Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard?

2000-10-03 Thread Thomas David Rivers
Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thomas David Rivers writes: : Nope - I have a "SmartLink" NE2000 clone card; that does to : 10/100 mbits/second... This is actually a re-labeled Archtek card. Ah. The light goes on. Does your config file look

Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard?

2000-10-03 Thread Thomas David Rivers
Just to add to this thread a little. I put the card in a 3.4-RELEASE machine (which works.) It seems to acquire a different MAC address than the 4.1.1 code does. In 3.4 PAO I get: Card inserted, slot 0 card0: assign ed0 iobase 0x300 irq 9 flags 0x3 ed0: address 00:10:60:38:3b:b7,

Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard?

2000-10-03 Thread John Reynolds~
[ On Tuesday, October 3, Thomas David Rivers wrote: ] Just to add to this thread a little. I put the card in a 3.4-RELEASE machine (which works.) It seems to acquire a different MAC address than the 4.1.1 code does. In 3.4 PAO I get: Card inserted, slot 0 card0: assign ed0

Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard?

2000-10-03 Thread Peter Radcliffe
John Reynolds~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] probably said: When you do this in 4.1.1, do you already have an 'ed0' device in your machine? The PAO example shows 'ed0' as the device while 4.1.1 shows ed1. I'm currently having problems with any 4.1.1 kernel probing my two ed cards incorrectly (I get ed1

Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard?

2000-10-02 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thomas David Rivers writes: : This built find, and it seems to be setting the interrupt (i.e. I get : not timeouts.) OK. : But, I also don't seem to get connected... like I mentioned before, : a `ping' to another host on the local net will generate traffic : on the