Matthias Buelow wrote:
Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sysctl dev.cpu and look at the current frequency setting. If low, then
your system is affected and will be fixed soon when I mfc. If not,
perhaps you have an interrupt storm (vmstat -i)
Just for the record. I ran vmstat -i in
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Matthias Buelow wrote:
Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sysctl dev.cpu and look at the current frequency setting. If low,
then your system is affected and will be fixed soon when I mfc. If
not, perhaps you have an interrupt storm (vmstat -i)
Just for the
Nate Lawson wrote:
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Matthias Buelow wrote:
Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sysctl dev.cpu and look at the current frequency setting. If low,
then your system is affected and will be fixed soon when I mfc. If
not, perhaps you have an interrupt storm (vmstat -i)
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Nate Lawson wrote:
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Matthias Buelow wrote:
Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sysctl dev.cpu and look at the current frequency setting. If low,
then your system is affected and will be fixed soon when I mfc. If
not, perhaps you have an
Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sysctl dev.cpu and look at the current frequency setting. If low, then
your system is affected and will be fixed soon when I mfc. If not,
perhaps you have an interrupt storm (vmstat -i)
Just for the record. I ran vmstat -i in a loop while untarring the
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 09:16:48PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Since I upgraded from 5.3-stable to 5.4-prerelease, I've noticed that my
computer is hanging badly under load. I've a P4 2.53 GHz without
hyperthreading (no SMP). I use the same kernel configurations than
before. Now when I
Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 09:16:48PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Since I upgraded from 5.3-stable to 5.4-prerelease, I've noticed that my
computer is hanging badly under load. I've a P4 2.53 GHz without
hyperthreading (no SMP). I use the same kernel configurations
Am Sonntag, 3. April 2005 18:07 schrieb Pierre-Luc Drouin:
Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 09:16:48PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Since I upgraded from 5.3-stable to 5.4-prerelease, I've noticed that my
computer is hanging badly under load. I've a P4 2.53 GHz without
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 12:07:14PM -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 09:16:48PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Since I upgraded from 5.3-stable to 5.4-prerelease, I've noticed that my
computer is hanging badly under load. I've a P4 2.53
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 06:34:46PM +0200, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
Am Sonntag, 3. April 2005 18:07 schrieb Pierre-Luc Drouin:
Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 09:16:48PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Since I upgraded from 5.3-stable to 5.4-prerelease, I've noticed that my
Emanuel Strobl wrote:
Huh? I thought by default it is HIGH, but it would also explain the
experiences in the thread cpufreq related RELENG_5 regression
(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=389949+393881+/usr/local/www/db/text/2005/freebsd-stable/20050327.freebsd-stable)
But does that
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 07:02:16PM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote:
Emanuel Strobl wrote:
Huh? I thought by default it is HIGH, but it would also explain the
experiences in the thread cpufreq related RELENG_5 regression
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 07:02:16PM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote:
Emanuel Strobl wrote:
Huh? I thought by default it is HIGH, but it would also explain the
experiences in the thread cpufreq related RELENG_5 regression
Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 12:07:14PM -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 09:16:48PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Since I upgraded from 5.3-stable to 5.4-prerelease, I've noticed that my
computer is hanging badly under load.
Kris Kennaway wrote:
I'm not under the impression that my CPU is running at a lower
frequency.
OK, but did you try the workaround?
I have now and it doesn't make any difference.
mkb.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 11:51:43PM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
I'm not under the impression that my CPU is running at a lower
frequency.
OK, but did you try the workaround?
I have now and it doesn't make any difference.
OK, must be a different problem then.
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 02:45:40PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 12:07:14PM -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 09:16:48PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Since I upgraded from 5.3-stable to
On Sunday, 3 April 2005 at 14:45:40 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 12:07:14PM -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 09:16:48PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Since I upgraded from 5.3-stable to
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Sunday, 3 April 2005 at 14:45:40 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 12:07:14PM -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 09:16:48PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Since I upgraded from
On Sunday, 3 April 2005 at 21:43:57 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
I'm experiencing similar issues. How can I confirm that this is the
case without rebooting the machine (which would be inconvenient)? Is
there some sysctl that tells me? I've taken a look, but I don't
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Sunday, 3 April 2005 at 21:43:57 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
I'm experiencing similar issues. How can I confirm that this is the
case without rebooting the machine (which would be inconvenient)? Is
there some sysctl that tells me? I've
On Sunday, 3 April 2005 at 21:59:45 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Sunday, 3 April 2005 at 21:43:57 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
I'm experiencing similar issues. How can I confirm that this is the
case without rebooting the machine (which
Since I upgraded from 5.3-stable to 5.4-prerelease, I've noticed that my
computer is hanging badly under load. I've a P4 2.53 GHz without
hyperthreading (no SMP). I use the same kernel configurations than
before. Now when I compile a port for example, the mouse pointer hangs
in Fluxbox and
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Since I upgraded from 5.3-stable to 5.4-prerelease, I've noticed that my
computer is hanging badly under load. I've a P4 2.53 GHz without
hyperthreading (no SMP). I use the same kernel configurations than
before. Now when I compile a port for example, the mouse pointer
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 04:33:49AM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote:
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Since I upgraded from 5.3-stable to 5.4-prerelease, I've noticed that my
computer is hanging badly under load. I've a P4 2.53 GHz without
hyperthreading (no SMP). I use the same kernel configurations
Kris Kennaway wrote:
You both forgot to mention which scheduler ;-)
Uhm, how should I know? The default thingy, I haven't changed
anything.
mkb.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 07:00:35AM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
You both forgot to mention which scheduler ;-)
Uhm, how should I know?
Check your kernel config.
The default thingy, I haven't changed
anything.
SCHED_4BSD, then.
Kris
pgpxzgu1YCV8G.pgp
Description:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Check your kernel config.
SCHED_4BSD, then.
options SCHED_4BSD # 4BSD scheduler
yes.
mkb.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe,
Matthias Buelow wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Check your kernel config.
SCHED_4BSD, then.
options SCHED_4BSD # 4BSD scheduler
yes.
mkb.
I have this option too. Do I have to change it for something else?
___
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 12:22:30AM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Matthias Buelow wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Check your kernel config.
SCHED_4BSD, then.
options SCHED_4BSD # 4BSD scheduler
yes.
mkb.
I have this option too. Do I have
30 matches
Mail list logo
