Re: package building performance (was: Re: FreeBSD on AMD Epyc boards)

> Am 17.02.2018 um 10:09 schrieb Don Lewis : > > It is unfortunate that there don't seem to be any server-grade Ryzen > motherboards. They all seem to be gamer boards with a lot of > unnecessary bling. That’s because few people use servers to build packages.

Re: package building performance (was: Re: FreeBSD on AMD Epyc boards)

On 14 Feb, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 09:15:53AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> On the plus side: 16+16 cores, on the minus: A low CPU tact of 2.2 GHz. >> Would a box like this be better for a package build host instead of 4+4 cores >> with 3.x GHz ? > > In my experience, "it

Re: FreeBSD on AMD Epyc boards

On 2/14/2018 3:15 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > On the plus side: 16+16 cores, on the minus: A low CPU tact of 2.2 GHz. > Would a box like this be better for a package build host instead of 4+4 cores > with 3.x GHz ? jail server. Lots of processes ---Mike > -- ---

package building performance (was: Re: FreeBSD on AMD Epyc boards)

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 09:15:53AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > On the plus side: 16+16 cores, on the minus: A low CPU tact of 2.2 GHz. > Would a box like this be better for a package build host instead of 4+4 cores > with 3.x GHz ? In my experience, "it depends". I think that above a certain

Re: FreeBSD on AMD Epyc boards

Hi! > To have a bit of a work around for the Intel Meltdown bug (yes, no > Spectre), I wanted to try out some AMD based CPUs. So far so good using > a SuperMicro H11SSL-i. A decent server board using an Epyc CPU. All > the things you need and expect for a server grade MB On the plus side:

FreeBSD on AMD Epyc boards

To have a bit of a work around for the Intel Meltdown bug (yes, no Spectre), I wanted to try out some AMD based CPUs. So far so good using a SuperMicro H11SSL-i. A decent server board using an Epyc CPU. All the things you need and expect for a server grade MB ipmi to provide remote management