[Not this year] Re: FreeBSD in Google Code-In 2012? You can help too!

2012-11-16 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 08:13:18PM +, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
 On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:19:57AM +, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
  (cross-posted message; please keep discussion on freebsd-hackers@)
  
  Hello,
  
  Last year FreeBSD qualified for Google Code-In 2011 event--contest for
  youngest open-source hackers in 13-17yr age range:
  
  http://www.google-melange.com/gci/homepage/google/gci2012
  
  It was successful. We gained one more FreeBSD developer thanks to that
  (Isabell Long) We're pondering participating in the contest this year as
  well.
  
  For now we only have 25 ideas. We need at least 100.
  
  I felt all members of the FreeBSD community should help, so please submit
  your own Google Code-In 2012 ideas here:
  
  http://www.emailmeform.com/builder/form/4aU93Obxo4NYdVAgb1
  
  Examples of previously completed tasks:
  
  http://wiki.freebsd.org/GoogleCodeIn/2011Tasks
  
  Those of you who have Wiki access, please spent 2 more minutes and submit
  straight to Wiki:
  
  http://wiki.freebsd.org/GoogleCodeIn/2012Tasks
  
  I plan to send out next e-mail if there's any progress on this project.
  
  Help will be appreciated.
 
 Hello,
 
 This is last call for action. 
 
 As for now, we won't qualify. I suggest doc@ and ports@ and www@ and src@
 teams to try to come up with some ideas and add them to Wiki. Most of the
 ideas which we have so far are more GSOC-alike.
 
 Unless we have at least 80 tasks of the easy/medium type, we'll have to
 postpone participating in Code-In for next year.
 
 Thanks,

Hello,

We didn't make it this year.

I want to thank all the people who submitted (and keep submitting) ideas for
our Google Code-In wiki page:

http://wiki.freebsd.org/GoogleCodeIn/2012Tasks

In total I got 61 ideas over e-mail from the web form (lessons learnt: for
GSOC, we should also have a web form) All of them should be on the Wiki now.

I suggest we keep collecting good ideas and try to make sure this years GSOC
will be successful.

On the other note--NetBSD guys are in Google Code-In..

Thanks,

-- 
Wojciech A. Koszek
wkos...@freebsd.czest.pl
http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/~wkoszek/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD in Google Code-In 2012? You can help too!

2012-11-02 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:19:57AM +, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
 (cross-posted message; please keep discussion on freebsd-hackers@)
 
 Hello,
 
 Last year FreeBSD qualified for Google Code-In 2011 event--contest for
 youngest open-source hackers in 13-17yr age range:
 
   http://www.google-melange.com/gci/homepage/google/gci2012
 
 It was successful. We gained one more FreeBSD developer thanks to that
 (Isabell Long) We're pondering participating in the contest this year as
 well.
 
 For now we only have 25 ideas. We need at least 100.
 
 I felt all members of the FreeBSD community should help, so please submit
 your own Google Code-In 2012 ideas here:
 
   http://www.emailmeform.com/builder/form/4aU93Obxo4NYdVAgb1
 
 Examples of previously completed tasks:
 
   http://wiki.freebsd.org/GoogleCodeIn/2011Tasks
 
 Those of you who have Wiki access, please spent 2 more minutes and submit
 straight to Wiki:
 
   http://wiki.freebsd.org/GoogleCodeIn/2012Tasks
 
 I plan to send out next e-mail if there's any progress on this project.
 
 Help will be appreciated.

Hello,

This is last call for action. 

As for now, we won't qualify. I suggest doc@ and ports@ and www@ and src@
teams to try to come up with some ideas and add them to Wiki. Most of the
ideas which we have so far are more GSOC-alike.

Unless we have at least 80 tasks of the easy/medium type, we'll have to
postpone participating in Code-In for next year.

Thanks,

-- 
Wojciech A. Koszek
wkos...@freebsd.czest.pl
http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/~wkoszek/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD in Google Code-In 2012? You can help too!

2012-10-23 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek

Dnia 23-10-2012 o 14:05:43 Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org napisał(a):


Right, lots of PHP coding. Attractive to a student.



Nobody prevents students from serving FreeBSD by writing stuff in attractive, 
well documented (books, translations) technologies. We just need to craft a 
task list around things which people consider attractive.

--
Wojciech A. Koszek
wkos...@freebsd.czest.pl
http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/~wkoszek/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: FreeBSD in Google Code-In 2012? You can help too!

2012-10-22 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:19:57AM +, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
 (cross-posted message; please keep discussion on freebsd-hackers@)
 
 Hello,
 
 Last year FreeBSD qualified for Google Code-In 2011 event--contest for
 youngest open-source hackers in 13-17yr age range:
 
   http://www.google-melange.com/gci/homepage/google/gci2012
 
 It was successful. We gained one more FreeBSD developer thanks to that
 (Isabell Long) We're pondering participating in the contest this year as
 well.
 
 For now we only have 25 ideas. We need at least 100.
 
 I felt all members of the FreeBSD community should help, so please submit
 your own Google Code-In 2012 ideas here:
 
   http://www.emailmeform.com/builder/form/4aU93Obxo4NYdVAgb1
 
 Examples of previously completed tasks:
 
   http://wiki.freebsd.org/GoogleCodeIn/2011Tasks
 
 Those of you who have Wiki access, please spent 2 more minutes and submit
 straight to Wiki:
 
   http://wiki.freebsd.org/GoogleCodeIn/2012Tasks
 
 I plan to send out next e-mail if there's any progress on this project.
 
 Help will be appreciated.
 

Update:

It looks pretty bad so far. Page:

http://wiki.freebsd.org/GoogleCodeIn/2012Tasks

Has 38 tasks so far out of which:

~30 would qualify.

Consider this e-mail to be the last call for action. Otherwise we'll have to
pull back and concentrate our efforts on GSOC instead.

-- 
Wojciech A. Koszek
wkos...@freebsd.czest.pl
http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/~wkoszek/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD in Google Code-In 2012? You can help too!

2012-10-22 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:46:21AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
 That wiki site has a distinct lack of help about:
 
 * what is required from us;
 * what the target is (kids, right?)
 * some examples of good and bad projects.
 
 Right now I have absolutely no idea what would constitute a good or
 bad coding project. :/
 

I updated the Wiki with Sample ideas section:

http://wiki.freebsd.org/GoogleCodeIn/2012Tasks

-- 
Wojciech A. Koszek
wkos...@freebsd.czest.pl
http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/~wkoszek/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


FreeBSD in Google Code-In 2012? You can help too!

2012-10-16 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
(cross-posted message; please keep discussion on freebsd-hackers@)

Hello,

Last year FreeBSD qualified for Google Code-In 2011 event--contest for
youngest open-source hackers in 13-17yr age range:

http://www.google-melange.com/gci/homepage/google/gci2012

It was successful. We gained one more FreeBSD developer thanks to that
(Isabell Long) We're pondering participating in the contest this year as
well.

For now we only have 25 ideas. We need at least 100.

I felt all members of the FreeBSD community should help, so please submit
your own Google Code-In 2012 ideas here:

http://www.emailmeform.com/builder/form/4aU93Obxo4NYdVAgb1

Examples of previously completed tasks:

http://wiki.freebsd.org/GoogleCodeIn/2011Tasks

Those of you who have Wiki access, please spent 2 more minutes and submit
straight to Wiki:

http://wiki.freebsd.org/GoogleCodeIn/2012Tasks

I plan to send out next e-mail if there's any progress on this project.

Help will be appreciated.

Thanks,

-- 
Wojciech A. Koszek
wkos...@freebsd.czest.pl
http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/~wkoszek/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD in Google Code-In 2012? You can help too!

2012-10-16 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:19:57AM +, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
 (cross-posted message; please keep discussion on freebsd-hackers@)
 
 Hello,
 
 Last year FreeBSD qualified for Google Code-In 2011 event--contest for
 youngest open-source hackers in 13-17yr age range:
 
   http://www.google-melange.com/gci/homepage/google/gci2012
 
 It was successful. We gained one more FreeBSD developer thanks to that
 (Isabell Long) We're pondering participating in the contest this year as
 well.
 
 For now we only have 25 ideas. We need at least 100.
 
 I felt all members of the FreeBSD community should help, so please submit
 your own Google Code-In 2012 ideas here:
 
   http://www.emailmeform.com/builder/form/4aU93Obxo4NYdVAgb1
 
 Examples of previously completed tasks:
 
   http://wiki.freebsd.org/GoogleCodeIn/2011Tasks
 
 Those of you who have Wiki access, please spent 2 more minutes and submit
 straight to Wiki:
 
   http://wiki.freebsd.org/GoogleCodeIn/2012Tasks
 
 I plan to send out next e-mail if there's any progress on this project.
 
 Help will be appreciated.

Hi,

(cross-posted message; please keep discussion on freebsd-hackers@)

I made a mistake -- the web form didn't have Contributor's name, thus I
don't know who of you guys contributed first 9 ideas; e-mail me which ideas
are yours, so that your name can be mentioned on Wiki:

http://wiki.freebsd.org/GoogleCodeIn/2012Tasks

I made slight adjustments to the form to make some fields more precise:

http://www.emailmeform.com/builder/form/4aU93Obxo4NYdVAgb1

Sorry and thanks,

-- 
Wojciech A. Koszek
wkos...@freebsd.czest.pl
http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/~wkoszek/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Google Code-In 2011 is over; 56 tasks got completed for FreeBSD!

2012-01-18 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek

Hello,

(This is cross-posted message between current@, stable@ and hackers@; for
eventual discussion, please use hackers@ mailing list.)

I am glad to announce that we've successfully reached the end of Google
Code-In 2011 Contest!

FreeBSD participated first time, and in my personal opinion GCIN has proven
to be a big success. I want to thank all the participants for their time,
cooperation and dedication.

Here's the list of this years participants:

Alex Rucker, Andrey Sinitsyn, Anikan, Astha Sethi, Bebacz, 
Bharath Mohan, doctorkohaku, Eric Newberry, GarrettF,
Isabell Long (issyl0), mpaloski, Violet Lin (n00l3), Nagato Yuki,
Nathan, passstab, Reid Anderson, Robin, Roger, Rushil Paul,
Thomas Turney, Utkarsh Pant, Zacharias Mitzelos 

I would like to point out Isabell Long (issyl0) completed 13 tasks for us
and holds this years record.

Some other numbers...

We've had 19 mentors. I send special thanks to those who offered their help
in mentoring/administration, since accepting/reviewing/judging tasks has
proven to be challenging.

We've had 78 tasks published. 56 tasks got completed, leading to ~72%
successful completions.

1 task was claimed at the time of hitting the deadline, 10 tasks were
claimed, but never  finished, thus got reopened. 12 of tasks were never
claimed. List of tasks, together with their outcome (uploaded results)
are present here:

http://www.google-melange.com/gci/org/google/gci2011/freebsd

It would be my wish to have the work done in GCIN commited to FreeBSD with:

Submitted by:   Name email (Google Code-In 2011)

header or similar, clearly stating work comes from GCIN 2011.

The hardest expectations for mentors was short response time. For students
I think it was meeting FreeBSD's standards, however I'm positively surprised
by the quality of submitted work.

The complaint which I've heard is: Not enough coding tasks. We should fix
it next time, since most of the tasks were related with documentation and
outreach/promotion.

I think GCIN should become an integral part of the FreeBSD involvement in
promotion of the Open Source software.

Thank you.

-- 
Wojciech A. Koszek
wkos...@freebsd.czest.pl
http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/~wkoszek/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


The FreeBSD Project in the Google Code-In 2011 contest

2011-11-20 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek

Hello,

(cross-posted message; please keep eventual comments on freebsd-hackers@)

The FreeBSD project has been accepted to the Google Code-In 2011 contest.


http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2011/11/google-code-in-2011-participating.html

We have proposed 50 tasks so far, and more are still coming!

This is an event similar to the Google Summer of Code, but is targetted to
people in the 13-17 age range. Young people will be working on
FreeBSD-related tasks for the next weeks.

If you know any potential candidates, feel free to forward this message.

Brief summary:

T-shirts and possibility of earning some $$$ for participants.
The best participants get a chance to see the Google complex in Mountain View,
Silicon Valley, California, USA.

FreeBSD tasks are here:

http://wiki.freebsd.org/GoogleCodeIn/2011

Ideas page can be extended till December, 16th!

Contest's home page:

http://www.google-melange.com/gci/homepage/google/gci2011

After you create an account, you can acquire tasks which you're 
interested
in (if any of them are left!)

Start date:

November, 21st (tomorrow)

Official communication channels:

IRC (EFNet):#freebsd-soc
Q/A:wkos...@freebsd.org, jc...@freebsd.org, 
ead...@freebsd.org
wkoszek, jceel, eadler on IRC
Mailing list:   freebsd-hackers@
Please coordinate communication with your mentor.
Include '[GCIN]' header when posting to freebsd-hackers@

In case of potential task candidates, ideas and suggestions, feel free
to contact me.

--
Wojciech A. Koszek
wkos...@freebsd.czest.pl
http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/~wkoszek/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: (Possible fix for sbp(4)) Re: Comment out sbp driver from GENERIC

2011-10-27 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek

Dnia 18-10-2011 o 14:12:56 Alberto Villa avi...@freebsd.org napisał(a):


On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Wojciech A. Koszek
wkos...@freebsd.czest.pl wrote:

Commenting a driver out is almost always a bad idea and should
be done as a last step.


Well, few weeks prior to -RELEASE can be considered a last step. :)


If you are impacted by sbp(4) hangs please follow this thread:


 http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2007-December/081411.html

And please let me know if a fix explained in this thread works for you.


Thank you, will test it in few days.


Any updates?

--
Wojciech A. Koszek
wkos...@freebsd.czest.pl
http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/~wkoszek/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


(Possible fix for sbp(4)) Re: Comment out sbp driver from GENERIC

2011-10-18 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek

Dnia 18-10-2011 o 01:28:36 Alberto Villa avi...@freebsd.org napisał(a):


Hello!

It has been reported several times that some motherboards have issues
at boot with sbp driver loaded. To hide the problem, the driver was
removed from GENERIC in 8-STABLE, but it was left in -CURRENT and it
is now going into 9-STABLE. Please, apply the workaround to 9-STABLE
also!

http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=199112


Hi,

Commenting a driver out is almost always a bad idea and should
be done as a last step.

If you are impacted by sbp(4) hangs please follow this thread:


http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2007-December/081411.html

And please let me know if a fix explained in this thread works for you.

--
Wojciech A. Koszek
wkos...@freebsd.czest.pl
http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/~wkoszek/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: bug in mdconfig -l (does not list all devices)

2007-04-28 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 03:41:03PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
 On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 04:34:44PM +0200, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
  On Saturday 28 April 2007, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
   Is it a bug or is it a desired feature, that mdconfig -l doesn't list
   all devices, but only last 95 devices?
  

[..]

 On current it just has a different bug :)
 
 If you have hundreds of md devices then mdconfig -l lists no devices.

I'm about to fix this.
 
 Anyway it is probably just a simple MFC to fix, so why not find out
 who committed the change to current and ask them about it?

I commited changes related with proper mdconfig(8) interface to
-CURRENT, but I'm not able to test them on RELENG_6 right now.

Please let me know if anyone is willing to test such changes on
RELENG_6.

-- 
Wojciech A. Koszek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/dunstan/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: bug in mdconfig -l (does not list all devices)

2007-04-28 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 04:34:44PM +0200, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
 On Saturday 28 April 2007, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
  Is it a bug or is it a desired feature, that mdconfig -l doesn't list
  all devices, but only last 95 devices?

[..]

 
  Can somebody test it on STABLE / CURRENT?
 It works correctly on current but fails on stable.
 

On RELENG_6, we still use old mdconfig(8) API and this limitation is
known. In -CURRENT, such limitation doesn't exist. 

-- 
Wojciech A. Koszek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/dunstan/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Possible memory leak?

2007-03-20 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 10:44:07AM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
 Stefan Ehmann wrote:
   Sometimes I'm noticing very high memory usage. Nearly my whole memory 
 (1GB) is 
   used although I'm running my usual set of processes - normally memory 
 usage 

[..]

 How do you measure memory usage?  The numbers from top(1)
 are mostly meaningless.  Personally I think top should be
 removed from FreeBSD, because it confuses many people (in
 fact I think _most_ people don't interpret the numbers
 correctly), but some people seem to be in love with it. :-)

You can obtain reliable output from vmstat(8):

vmstat -m
vmstat -z

-- 
Wojciech A. Koszek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/dunstan/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Reverting to 6.2-RELEASE

2007-03-19 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:33:44PM -, Steven Hartland wrote:
 I think this is a very good idea, I've been caught at least once
 not being able to recreate a working kernel due to the loss of
 the original config file.
 
Steve
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: LI Xin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 I always use options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE for my kernel :-)  Maybe we
 should add it to DEFAULTS some day...

I did some work in this area, as several system administrators I've met
also seem to have problem with kernel configuration recovery. In my case
I came with a method of obtaining a configuration of a running kernel
via sysctl (kern.conftxt for now) and via config(8) form the kernel file.

Hopefully this work will get more review soon.

Thanks,

-- 
Wojciech A. Koszek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/dunstan/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Reverting to 6.2-RELEASE

2007-03-19 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 02:32:48PM -, Steven Hartland wrote:
 - Original Message - 
 From: Wojciech A. Koszek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 I did some work in this area, as several system administrators I've met
 also seem to have problem with kernel configuration recovery. In my case
 I came with a method of obtaining a configuration of a running kernel
 via sysctl (kern.conftxt for now) and via config(8) form the kernel file.
 
 Hopefully this work will get more review soon.
 
 Does this take into account includes as I just tried INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE
 and its appears to be useless for configs which make use of include .
 

Yes, it does. You get full configuration file from sysctl(8) or from
config -k kernel, and config(8) is modified in a way, that lets you to
use this file without additional trimming.

-- 
Wojciech A. Koszek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/dunstan/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Reverting to 6.2-RELEASE

2007-03-19 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 10:23:53PM +0800, LI Xin wrote:
 Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:

[..]

  I always use options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE for my kernel :-)  Maybe we
  should add it to DEFAULTS some day...
  
  I did some work in this area, as several system administrators I've met
  also seem to have problem with kernel configuration recovery. In my case
  I came with a method of obtaining a configuration of a running kernel
  via sysctl (kern.conftxt for now) and via config(8) form the kernel file.
  
  Hopefully this work will get more review soon.
 
 Not sure how useful could it be to expose it via sysctl(8) interface but
 sounds interesting to me.  Have you posted the patch somewhere?

Well, being able to ask about output of:

sysctl -a | egrep '(LOCK_PROFILING|WITNESS)'

Or any other important options, whose impact isn't directly noticeable
is useful, at least for me; even without mentioning, how useful would be
to have a feature in our build infrastructure, which could warn a user,
that the kernel module which is being compiled separately (e.g: from
ports/) doesn't have LOCK_PROFILING, while the running kernel has this
option included.

-- 
Wojciech A. Koszek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/dunstan/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Mounting OpenBSD partitions

2006-12-06 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 05:13:43PM +0200, Clayton Milos wrote:
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Alex Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: FreeBSD STABLE freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
 Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 3:18 PM
 Subject: Re: Mounting OpenBSD partitions
 
 
 Hi,
 
 What you need is a GEOM module called nbsd. Here is the link:
 http://www.26th.net/public/projects/freebsd/geom_nbsd/geom_nbsd.tgz
 
 This module is analgous to the default component (geom_bsd I believe
 it is called) that understands FreeBSD disklabels, but instead it
 understands NetBSD, OpenBSD and DragonFlyBSD disklabels.
 
 Once compiled and kldload'ed into the kernel, that module will allow
 you to mount your partitions from the OpenBSD disk. However, note that
 when I used it, there was some bug that did not allow you to get rid
 of the module (cannot rememeber whether it panicked, hung or just
 refused to unload), and so I simply rebooted once I had pulled the
 data off the drive I needed to.
 
 Incidentally, it seems a great shame that FreeBSD does not deliver
 this support in the base system, it would seem like a VERY useful
 thing to be able to do for users and developers who use a couple of
 the different BSD systems.
 
 Thanks and hope this helps, Alex J Burke.
 
 Alex
 
 You have a very valid point here.
 FreeBSD's support for other FS' is horiffic. Very little else is supported 
 which I find very sad.
 There is not even support for Solaris UFS. Something that would be really 
 nice would be support for XFS.

Actually, I've worked on Solaris labels support in the past. It meant
decoding their structures which is done:


http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2005-February/011797.html

Then, I hacked geom_sunlabel in order to accept minor changes between
way of handling SPARC/x86 differences (number of labels). Result of this
experiment was a set of readable slices and labels.

I don't remember exact differences between Solaris/FreeBSD UFS, but I
remember I was able to mess Solaris UFS with fsck(8) from FreeBSD, and
after correcting file system [1], I was able to read files from Solaris
label.

[1] Solaris fsck(8) wasn't able to handle such serious brokeness, even
after specifying alternative, backup superblock.

-- 
Wojciech A. Koszek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/dunstan/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Crash with FreeBSD 6.1 STABLE of today

2006-06-22 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
On śro, cze 21, 2006 at 07:43:15 +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
 On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Martin Blapp wrote:
 
 I just upgraded from 5.5 (stable btw.) to 6.1 and after 10 hours I got a 
 nice panic. Does this look like some tty problem ?
 
 It looks like a tty or devfs problem.
 
 This is the machine which made that many problems with PREEMTION enabled 
 in earlier releases of 5.x. Is it possible that I'm hitting now again the 
 same bugs or is it clearly a tty related problem ?
 
 I'm not sure there's evidence it's caused by preemption, but it's not 
 impossible that preemption makes it more likely to happen, or facilitates 
 it happening on non-SMP systems.  Wojciech Koszek has recently been looking 
 into devfs-related races that trigger for pty's, which could be relevant to 
 what you're seeing, so I've CC'd him.

Robert,

Thanks for CCing me, even with wrong address ;-) I'll look into that.

 kgdb /var/core/kernel.debug /var/core/vmcore.6
 
 #0  0xc0663002 in doadump ()
 #1  0xc066355e in boot ()
 #2  0xc06638b5 in panic ()
 #3  0xc085c6b6 in trap_fatal ()
 #4  0xc085c3bf in trap_pfault ()
 #5  0xc085bfb5 in trap ()
 #6  0xc0848bea in calltrap ()
 #7  0xc0693b51 in ttymodem ()
 #8  0xc0698362 in ptcclose ()
 #9  0xc0638a6f in giant_close ()
 #10 0xc06162bf in devfs_close ()
 #11 0xc086dc1c in VOP_CLOSE_APV ()
 #12 0xc06c87e2 in vn_close ()
 #13 0xc06c974a in vn_closefile ()
 #14 0xc06162e7 in devfs_close_f ()
 #15 0xc0642cdc in fdrop_locked ()
 #16 0xc0642c29 in fdrop ()
 #17 0xc06411c7 in closef ()
 #18 0xc063e329 in close ()
 #19 0xc085c9f7 in syscall ()
 #20 0xc0848c3f in Xint0x80_syscall ()
 #21 0x0033 in ?? ()
 Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
 
 Unfortunaltly I get this with the debug kernel.
 Does one have to boot with the debug.kernel itself
 to get a trace which is usable ?

I think your problem is that one I wanted to know more about.

 kgdb /var/core/kernel.debug /var/core/vmcore.6
 
 kgdb: kvm_read: invalid address (0x21)
[..]
 kgdb: kvm_read: invalid address (0x21)
 

Martin,

Could you make sure your kernel and kernel.debug are in sync? It look like
you have kernel and kernel.debug compiled from different sources or
different configuration files. After 'bt' typed in kgdb you should get a
backtrace.

Thanks,
-- 
Wojciech A. Koszek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/dunstan/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: missing dependency - crypto.ko to zlib.ko

2006-03-04 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
On ptk, mar 03, 2006 at 08:47:54 -0500, Ben Kelly wrote:
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 From: Ben Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 20:47:54 -0500
 Subject: missing dependency - crypto.ko to zlib.ko
 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3
 
 Hello all,
 
 I upgraded my RELENG_6 server today and ran into a strange problem.  Whenever 
 I try to kldload crypto.ko the operation fails and I get the following error 
 in my dmesg:
 
   link_elf: symbol inflateInit2_ undefined
 
 I was indirectly trying to load crypto because I had geom_eli.ko in my 
 loader.conf.  I don't have any crypto hardware in the box.
 
 I'm guessing this is related to this commit:
 
   http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2006-March/060511.html
 
 It appears that the MODULE_DEPEND macro was added to cryptodev.c, but not to 
 crypto.c.
 
 I tried adding MODULE_DEPEND to crypto.c and the problem went away.  I'm not 
 that familiar with the module system, so perhaps there is something else 
 wrong with my configuration and this is the wrong fix.  In any case, here is 
 the patch:
 
 
 --- crypto.c.orig   Fri Mar  3 20:21:35 2006
 +++ crypto.cFri Mar  3 20:21:04 2006
 @@ -252,6 +252,7 @@
 }};
  MODULE_VERSION(crypto, 1);
  DECLARE_MODULE(crypto, crypto_mod, SI_SUB_DRIVERS, SI_ORDER_FIRST);
 +MODULE_DEPEND(crypto, zlib, 1, 1, 1);
 
  /*
   * Create a new session.
 
 
 For reference, I am running:
 
   FreeBSD vir.in.vadev.org 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #0: Fri Mar  
 3 16:23:47 EST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SERVER  
 i386
 
 Last cvsup'd at 2006-03-03 04:07:00 EST.
 
 Please let me know if there is a better way to fix this.  Any input would be 
 appreciated.

Will be fixed ASAP.

Thanks !
-- 
Wojciech A. Koszek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/dunstan/


pgp3pmYRaOC3a.pgp
Description: PGP signature