Am 26.06.20 um 12:23 schrieb Peter Jeremy:
> On 2020-Jun-25 11:30:31 -0700, Donald Wilde wrote:
>> Here's 'pstat -s' on the i3 (which registers as cpu HAMMER):
>>
>> Device 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity
>> /dev/ada0s1b 335544320 33554432 0%
>> /dev/ada0s1d
Am 10.06.20 um 16:51 schrieb Donald Wilde:> Okay, it didn't work, but
discovered INDEX-12 in /usr/ports, so
> ' grep gcc INDEX-12 | wc -l ' worked.
My mistake, since you posted on the STABLE mail list but
replied to a mail that mentioned INDEX-13:
It is INDEX-12 for FreeBSD-12.x and INDEX-13 for
Am 10.06.20 um 15:45 schrieb Donald Wilde:
> On 6/10/20, Mark Linimon wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 08:09:21PM -0700, Donald Wilde wrote:
>>> (and FreeBSD's port maintainers) reach the point of diminishing
>>> returns by supporting GCC
>>
>
> Hi, Mark! LTNT2!
>
>> All you have to do is fix
Matthew Dillon wrote:
In anycase, the usual solution is to disable Nagle rather then mess
with delayed acks. What we need is a new Nagle that understands the
new reality for interactive connections... something that doesn't break
performance in the 'server in the middle' data
Kris Kennaway schrieb:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 10:54:08AM -0500, Scot Hetzel wrote:
On 8/6/07, JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only to remember the problem only ocurres when loading powerd and seems the
freeze happens when cpu freq is upshifting not down.
Try setting:
On 2005-11-30 10:20 +0100, Vincent Blondel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
When having a look at log files on my web servers, I regulary see next output
on the 3COM ethernet interfaces :
xl1: transmission error: 90
xl1: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 120
On 2005-01-23 05:57 -0800, Net Virtual Mailing Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My latest problem is with a:
dc0: ADMtek AN985 10/100BaseTX port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xe608-
0xe60803ff irq 11 at device 10.0 on pci0
dc0: Ethernet address: 00:0c:41:ed:ae:85
... after several hours of
On 2004-11-12 15:27 +0100, Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to force linux-OpenGroupware port to run turned out to be hard
work, and currently I'm stuck at this: (output from dmesg):
linux: pid 49052 (glidelink): sysctl {1,23} is not implemented
linux: pid 49052 (glidelink):
On 2003-07-23 18:52 -0700, Don Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23 Jul, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 12:36:54AM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote:
Barney Wolff writes:
One might argue that this is a config error, and ulimit should be used
to cut the address space to below
