(no subject)

2006-06-30 Thread tbyte
I found a little bug (probably) in sys/dev/ata-all.c which somehow corrupts 
device parameters structure. When I first did atacontrol list device info 
about ad0 looked like this:

Master:  ad0 Maxtor 6Y080P0/YAR41BW0 ATA/ATAPI revision 7
after I ran atacontrol cap ad0 it printed somewhat messy output like 
having enabled SMART but not supported...
then I did atacontrol list again and saw that the line about ad0 have 
changed to something like this:

Master:  ad0 W0Maxtor 6Y080P0/YAR41BW0 ATA/ATAPI revision 0
or similar. 

After some digging and comparing the way IOCATADEVICES and IOCATAGPARM 
work I saw (probably) bogus ata_getparam() call. After removing this call to 
ata_getparam() everything work as expected (atleast that's what it looks 
like for ~30 min run). atacontrol cap ad0 shows right results and doesn't 
screw the device parameters. I just hope that this doesn't break something 
else but I doubt it coz it just gets info and doesn't set anything. 

The giant patch is attached. It's agains today's -STABLE. 

regards 
--- ata-all.c.old   Sat Jul  1 04:10:30 2006
+++ ata-all.c   Sat Jul  1 04:40:26 2006
@@ -505,7 +505,6 @@
return error;

 case IOCATAGPARM:
-   ata_getparam(atadev, 0);
bcopy(atadev-param, params, sizeof(struct ata_params));
return 0;

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug in ata (ata-all.c) driver

2006-06-30 Thread tbyte
I found a little bug (probably) in sys/dev/ata-all.c which somehow corrupts 
device parameters structure. When I first did atacontrol list device info 
about ad0 looked like this:

Master:  ad0 Maxtor 6Y080P0/YAR41BW0 ATA/ATAPI revision 7
after I ran atacontrol cap ad0 it printed somewhat messy output like 
having enabled SMART but not supported...
then I did atacontrol list again and saw that the line about ad0 have 
changed to something like this:

Master:  ad0 W0Maxtor 6Y080P0/YAR41BW0 ATA/ATAPI revision 0
or similar. 

After some digging and comparing the way IOCATADEVICES and IOCATAGPARM 
work I saw (probably) bogus ata_getparam() call. After removing this call to 
ata_getparam() everything work as expected (atleast that's what it looks 
like for ~30 min run). atacontrol cap ad0 shows right results and doesn't 
screw the device parameters. I just hope that this doesn't break something 
else but I doubt it coz it just gets info and doesn't set anything. 

The giant patch is attached. It's agains today's -STABLE. 

regards 

--- ata-all.c.old   Sat Jul  1 04:10:30 2006
+++ ata-all.c   Sat Jul  1 04:40:26 2006
@@ -505,7 +505,6 @@
return error;

 case IOCATAGPARM:
-   ata_getparam(atadev, 0);
bcopy(atadev-param, params, sizeof(struct ata_params));
return 0;

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]