Re: em0 and em1 watchdog timed out

You missed the all-important details: OS version, driver version. And another question I can think of, do these interfaces watchdog if they are not configured with lagg? Cheers, Jack On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Frank de Bot (lists) wrote: > On a server I have 2

Re: 4TB Western Digital My Book 1230 USB hard drive not working on 10.2

PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: Have you tried it on HEAD, and have you tried it on the same system with some recent flavor of Linux? No, and no. It's a good idea, though. I can try it this weekend, if I can run each OS via a USB memstick. Just to follow up on myself, I

Re: 4TB Western Digital My Book 1230 USB hard drive not working on 10.2

Have you tried it on HEAD, and have you tried it on the same system with some recent flavor of Linux? Jack On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Paul Mather freebsd-li...@gromit.dlib.vt.edu wrote: On Aug 3, 2015, at 11:09 AM, Alban Hertroys haram...@gmail.com wrote: On 3 August 2015 at 15:01,

Re: ixgbe/ix sysctl missing in FreeBSD 9.2

sysctl dev.ix.0 etc... Jack On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Rumen Telbizov telbi...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, I am trying to tweak some of the sysctl tunables for the ix (ixgbe) driver in FreeBSD 9.2 since I am experiencing less than ideal performance and it seems like I can't

Re: ixgbe/ix sysctl missing in FreeBSD 9.2

with 6-8 multiple parallel threads (tried both UDP and TCP). What kind of tuning would you recommend that I try? Thanks, Rumen Telbizov On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: sysctl dev.ix.0 etc... Jack On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Rumen Telbizov telbi

Re: ixgbe/ix sysctl missing in FreeBSD 9.2

with the flapping interface. If anything else comes to mind and there should be another knob to turn - feel free to suggest it. Thanks, Rumen Telbizov On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: Make sure you are in slots with enough lanes/bandwidth, the driver

Re: FreeBSD 9.1 ix driver vlan problem

I will look into this. Jack On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Rumen Telbizov telbi...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Jack, list, I've been dealing with a nagging problem for a day now and decided to ask a quick question here. Basically I am building a brand new FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE router which

Re: FreeBSD 9.1 ix driver vlan problem

Rumen, I'd like to know if you can check the spanning tree setting as Daniel mentioned and if that solves it, I do know that that can cause considerable delay in link transitions. Also, can you see if you see different behavior by going to the latest 9.2 bits? Oleg thanks for the patch, I will

Re: FreeBSD 9.1 ix driver vlan problem

with the latest 9.2 and repeat the tests see what happens. 2. If the previous one fails - I'll try the patch that Oleg sent. Thanks a lot for providing that patch. I'll update this list with more findings. Thank you, Rumen Telbizov On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com

Re: Intel 10Gb network card

ixgb is the old PCI-X based adapter, ixgbe is for all pci express hardware. The latter is almost certainly what you want :) Jack On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Daniel Braniss da...@cs.huji.ac.il wrote: hi, I have a hard time figuring this out, the kernel says: ... ix0: Intel(R)

Re: ixgbe Jumbo race condition leading to Deadlock

The potential race condition as the data sheet puts it, is only when you are trying to manage your RX ring by reading the RDH register, this is a bad idea anyway, none of our (Intel) drivers do this. Using the DD bit is what you want to do. The DD bit is set when the descriptor is written back,

Re: still mbuf leak in 9.0 / 9.1?

So, you stop getting 10G transmission and so you are looking at mbuf leaks? I don't see anything in your data that makes it look like you've run out of available mbufs. You said you're running jumbos, what size? You do realize that if you do this the clusters are coming from different pools and

Intel 82574 issue reported on Slashdot

For those that may have run across the story on Slashdot about this NIC, here is our statement: Recently there were a few stories published, based on a blog post by an end-user, suggesting specific network packets may cause the Intel® 82574L Gigabit Ethernet Controller to become unresponsive

Re: igb issues

Try putting the driver from 9.1 back onto 8.3 and see if you still see a problem. That will indicate if its in the driver or the stack/OS. If you have any question about doing this send me email. Is NFS using UDP or TCP? Regards, Jack On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Daniel Braniss

Re: 9.1-RC3 IGB dropping connections.

Something in your environment, have lots of users with this driver in very demanding environments and I have not been seeing reports of this sort. Jack On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.comwrote: I've got an Intel server motherboard with 4x igb (and 1x em) on

Re: 9.1-RC3 IGB dropping connections.

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.comwrote: To Jack Vogel's comment, this problem only seems to occur on systems that are exceedingly lightly loaded (in this case, not yet in production and I'm the only one using it). On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Andre

Re: msi-x enabled igb works only if module loaded twice [Was: Re: kldload if_igb twice needed to bring nic into operation]

LOL, wow this is interesting. When I first was developing the VF support, and using Linux KVM as the host I had exactly this problem, turned out it was because of the way in which MSIX was handled in the Linux side. When my driver would first attempt to get some vectors the Linux code would go

Re: Issue with igb and lagg (was Re: Problem with link aggregation + sshd)

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Giulio Ferro au...@zirakzigil.org wrote: On 09/11/2012 11:34 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: On Sep 11, 2012 2:12 PM, Giulio Ferro au...@zirakzigil.org mailto:au...@zirakzigil.org wrote:

Re: Issue with igb and lagg (was Re: Problem with link aggregation + sshd)

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for checking. I've used lagg(4) with igb, just not on 9.x. You're

Re: intel 82579 nic support?

7, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote: schrieb Jack Vogel am 07.09.2012 00:27 (localtime): 82579 is not a NIC, its a PHY, and it you look at the current code you will see the support is in there. So the real question is what the actual NIC is, how about

Re: intel 82579 nic support?

On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote: schrieb Jack Vogel am 07.09.2012 18:53 (localtime): OH, now things are clearer, this is a client part, and it is supported by the em driver, I don't know why loading igb would have any effect. If you

Re: intel 82579 nic support?

82579 is not a NIC, its a PHY, and it you look at the current code you will see the support is in there. So the real question is what the actual NIC is, how about a pciconf -lv? Next, how are you trying to pass through the device into my FreeBSD VM, what is the virtualization environment. Widely

Re: FreeBSD 8-STABLE on R620 w/ X520-DA2/Intel 82599

Be patient, a new version will hit HEAD soon with the ID added. Jack On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Rick Miller vmil...@hostileadmin.comwrote: On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Gary Palmer gpal...@freebsd.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:50:52AM -0400, Rick Miller wrote: Hi All,

Re: Intel X520-DA2 Supported in stable/8?

Miller vmil...@hostileadmin.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: Would probably be good to take care of the storm threshold if you haven't, set it to 0 and you disable the check, that's what we do internally. As for the queues and number

Re: Intel X520-DA2 Supported in stable/8?

Increase your system mbuf pool size, you do not want that failure to happen. Jack On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Rick Miller vmil...@hostileadmin.comwrote: dmesg and ifconfig output below... On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Rick Miller vmil...@hostileadmin.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 22,

Re: Intel X520-DA2 Supported in stable/8?

, when you get rid of the rx ring setup failure you will get things working. Jack On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Rick Miller vmil...@hostileadmin.comwrote: On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: Increase your system mbuf pool size, you do not want that failure

Re: Support for Intel 82599ES?

Yes, it is supported in the ixgbe driver. Jack On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Rick Miller vmil...@hostileadmin.comwrote: Hi All, I did not see the Intel 82599ES chipset in the hardware release notes for 8.3 or 9.0. Are these controllers supported at this time? -- Take care Rick

Re: ixgbe v2.3.11 won't negotiate LACP, v2.4.4 does

Never rains but it pours, this is the second request today :) Yes, I will do an MFC as soon as quickly as I am able. Jack On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Chris Forgeron cforge...@acsi.ca wrote: I have a few systems with Intel X520-DA2 PCIe network cards (10 Gig). The problem I've been

nmbclusters: how do we want to fix this for 8.3 ?

Using igb and/or ixgbe on a reasonably powered server requires 1K mbuf clusters per MSIX vector, that's how many are in a ring. Either driver will configure 8 queues on a system with that many or more cores, so 8K clusters per port... My test engineer has a system with 2 igb ports, and 2 10G

Re: nmbclusters: how do we want to fix this for 8.3 ?

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote: On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:09:46PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 21:52 +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: ... I have hit this problem recently, too. Maybe the issue mostly/only exists on 32-bit systems.

Re: igb hang when cable unplugged

On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Daniel Kalchev dan...@digsys.bg wrote: I am observing an transmit hang of the igb driver when the cable is unplugged. It only recovers after unit reset, such as ifconfig igb0 down up This is with kernel FreeBSD xxx 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Fri Sep

Re: em0 watchdog timeout

On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Willem Jan Withagen w...@digiware.nlwrote: On 2011-11-10 23:25, Joshua Boyd wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Willem Jan Withagen w...@digiware.nl mailto:w...@digiware.nl wrote: em0@pci0:0:25:0:class=0x02 card=0x10bd15d9

Re: rsync corrupted MAC

my brevity. Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: Well, for a start I'd get both interfaces at the same speed, sounds like a hardware issue of some sort, cable or switch maybe? Jack On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org wrote: On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Jeremy

Re: rsync corrupted MAC

that the majority of the time it's caused by NIC drivers acting oddly. Also, I believe the em(4) driver in 9.x is slightly different than on 8.x, so I'm CC'ing Jack Vogel here. from 9.0: NameMtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Idrop Ibytes Opkts Oerrs Obytes

Re: 10G Inter adapter

What OS release are you going to be using, 8.2 ? The driver in HEAD is the latest code, the internal tarball goes thru release machinery so it is lagging a bit (2.3.8 vs 2.3.11), you should be OK in either case, but I'd recommend the newer. Jack On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Sami Halabi

Re: em0 watchdog timeouts on 8-STABLE

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: I have hardware now, am working on reproducing this. Just curious, do you have the em driver defined in the kernel, or as a module? Jack On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote: On Wed, Jun

Re: em0 watchdog timeouts on 8-STABLE

I have hardware now, am working on reproducing this. Just curious, do you have the em driver defined in the kernel, or as a module? Jack On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote: On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:57 AM, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.comwrote: On

Re: Intel em driver sleeps with non-sleepable lock.

So, this happens EVERY time after an install of 8.2 ?? Give me details about the hardware please. Jack On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.comwrote: The motherboard in question is made by Intel and contains a Xeon 3440 (4 core x 2 HT per core). 16 Gig of RAM is

Re: No data received with Intel Corporation Gigabit CT Desktop Adapter (82574L)

: 2011/4/29 Wiktor Niesiobedzki b...@vink.pl: 2011/4/28 Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com: On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:28 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thursday, April 28, 2011 5:17:11 pm Wiktor Niesiobedzki wrote: Though they mention that HT MSI windows is disabled. I'm not sure

Re: No data received with Intel Corporation Gigabit CT Desktop Adapter (82574L)

Notice this: em0: Using MSIX interrupts with 0 vectors ZERO vectors are not a good sign :) You need to look at your system, you have MSIX disabled or something? Maybe some message in /var/log/messages?? Jack On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Wiktor Niesiobedzki b...@vink.pl wrote: Hi, I've

Re: No data received with Intel Corporation Gigabit CT Desktop Adapter (82574L)

cap 08[88] = HT MSI fixed address window disabled at 0xfee0 cap 0d[90] = PCI Bridge card=0x0004 Though they mention that HT MSI windows is disabled. I'm not sure, whether this matters. Cheers, Wiktor 2011/4/28 Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com: Notice this: em0: Using MSIX

Re: No data received with Intel Corporation Gigabit CT Desktop Adapter (82574L)

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:28 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thursday, April 28, 2011 5:17:11 pm Wiktor Niesiobedzki wrote: Hi, I really don't know (I haven't done that intentionally). There is nothing special in /var/log/messages: kadlubek# grep -i msix /var/log/messages

Re: ixgbe(4) and Could not setup receive structures

If you get this message its only for one reason, you don't have enough mbufs to fill your rings. You must do one of two things, either reduce the number of queues, or increase the relevant mbuf pool. Increase the 9K mbuf cluster pool. Jack On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Leon Meßner

Re: ixgbe(4) and Could not setup receive structures

So, what do you have in mind as the real problem then? Jack On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:55 AM, K. Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote: That isn't guaranteed to work if he is KVA limited. On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: If you get this message its only for one

Re: ixgbe(4) and Could not setup receive structures

to work if he is KVA limited. On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: If you get this message its only for one reason, you don't have enough mbufs to fill your rings. You must do one of two things, either reduce the number of queues, or increase

Re: em0 with latest driver hangs again and again (without Watchdogtimeout message!)

.interrupts.tx_queue_min_thresh: 0 dev.em.3.interrupts.rx_desc_min_thresh: 0 dev.em.3.interrupts.rx_overrun: 0 On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: Missed packets just mean that some temporary resource shortage or error caused the packet to be dropped. I don't believe

Re: em0 with latest driver hangs again and again (without Watchdogtimeout message!)

Missed packets just mean that some temporary resource shortage or error caused the packet to be dropped. I don't believe this is indicative of a problem, just let it keep running, 2 days is good but 2 weeks is better :) Thanks for testing it! Jack On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Özkan KIRIK

Re: em0 with latest driver hangs again and again (without Watchdog timeout message!)

Anyone in net and stable that wants it, limits blocked it, so send me personal email and I'll send to you. Jack On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: Here is the 7.2.2 tarball. IMPORTANT: if you use this DO NOT try and put it into your kernel source tree

Re: em0: Watchdog timeout -- resetting

I don't test POLLING, sounds like its broken, I don't understand why you think you need you need it? This hardware supports MSI why not use it? Jack 2011/1/31 Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org Hello, Freebsd-stable. You wrote 1 февраля 2011 г., 10:24:16: And all connections are reset.

Re: High interrupt rate on a PF box + performance

If you go to 8.2 and the latest driver you will get better stats also, ahem... Jack On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.comwrote: On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:39:40PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote: On 1/27/11 7:46 PM, Sergey Lobanov wrote: В сообщении

Re: High interrupt rate on a PF box + performance

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.comwrote: On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 09:38:22PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote: On 1/27/11 8:57 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: ...snipping out stuff... We're also considering moving to faster machines but I don't think that

Re: em 7.1.9

NO, and i was rather irritated by a checkin that broke backward compatibility without even asking me first btw. That should be the only issue however, and it can be fixed by a define. I'll get there soon. Jack On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote: Hi Jack,

Supermicro Bladeserver

I am trying to track down a problem being experienced at icir.org using SuperMicro bladeservers, the SERDES 82575 interfaces are having connectivity or perhaps autoneg problems, resulting in link transitions and watchdog resets. The closest hardware my org at Intel has is a Fujitsu server who's

Re: repeating crashes with 8.1

I'm a bit dubious about this, if a descriptor still has an mbuf it was due to a discard, go look at em_rx_discard(), you will notice there that all these things are already being done at that point. So do you have a scenario where we can have an unused mbuf that didn't come thru that path?? Jack

Re: problems with network on em

152726 0 143900328 0 00 Regards, Rolandas Naujikas Thanks. Oops, I forgot requesting output from one other command: $ vmstat -i Adding Jack Vogel to the thread, who might have ideas/comments. Jack, here's the thread: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail

Re: problems with network on em

in testing (24 nodes was downloading a file with wget from server from another side of router), but finally there was some deadlock. I'm recovering the data on it. On 2010.11.20, at 22:37, Jack Vogel wrote: Did you mean the 7.1.7 version from HEAD ? Jack On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:18 AM

Re: icmp packets on em larger than 1472

packets on em larger than 1472 To: Kirill Yelizarov ykir...@yahoo.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com Date: Wednesday, November 10, 2010, 3:59 PM On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:21:12AM -0800, Kirill Yelizarov wrote: Hi, All my em cards running 8.1 stable don't

Re: repeating crashes with 8.1

Odd, can you make any connection between this and the em complaints?? Jack On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote: At 09:11 PM 10/22/2010, Mike Tancsa wrote: At 08:01 PM 10/22/2010, Chris Morrow wrote: Note, Warren and I attempted to test this this evening on a

Re: repeating crashes with 8.1

and locked up. required power cycle to reboot CC'ing Jack Vogel of Intel, who is currently re-working portions of the em(4) driver. I think taskq issue might be the thing he's fixing and thus might have a workaround for you. But we're going to need to know exactly what em(4) model

Re: Bogus igb1: Could not setup receive structures in 8-STABLE

The number of MSIX vectors it uses is the number of queues PLUS one vector for link. I would use two or four rather than 3, but it should be ok with that if that's what you wish. Jack On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Terry Kennedy te...@tmk.com wrote: The problem is mbuf resources, the

Re: Bogus igb1: Could not setup receive structures in 8-STABLE

The problem is mbuf resources, the driver is autoconfiguring the number of queues based on the number of cores, on newer systems with lots of them this is outstripping the mbuf resource pool. I have decided to hard limit the queues to 8, you can fix the number manually by searching for num_queues

Re: RELENG_7 em problems (and RELENG_8)

show here. I will try to get the new driver out shortly for you to try. Jack On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote: At 06:36 PM 9/24/2010, Jack Vogel wrote: There is a new revision of the em driver coming next week, its going thru some stress pounding over

Re: RELENG_7 em problems (and RELENG_8)

The system I've had stress tests running on has 82574 LOMs, so I hope it will solve the problem, will see tomorrow morning at how things have held up... Jack On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote: At 06:19 PM 9/26/2010, Jack Vogel wrote: Your em1 is using MSI

Re: RELENG_7 em problems (and RELENG_8)

There is a new revision of the em driver coming next week, its going thru some stress pounding over the weekend, if no issues show up I'll put it into HEAD. Yongari's changes in TX context handling which effects checksum and tso are added. I've also decided that multiple queues in 82574 just are

Re: MSIX failure

We don't deal with desktop systems that much in my group, it was pointed out by a coworker that the BIOS has settings that could disable MSI, please check out how yours is set. Jack On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Gareth de Vaux b...@lordcow.org wrote: On Fri 2010-09-10 (10:43), Jack Vogel

Re: MSIX failure

On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Gareth de Vaux b...@lordcow.org wrote: On Fri 2010-09-10 (10:41), Gareth de Vaux wrote: Gareth, set hw.pci.honor_msi_blacklist=0, you'll have to do that at boot btw. Ok, I'll have to get back to you in a day or 2 when I reboot. Done: $ sysctl -a |

Re: MSIX failure

On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Gareth de Vaux b...@lordcow.org wrote: On Thu 2010-09-09 (13:48), Jack Vogel wrote: Gareth's email bouncing for anybody else or is it just me? Yes sorry I disabled this alias after picking up years of spam on the mailman archives. I assumed people would

Re: MSIX failure

On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Kurt Jaeger p...@opsec.eu wrote: Hi! Is this within a jail or something else along those lines? I can't reproduce the problem otherwise. Frustrating! Someone else on the list might have ideas as to what could cause this. Nope, this's a normal

Re: MSIX failure

On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:37 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thursday, September 09, 2010 12:41:07 pm Jack Vogel wrote: On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Kurt Jaeger p...@opsec.eu wrote: Hi! Is this within a jail or something else along those lines? I can't

Re: MSIX failure

...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thursday, September 09, 2010 3:04:27 pm Jack Vogel wrote: On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:37 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thursday, September 09, 2010 12:41:07 pm Jack Vogel wrote: On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Kurt Jaeger p...@opsec.eu wrote: Hi

Re: MSIX failure

, Gareth de Vaux b...@lordcow.org wrote: On Tue 2010-09-07 (13:25), Jack Vogel wrote: I've looked at the code, this message was misleading, what really happens is that the driver fails to be able to setup either MSIX OR MSI, when this happens it will fall back and use a Legacy interrupt, so its

Re: MSIX failure

more about the system please? Jack On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: In the future make sure that you put E1000 or EM in the title otherwise I might miss it, fortunately I looked at this :) I'm on a holiday weekend, I will investigate this tomorrow. Jack

Re: MSIX failure

other issues, and I have added a changed message that will be less confusing. Regards, Jack On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: Email to Gareth de Vaux is bouncing :( First off, this device was not supported in 8.0 REL, what were you running that last

Re: MSIX failure

In the future make sure that you put E1000 or EM in the title otherwise I might miss it, fortunately I looked at this :) I'm on a holiday weekend, I will investigate this tomorrow. Jack On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Gareth de Vaux b...@lordcow.org wrote: Hi all, I moved from 8.0-RELEASE to

Re: page fault in e1000_clear_hw_cntrs_base_generic() during SIOCAIFADDR

LOL, if its the VF its pretty new code, PLEASE anyone, if this is the case make it clear in the title somewhere, ok? Thanks. Jack On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:24 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 1:11:31 pm pluknet wrote: On 1 September 2010 20:06, John

Re: Crashes on X7SPE-HF with em

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Philipp Wuensche cryx-free...@h3q.comwrote: Jack Vogel wrote: On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com mailto:free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:56:48PM +0200, Philipp Wuensche wrote

Re: Crashes on X7SPE-HF with em

Hmmm, can you remove ALTQ from the mix and see if that eliminates it? Jack On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Philipp Wuensche cryx-free...@h3q.comwrote: Jeremy Chadwick wrote: CC'ing Jack Vogel of Intel and Yong-Hyeon PYUN who might have some ideas. OP's backtrace is here: http

Re: Crashes on X7SPE-HF with em

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.comwrote: On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:56:48PM +0200, Philipp Wuensche wrote: Jeremy Chadwick wrote: CC'ing Jack Vogel of Intel and Yong-Hyeon PYUN who might have some ideas. OP's backtrace is here: http

Re: svn commit: r209611 - head/sys/dev/e1000

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 2:45 AM, pluknet pluk...@gmail.com wrote: By the way, Sometimes after boot I have to kldreload if_igb.ko several times until watchdog go to sleep, so traffic starts flowing. Hmmm, the intention is that the VF always be single queue, but I see the code I used to

Re: svn commit: r209611 - head/sys/dev/e1000

not the complete string, use sysctl -a |grep blacklist to find it) and set that to 0. It needs to be set at boot. That should get you running. Jack On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 8:18 AM, pluknet pluk...@gmail.com wrote: On 1 July 2010 02:13, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 2:50 PM

Re: RELENG_7 em problems (and RELENG_8)

Hmmm, interesting, I'll have to have some testing done, maybe for the 574 it should automagically disable CSUM? Jack On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 05:07:11PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: Hi Jack, FYI, I am still

Re: RELENG_7 em problems (and RELENG_8)

I believe the requirement of a context descriptor for most frames in the igb driver is just the way the hardware works, I've looked over the Linux driver again and it looks like they require the same. I don't believe its a big deal, just the added descriptor for the frame. Jack On Tue, Aug 17,

Re: RELENG_7 em problems (and RELENG_8)

Well we do of course, i'll have my test engineer try it both ways and see what looks better. Let you know... Jack On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:05:56PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: Hmmm, interesting, I'll have to have some

Re: RELENG_7 em problems (and RELENG_8)

to be proven wrong :) Jack On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:34:31PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: I believe the requirement of a context descriptor for most frames in the igb driver is just the way the hardware works, I've looked over

Watchdog resets on 82575

If you have this adapter and have been getting watchdogs you need to pick up the small update I checked into HEAD today. When I added the SR-IOV support for the 82576 adapter I removed a call to set the MAC type in an early routine, thinking it was unnecessary, since a slightly later shared code

Re: em(4) duplex problems with 82541EI on RELENG_8, -CURRENT on PowerEdge 1850

The fact that I WISH it to be MFC'd doesn't mean that I am actually given permission to do so. Jack On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Steve Polyack kor...@comcast.net wrote: On 07/15/10 13:31, Michael Tuexen wrote: On Jul 15, 2010, at 6:50 PM, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: It may have gone

Re: RELENG_7 em problems (and RELENG_8)

I got the email, there are server outages around here today and people leaving for a long weekend, so not much getting done. I'll take some time and look into this after the weekend, ok? Jack On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote: Hi Jack, Just a followup

Re: RELENG_8 em(4) -- input errors (Missed Packets)

I do not believe this is a problem, a bit hard to parse the numbers on that netstat, but missed packets will happen when an interface gets lots of traffic. Keep an eye on things though. Thanks, Jack On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.comwrote: Something I

Re: em(4) duplex problems with 82541EI on RELENG_8, -CURRENT on PowerEdge 1850

you provided are for em1 when most of your post focuses around em0 and em3. Is there some correlation or was it a mistake? Adding Jack Vogel of Intel to the CC list, as he's been working on em(4) as of late. Brian, I have no idea if this will help or not, but... Jack just committed

Re: Strange igb befavior

Panic is due to a failure to get enough mbufs, when you make your ring that big you hit the problem, I have been experimenting with a change to fix it but am not yet completely confident, for the moment don't make your ring so big :) Jack On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Kirill Yelizarov

Re: Strange igb befavior

hw.igb.fc_setting=0 hw.igb.lro=0 Some years ago i downloaded an article about em card from intel site. Perhaps there is one for igb as well? Kirill --- On Thu, 5/27/10, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: From: Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Strange igb befavior To: Kirill Yelizarov

Re: network probs rxcsum

the following commands? Jack Vogel will probably respond later about this, but said output would help him. - uname -a - dmesg | grep em0 - pciconf -lvc Thanks. Could it be a shared interrupt problem? Even though ssh worked with rxcsup disabled, network performance was horrible

Re: [releng_7 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

DUH, forgot to add the file, lol. Fix coming shortly Jack On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.comwrote: On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:40:23PM -0400, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: === em (depend) @ - /src/sys machine - /src/sys/amd64/include awk -f

Re: em WOL_MCAST repowers machine after poweroff [Was: Re: em JumboFrame improovement and PCIe addon-card regression]

Oppps, forgot about the lem case, sorry, and here I made lem so i wouldnt have to touch that code, lol :) As for WOL not working at all, that's something I'll have to check on. Jack On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote: Jack Vogel schrieb am

Re: em WOL_MCAST repowers machine after poweroff [Was: Re: em JumboFrame improovement and PCIe addon-card regression]

Schmalzbauer wrote: Jack Vogel schrieb am 16.04.2010 22:02 (localtime): Glad things are better. On the Hartwell, the 0x10D3 adapter, what is the problem you are seeing? I just did an MFC, would ask that you try that code, see if it changes anything. With latest MFCs I see em0: Intel(R

Re: RELENG_8 -- shutdown -p no longer powers off boxes

in the programming of the PHY to enable WOL. It definitely is an em WOL problem though. CC'ing Jack Vogel on this one too. Guido, Thanks for the investigative efforts. I can validate your statements: doing ifconfig emX -wol does in fact address the problem. The ifconfig(8) man page

Re: em regression, UDP LOR followed by ssh stall

On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:22 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: On Friday 16 April 2010 5:37:59 am Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Jeremy Chadwick schrieb am 16.04.2010 11:28 (localtime): On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:18:56AM +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: with RELENG_8 from 6 weeks ago

Re: em JumboFrame improovement and PCIe addon-card regression [Was: Re: em regression, UDP LOR followed by ssh stall]

Glad things are better. On the Hartwell, the 0x10D3 adapter, what is the problem you are seeing? I just did an MFC, would ask that you try that code, see if it changes anything. Regards, Jack On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote: Brandon

Re: em JumboFrame improovement and PCIe addon-card regression [Was: Re: em regression, UDP LOR followed by ssh stall]

Why are you using ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS? And is this LOR happening on STABLE or CURRENT? Jack On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote: Jack Vogel schrieb am 16.04.2010 22:02 (localtime): Glad things are better. On the Hartwell, the 0x10D3 adapter

Re: em JumboFrame improovement and PCIe addon-card regression [Was: Re: em regression, UDP LOR followed by ssh stall]

No objection, I just wondered if it could somehow be involved in the problem you are seeing. What do you use that actually uses them? Jack On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote: Jack Vogel schrieb am 16.04.2010 22:53 (localtime): Why are you

  1   2   3   4   >