Hi!
I have a new laptop (Lenovo P14s), installed freebsd 13.0-RC5 on it
with ZFS, geli encryption.
If I cold-start the laptop, the first boot will crash before
going multi-user and reboot, and the next boot will be fine.
I activated /var/log/kern for kern.*, but the crash happens
so early that
Hi!
> The third RC build of the 13.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available.
Upgrading a 13.0-RC2 poudriere jail to RC3 seems to fail ?
# poudriere jail -u -j 130 -t 13.0-RC3
[...]
To install the downloaded upgrades, run "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update.fixed
install".
Installing updates...Scanning
Hi!
> We can't do that. gptzfsboot is for something else that we can't get rid
> of: BIOS/CMS booting. It's never been used for EFI booting at all. There's
> no way to for EFI to use it, nor is there anyway for us to build it to just
> work. You have to copy BOOTx64.efi to your ESP. What we could
Hi!
> You can upgrade to 13 w/o hassle. The upgrade process doesn't automatically
> upgrade the zpools. The only problem is if you also do a 'zpool upgrade'
> which will change your zpool features. The fix is easy: upgrade your boot
> loader (bootx64.efi) on the ESP at the same time before
Hi!
> > Unfortunately it contains an old version of the boot loader:
[...]
> We should be better about upgrading boot blocks, but EFI is kinda new and
> kinda different than the other out-of-root-filesystem boot blocks we've had
> in the past, so there's still some rough edges.
We run many
Hi!
> I just upgraded a machine from 11.4-RELEASE to 12.2-RELEASE. Using
> the same version of ctwm (4.0.3,1 installed from packages) with the
> same .ctwmrc, things behave differently and I don't know why.
>
> My first problem is the middle button on my Logitech TrackMan Marble
> PS/2 mouse is
Hi!
> sreehari wrote this message on Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 21:02 -0700:
> > I have a USB C hub that supports gigabit ethernet under any other OS,
> > but under FreeBSD it seems to detect it properly, but I never get
> > speeds exceeding 100Mbps transfer rate on the whole thing. Is this a
> > known
Hi!
> It seems that the Linux-compatible "scsi-generic" driver is not working
> in 12-stable when using multimedia/makemkv; it never finds a blu-ray
> player, which it does on 12.1.
>
> The change that seems to have done it is revision 361038
>
>
Hi!
> Boots from a Samsung SSD 840EVO.
Can you check smart values ?
smartctl -a /dev/ada0
(or whatever drive you have) ?
If it's that old, maybe the SSD wear leveling comes to its ends ?
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ?
Hi!
> > I'm guessing: Do you have the dbus and hald daemon running ?
> >
> > hald_enable="YES"
> > dbus_enable="YES"
> >
> > in /etc/rc.conf ?
> >
> Yes, I do. Should I disable them, then? -- George
No, they are needed.
You mentioned that you build the x11 stuff on 11.3. I do
Hi!
> 1. Is there a way to shut "make delete-old" up? For most minor
> upgrades, of course, it never says anything. But for an upgrade such
> as this, it forces me to type "y" upwards of a hundred times.
I use:
yes | make delete-old
> Does this mean I need to provide a configuration file?
Hi!
> I'd like to retire the spkr driver. It was a cute hack before sound cards
> were ubiquitous, but it's not been kept up to date, and it's not clear that
> it still works It is still Giant locked, and though it's not a huge
> effort to do the locking I literally have no way to test it
Hi!
> # uname -a
> FreeBSD lash.internal 12.1-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE-p2 GENERICĀ amd64
See here:
https://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-EN-20:09.igb.asc
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ?
Hi!
> After looking at this some more I see the problem.
>
> http://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:11:amd64/release_4/All/
[...]
> Anyone know why firefox didn't make it into release_4?
No, but I've started a build on https://repo.nepustil.net/114/, so
that you can get it from there in a few hours.
Hi!
> This might be due to cockpit error, but I don't remember the exact history
> of this machine. I have a test machine that was running 11.3-RELEASE, and
> had been upgraded with freebsd-update. I upgraded it to 11.4-BETA1 last
> week, and BETA2 this weekend. Then I tried "pkg upgrade" and
Hi!
> The first RC build of the 12.1-RELEASE release cycle is now available.
If I try to update a 12.1-BETA3 poudriere jail to 12.1-RC1,
this happens:
poudriere jail -j 121 -u -t 12.1-RC1
[...]
To install the downloaded upgrades, run "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update.fixed
install".
Installing
Hi!
> The second BETA build of the 12.1-RELEASE release cycle is now
> available.
Upgrading a 12.1-BETA1 poudriere install with
poudriere jail -u -t 12.1-BETA2 -j 121
fails with:
No updates needed to update system to 12.1-BETA2-p0.
touch:
Hi!
> > > Alternative is to for announcers to do Less work:
> > > Send each announcement when ready.
> > The problem is not the announcement, the problem is providing
> > the freebsd-update.
> > If announcements are send when ready, and the freebsd-update is
> > not ready, therefore, the
Hi!
> > > PR headline : "FreeBSD flood of 8 breakage announcements in 3 mins."
> > >
> > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-announce/2019-May/date.html
> > >
> > > Volunteers who contribute actual fixes are very much appreciated;
> > > But those styled as 'management' who delay
Hi!
> PR headline : "FreeBSD flood of 8 breakage announcements in 3 mins."
>
> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-announce/2019-May/date.html
>
> Volunteers who contribute actual fixes are very much appreciated;
> But those styled as 'management' who delay announcements to batch floods
Hi!
> If one triggers such a fault on a production server, how can one
> justify transferring from backup multiple terabytes (or even petabytes
> now) of data to repair an unmountable/faulted array because all
> backup solutions I know currently would take days if not weeks to
> restore the
Hi!
> I know I'm not going to be popular for this, but I'll just drop it here
> anyhow.
>
> http://www.michellesullivan.org/blog/1726
With all due respect, I think if that filesystem/server you describe
has not kept with all those mishaps, I think it's not perfect, but
nothing is.
> Perhaps
Hi!
> If I give binmiscctl the magic for arm6 and then for say mips64, will
> this break things?
>
> Let's say I'm using an amd64 box to cross-compile using poudriere
> for arm6 and mips64 ports. Can I do both on the same box at the same
> time? Or do I need to let's say the arm6 run to finish,
Hi!
> With the Java FreeBSD mailing list pretty quiet, I thought I might ask
> here whether anyone was working on porting the latest Java versions over
> to FreeBSD.
There's the openjdk port, java/openjdk8.
You are asking about input from the FreeBSD community to openjdk9, 10 and 11 ?
>
Hi!
> I know (and have done) binary updates between -RELEASE versions
[...]
> How do I do this, say, coming from 11.2 and wanting to target 12 post
> the IPv6 fix MFC?
You can't. Either wait until a 12.0 with the fix included or
12.1 is released, or you fetch the source with the fix included,
Hi!
> > Use following command to see how much memory is wasted in your case:
> >
> > vmstat -z | awk -F, '{printf "%10s %s\n", $2*$5/1024/1024, $1}' | sort
> > -k1,1 -rn | head
>
> Oops, small correction:
>
> vmstat -z | sed 's/:/,/' | awk -F, '{printf "%10s %s\n", $2*$5/1024/1024,
> $1}' |
Hi!
> > Almost 3 months have passed and no response from upstream.
> > Should we go ahead and fix it despite of it is part of contrib?
> Do you have a fix? Can you put it up for review somewhere?
It's in the PR, see
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=199000
> We are no where
Hi!
> > Credits:Mark Johnston
> > Affects:FreeBSD 11.2
> > Corrected: 2019-11-24 17:11:47 UTC (stable/11, 11.2-STABLE)
>
> Should this be 2018 or is this yet in the future?
And why does fbsd-update fail like this:
The update metadata is correctly signed, but
failed an
Hi!
> What do the newer firmwares give you ? i.e. why upgrade ? On my APU3s I
> am running
> and havent seen any issues with it ? Are there new features ?
I had an issue, FreeBSD 12.0 would only boot *very* slowly. That's why I started
upgrading to legacy 4.0.22, which would not boot at all,
Hi!
> It was my understanding FreeBSD only worked with the "legacy" firmware
> releases.
Well, that's what I thought as well, but when the legacy did not work,
I tried the mainline (the 4.8.0.5), it worked.
> Since 4.8.0.5 is a "mainline" release, is there any particular
> reason not to go for
Hi!
> Has there been any progress on this?
>
> I'm asking because I'd very much like to upgrade my apu's to FreeBSD 12 as
> well!
Well, if you can upgrade your firmware to 4.8.0.5, it should work (it
was a re-install).
--
p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372 One year to
Hi!
> Our developers ask for the full log you could provide.
Below the boot1 with 4.0.22, that stalled.
And the boot2, with 4.8.0.5, that worked.
Serial Number: 1086158
-boot1---
PC Engines apu2
coreboot build 20180312
BIOS version v4.0.22
4080 MB ECC DRAM
SeaBIOS
Hi!
> > > PPC64 with the advent of Power9 is the only real alternative platform
> > > to amd64 in the data center [...]
> > I'm curious, isn't arm64 also a contender in this market ?
> Supposedly. The FF has invested in it greatly. Nonetheless, none of the
> offerings have been very good in
Hi!
> PPC64 with the advent of Power9 is the only real alternative platform
> to amd64 in the data center [...]
I'm curious, isn't arm64 also a contender in this market ?
--
p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372 2 years to go !
___
Hi!
> Testing FreeBSD 12.0 on an apu2d4 with WLAN board, after upgrading to
>
> http://pcengines.ch/file/apu2_v4.0.22.rom.tar.gz
>
> the boot hangs after:
With apu2_v4.8.0.5.rom it boots.
--
p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372 2 years to go !
Hi!
Testing FreeBSD 12.0 on an apu2d4 with WLAN board, after upgrading to
http://pcengines.ch/file/apu2_v4.0.22.rom.tar.gz
the boot hangs after:
[...]
Event timer "RTC" frequency 32768 Hz quality 0
attimer0: port 0x40-0x43 irq 0 on acpi0
Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
Hi!
> Well, another lockup. This time after ~ 10 days of uptime. Box was idle
> at the time and just a solid freeze.
Here's another datapoint: No lockups/problems with:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Board: PRIME X399-A (not the -PRO)
BIOS from 10/12/2018
running: 13.0-CURRENT r340445
up 19 days,
Hi!
> As I understand it, there are plans for a major upgrade of OpenSSL in
> -CURRENT.
Yes.
> Will this likely be backported to 11-STABLE
As far as I understand: most probably not, it would break
too much on 11-STABLE (it's a mess on 12, too 8-})
> or should I prepare
> switching to 12 when
Hi!
> > You will not see this if you install the security/ca_root_nss port.
> Why is security/ca_root_nss not present in base?
There are several reasons:
- The project is hesistant to endorse certificate authorities (CAs), as some
of them might be (or become) of questionable trust-worthyness
Hi!
I've seen a strange effect: NFS via IPv6 between 11.2-REL amd64
boxes failed for directories with more than 45 files or directories.
Small directories worked. It seems to be an issue with
ipv6 fragmentation (?), as can be seen by tcpdump:
17:54:16.855978 IP6 nfs-serv > nfs-client frag
Hi!
> 14.08.2018 3:15, Alexander Lochmann wrote:
>
> >> You should not rely on defaults and make sure you disable modem control/CD
> >> either explicitly (using stty(1) etc.) or implicitly by switching to
> >> /dev/cuau0
> >> instead of /dev/ttyu0. Flow control settings should match too, for
Hi!
> >> Could you please give any advice or workaround for this issue?
> > I switched to a workaround for the time being which you might use as well
> > in a similar way:
> >
> > #) configure fail2ban to use /var/log/faillog
> > #) run something like that in the background:
> >
> > nohup
Hi!
Thanks for the detailed report.
> For those who agree with my _user_ usability view, as a summary, can you
> tell me:
> o How do you access mobile media like FAT UFDs and NTFS HDDs?
I sudo to root and mount it.
> o How do you access aribtrary DVDs (yes, besides data, I'm also curious
>
Hi!
> any ideas why a current RELENG_11_1 system with ixl(4)
> onboard interfaces might not negotiate with a switch that
> has only fast ethernet?
>
> status: no carrieron the host
> line protocol is down (notconnect)on the switch
>
> dmesg:
>
Hi!
> To have a bit of a work around for the Intel Meltdown bug (yes, no
> Spectre), I wanted to try out some AMD based CPUs. So far so good using
> a SuperMicro H11SSL-i. A decent server board using an Epyc CPU. All
> the things you need and expect for a server grade MB
On the plus side:
Hi!
> I have a couple of ancient FreeBSD install that I have to bring into
> this century (read either 10.4 or 11.1) :-)
>
> I'm talking about a FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p4 and a couple of FreeBSD
> 9.3-RELEASE-p53.
>
> What upgrade strategy would you suggest?
The best way is to update stepwise
Hi!
> yes
> a lot of "> 10.4 RELEASE" and " current version"
Ah, so you skipped some of the questions during the update.
Well, that takes a bit of work to clean up, but it's no deal breaker.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
Hi!
> After second freebsd-update install
Boot single-user and edit /etc/defaults/rc.conf and/or /etc/rc.conf,
there's some typo somewhere.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
___
Hi!
> Im with a 9.3 Release now (thanks Kurt)
> but When I try to install a port, same error
>
> root@avvio-fw:/usr/src # cd /usr/ports/net-mgmt/rancid3/
> root@avvio-fw:/usr/ports/net-mgmt/rancid3 # make delete-old-libs
> "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1045: Unknown directive
> Unknown
Hi!
> ok, I will try this, becausa I did everthing, then I reboot, like this steps
>
> svn checkout https://svn.freebsd.org/base/release/9.3.0/ .
> make buildworld
> make buildkernel
> make installkernel
> make installworld
>
> mergemaster -UiP
> shutdown -r now
Yes, this works for small
Hi!
> yes I can boot single mode, mount / , etc
Try to boot single user mode with the new kernel, then re-run
make installworld
mergemaster -UiP
The normal way to do it is to reboot after
make installkernel
If you ran the installworld before the reboot, some files might
not be copied.
Hi!
> I follow the steps (that Kurt sent with his help)
> After the mergemaster -UiP
> the server stop at boot, after this point (see pictures attached)
Can you boot single-mode ?
Can you boot the old kernel ?
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
Hi!
> sysrc nrpe2_enable="YES"
>
> for instance
Yes, that's it! Thanks!
man rc.conf and man rc need a pointer to this!
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi!
I vaguely remember that there's a new way to edit the content of
/etc/rc.conf via some command, to be used in scripting system-setups.
Can someone point me into the right direction ?
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
Hi!
> > uname -a
[...]
> > *server# uname -aFreeBSD server.avgroup.loc 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD
So you have a PRERELEASE version and you have a custom kernel.
Do you know why that is ? Any specific change that needs to
be in that kernel config ?
Please check if you have a 'svn' binary somewhere,
Hi!
> Yes, I need help, its exactly what Im trying to do, upgrade
> to a newer version
So, what does
uname -a
say ?
What does
freebsd-version -ku
say ?
Can you try to do these steps to get to a slightly newer version first ?
freebsd-update -r 9.3-RELEASE upgrade
# installation kernel
Hi!
> I have a 9.1 freebsd server, and every ports I try to install I get
> the follow error
9.1 is no longer supported. Any chance to upgrade ? Do you need
help to upgrade that box ?
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
Hi!
> > I've got the following problem: the firefox building from ports ends with
> > errors:
[...]
There's a problem report for this:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222641
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
Hi!
> I've got the following problem: the firefox building from ports ends with
> errors:
>
> --
> x86_64-unknown-freebsd/release/libgkrust.a: could not read symbols: File
> format not recognized
Same here, with a build in poudriere.
Hi!
> Now that we are on a faster upgrade policy for minor branches, it is expected
> that we'll upgrade from 11.0 to 11.1 to 11.2 much faster than in the old
> days. I can cope with that, but it appears that functional changes are also
> being made within the stable branch as seen here:
>
>
Hi!
> > is it possible or even allowed to just mirror one of the freebsd-update
> > servers locally?
[...]
> Take a look at https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/hubs/index.html.
> This doc discusses setting up a mirror (found via quick Google
> search).
That's a mirror of some FTP server,
Hi!
> The full details with boot console outputs:
> https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/61936/
>
> Bugzilla bug: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221350
Please compare with
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213155
Hi!
> Is there any chance to mount UDF filesystem under FreeBSD with mdconfig
> and ISO image ? Mount -t cd9660 /dev/md0 /mnt/cdrom gives me the
> readme.txt with "This is UDF, you idiot" and mount -t udf /dev/md0
> /mnt/cdrom gives me
>
>
> # mount -t udf /dev/md0 cdrom
> mount_udf:
Hi!
> Some time ago, I ported a linux program that was using clock_nanosleep().
> I see now that the extra code I'd put in isn't needed anymore in 11-stable,
> as it appears this call was added in 11.1. My question is, to
> properly protect these changes, what is the best way to know at
>
Hi!
> After upgrading to 11.1-PRERELEASE, none of my MD5 BGP connections are
> coming up. They were fine in 11.0-RELEASE.
Please submit a PR via bugs.freebsd.org and send the PR number.
We should bring this to the attention of re@.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372
> Hello stable@
>
> I have an up-to-date 10.3 server that is randomly rebooting, after being
> up for days. Previously it had been up for many months. The problem is,
> nothing seems to be left in the logs to indicate why it's doing this. I
> have all.log and console.log enabled.
>
> So, what
Hi!
> > I have a file with the following ACL (in fact, a whole tree with files
> > like that):
> >
> > srv$ getfacl myfile
> > # file: myfile
> > # owner: myuser
> > # group: domain-users
> > group:myuser:rw-p--aARWcCo-:---:allow
> >group@:rw-p--a-R-c---:---:allow
> >
Hi!
I have a file with the following ACL (in fact, a whole tree with files
like that):
srv$ getfacl myfile
# file: myfile
# owner: myuser
# group: domain-users
group:myuser:rw-p--aARWcCo-:---:allow
group@:rw-p--a-R-c---:---:allow
Hi!
> I'm trying to update from 10.20 to 11.0 and am failing:
>
> $ sudo freebsd-update -r 11.0-RELEASE upgrade
> Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found.
> Fetching metadata signature for 10.2-RELEASE from update6.freebsd.org... done.
> Fetching metadata index... done.
>
Hi!
> > I had some cases in the past where xterm was hanging, too -- but
> > not with *that* high rate of problems.
>
> Hmm that doesn???t sound too good. Potentially exploitable bug?
I assume so, yes. Needs more fuzzying 8-}
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372
Hi!
> does anyone suffer from this too ? Right now (and for several last
> years) a 100% decent way to reset a terminal session (for instance,
> after a connection reset, after acidentally displaying a binary file
> with symbols that are treated as terminal control sequence, after
> breaking a cu
Hi!
> I've got legacy FreeBSD server running 8.4-STABLE and I'm trying to upgrade
> it.
> Source upgrade for 8.4 to 9.3-STABLE r310015 went flawlessly.
> After reboot, I checked out stable/10 r310043 sources and ran buildworld
> again.
> It fails:
I suggest two different approaches (have not
Hi!
> I had a very similar problem, which led me to throw this together:
>
> https://github.com/eborisch/ethname
>
> I think the comments in it are fairly complete, let me know if anything
> doesn't make sense.
Can you submit a PR via bugs.freebsd.org so that this script can be added
as port
Hi!
> After upgrade and a last reboot the iwn driver gets loaded but no iwn0
> interface pops up.
In 11, the hardware interfaces no longer appear.
They still can be found with
sysctl net.wlan.devices
> Doing a 'service netif restart' crashes the machine
> and a core is written.
The crash
Hi!
> I subscribe to the RSS feed of FreeBSD security advisories
> (http://vuxml.freebsd.org/freebsd/rss.xml). Today, it told me that there
> were forty-something advisories. I went to the VuXML site and saw that a
> stack of old entries have been updated to have today as their "Entry"
>
Hi!
> I upgraded my local machine to the above revision a few days ago. Since then
> I have seen the local em0 card locking up and getting he following
> messages in dmesg
>
> em0: Watchdog timeout -- resetting
> em0: link state changed to DOWN
> em0: link state changed to UP
>
>
> I thought
Hi!
> Since then I'm draging a minimal patch which prevents at least the
> kernel panics for me.
> Unfortunately I don't have the skills to continue Attilio Raos work.
>
> Just for anybody else needing unionfs:
> https://people.freebsd.org/~attilio/unionfs_missing_insmntque_lock.patch
Is this
Hi!
> Is there any information available on when freebsd-update might
> be corrected to upgrade some 9.3 systems to 11.0?
Does
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211354
help ?
> I have a number of production systems on 9.3 that need to be
> upgraded. I can't go to 10.x as it
Hi!
> So my question is this, should old rc scripts adapt to this new default, or
> should the default be changed to avoid issues like I just found?
There should be a PR about this, and please give it to re
(release engineering).
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372
Hi!
> > Before: ca. 660 seconds to reboot, now 77 seconds to reboot.
> > Now, if someone could explain, why...
> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2016-June/084865.html
Any pointer to a commit or three that fixed it ?
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372
Hi!
> > I installed FreeBSD 10.3 on brand new machine Supermicro X11SSW-F. It
> > sits on top of 4x 1TB Samsung SSDs on ZFS RAIDZ2.
> >
> > The booting is painfully slow from BTX to menu to kernel loading.
>
> I have the same problem on a Supermicro X11SSH-LN4F.
> > I found this blog post
Hi!
> I installed FreeBSD 10.3 on brand new machine Supermicro X11SSW-F. It
> sits on top of 4x 1TB Samsung SSDs on ZFS RAIDZ2.
>
> The booting is painfully slow from BTX to menu to kernel loading.
I have the same problem on a Supermicro X11SSH-LN4F.
> Progress indicated by \ | / - characters
Hi!
> I currently issued
>
> freebsd-update fetch
> freebsd-update install
>
> and after reboot have
>
> freebsd-version -ku
> 10.2-RELEASE-p18
> 10.2-RELEASE-p19
>
> Please note that kernel version is p18, userland p19.
>
> Is this intended behavior or is something broken with
Hi!
> It seems this is a general problem, but mostly on the application
> side. See for example:
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=147938
>
> which shows that the application code uses the wrong type
> for an ioctl argument.
See
/usr/src/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:sys_ioctl()
Hi!
> I get many CommVault-related warnings (ioctl sign-extension
> ioctl) similar to those discussed for ages related to Python (June
> 2010 and before).
It seems this is a general problem, but mostly on the application
side. See for example:
Hi!
> while replacing a switch I ran into a problem with using 802.1q VLANs
> (vlan(4)) on a em(4) card - that is, I could not get the card to work
> with VLANs.
Have you tried fiddeling with the flags ?
options=4219b
Hi!
> > Its worth noting you can also select BEs from beastie now as well.
> While this is a great feature I still find it strange that I have to
> install a 3rd party app (beadm) to get FreeBSD core functionality (BE) .
> Why not make it part of the OS?
Similar to pkg: Because the
Hi!
I recently tried to get some host updated using freebsd-update:
It failed on all sites with this:
# freebsd-update -r 10.2-RELEASE upgrade -s update4.freebsd.org
Looking up update4.freebsd.org mirrors... none found.
Fetching metadata signature for 10.1-RELEASE from update4.freebsd.org...
Hi!
> Not sure if this is the right place to enquire about this. If not please
> direct me to the right place and accept my apologies.
It's a good place, if you run a stable version. What version of FreeBSD
do you run ?
And it's an interesting bug-report. Other places where it might
be useful
Hi!
> But isn't 'CentOS 6.7' is already in ports tree?
It's in HEAD ports tree, but probably not in the quarterly. Can this be the
cause ?
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 4 years to go !
___
Hi!
> So my final question then is, how do you extract it into userland (in
> the absence of an "mfiutil" as the MFI driver has)?
They renamed the util to StorCLI, it looks very similar to the old tw_cli,
and can be downloaded from
Hi!
> I have a new Asus H170-Plus-D3 motherboard that will be used for a DOM0 Xen
> Server. It uses an Intel i5-6300 processor and a Samsung 840 EVO SSD. I
> would like to use ZFS on this new installation. The Xen Kernel does not have
> UEFI support at this time, so I installed FreeBSD
Hi!
> I could be recalling wrongly but I'm pretty sure a number of emails have
> been seen on @freebsd.org lists that say, "don't use zfs on single
> spindle machines"
We do ZFS on single-spindle/SSD devices regularly. No problems
as of now.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372
Hi!
> We have a NFS server witch has three network ports.
>
> We have bonded these interfaces as a lagg interface, but when we use the
> server it looks like only two interfaces are used.
>
> This is our rc.conf file
>
> ifconfig_igb0="up"
> ifconfig_igb1="up"
> ifconfig_igb2="up"
>
Hi!
> > Is there something we can do to make sure lagg0 uses all the interfaces.
>
> Nope. LACP doesn't actively load balance its interfaces.
On FreeBSD 11
man lagg(4)
says:
The driver currently supports the aggregation protocols failover (the
default), lacp, loadbalance,
Hi!
> > I'm trying to understand why the sshd still starts after local daemons,
> > out-of-the-box, and what it takes to make this extremely vital service
> > to start before non-system (local) ones. I bet I'm not the first one to
> > ask, so why isn't this already done ? Seems quite easy for me.
Hi!
Or run tcpdump for port 53; also curious if it might be an IPv4
vs. IPv6 issue?
I did run tcpdump on port 53 on both the client and the
dns server for this, everything looked normal. It was no IPv6 issue.
I'll retest with more detail this evening.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171
Hi!
[bob wrote]
[ck wrote]
I have been trying to update several of my FreeBSD 10.1 amd64
VM to 10.2-RELEASE with freebsd-update and have been failing with
an incorrect hash error.
FWIW I had the same issue yesterday on a couple of systems.
Repeating freebsd-update worked after two or
Hi!
It could be the classic fall back to TCP on SRV records problem on
your upstream DNS forwarder if you're using one:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-May/074801.html
If I query that same DNS resolver using the line from
the script, it works every time. It's a 10.1p16
Hi!
prior to the releng/10.2 branch), please exercise caution when upgrading
to the latest stable/10 or releng/10.2 if your storage controller
matches any of the following PCI device IDs:
Which field of pciconf -lvb or sysctl output needs to be compared ?
Is it the device= field ?
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo