Doug Barton writes:
> I saw your followup, and I think you're probably right ... the problem
> is that there are some things in the ports tree that are conditional on
> OSVERSION, so the fact that it works on HEAD and 9 doesn't necessarily
> mean that it will work in 8.
Well, actually, ports will
According to the unzip(1) man page on 9-stable:
HISTORY
The unzip utility appeared in FreeBSD 8.0.
So possibly the man page needs to be fixed as well.
Daniel
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
On 5/29/2012 12:37 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Doug Barton writes:
>> This needs more than diff-posting, it needs actual testing. By humans,
>> and an -exp run. Since miwi is on the cc list, perhaps he can arrange
>> it?
>
> No -exp run required. This code is already in use in head and 9 an
Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
> No -exp run required. This code is already in use in head and 9 and has
> been for ages - two and a half years, to be exact.
To clarify:
- usr.bin/unzip was hooked up to the build in head in December 2009,
long before 9 was branched, so 9.0 shipped with it.
-
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:55:24PM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
> Yes I can do that.
It doesn't make sense to do exp-run before libarchive 3.04 MFV and premission
patch for unzip will be commited. To many ports failures.
>
> +-oOO--(_)--OOo-+
> With best Rega
Doug Barton writes:
> This needs more than diff-posting, it needs actual testing. By humans,
> and an -exp run. Since miwi is on the cc list, perhaps he can arrange
> it?
No -exp run required. This code is already in use in head and 9 and has
been for ages - two and a half years, to be exact.
D
Hi,
Yes I can do that.
+-oOO--(_)--OOo-+
With best Regards,
Martin Wilke (miwi_(at)_FreeBSD.org)
Mess with the Best, Die like the Rest
On May 29, 2012, at 12:36 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> This needs more than diff-posting, it needs actual testing.
This needs more than diff-posting, it needs actual testing. By humans,
and an -exp run. Since miwi is on the cc list, perhaps he can arrange it?
Doug
On 5/28/2012 10:59 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
> Here is the unzip diff from stable/8 -> head
>
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 07:20:03PM +0200, Da
Here is the unzip diff from stable/8 -> head
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 07:20:03PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Jason Hellenthal writes:
> > Could someone MFC this to stable/8 please...
>
> Is unzip in stable/8 identical to unzip in head and stable/9? If not,
> this should be addressed fi
Jason Hellenthal writes:
> Could someone MFC this to stable/8 please...
Is unzip in stable/8 identical to unzip in head and stable/9? If not,
this should be addressed first. Otherwise, there is a good chance that
many ports will fail to build.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
Could someone MFC this to stable/8 please...
r200068 | rdivacky | 2009-12-03 13:02:55 -0500 (Thu, 03 Dec 2009) | 6 lines
Connect unzip to the build.
Approved by:ed (mentor)
Approved by:des (unzip author)
Tested by:
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Chris Nehren
wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 20:29:26 +1000 , Ian Smith wrote:
>> Silly, it's always been a port :)
>>
>> smithi on t23% ll /usr/bin | grep unzip
>> -r-xr-xr-x 3 root wheel 26852 Apr 14 2011 bunzip2
>> -r-xr-xr-x 4 root wheel 31232
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 20:29:26 +1000 , Ian Smith wrote:
> Silly, it's always been a port :)
>
> smithi on t23% ll /usr/bin | grep unzip
> -r-xr-xr-x 3 root wheel 26852 Apr 14 2011 bunzip2
> -r-xr-xr-x 4 root wheel 31232 Apr 14 2011 gunzip
> smithi on t23% which unzip
> /usr/local
On Sat, 26 May 2012, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 03:41:55PM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> > On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 04:39:40PM -0400 I heard the voice of
> > Jason Hellenthal, and lo! it spake thus:
> > >
> > > Funny... so there are probably alot of machines running
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 03:41:55PM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 04:39:40PM -0400 I heard the voice of
> Jason Hellenthal, and lo! it spake thus:
> >
> > Funny... so there are probably alot of machines running around with
> > old unzip binaries... including the alread
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 04:39:40PM -0400 I heard the voice of
Jason Hellenthal, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Funny... so there are probably alot of machines running around with
> old unzip binaries... including the already packaged releases.
No, they wouldn't have _any_ unzip binaries.
--
Matthe
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 03:31:28PM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 04:24:32PM -0400 I heard the voice of
> Jason Hellenthal, and lo! it spake thus:
> >
> > I have just noticed the following depicting unzip not being
> > updated/installed during a make installworld.
>
>
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 04:24:32PM -0400 I heard the voice of
Jason Hellenthal, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> I have just noticed the following depicting unzip not being
> updated/installed during a make installworld.
>From a quick look at history, unzip was never connected to the build
in 8.x, only
I have just noticed the following depicting unzip not being
updated/installed during a make installworld.
The last binary before this test that caught my attention was from Apr
15, in which I cd(1) into unzip's source directory and did a make &&
everything neccesary to install it. After running a
19 matches
Mail list logo
