On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:40:23PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> uart(4):
> 0x00080 use this port for remote kernel debugging
Thanks, that did the magic. The problem, however, is that kgdb from i386
does not like amd64 kernel image, and I do not have any other amd64 box
in the vicinity. Not sur
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:48:10AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Could you please obtain acpidump output using Ubuntu?
Yup, I already did [1]. Here is the what's inside:
all.bin dump of all tables
dsdt.bin dump of DSDT (original)
dsdt.dsl decompiled DSDT
dsdt.aml reco
on 14/12/2012 12:35 Alexey Dokuchaev said the following:
> I thought of it, but last time I tried I could get rid of "GDB: no debug
> ports present" message in dmesg. :-( Maybe it was due to USB<->serial
> adapter, and with "real" serial port it would not be a problem.
uart(4):
0x00080 use thi
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:50:06AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> It looks like you obtained the boot messages using some sort of a remote
> console?
Yes; luckily this box has serial port (real, on-board one).
> If yes, you can try to use kgdb for a live remote debugging.
I thought of it, but last
on 14/12/2012 10:04 Alexey Dokuchaev said the following:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:40:56AM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:23:49PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
>>> If the memstick panics, I am not sure how much good the kernel symbols
>>> will do for you.
>>
>> It's OK,
on 14/12/2012 05:02 Alexey Dokuchaev said the following:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 05:36:35AM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
>>
>> https://snapshots.glenbarber.us/Latest/
>>
>> It is a few days behind though.
>
> I've tried 10.0 image from it; still getting (apparently the same) panic [1].
OK. Let's
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:40:56AM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:23:49PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
> > If the memstick panics, I am not sure how much good the kernel symbols
> > will do for you.
>
> It's OK, as long as they are provided, I should be able to modify the
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:23:49PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:07:47PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
> > They are included in the ISO.
> >
>
> Meh... I did not pay attention to the subject too closely, it seems.
>
> If the memstick panics, I am not sure how much good the k
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:07:47PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
> They are included in the ISO.
>
Meh... I did not pay attention to the subject too closely, it seems.
If the memstick panics, I am not sure how much good the kernel symbols
will do for you. I cannot build them into the memstick witho
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:02:09AM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 05:36:35AM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
> >
> > https://snapshots.glenbarber.us/Latest/
> >
> > It is a few days behind though.
>
> I've tried 10.0 image from it; still getting (apparently the same) panic [1
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 05:36:35AM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
>
> https://snapshots.glenbarber.us/Latest/
>
> It is a few days behind though.
I've tried 10.0 image from it; still getting (apparently the same) panic [1].
It seems that something is wrong with AML, but I cannot tell much without
deb
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 05:26:51PM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> Do we have memstick.img snapshots for -CURRENT somewhere? Can only boot
> via USB this time.
>
https://snapshots.glenbarber.us/Latest/
It is a few days behind though.
Glen
pgpql8OZjDAun.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:19:12PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Just a general note that nowadays booting without ACPI especially on
> laptops would not get you very far in 99% cases.
> IMO, it's pointless to try.
I know, I just wanted to isolate a problem.
> Will you be able to try head on this
on 13/12/2012 09:30 Alexey Dokuchaev said the following:
> Hey folks,
>
> Was going to try 9.1/amd64 on this Lenovo box with E5500 I have here at
> $work. Unfortunately it panics immediately upon boot [1]. Seems it be
> ACPI-related, as disabling it allows the boot to proceed a little further
>
Hey folks,
Was going to try 9.1/amd64 on this Lenovo box with E5500 I have here at
$work. Unfortunately it panics immediately upon boot [1]. Seems it be
ACPI-related, as disabling it allows the boot to proceed a little further
but still panic [2].
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS booted and worked just fine on
15 matches
Mail list logo
