On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 09:21:29PM +0100, Ronald Klop wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 16:03:59 +0100, Pete French
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I'm about to start installing a whole new set of machines for production
> >use with 6.0 on them. Normally I would just use -RELEASE, but as this is
>
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 16:03:59 +0100, Pete French
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm about to start installing a whole new set of machines for production
use with 6.0 on them. Normally I would just use -RELEASE, but as this is
a dot-nought release I was wondering if there is anything vital which
has
> The ARP problem is not in -RELEASE, it was introduced in -STABLE and
> fixed a day later.
Ah, O.K. thanks
-pete.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EM
Pete French wrote:
> I havent seen anything go past which I regard as
> critical, though somebody did make a mention of some arp problem
> being fixed, which I could find a reference to the original
> problem for.
The ARP problem is not in -RELEASE, it was introduced in -STABLE and
fixed a day l
I'm about to start installing a whole new set of machines for production
use with 6.0 on them. Normally I would just use -RELEASE, but as this is
a dot-nought release I was wondering if there is anything vital which
has been commited to stable, and if I should therefore sun the machines
under stabl
