Re: freebsd-update and speed

On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 at 10:51, Philip Paeps wrote: > > > It looks like there were at least experiments with pointing > freebsd-update at AWS, similar to how portsnap currently works. I will > check if these experiments went anywhere and possibly point > freebsd-update there instead. > The AWS

Re: FreeBSD 13.0-RC3 Now Available

On Sun, 21 Mar 2021 at 03:08, Glen Barber wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > The third RC build of the 13.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available. > > === Upgrading === > > The freebsd-update(8) utility supports binary upgrades of amd64, i386, > and aarch64 systems

Re: FreeBSD 13.0-BETA2 Now Available

On Sat, 13 Feb 2021 at 09:52, Glen Barber wrote: > The second BETA build of the 13.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available. > > > === Upgrading === > > The freebsd-update(8) utility supports binary upgrades of amd64, i386 > and aarch64 systems running earlier FreeBSD releases. Systems running

Re: Fragmentation of em(4) traffic (potentially others) when using vlanhwtag 12.2-BETA1

On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 19:52, Jason Tubnor wrote: > -- Forwarded message - > From: Jason Tubnor > Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 10:49 > Subject: Fragmentation of em(4) traffic (potentially others) when using > vlanhwtag 12.2-BETA1 > To: freebsd-stable > > &

Fragmentation of em(4) traffic (potentially others) when using vlanhwtag 12.2-BETA1

Hi, Doing some edge case testing with 12.2-BETA1, I have come across fragmentation issues when vlanhwtag is enabled on the em(4) network device (device listed below), causing IPSec traffic moving through a bhyve 'router-on-a-stick' to tank on send. When you disable (-vlanhwtag), this issue goes

Re: Binary update to -STABLE? And if so, what do I get?

On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 00:53, Karl Denninger wrote: > > > You can't. Either wait until a 12.0 with the fix included or > > 12.1 is released, or you fetch the source with the fix included, > > and build from source. > Got it -- thanks. Wait it shall be. > > > I also have hit this IPv6 issue (I

Re: bad hash in repo

On Sat., 18 Aug. 2018, 01:45 Randy Bush, wrote: > seeing a lot of these > > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org > Applying patches... done. > Fetching 2 files... > 104969ef03336523729ea1df2547267441a13cb040c778e971b74103e88dbc77 has > incorrect hash. > Do you have a transparent proxy in your network

Re: pf best practices: in or out

Hi Ari, In most cases, block all and then perform conditional pass in on traffic. Depending on your requirements you would conclude your rules with explicit pass out or just a general pass out 'all' (the former in the newer syntax of PF allows you to control queues, operational tags etc - but

Re: Mirror the freebsd-update server?

On 13 September 2017 at 07:52, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > > is it possible or even allowed to just mirror one of the > freebsd-update servers locally? > [...] > > > Take a look at https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/hubs/index.html. > > This doc discusses setting up a

Re: Bridged networking regression in 11.0?

On 30 August 2017 at 20:49, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > > The only real change relates to IF teardown and we did not change anything > (stop/restart jails) when the outages occured. > > So ... the network interface driver? Probably? > > > We are using igb(4) with vlan(4), tap(4)

Re: Where is 10.2-STABLE?

On 31 March 2016 at 10:23, John Nielsen wrote: > equivalent of 10-STABLE are under releases/amd64/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/10.3 of > your favorite FTP mirror. E.g.: > http://ftp4.us.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/10.3/ > > Once the release is final and