worker, running
mod_fcgid with php, perl and python fastcgi processes, hangs daliy in wait4:
# procstat -k 54688
PIDTID COMM TDNAME KSTACK
54688 101355 httpd-mi_switch
On 05/07/2012 14:21, Mark Saad wrote:
I am using VMware esxi v4.01 with no issues for 6, 7, 8 and 9 . Esxi will
happily host amd64 installs and i386 provider the underlying hardware
supports it. The older esx 3.5 works as well on 32bit hardware but I am no
longer using it. Also I use
On 16/05/2012 11:45, Alexey V. Panfilov wrote:
Hi!
I try to boot from CDROM with FreeBSD on IBM xServer x3250 M4 (P/N
2583-72G), but it always crash with message: NMI ISA b8, EISA ff
RAM parity error, likely hardware failure.
Attempts to install 8.3, 9.0, 7.3 / i386, amd64 - result always
On 04/04/2012 18:03, Efraín Déctor wrote:
Hello.
Does anyone know if FreeBSD 8.2 and FreeBSD 9.1 are fully compatible with
this processor: Intel XEON E3 1270 ?.
Yes.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 20/03/2012 06:26, Matt Thyer wrote:
I've upgraded my FreeBSD-STABLE NAS from r225723 (22nd Sept 2011) to
r232477 (4th Mar 2012) and am finding that a system process called intr
is now constantly using about 60% of 1 CPU starting a short time after
reboot (possibly triggered by use of the
On 20 March 2012 12:52, Matt Thyer matt.th...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 March 2012 21:12, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 20/03/2012 06:26, Matt Thyer wrote:
I've upgraded my FreeBSD-STABLE NAS from r225723 (22nd Sept 2011) to
r232477 (4th Mar 2012) and am finding that a system process
On 09/03/2012 16:43, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
Does anybody have success story of using HPET event timer (not time
counter!) on Serverworks HT-1000 chipset under FreeBSD 9/10?
I was reported about problems with it on HP BL465c G6 blade system and
now thinking whether it is global problem
On 23/02/2012 09:19, Fabien Thomas wrote:
I think this is more reasonable to setup interface with one queue.
Unfortunately, the moment you do that, two things will happen:
1) users will start complaining again how FreeBSD is slow
2) the setting will be come a sacred cow and nobody will change
On 13/02/2012 02:50, Peter Olsson wrote:
Desktop: FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE amd64, generic kernel,
running Openbox. My WAN is about 1.2 Mbps, and I try
to run RDP to windows servers beyond my WAN.
RDP to a Windows Server 2003 SP2 is fast and works
without problems.
RDP to a Windows Server 2008
On 30/01/2012 13:06, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
For now I've turned off journaling (soft updates seem fine) and that
works around the issue.
Let me know if I can provide more details etc!
I'm not sure, but this may be an after-effect of known problems right
now with SU+J on 9.0. It would help
I have a strange situation on a VMWare 5-hosted machine:
# vmstat -i
interrupt total rate
irq1: atkbd0 74 0
irq6: fdc011 0
irq15: ata1 17 0
irq18: em0
On 21.12.2011. 14:48, Maxim Dounin wrote:
Hello!
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:02:04PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
Unless the tickless kernel project has advanced more than I think,
It is, actually. Many thanks to mav@ for his amazing work.
$ sysctl kern.eventtimer.periodic
On 24.11.2011. 8:02, Kris Bauer wrote:
Hello,
I am currently experiencing an issue with FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 r227852 where the
net.inet.tcp.reass.curesegments value is constantly increasing (and not
descreasing when there is nominal traffic with the box). It is causing tcp
slowdowns as described
On 16/11/2011 07:43, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hey,
we have seen this or a very similar panic for about 1 year now once in
a while and I think I reported it before; this is FreeBSD as guest on
Yes, IIRC I've also reported it before; it crashes randomly, when the
machine is not doing anything
On 16/11/2011 15:45, Joel Dahl wrote:
Hmm. We're running many FreeBSD 8.2 machines as guests in VMware but have
never encountered the panic described above. Should I be worried? :-)
I've encountered them often enough that I started removing cdrom devices
from the VMs.
signature.asc
On 24/10/2011 11:21, carlopmart wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to use gvirstor as a thin provisioning solution for a
mysql server, but I have some doubts about using it:
Yes, it's kind of what it was created for...
a) Do I need to put geom_virstor_load=YES on loader.conf or this
kernel
On 18/10/2011 09:03, Gót András wrote:
The M5014 RAID is also UEFI aware and of course I only made the initial
disk group and volume group config on it. :)
Yes, the moment of truth will come this evening. I hope I'll be able got
FreeBSD working on the machine and I don't have to go on with
I have PHP executing as fastcgi via the mod_fcgid module in Apache. I
suspect there is a bug in PHP or one of its extensions which causes it
to crash with sigsegv, but I cannot get any coredumps. I suspect
something is setting coredumpsize to 0 - either Apache, mod_fcgid or PHP.
So the question
On 18 October 2011 16:43, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 04:32:11PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
I have PHP executing as fastcgi via the mod_fcgid module in Apache. I
suspect there is a bug in PHP or one of its extensions which causes it
to crash
On 25/08/2011 15:28, noel beck wrote:
The following is the example of the error when compiling in 32-bit on a
64-bit machine:
[gsaid@Bruno ~]$ gcc -m32 -o hello hello.c
I don't think -m32 is supported at all.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
On 18/08/2011 11:55, Yuri wrote:
On 08/18/2011 02:17, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
The below advice still applies. Do not skim the page, read it.
http://ivoras.net/blog/tree/2011-01-01.freebsd-on-4k-sector-drives.html
You will therefore have to go through some manual rigmarole (preferably
with
On 19/08/2011 03:28, Yuri wrote:
Following instructions here
(http://ivoras.net/blog/tree/2011-01-01.freebsd-on-4k-sector-drives.html) I
destroyed my previous ZFS pool with 512 byte sectors and did this:
gnop create -S 4096 /dev/ad4
zpool create mypool /dev/ad4.nop
zpol create mypool/mydir
zpool
On 21/07/2011 23:56, Bakul Shah wrote:
I got wondering if iSCSI on
FreeBSD is stable enough for time machine use. How much duct
tape and baling wire are needed to make it work?!
iSCSI as in the target (server) function? net/istgt in ports seemed ok
last time I tried it.
On 19/07/2011 07:56, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 19.07.2011 1:22, Scott Long wrote:
Btw, I *HATE* the chip and card identifiers used in pciconf. Can we change
it to emit
the standard (sub)vendor/(sub)device terminology?
Oh, yeah. I hate that too. Would you want them as 4 separate entities
On 19.7.2011. 19:54, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jul 18, 2011, at 11:04 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
I just wish FreeBSD had some decent documentation on such a fundamental
operation. Fortunately there are some pretty good articles folks have
written, but they did leave me with several questions.
Is
On 29/06/2011 23:03, Mark Saad wrote:
The svn sources are here http://svn.freebsd.org/base/projects/suj/8/ .
Why would suj not make it into 8-STABLE ?
It is a too large patch, and it changes a lot of important, known and
working code (like softupdates). In other words, it's too risky.
Hello,
This *looks* like it should be a trivial problem (or at least
often-encountered one) but short of debugging both screen and tcsh, I
have no ideas what to do next...
On several machines (seemingly random, some are running 7-stable, others
8-stable), I get this message after starting
On 24/05/2011 15:21, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I am planning on some changes in head and would like to see if people use the
following features:
- machdep.hyperthreading_allowed tunable and sysctl
- machdep.hlt_logical_cpus tunable and sysctl
- mp_watchdog kernel option
If you are using any of the
On 02/05/2011 19:56, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Monday 02 May 2011 10:48 am, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 21:20:28 -0700
Jeremy Chadwickfree...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
Anyone know if machdep.cpu_idle_hlt still exists? Taken from
acpi(4) on RELENG_8:
It looks like it might have been
On 28/04/2011 17:02, Edho P Arief wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Freddie Cashfjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
Granted, there may be reasons why it wasn't done like this in the
beginning, but my non-GEOM programmer's eyes can't see any.
I believe one of the reason is it would prevent
On 30/03/2011 02:48, Clayton Milos wrote:
Now on 8.2-RELEASE when I run geli onetime -s 4096 gzero it crashes
the box with a kernel fault.
You need to obtain information about the crash. Add a line to /etc/rc.conf:
dumpdev=AUTO
(assuming you have decent swap space on an unencrypted drive),
On 7 February 2011 14:37, Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com wrote:
It's up to user to mount tmpfs filesystems of reasonable size to prevent
resource exhaustion. Anyway, enormously large tmpfs killing all your
process is not the way to go.
Of course not, but as I see it (from admin
On 01/02/2011 13:35, Yue Wu wrote:
Hi list,
I'm trying to do something to make rc.conf can act conditionally
Technically, yes it can be done, but you shouldn't. It is in essence a
shell script as it is sourced by other shell scripts but that's only
because that approach is easiest to
On 31/01/2011 14:41, Pete French wrote:
Just saw that the TRIM support for UFS has been MFC'd. Excellent stuff.
I was wondering if there were any plans to do similar for ZFS at all ?
AFAIK it isn't yet supported in upstream ZFS.
___
On 19/01/2011 12:30, Johan Hendriks wrote:
Hello all, i used to have disk configured with gpart and gmirror.
But with the latest 8.2, my server will not boot anymore if i label the
disk with gmirror.
Gpart status
Name Status Components
ad4p1 OK ad4
Then i do a gmirror label
On 21/01/2011 13:56, Johan Hendriks wrote:
Ok the funny thing is, i get the same error on 8.1 Release (the corrupt error),
but it boots, and all seems to work.
Maybe the boot process was made to be more standard-compliant :)
___
On 21/01/2011 14:22, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 21.01.2011 16:03, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 21/01/2011 13:56, Johan Hendriks wrote:
Ok the funny thing is, i get the same error on 8.1 Release (the corrupt error),
but it boots,
and all seems to work.
Maybe the boot process was made to be more
On 19/01/2011 11:09, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 01/19/11 09:46, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:37:35AM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
I first noticed this problem on machines with more memory (32GB
eg.), but now it happens on 4G machines too:
tmpfs 0B 0B 0B
100% /tmp
FreeBSD builder
On 19 January 2011 16:02, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~ivoras/diffs/tmpfs.h.patch
I don't think this is a complete solution but it's a start. If you can,
try it and see if it helps.
This is not a start, and actually a step in the wrong direction.
On 08/01/2011 23:06, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
I need to look how raid3 and vinum/raid5 lives with that situation.
One other standard solution is to spawn a thread and offload the job to
that thread, instead of within GEOM start(). This is what most current
complex GEOM classes to.
On 08/01/2011 20:42, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Kostik.
You wrote 8 января 2011 г., 22:02:32:
If I am guessing right, this creature has a classic deadlock when
bio processing requires memory allocation. It seems that tid 100079
is sleeping not even due to the free page shortage, but due to
On 12/30/10 12:40, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
I am concerned that in the event a drive fails, I won't be able to
repair the disks in time before another actually fails.
An old trick to avoid that is to buy drives from different series or
manufacturers (the theory is that identical drives tend to
On 01/02/11 09:41, miyamoto moesasji wrote:
miyamoto moesasjimiyamoto.31bat gmail.com writes:
In setting up tmpfs (so not tmpmfs) on a machine that is using
zfs(v15, zfs v4) on 8.2prerelease I run out of space on the tmpfs when
copying a file of ~4.6 GB file from the zfs-filesystem to the
On 14/12/2010 15:27, Eugene Mitrofanov wrote:
Hi
I observe the very strange message while run a lot of commands:
r...@beaver:eugene# glabel status
Unexpected XML: name=stripesize data=18432
Unexpected XML: name=stripeoffset data=0
Maybe you have a label or some other custom device name with
On 14/12/2010 16:19, Eugene Mitrofanov wrote:
How can I locate this device? Also I dont understand why mdconfig complains?
Try examining the output of
# sysctl -b kern.geom.confxml
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On 14/12/2010 16:29, Eugene Mitrofanov wrote:
On Tuesday 14 December 2010, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 14/12/2010 16:19, Eugene Mitrofanov wrote:
How can I locate this device? Also I dont understand why mdconfig
complains?
Try examining the output of
# sysctl -b kern.geom.confxml
Here
On 11/16/10 08:16, Christer Solskogen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Brian Reichertreich...@numachi.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:50:50PM +0100, Christer Solskogen wrote:
My load on my i7 920 is certainly higher when I add a 8GB usb stick as
a ZFS cache device.
USB 1.0?
On 16 November 2010 13:15, Christer Solskogen
christer.solsko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
You can easily test it - use the stick as a simple disk device with UFS and
see how much CPU does it take simply to talk to the device.
See
I'm not sure what to expect from these (i.e. what is normal in this
case?) but the VM sizes for the NFS-used rpc.statd and rpcbind here look
a bit too big, compared to their resident sizes:
778 root 1 440 26420K 3256K select 1 0:01 0.00%
rpcbind
891 root 1
On 10/21/10 21:06, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:50:03AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 05:48 -0700, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 20/10/2010 21:28 Sean Bruno said the following:
I guess, I could replace the kernel on the CD and have them reburn it?
That should
On 10/21/10 21:08, Randy Bush wrote:
FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #2: Thu Oct 21 15:30:45 UTC 2010
r...@rip.psg.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RIP amd64
console recording
em0: discard frame w/o packet header
em0: discard frame w/o packet header
em0: discard frame w/o packet header
em0: discard
On 10/22/10 16:25, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 10:18 AM 10/22/2010, Randy Bush wrote:
Do you know how this panic is triggered ? Are you able to
create it on demand ?
no i do not. bring server up and it'll happen in half an hour.
and the server was happy for two months. so i am thinking
On 10/15/10 03:43, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
0n Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:51:10PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
0n Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 02:13:27PM +0600, Sergey Nikolenko wrote:
On 14.10.2010 09:26, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
I have come across a bug that
On 10/07/10 14:15, John Hay wrote:
Hi,
I got hold of a SunFire X4500 with 48 X 500G disks and thought to try
FreeBSD 8-stable with zfs on it.
I have setup the two boot disks in a zfs mirror and then the rest in
a pool of 6 X raidz2 of 7 disks each.
I have created a 10G file with dd in the
On 10/07/10 20:25, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 07/10/2010 15:35 Ivan Voras said the following:
/boot/loader.conf) and 2) disable superpages, they don't get along on a few
models
of Opterons (vm.pmap.pg_ps_enabled=0 in /boot/loader.conf).
Those who follow know that the issue is supposed
On 10/02/10 22:18, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
pool: tank
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
tank ONLINE 0 0 0
mirror ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/tank0 ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/tank1
On 09/16/10 12:42, Guido Falsi wrote:
Related to this, I have a question.
Is it convenient to put databases on a compresed filesystem? Apart from
the space advantage, does it give any speed advantage/penalty?
It depends on what you do. It will not save you memory usage either
since data
On 09/15/10 15:36, Zara Kanaeva wrote:
Hi all,
vor 2 hours i made a very stupid mistake: i have deleted (as root
naturally) a part of /usr-directory. I have definitely deleted .snap and
presumably 100-150 files in /usr/bin.
uname -a -
FreeBSD (XX).uni-tuebingen.de 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD
On 09/14/10 15:35, Max Khon wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:01 PM, George Mamalakismama...@eng.auth.grwrote:
thank you very much for your help. The driver works fine; I am able to see
all 13T.
In case something goes wrong I will inform you. For the time being,
everything is OK.
I committed
On 09/14/10 12:01, George Mamalakis wrote:
thank you very much for your help. The driver works fine; I am able to
see all 13T.
In case something goes wrong I will inform you. For the time being,
everything is OK.
As it is a relatively uncommon protocol, can you run some tests and
describe
On 09/09/10 17:39, Gareth de Vaux wrote:
Hi again, I use some keep-state rules in ipfw, but get the following
kernel message:
kernel: ipfw: install_state: Too many dynamic rules
when presumably my state table reaches its limit (and I effectively
get DoS'd).
netstat shows tons of connections
On 02/25/10 01:23, Ivan Voras wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
I have a fairly recent 8-stable machine running under VMWare ESXi 3.5
(amd64 guest), which apparently crashes every few days from the same
causes:
em0: discard frame w/o packet header
em0: discard frame w/o packet header
em0: discard frame
On 09/01/10 15:08, jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
I'm running -STABLE with a kde-derived desktop. This setup (which is
pretty standard) is providing abysmal interactive performance on an
eight-core machine whenever I try to do anything CPU-intensive (such as
building a port).
Basically, trying
hi,
I can't seem to find how to manually remap uid gid information while
using NFS, e.g. something similar to this:
http://www.kernelcrash.com/blog/nfs-uidgid-mapping/2007/09/10/
Is such mapping really unimplemented?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
On 08/20/10 12:30, Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
I am somewhat concerned about the numbers for per-char-output and
per-char-input. In fact, i have never before seen that low numbers in a
bonnie test. Using a single disk with UFS yields about 6 times as much.
BTW: Running OpenSolaris on the same
On 13.8.2010 18:01, Kevin Oberman wrote:
For some time I have seen very odd issues with IO performance on
8-Stable. Going back to November of last year when 8.0 was released, I
see variations of up to 22% in identical operations. This is not a
degradation as the performance moves up and down.
On 9 August 2010 16:55, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 7 August 2010 19:03, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
It's unlikely they will help
On 9.8.2010 17:12, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 9 August 2010 16:55, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
I'm going to try 7.3-RELEASE today, just to make sure that this isn't a
regression of some kind. It seems from reading other
On 9 August 2010 18:11, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
I thought Intel VT-d was supposed to help address things like this?
Probably - http://www.intel.com/technology/itj/2006/v10i3/2-io/7-conclusion.htm
says it should help unmodified guests, but I don't know for sure. I do
know
On 5.8.2010 6:47, Alex V. Petrov wrote:
camcontrol identify ada2
pass2: WDC WD10EADS-00M2B0 01.00A01 ATA-8 SATA 2.x device
Aren't those 4k sector drives?
To verify this hypotesis though, you will have to destroy the zpool, use
gnop to create a virtual 4k sector drive for each physical drive
On 7.8.2010 3:21, Joshua Boyd wrote:
Hello,
I'm experiencing slow write speeds on 8-STABLE running on an ESXI 4.0
server, despite whatever tunables I've thrown at it. Read speeds are slower
than they should be, but acceptable. Note, this is a thick provisioned disk,
not thin.
Speeds on
On 4.8.2010 16:49, jhell wrote:
On 08/04/2010 03:22, David Xu wrote:
Sigh, pressing ScrollLock key several times can lock up the
kernel when it is still booting before /sbin/init runs.
David Xu
Sorry David,
No matter what I have tried I have not been able to reproduce this
across 5
On 7 August 2010 19:03, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
It's unlikely they will help, but try:
vfs.read_max=32
for read speeds (but test using the UFS file system, not as a raw device
like above
On 25.7.2010 5:58, Dan Langille wrote:
---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
GB M/sec %CPU M/sec %CPU M/sec %CPU M/sec %CPU M/sec %CPU /sec %CPU
5 110.6 80.5 115.3 15.1 60.9 8.5 68.8 46.2 326.7 15.3
On 06/11/10 10:48, Johan Hendriks wrote:
Hello all.
I try to install the Beta of 8.1 but it panics on my server HP Proliant
ML110 with the following.
Just as a data-point: I've tested 8.1 on HP DL380 G6 (i.e. same
generation, different series) and there were no problems.
On 04/15/10 13:11, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 02:05:26PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 01:24:14PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Daniel Branissda...@cs.huji.ac.il wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting this with FreeBSD-8-stable, it
On 28 March 2010 16:42, Masoom Shaikh masoom.sha...@gmail.com wrote:
lets assume if this is h/w problem, then how can other OSes overcome
this ? is there a way to make FreeBSD ignore this as well, let it
result in reasonable performance penalty.
Very probably, if only we could detect where
On 03/25/10 00:45, Michal wrote:
backend storage for databases. It's all well and good having 1 ZFS
server, but it's fragile in the the sense of no redundancy, then we have
1 ZFS server and a 2nd with DRBD, but that's a waste of money...think 12
TB, and you need to pay for another 12TB box for
Freddie Cash wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Michal mic...@ionic.co.uk wrote:
I wrote a really long e-mail but realised I could ask this question far
far easier, if it doesn't make sense, the original e-mail is bellow
Can I use ZFS to create a multinode storage area. Multiple HDD's in
On 03/11/10 15:09, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org (from Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:59:01
+0100):
On 03/11/10 09:54, Borja Marcos wrote:
I don't know about the rest but this:
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5420 @ 2.50GHz (2496.25-MHz K8-class CPU)
does not agree
,
but this is the only 64-bit one. I don't know if this information
helps.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
I have a fairly recent 8-stable machine running under VMWare ESXi 3.5
(amd64 guest), which apparently crashes every few days from the same causes
Ivan Voras wrote:
I have a fairly recent 8-stable machine running under VMWare ESXi 3.5
(amd64 guest), which apparently crashes every few days from the same
causes:
em0: discard frame w/o packet header
em0: discard frame w/o packet header
em0: discard frame w/o packet header
Panic string
On 02/18/10 16:26, Harald Weis wrote:
Has anybody encountered the following problem ?
Mac OS X does recognize FreeBSD partitions on USB disks, but doesn't
want to mount them because ``Incorrect super block''.
This is extremely annoying for my ``client'' because he relies on dayly
backups on USB
On 02/15/10 13:25, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Hi,
Our company have a FreeBSD based product that consists of the numerous
interconnected processes and it does some high-PPS UDP processing
(30-50K PPS is not uncommon). We are seeing some strange periodic
I have nothing very useful to help you with
It looks like I've stumbled upon a bug in vSphere 4 (recent update) with
FreeBSD/amd64 8.0/8-stable (but not 7.x) guests on Opteron(s). In this
combination, everything works fine until a moderate load is started - a
buildworld is enough. About five minutes after the load starts, the
vSphere
On 02/10/10 17:05, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 10/02/2010 17:36 Ivan Voras said the following:
It looks like I've stumbled upon a bug in vSphere 4 (recent update) with
FreeBSD/amd64 8.0/8-stable (but not 7.x) guests on Opteron(s). In this
combination, everything works fine until a moderate load
On 10 February 2010 18:13, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
on 10/02/2010 19:05 Ivan Voras said the following:
On 02/10/10 17:05, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Wild guess - try disabling superpages in the guests.
It looks like your guess is perfectly correct :) The guest has been
doing
On 10 February 2010 19:10, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
on 10/02/2010 20:03 Ivan Voras said the following:
When you say very unique is it in the it is not Linux or Windows
sense or do we do something nonstandard?
The former - neither Linux, Windows or OpenSolaris seem to have what we
On 10 February 2010 19:26, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 10 February 2010 19:10, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
on 10/02/2010 20:03 Ivan Voras said the following:
When you say very unique is it in the it is not Linux or Windows
sense or do we do something nonstandard
On 10 February 2010 19:35, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
on 10/02/2010 20:26 Ivan Voras said the following:
On 10 February 2010 19:10, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
on 10/02/2010 20:03 Ivan Voras said the following:
When you say very unique is it in the it is not Linux or Windows
On 02/08/10 15:33, Guido Falsi wrote:
It looks like it freezes the system for the second or two it takes
to flush buffers to disk when there are big outputs. This happens
when decompressiong big distfiles, mainly. The openoffice port
triggers this almost continuosly every few seconds during
Hi,
This has bugged me on a couple of machines but I've always attributed it
to some misconfiguration of mine: running curses-like programs under
screen (i.e. in virtual screens) fails with messages like terminal
entry not found. For example, less does this, and vim complains
with this:
1 - 100 of 501 matches
Mail list logo
