Re: jail related inconsistencies in FreeBSD tools parameters

2018-06-26 Thread James Gritton
On 2018-06-23 12:58, Eitan Adler wrote: On 23 June 2018 at 08:50, James Gritton wrote: On 2018-06-23 09:45, Eitan Adler wrote: On 23 June 2018 at 08:30, James Gritton wrote: On 2018-06-22 16:03, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Chris H wrote on 2018/06/22 23:46: On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 23:13:17

Re: jail related inconsistencies in FreeBSD tools parameters

2018-06-23 Thread James Gritton
On 2018-06-23 09:45, Eitan Adler wrote: On 23 June 2018 at 08:30, James Gritton wrote: On 2018-06-22 16:03, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Chris H wrote on 2018/06/22 23:46: On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 23:13:17 +0200 "Miroslav Lachman" <000.f...@quip.cz> said I don't know if it is b

Re: jail related inconsistencies in FreeBSD tools parameters

2018-06-23 Thread James Gritton
On 2018-06-22 16:03, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Chris H wrote on 2018/06/22 23:46: On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 23:13:17 +0200 "Miroslav Lachman" <000.f...@quip.cz> said I don't know if it is better to discuss it in jail@ or stable@ list so a do cross-post. FreeBSD has many jail aware utilities but

Re: jail: /etc/rc: cannot create /dev/null: Operation not supported

2015-07-18 Thread James Gritton
On 2015-07-17 11:26, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: On 2015-07-17 01:41, James Gritton wrote: On 2015-07-15 13:52, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: FreeBSD 10.2-PRERELEASE #0 r284949 The jail can be started, but when /etc/rc is executed: root@mar:/ # sh -x /etc/rc + stty status ^T /etc/rc: cannot create

Re: jail: /etc/rc: cannot create /dev/null: Operation not supported

2015-07-16 Thread James Gritton
On 2015-07-15 13:52, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: FreeBSD 10.2-PRERELEASE #0 r284949 The jail can be started, but when /etc/rc is executed: root@mar:/ # sh -x /etc/rc + stty status ^T /etc/rc: cannot create /dev/null: Operation not supported + trap : 2 + trap 'echo '\''Boot interrupted'\''; exit

Re: 7.x and multiple IPs in jails

2008-10-29 Thread James Gritton
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: The plan as the status report will say is to get this in, merge it to stable/7 before 7.2 and keep it in 8. 8 will also have vimages and ideally I'd like to see this entire jail IP hacks be gone for 9, when vimage will provide the infrastructure, etc. This means that 8

Re: FreeBSD 6.3 deadlock (vm_map?) with DDB output

2008-06-23 Thread James Gritton
John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday 19 June 2008 11:57:51 am James Gritton wrote: John Baldwin wrote: On Sunday 15 June 2008 07:23:19 am Stef Walter wrote: I've been trying to track down a deadlock on some newish production servers running FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE-p2. The deadlock

Re: FreeBSD 6.3 deadlock (vm_map?) with DDB output

2008-06-19 Thread James Gritton
John Baldwin wrote: On Sunday 15 June 2008 07:23:19 am Stef Walter wrote: I've been trying to track down a deadlock on some newish production servers running FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE-p2. The deadlock occurs on a specific (although mundane) hardware configuration, and each of several servers